Why
Infinity Lyrics


Jump to: Overall Meaning ↴  Line by Line Meaning ↴

ねえ どうして?目覚まし時計
ちゃんと鳴らないの?
ねえ どうして?駅まで来て
財布忘れてんの?
ねえ どうして?スマートフォン
すぐに壊れるの?
ねえ どうして?
ムカつくんだけどぉっ!
悩んで悔やんで溜め息ついて
空回りして生きてる日常
唄って笑って泣いて気付いて
強いワタシにあゝいつかは
なれたらいいな...

ねえ どうして?最近アイツと
うまくいかないの?
ねえ どうして?すぐにケンカに
なってしまうの?
ねえ どうして?ゴメンねって
素直に言えないの?
ねえ どうして?
可愛くなれないの?
こんな涙なんか消えちゃえ...
キラキラキララ 魔法みたいにさ...
唄って笑って泣いて気付いて
強いワタシにあゝいつかは
なれたらいいな...

悩んで悔やんで溜め息ついて
空回りして生きてる日常
唄って笑って泣いて気付いて




強いワタシにあゝいつかは
なれたらいいな...

Overall Meaning

The lyrics of Infinity's song "Why" reflect on the daily struggles and frustrations that individuals face in their lives. The first stanza questions the unreliability of everyday objects, such as alarm clocks, smartphones, and wallets. The singer feels trapped in a cycle of disappointment and despair, feeling as if they cannot escape the daily grind. The repeated phrase "nee doushite" emphasizes the sense of bewilderment and confusion that the singer feels, wondering why life seems to be so difficult.


The second stanza reflects on the struggles of personal relationships. The singer questions why they cannot communicate with their partner effectively and why disagreements quickly spiral into arguments. Despite the frustration and sadness they feel, the singer dreams of becoming stronger and more resilient. The repetition of the phrase "nakunade kuyande tameiki tsuite kuuzaride" conveys a sense of weariness and exhaustion, but the chorus provides a glimmer of hope, as the singer hopes to one day become powerful and resilient.


Overall, the lyrics of "Why" are reflective and introspective, exploring the challenges and difficulties of life while acknowledging the possibility of growth and transformation.


Line by Line Meaning

ねえ どうして?目覚まし時計 ちゃんと鳴らないの?
Hey, why doesn't my alarm clock ring properly?


ねえ どうして?駅まで来て 財布忘れてんの?
Hey, why did I forget my wallet after coming all the way to the station?


ねえ どうして?スマートフォン すぐに壊れるの?
Hey, why does my smartphone always break so easily?


ねえ どうして? ムカつくんだけどぉっ!
Hey, why is everything so annoying?!


悩んで悔やんで溜め息ついて 空回りして生きてる日常
I'm constantly worrying and regretting, but my daily routine feels empty and meaningless.


唄って笑って泣いて気付いて 強いワタシにあゝいつかは なれたらいいな...
Sing, laugh, cry, and realize that I hope to become a strong person someday.


ねえ どうして?最近アイツと うまくいかないの?
Hey, why isn't my relationship with that person going well lately?


ねえ どうして?すぐにケンカに なってしまうの?
Hey, why do we always end up fighting?


ねえ どうして?ゴメンねって 素直に言えないの?
Hey, why can't I just be honest and say sorry?


ねえ どうして?可愛くなれないの?
Hey, why can't I become more cute?


こんな涙なんか消えちゃえ... キラキラキララ 魔法みたいにさ...
Let these tears disappear...like magic, with a twinkle.


悩んで悔やんで溜め息ついて 空回りして生きてる日常
I'm constantly worrying and regretting, but my daily routine feels empty and meaningless.


唄って笑って泣いて気付いて 強いワタシにあゝいつかは なれたらいいな...
Sing, laugh, cry, and realize that I hope to become a strong person someday.




Lyrics © O/B/O APRA AMCOS
Written by: Ryo Owatari

Lyrics Licensed & Provided by LyricFind
To comment on or correct specific content, highlight it

Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Song not found
Most interesting comment from YouTube:

MuffinsAPlenty

This is not a proof of the Continuum Hypothesis. The Continuum Hypothesis is genuinely undecidable from the standard axioms of set theory.

Modern day set theorists look at alternative axiomatizations of set theory, just to see what happens. If you add certain axioms that seem reasonable, can you prove the Continuum Hypothesis from this new axiom set? Can you disprove the Continuum Hypothesis from this new axiom set?

Currently, many set theorists feel it to be more natural to add new axioms to set theory which would force CH to be true. Other set theorists find it more natural to add new axioms to set theory which would force CH to be false. How should we decide which is the better approach?

The two sets described in this article were thought by many in the anti-CH camp to be good evidence for rejecting CH by way of adding axioms which make it false. The problem for the anti-CH camp is that they don't have any reasonable candidates for sets which could have intermediate cardinalities between that of the natural numbers and that of the continuum. If they could find a legitimate set which one could actually work with that could have an intermediate cardinality under some new axioms, then that would probably convince some of the pro-CH people that the anti-CH position was pretty reasonable. The two sets mentioned in the article are, indeed, sets which people can work with.

The article shows that it was proven that those two sets have the same size. This means that no matter what axioms you add to set theory, they will remain the same size. This is a blow to the anti-CH camp, since they lost a candidate set which one can actually work with but could have an intermediate cardinality when adding new axioms.



All comments from YouTube:

RandomMusings

You can take infinity out of infinity infinite times and still left with infinity.

Ionian

Pythagorean arithmetic system
youtu.be/o00n2TSxm_U

J M

That’s a very basic level of understanding..

Jira 64

Like zero

King Umar

I think you're having a misconception about infinity. It's neither the largest number, nor indeterminate. It's a concept as explained by the scientists. That's why the number laws does not apply on infinity. Broo, I just realised maybe infinity is an imaginary number like negetive numbers to help the formulas. Oh wait, it's actually an imaginary concept of a number which is quite weird on its own 🤔

Small chungus

Actually you cant

34 More Replies...

Thunder Falcon

"No matter how big a number is, it's always close to zero than to infinity".

Halal Gordon Ramsay

@mason farnsworth thanks for the ted talk

Nathan SOS

@Abhishek CORRECT, YOU WON THE INFINITY QUIZ, YOU WIN INFINTY MONEY!

Nathan SOS

@hugemagoo no inf x 6 is infini6

More Comments

More Versions