Memories
Liz B Lyrics


We have lyrics for these tracks by Liz B:


Blackout (Music) (More music) (Music) (Same) (Same) Ohhh- Bill (Bill …
Keep on Walking Why are you breathing so heavy? Why are you talking…


The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos

Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Song not found
Most interesting comments from YouTube:

@notsunkyet

+Brooklyn Bradley - Exactly! I would argue ‘innocent until proven guilty’ is a bed rock foundational principal.

+Benjamin Michaels - I suspect you would feel differently if you are ever wrongly accused of such a horrid crime as rape.

------------------
On the subject of Justice

”That it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer, is a Maxim that has been long and generally approved.” ~ Benjamin Franklin (1706–90) in a letter to Benjamin Vaughan, March 14, 1785.—The Writings of Benjamin Franklin, ed. Albert H. Smyth, vol. 9, p. 293 (1906).

Franklin was echoing Voltaire, ”that generous Maxim, that ’tis much more Prudence to acquit two Persons, tho’ actually guilty, than to pass Sentence of Condemnation on one that is virtuous and innocent.” ~Zadig, chapter 6, p. 53 (1749, reprinted 1974).

Also, Sir William Blackstone, in his Commentaries on the Laws of England, 9th ed., book 4, chapter 27, p. 358 (1783, reprinted 1978), says, ”For the law holds, that it is better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer.”
----------------

+Jordan Francique - I think it is a righteous duty for someone - who has had their life, liberty and inalienable rights stolen from them, wrongly imprisoned and name trashed so that he would always be looked at with suspicion for the rest of his life, impacting his ability to find work - to do something about it. To right the wrong, to clear his name.

I think it is unfair for the presenter to portray him as “bitter”, (she didn’t go through the ordeal and her name isn’t trashed for the rest of her life) as well as his fiancé who I suspect did not understanding his righteous anger. I bet if his fiancé showed a bit of understanding and willingness to help him clear his name he wouldn’t have been so ‘angry’.

There is something called righteous indignation and you can be angry without sinning. I believe he had just cause to have both. He was doing the right thing to try and right the wrong by using the very system that unjustly not only convicted him but ruined not only his present life but his future life as well.



@notsunkyet

+Ameerali Abdeali - The only bad, random thing that happened to Steve Titus was the initial sloppy and incompetent police work when he got pulled over for driving a car that "sort of resembled" the one reported by the rape victim.

From there on out it was a concerted effort of collusion and corruption in the criminal justice system, the police, the prosecuting attorney, those who coached the victim to make sure Titus was convicted at all costs, based solely on the victim's changed story.

Yes, he made a choice, and as I've said above, I believe it was the only duty-bound choice to make. To try to right the grievous wrong that was purposefully done to him. It is our duty to bring to light these injustices that show not only where the system is broken, but also the willful incompetence and corruption of those who have sworn a duty to uphold, protect and defend our inalienable rights.

Titus' inalienable rights were trashed, along with his life as well as his future life too. He would always be held in suspicion and his ability to find decent work severely hindered.

Our - your - rights do not and cannot stand for themselves, we - you - must stand for them. That is what Titus was attempting to do, not just for himself but for all of us. I do not find that to be the actions of someone who is bitter, righteously indignant, but not bitter. Unfortunately, it appears that he did not have the support he needed from his fiance or anyone else. I dare anyone to go through what Titus did and not have any support from loved ones and see how well their health fairs.

Because of all of the people before us, that were willfully and wrongly convicted, decided to take the easy way out and simply shrugged their shoulders and moved on, they failed to do their civic duty to stand upon and defend their inalienable rights against the corruption. That is why we now find ourselves losing them at alarming speed with little to no over-sight by the "people" and no accountability to those in the justice system who habitually abuse them.

Now days whenever someone tries to assert their rights, more often than not, the police officer 'cops' an attitude and purposefully goes about escalating the situation in order to make the person pay for asserting their rights. Why? Because the police feel that their authority (their ego) has been challenged. Why would that be? Because of the training that they are given. The system is rotten and it needs to be corrected and that can only happen when 'the people' do the difficult civic duty and stand up for their rights.



@Racingirl911

When I was in college I did a project for my psychology class, and the results of my project even surprised and shocked me!

