Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Song not found

Violin Concerto "L'arbre des songes" : III. Lent -
Henri Dutilleux Lyrics


No lyrics text found for this track.

The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos
Most interesting comment from YouTube:

J F

Well, Dutilleux's own description suggests that the piece constantly comes back to its own material and renew/expand it.

But this is the problem with most contemporary pieces. It doesnt really matter how intricately the composer manipulates and shapes the material even in the most cohesive sense, most of the times audiences just don't hear it unless it is made incredibly obvious.

**academic snobs trigger warning**
This bit is where academic composers get incredibly defensive.
The truth is, in this musical language, it is extremely challenging for human ears to pick up all that material transformation. After all, we aim to HEAR all of that, but a lot of what composers do cant even be noticed by audiences unless we look at the score closely, which at that point, the listening experience isnt even relevant anymore. We are examining the score for the sake of it.

The way to go about this, in my opinion, is to really just enjoy the surface beauty of the music. I honestly cant care less about how he manipulates his material
This is because Dutilleux's music doesnt require note-to-note score analysis in order to appreciate(like most serialist music). His sense of harmony, melodic writing, instrumental color and orchestration already offers a lot to appreciate on the surface. Not a lot of composers offer that.



All comments from YouTube:

Tariq Khan

stunning concerto, one of my favourites!

Xingyi Betty Chen

Interlude III is just brilliant

Didier Schein

Thank you very much for the score.

John Massari

Sublime.

Giovanni Smartini

18:02 Amazing

█████████████████████████████████████████████████

Cool

2906nico

The textures are extraordinary, and quite beautiful, but it doesn't make a lot of sense, even after listening several times and following the score. There's no shape or logic. Yes, I know, it's called the tree of dreams.

nicholas72611

@J F Thanks for explaining better than I could dream of 🤣. Dutilleux's music is an auditory narrative to me. His pieces tell a story and I find most of the time I'm not at all concerned with the form. The toccata in his first symphony is an exception.
I'm terms of contemporary form, I love the idea of "inhale and exhale." I read a paper analysing Grisey's Partials in that way, separating each section into inhales and exhales. It's a really unique way of looking at "form" in contemporary music.

J F

Well, Dutilleux's own description suggests that the piece constantly comes back to its own material and renew/expand it.

But this is the problem with most contemporary pieces. It doesnt really matter how intricately the composer manipulates and shapes the material even in the most cohesive sense, most of the times audiences just don't hear it unless it is made incredibly obvious.

**academic snobs trigger warning**
This bit is where academic composers get incredibly defensive.
The truth is, in this musical language, it is extremely challenging for human ears to pick up all that material transformation. After all, we aim to HEAR all of that, but a lot of what composers do cant even be noticed by audiences unless we look at the score closely, which at that point, the listening experience isnt even relevant anymore. We are examining the score for the sake of it.

The way to go about this, in my opinion, is to really just enjoy the surface beauty of the music. I honestly cant care less about how he manipulates his material
This is because Dutilleux's music doesnt require note-to-note score analysis in order to appreciate(like most serialist music). His sense of harmony, melodic writing, instrumental color and orchestration already offers a lot to appreciate on the surface. Not a lot of composers offer that.

nicholas72611

Did you read the description? Also if you're looking for proper form in Post Modern music I think you'll be very disappointed.

More Comments

More Versions