Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Song not found

javascript void;
Brian Cox Lyrics


No lyrics text found for this track.

The lyrics can frequently be found in the comments below, by filtering for lyric videos or browsing the comments in the different videos below.
Most interesting comments from YouTube:

Frank DiMeglio

Mathematics Professionals (with 7,488 likes) has now given the following writing the thumbs up on their page:

The page Nexus of Physics has now given the following two writings the thumbs up on their page. ALSO consider this: E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.

THE UNIVERSAL AND MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY:

Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE SUN AND THE EARTH are described and represented by BOTH F=ma AND E=mc2. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational (IN BALANCE). Objects fall at the same rate (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS the SPEED OF LIGHT is RELATIVELY CONSTANT AS WELL. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. In fact, the rotation of THE MOON MATCHES it's revolution; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. So, THE PLANETS (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) are not "falling" in what is "curved SPACE" in RELATION to what is THE SUN. This is nonsense. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. This truly explains PERPETUAL MOTION. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.

By Frank DiMeglio

EINSTEIN NEVER UNDERSTOOD PHILOSOPHY, MATHEMATICS, AND PHYSICS, AS HE HAS BEEN TOTALLY OUTSMARTED BY SIR FRANK MARTIN DIMEGLIO:

The balance of being AND EXPERIENCE is ESSENTIAL. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.

THE SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. MOREOVER, the ability of THOUGHT to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.

Dream experience is/involves true/real QUANTUM GRAVITY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. MOST IMPORTANTLY, in dreams, BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE is invisible AND VISIBLE IN BALANCE. IMPORTANTLY, dream experience is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. THE EYE is ALSO the body. Dreams improve upon memory AND UNDERSTANDING. Indeed, there is no outsmarting the GENIUS of dreams.

OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/with what is THE EARTH. NOW, get a good LOOK at what is the translucent, SEMI-SPHERICAL, QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AND BLUE sky. Excellent. The DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. THE EARTH IS also BLUE (as water).

F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that, why, and how ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, and describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. SO, it is NECESSARILY a matter of precisely how these equations are understood in a BALANCED, EXTENSIVE, AND INTEGRATED fashion in RELATION to/with WHAT IS THOUGHT. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma.

Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.

The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Get a good LOOK at what is THE EYE. POINTS are points. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT.

The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. OPEN your EYES. NOW, LOOK at what is the FLAT, SETTING, AND ORANGE SUN (with the SPACE around it THEN going invisible AND VISIBLE IN BALANCE). This ORANGE SUN manifests or forms at what is EYE LEVEL/BODY HEIGHT as well. This ORANGE SUN is manifest ON BALANCE as what is NECESSARILY the BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE of THE EARTH/LAVA. The viscosity of LAVA IS BETWEEN what is manifest as WATER AND THE EARTH/GROUND. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. F=ma AND E=mc2 do provide absolute, BALANCED, THEORETICAL, and CLEAR proof that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.

Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THEREFORE, the rotation of THE MOON MATCHES it's revolution. MOREOVER, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal areas in equal times; AND this is THEN consistent with/as what is F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is PERPETUAL MOTION; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.

THE PLANETS (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) are NOT "falling" in what is "curved SPACE". In fact, this is nonsense. It is PROVEN.

By Frank DiMeglio



Alex Leibovici

@John Fehr
> what was the point? Was it to confirm Einstein's theory that the earth was moving up to meet the ball and feathers...
No, and I am not aware of such a theory by Einstein...
> Or was this demonstration made to prove gravity exists in a vacuum and therefore the earth, the moon, stars and all heavenly bodies are all "falling" in the same direction?
Neither.
- Gravity DOES exists in a vacuum, and this is undisputed
- the Earth, the Moon, stars and all heavenly bodies are NOT "falling" in the same direction, they are "falling" in DIFFERENT directions: the Moon - (mainly) toward the Earth, the Earth - toward the Sun, and so on.
> Or, is it something that Brian didn't mention? Is it possible that in the absence of air, the affect [effect] of density on a ball
No. (Besides, what do you mean by the "effect of density" ?)
The point of Brian Cox's video was to show that:

in the absence of other forces besides gravity, the accelerations of all bodies are the same, whatever their masses

(Unfortunately, his comment in the last 20 seconds of the movie - about the gravity not existing as a force - blurs the point, as seen in many comments here. Bad pedagogy...)



John Fehr

@Alex Leibovici The video is impressive. But what was the point?

1. Was it to confirm Einstein's theory that the earth was moving up to meet the ball and feathers since it looked apparent that the ball and feather were standing still based on the theory there was no force acting on these objects in this simulation? Then, if true, theoretically, if this experiment was repeated to coincide with an identical experiment at 180 degrees on the opposite side of the globe, if the globe earth exists, then the ball and feathers in one of the experiments should be met by the ceiling when released while the other ball and feathers in the other experiment should be met by the floor unless the earth can move in opposite directions simultaneously. If that doesn't make you scratch your head, consider that when the ball and feathers bounced off the crate, they should have continued back up towards the ceiling in the same the direction the earth was moving as it rose to meet the ball and feathers.

2. Or was this demonstration made to prove gravity exists in a vacuum and therefore the earth, the moon, stars and all heavenly bodies are all "falling" in the same direction? A bit of a stretch but, who cares? It's only a back story to support other Nasa propaganda. Consider also that if you're on the side the globe earth that's falling in the same direction as the rest of the universe, objects including humans should weigh considerably less due to the gravitational force pulling them in that direction than if they were on the opposite side that has no additional forces - at least if this experiment was to prove gravity.

