En Saga Op. 9
Jean Sibelius Lyrics


We have lyrics for these tracks by Jean Sibelius:


Be Still My Soul Be still my soul the Lord is on thy side Bear…
Finlandia Oi Suomi, katso, Sinun päiväs koittaa, yön uhka karkoitettu…
Finlandia-hymni Oi, Suomi, katso, sinun päiväs' koittaa Yön uhka karkoitettu…
Säv säv susa Säv säv susa Våg våg slå I sägen mig var ingalill Den unga…
Sibelius : Finlandia-hymni Oi, Suomi, katso, sinun päiväs' koittaa Yön uhka karkoitettu…
Var det en dr Var det en dröm att ljuvt en gång Jag var ditt…
Var det en dröm Var det en dröm att ljuvt en gång Jag var ditt…
Var det en dröm Var det en dröm att ljuvt en gång Jag var ditt…
Var det et dröm Var det en dröm att ljuvt en gång Jag var ditt…



Var det et dröm? Var det en dröm att ljuvt en gång Jag var ditt…


The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos
Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Song not found
Most interesting comment from YouTube:

Mariposa Symphony Orchestra

@Monty Vierra - the personnel involved in this recording are listed NOW, but were not listed at the time of my comment. It was posted with no reference to the Lahti Orchestra or Vanska. Take a look at other past comments by posters who were attempting to guess whose interpretation this is. I did suspect it was Vanska's Lahti take - that is, his interpretation of the final (1902) version from Sibelius; you may not know that he's also recorded (also with the Lahti SO) Sibelius' ORIGINAL version of En Saga: the 1892 version. And just for the record? I consider THAT recorded version, by Vanska himself: to have the edge over this version, though whether that slightly-longer 1892 En Saga is preferred over the final version I'll leave to others.

That said? Vanska's take - THIS one on BIS is very good. I have it in three of the currently-available CD pressings from Vanska and Lahti. And yes, I have a library of over 8,000 CDs, many of which are out of print and reflect interpretations which I would place either on the same plane as that of Vanska, or - better. And subjectively? I prefer Leif Segerstam's reading with the Danish Radio Symphony Orchestra, which my experienced ear knows well: to be better than this "best" one. Also perhaps better than the Vanska (final version) recording which was posted here as "the best"? Paavo Berglund's great reading with Bournemouth, analog recording aside. It has a seething energy that really reflects what we know of Sibelius' personal strife both in 1892 when he composed the original version and then, later - for more personal reasons, in 1902 when he offered his final revised form. Both Segerstam and Berglund capture that whirlpool of sound to a better degree - in my opinion - than Vanska in his multiple outings. And don't get me wrong: Vanska is an excellent conductor, and gets the best out of the Lahti players, but - in this case, he's just not quite at the top. Again, in my opinion.

And another thing about Berglund? He's the man who pulled "Kullervo" out of obscurity and released its initial recording (the Bournemouth 1971, not the later go with Helsinki, which is good, but not quite as good as that first recording with the BSO) - which I still consider to be at the top of the pile, despite so many other conductors and ensembles THEN wishing to add it to their discography over the ensuing half-century of readings. This is a man who understands - like Segerstam - exactly what made Sibelius tick, to an astonishing degree. Though En Saga is not derived from the Kalevala, it IS directly related to Kullervo, and no one (in my opinion) understands that quite so well as Berglund.

And if you need any sort of further reassurance of my creds? I first read the Elias Lonnrot "Kalevala" from which Sibelius drew so much of his inspiration and direct roadmaps for compositions: when I was a teen, decades ago. That absolutely massive tome, in its Magoun translation. And have returned to it over the years - it's the virtual bible from which Sibelius derived SO much. Understanding the Kalevala is to understand Sibelius; to truly understand Sibelius and his world is to better be able to adjudicate interpretations of his work. You?

But the critical point you dismissed is the use of LANGUAGE. You note yourself the ubiquitous use of "best performance" - which shows that the word itself - "BEST " - has become tainted by mis-use. The meaning of "best" is now, in effect: meaningless, because of the sort of puppy-dog eagerness to proclaim something "the best" without truly comprehending either the actual meaning of the word, or worse: a sense of laziness for not actually researching to determine which (subjectively) IS "the best." How can something be "the best" unless all available options have been experienced? This sort of thing actually demeans both the reader AND all other interpretations unless the OP has actually heard them all. The less-sophisticated reader who may be new to the field is then perhaps swayed into believing that yes, this IS the BEST and that no other recordings, no other interpretations - are to be considered. Which is, of course: unfortunate and perhaps reflects the dumbing-down of the music field.

As for my relationship with YouTube? Nope - your sideswipe comment at my experience with YouTube is way off the mark. Let's simply say I have a discerning attitude when it comes both to interpretation across the panoply of the classical rep - and to the use, or mis-use: of language.

I hope that helps you.



All comments from YouTube:

Guillermo Jesus Guerra Bravo

Brillante obra de este autor finlandés.

Keith Laws

Beautiful performance; considering it was only Sibelius 2nd ever written work. I think it's quite modern and excellent

Conrad Dean

Truly increadible! Sibelius himself said this piece captured the "entirety of my youth". This piece really feels so intimate

Ben Garrison

Great stuff--Sibelius was one of a kind.

Wim Wulffele

Ben Garrison (

Dave Schauweker

Wonderful work and performance, and the lyrical, melancholy clarinet solo conclusion is a masterstroke.

Martin West

A very fine performance, indeed! In my opinion only the final allegro (starting at 13:30) is a teeny bit too fast, being restless more than dramatic. The gran cassa also is a bit rude at times towards the end, having also a tendency to accent the last note in the "du - dudu - du" crescendo rhythm (while the emphasis being on the note before that) (starting at 4:03 and so on). Puny details, I know. The pianissimi of the orchestra are exquisite.

Richard Williams

The bass drum near the end is very formidable! BRAVO

Reed Crisis

This has to be the Vänskä, Lahti recording. And it is very good indeed. I learned to play Clarinet because of this pieces ending, as one of the main reasons.

Reed Crisis

@soavemusica Yeah, the clarinet solo here is all about beauty and it is relatively easy to play for a beginner.

More Comments

More Versions