Good Job
J.K. Simmons Lyrics


Jump to: Overall Meaning ↴  Line by Line Meaning ↴

I told you that story of how Charlie Parker became Charlie Parker?
Joe Jonester's symbol accent.
Exactly.
Parkers a young kid, pretty good on the sax; gets up to play at a cutting seccion, and Jones nearly decapitates it for him.
And he's laughed off stage.
Cries himself to sleep that night, but the next morning what does he do?
He practices.
And he practices, and he practices with one goal in mind: To never to be laughed at again.
And a year later he gets back to the arena, and he steps up on that stage and he plays the best solo the world has ever heard.
So imagine if Jones had just said "Well thats okay Charlie, that was alright; good job."
And Charlie thinks to himself "I did do a pretty good job."
End of story.
No bird.
That to me is, an absolute tragedy.
But thats just what the world wants now.
People wonder why jazz is dying.




I'll tell you man, and every Starbucks "Jazz" album just proves my point really.
There are no two words in the english language more harmful, than "Good Job."

Overall Meaning

The lyrics to J.K. Simmons's song "Good Job" speak to the idea that true greatness is not attained through complacency and settling for mediocre results. The story of Charlie Parker serves as an example of this concept. The saxophonist initially fails at a performance, laughed off stage as Jones nearly cuts off his playing altogether with his symbol accent. But Parker uses this failure to motivate him to practice fervently with the goal of never being laughed at again. A year later, Parker returns to the stage and delivers a solo that is hailed as the greatest the world has ever heard.


The last line of the song is particularly impactful: "There are no two words in the English language more harmful, than 'Good Job.'" This line is a cautionary tale for those who might settle for less and be content with doing just "okay." In contrast, those who are willing to put in the hard work and strive for greatness are the ones who will go down in history as legends. The lyrics highlight the importance of continuous improvement and the dangers of complacency.


Line by Line Meaning

I told you that story of how Charlie Parker became Charlie Parker?
Do you remember me telling you the story of how Charlie Parker became the musician he is known for today?


Joe Jonester's symbol accent.
Correct, I am referring to that story.


Parkers a young kid, pretty good on the sax; gets up to play at a cutting seccion, and Jones nearly decapitates it for him.
Charlie Parker was a young and talented saxophonist who got on stage to perform at a music event where Jo Jones, another musician, almost ruined his performance.


And he's laughed off stage.
Charlie Parker's performance was a complete failure, and the audience laughed at him.


Cries himself to sleep that night, but the next morning what does he do?
Charlie Parker was very disappointed in his performance and cried before going to bed, but the next morning he made a decision.


He practices.
Charlie Parker devoted himself to practicing his music.


And he practices, and he practices with one goal in mind: To never to be laughed at again.
Charlie Parker's goal for his practice was to never experience the embarrassment of being laughed at by an audience again.


And a year later he gets back to the arena, and he steps up on that stage and he plays the best solo the world has ever heard.
A year later, Charlie Parker went back to the same arena, stepped up on the stage and performed a solo that was considered to be the best by the audience.


So imagine if Jones had just said "Well thats okay Charlie, that was alright; good job."
If Jo Jones had just praised Charlie's failed performance as a 'good job,' Charlie might never have worked hard enough to become the successful musician he is today.


And Charlie thinks to himself "I did do a pretty good job."
If Jo Jones had praised Charlie's performance as good, Charlie would have thought that he did well despite his bad performance.


End of story.
And that would have been the end of the story.


No bird.
Charlie would not have become successful and there would have been no Charlie Parker the great musician.


That to me is, an absolute tragedy.
Not allowing people to face criticism and the need to improve themselves, or praising them falsely, will deprive them of opportunities, which would be a tragedy to me.


But thats just what the world wants now.
Unfortunately, the world we live in now has become very afraid of criticizing anyone's performance; and, more often than not, people tend to praise an average performance, without giving any feedback.


People wonder why jazz is dying.
Jazz, like any other art form, requires criticism, critique and feedback to keep the quality and the essence of the music alive.


I'll tell you man, and every Starbucks "Jazz" album just proves my point really.
Starbucks, one of the leading coffee chains, releasing jazz albums only helps to prove the fact that critique and feedback has been forgotten and, instead, is replaced by awards, certificates or titles.


There are no two words in the english language more harmful, than "Good Job."
Praising mediocrity with 'good job' can act as a constant barrier to one's growth, which would be harmful to them, and that, to me, is the most harmful thing you can say.




Contributed by Anthony J. Suggest a correction in the comments below.
To comment on or correct specific content, highlight it

Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Song not found
Most interesting comment from YouTube:

@frogturtle

a few words to people seeking to improve at anything:

my mentor was hard on me as a growing artist, but he never personally attacked me. it was always about my art, he always pushed me to challenge my weaknesses head on. whenever I felt bad about a piece and someone said "good job," I saw through their shit. I learned to listen to that voice bitching at me for not being good enough, but I also listened to the voice that said I earned a compliment when credit was due.

it's bullshit to say that all of the true gods of any field suffer through insane abuse to get there. maybe some do, and it worked for them. that's fine. but others are uplifted and discover who they are through healthy criticism and encouragement, and succeed that way. this scene tries too hard to suggest that only the first one works.

if you're scared of honest criticism, toughen up. growth doesn't come without pain. if you're letting others stomp you into the dirt, have some more self-respect. you're not your teacher's little bitch, you're their student.

at the end of the day it's about being real with yourself. that's priority 1.



All comments from YouTube:

@AliKurtze

Start your own channel with our YouTuber Templates! Whether you are using Adobe Premiere, AfterEffects or Final Cut Pro X... we've got you covered with titles, transitions, lower thirds, endcards and many more!
https://1.envato.market/EdP9n

@hunterdunning1776

I love the delivery of "it's OK, I know I made... enemies." I was expecting him to say "mistakes", but he truly believes in the end, he did nothing wrong.

@pootytang69

Yeah I was thinking the same thing - the timing of the delivery was excellent, and if you stop to think about it, it's absolutely bonkers narcissistic and the rhetoric used by an abusive manipulator.

"Sorry you felt hurt by what I was trying to do, pussy ass non charlie parker - hopefully next time you'll learn to appreciate that chair I threw at you and not take it the wrong way like a little bitch." is the essence of what he's saying to Andrew, knowing full well Andrew ratted him out - the whole conversation is nothing but manipulation of Andrew's feelings towards Fletcher and himself.

@dollarinthewoods8850

It’s cause he’s a narcissist, he truly can’t believe he has done anything wrong, that’s why he can’t even admit his own student committed suicide when it happens

@dollarinthewoods8850

@@sam-ht6qvabout what??? 😂

@singularity1976

He made one mistake, though. He didn't find the next Charlie Parker. What he was doing was not a mistake, because it was a mission where the end was supposed to justify the means.

@singularity1976

​@@pootytang69You're wrong, because Fletcher wants to bring the best out of him trying to push him beyond what's expected. The end justifies the means.

18 More Replies...

@lukegriffiths8653

It's crazy how Fletcher has this conversation knowing that Neiman ratted him out.

@futuremovieactor

He wanted revenge, but at the same time, he wanted to explain himself too. Just another way in which Fletcher was testing Andrew.

@shime8083

@futuremovieactor nah fletcher was trying to gaslight him to embarrass him in front of a live audience. he wasnt testing andrew he purely only did it for revenge.

More Comments

More Versions