3. Or, is it something that Brian didn't mention? Is it possible that in the absence of air, the affect of density on a ball and a couple feathers is the same in a vacuum until they reach another object, which happened to be stationary in this case, which was the crate the ball clearly broke the surface of before bouncing up a few inches while the feathers lightly touched the crate before bouncing significantly higher than the ball?

Great video Brian! Theoretically, (i really think you proved it) you just proved density exists in a vacuum and gravity is a myth!3



Drift Simulator

because they need to edit videos to make it look they fall together :D
there are filmed one by one and edited speed on both making them fall in same time for other who watch the video :)
nasa liar who work for iluminati, there they make fake videos about stars and more crazy videos,
iluminatis power is real info of everything
iluminatis worker are them who work to make people to believe on fake things!!! just to hold people far away from reality, nasa have to create things with lose reality from astronomy
media work for iluminati to share fake things more faster
and the bad things we know every school is programed from iluminati, and in school u cant learn about secrets :D but just to read and write, and some small things but never ever u can learn about real earth or some more secrets.
so think now about this people here who are commenting the teacher show this video to us.....
that is how bad school works when is controlled from iluminati who want to keep real info for themself



John Fehr

The video is impressive. But what was the point?

1. Was it to confirm Einstein's theory that the earth was moving up to meet the ball and feathers since it looked apparent that the ball and feather were standing still based on the theory there was no force acting on these objects in this simulation? Then, if true, theoretically, if this experiment was repeated to coincide with an identical experiment at 180 degrees on the opposite side of the globe, if the globe earth exists, then the ball and feathers in one of the experiments should be met by the ceiling when released while the other ball and feathers in the other experiment should be met by the floor unless the earth can move in opposite directions simultaneously. If that doesn't make you scratch your head, consider that when the ball and feathers bounced off the crate, they should have continued back up towards the ceiling in the same the direction the earth was moving as it rose to meet the ball and feathers.

2. Or was this demonstration made to prove gravity exists in a vacuum and therefore the earth, the moon, stars and all heavenly bodies are all "falling" in the same direction? A bit of a stretch but, who cares? It's only a back story to support other Nasa propaganda. Consider also that if you're on the side the globe earth that's falling in the same direction as the rest of the universe, objects including humans should weigh considerably less due to the gravitational force pulling them in that direction than if they were on the opposite side that has no additional forces - at least if this experiment was to prove gravity.

3. Or, is it something that Brian didn't mention? Is it possible that in the absence of air, the affect of density on a ball and a couple feathers is the same in a vacuum until they reach another object, which happened to be stationary in this case, which was the crate the ball clearly broke the surface of before bouncing up a few inches while the feathers lightly touched the crate before bouncing significantly higher than the ball?

Great video Brian! Theoretically, (i really think you proved it) you just proved density exists in a vacuum and gravity is a myth!3



Whatever Noticed

@Jacob E 'glad we agree on the melting part."

Cool.

' so I am not sure why you would think the buildings fell as the official narrative when that type of pancaking is impossible physics."

it is not impossible physics.
the official narrative also doesn't state that the steel had to melt in order to make the structure fail. That is a red herring used by the so called truther movement in order to give their alternative more credit.


" if the top were to have fallen naturally it would have either collapsed into the bottom part until the top part disintegrated or have sheered off the side. "

No, and No.

The towers were a tube in a tube design, e.g. strong perimeter and core, with floors hanging in between them, providing the lateral support.
The floors were designed to carry a dynamical load of 6 additional floors.

When the top came down, the downward force exceeded that more than 3 times. So obviously, every floor that got impacted by the downward mass of the top gave way and added its own mass to that downward mass.
So at no point during the collapse, the downward mass would get below the force equal to the dynamic load of 6 floors. Meaning that the collapse of the floors would not stop until the ground was reached.


The top could not sheer to the side because in order to do so, it had to overcome the resistance of both core and perimeter of the tower.

The floors collapsed around the core, inside the perimeter.
Loosing its lateral support while enduring the force of the collapse, the perimeter fell mostly sideways, away from the towers, severely damaging other buildings, including WTC7.
The core also came down for the same reason, although for a brief moment, 40-60 floors of core of each tower was still standing after the rest of the tower was gone completely.



All comments from YouTube:

Rick

Imagine Galileo seeing it he would have cried watching this amount of beauty.

avantika

@The Seductive Potato newton discovered gravity

avantika

@The Seductive Potato newton is only working on gravity galileo is working on the the falling test

ATGG

I know I honestly cried -a bit-.... Imagine..

Matthew Bartsh

Matthew Christopher Bartsh here. I'd like to see how long the bunch of feathers would swing if you attached them to the end of a thread and swung them. Also, how fast the bunch of feathers could be whirled around on the end of a strong thread/line. Also, the same experiment with a balloon inflated to a very low pressure.

tirius66

It's 2021 and I still cry

25 More Replies...

Shivelight

Everyone's saying their teacher forced them to watch this but I came here myself....

study groove

saame!1...exactly the sameee!!

Jamie Smith

Haha yep, I was a teacher a planned this into lessons on forces - it's fantastic

Johan Liebert

@BewareOF- Yellowstone Hi! For gravity,we should not consider it like a particular kind of force,but more like a result of interaction between mass/energy and spacetime. I'll explain, see spacetime as a linear field,like a math exercise book. A body with a mass or energy is "placed" on this field,and more power it has,more it bend and incurves the space, creating something like a depression in spacetjme surface. The more it incurves it,the more time will slow. Even here in earth,more we get to its center,and the more time slow down,even for nanoseconds. Thank you for question!

More Comments

More Videos