With my professor's permission, I did my project during one of our classes. For my project, at approximately halfway through the one hour class, I had a friend of mine suddenly, and quite aggressively, run into the room and "steal" my purse that I had placed on my desk, which was located in the front row of the classroom. And, although my friend didn't say anything as she aggressively grabbed my purse and then quickly turned around and made her escape out of the same door she had just entered, I yelled just one word—"HEY!!!!!"

Well, immediately after my friend grabbed my purse and ran out the door, I handed a short one page questionnaire to every student (approx. 50 students) in the classroom that day. Most of the questions were about the physical description of the "thief". And, the rest of the questions focused on what they felt they saw happen. The answers that pertained to the physical description of my friend varied dramatically! My friend was as follows:
1. Gender--female
2. Height--5'7"
3. Weight--160 pounds
4. Clothes--She was wearing a black "hoodie", and blue jeans
5. She had shoulder length hair that was a very dark brown, and it could be seen quite well, despite the fact that she had pulled the hat of the hoodie up onto her head.

Most of the students said that she was a "he", who was anywhere from 5 feet tall to over 6 feet. She was said to weigh somewhere around 120 pounds to 200 pounds. She was also described as having red, dark blonde and even black color hair. And, with regards to what they described she was wearing, the answers once again were as varied as the answers in all of the previous questions. Oh, and when asked if they heard any sounds or words spoken during this incident, some stated that nothing was said, while others said they had "clearly" heard the "thief yell something to me.

So, after viewing all of the data I had garnered from my "Eyewitness" project, I came to the only conclusion that could be drawn from the overall results of my project--without a doubt, eyewitness accounts were unreliable and should never be accepted as any real type of "evidence" in a criminal trial. And, given those results, I truly have to wonder how many innocent people have been to, or are currently in prison based on any degree of "eyewitness accounts"...



@ayayla7846

This is fascinating and truly terrifying at the same time. More terrifying actually, because the implications for nefarious uses (which is already being practiced) are...well, terrifying. This makes me wonder...are there ways to protect my mind?
And can you find out, without a shadow of a doubt if you yourself or a person close to you has been manipulated in such a way? I'm specifically thinking about people that were or are in relationships with abusive, manipulative partners who tried/try to isolate them and might have suggested/suggest their parent or another close person has abused them or done something else really bad and that means they should cut off contact with that person, isolating the victim further.

Banning the use of this terrifying technique would not work, because
1) people would ignore it (not all but enough),
2) How do we know it's really been stopped if memories can be falsily planted/rewritten?

On the other hand, using false memories to erase trauma or make it easier to cope, thus erasing the need to take antipsychotics or just making it possible for the traumatized, suffering person to have a peaceful, pleasant life from thereon in...why not? Of course it would need to be with the subjects full understanding and cooperation, also it would need to be under strict rules and done by a person who truly has the subjects best interests at heart and does not do it for profit. Also, perhaps the true memories (or what the subject thinks as true) should be written down and preserved and the subject should be allowed to suggest the false memories/rewrites.
Also, planting a harmless false memory in a child that would otherwise have to fight obesity and other illnesses for life, or never watch what they eat, never be successful...again, why not? As long as it makes the quality of life better for said child and, again, isn't done for nefarious reasons (that includes creating a clone of yourself that thinks and reacts like you want it to, always agreeing with you) or self-gain, I think it's actually good.

Now before you get onto my case here, I do know that in this world, ensuring such things as the person truly acting out of the goodness of their heart without any notions of self-gain is practically impossible. I'm NOT saying there aren't such genuinely good-hearted people, what I mean is KNOWING FOR SURE the person you're talking with/thinking of is such a genuinely good-hearted person with their subjects best interests at heart and PROVING it, is impossible. If it were possible though...then using false memories to ease or even erase trauma, or instill healthy behaviours in children would be great.



All comments from YouTube:

@emiliofregoso1936

who else here for their psychology homework ?

@j.c.8677

Me🙃

@jiayicheng1288

😅

@virginiacampos7264

Yup lol 😂

@Torien-024

@@virginiacampos7264frfr

@Thurick

me lol

27 More Replies...

@DavidFMayerPhD

In Scottish Law, witnesses are NOT PERMITTED to hear the testimony of other witnesses to prevent contamination of testimony. This has been the case for HUNDREDS OF YEARS.

@minimanofiron2501

Scottish law seems to be awesome then.

@JeffryMinecraft

America is by far the most socially backwards "westernized" country. I hate living here.

@DavidFMayerPhD

Ben Rosenberg:
There is a simple solution to your problem. Go somewhere else.

More Comments

More Versions