Harry's Mistake
My Fair Lady Lyrics


We have lyrics for these tracks by My Fair Lady:


A Hymn To Him HIGGINS What in all of heaven could've promted her to…
Ascot Gavotte Every duke and earl and peer is here Everyone who should…
Get Me To The Church On Time A few more hours, that's all the time I got A…
I Could Have Danced All Night Bed, bed I couldn't go to bed My head's too light…
I'm an Ordinary Man Well after all, Pickering, I'm an ordinary man, Who desires…
I've Grown Accustomed To Her Face Grown accustomed to her looks Oh I, I've grown, grown accus…
just you wait Just you wait, 'enry 'iggins, just you wait! You'll be sorr…
On The Street Where You Live When she mentioned how her aunt Bit off the spoon, she…
Show Me Don't talk of stars, burning above If you're in love, show…
The Rain In Spain Poor Professor Higgins! Poor Professor Higgins! Night and …
Why Can't the English Henry Look at her, a prisoner of the gutter, Condemned…
Why Can't The English? Henry Look at her, a prisoner of the gutter, Condemned…
With a Little Bit of Luck Alfred The Lord above gave man an arm of iron…
Without You What a fool I was, what dominated fool To think that…
Wouldn't It Be Lovely It's rather dull in town, I think I'll take me…



You Did It Pickering Tonight, old man, you did it! You did it!…


The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos
Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Song not found
Most interesting comments from YouTube:

@socratesrocks1513

That matches my interpretation. The point being made in the musical is that they've educated each other. She's become a lady, yes, but he's realised that, for all his blustering, he's only been a bachelor because no woman was strong enough to stand up to him. There's a lot of self-delusion in HIggins' character. He was really looking for someone like his mother who, we see in the play, is a tough lady. She knows what he's like, is mostly willing to tolerate his childish behaviour until it gets completely out of hand, at which point she slaps him down, but she does love him despite it all. That is what Eliza has become at the end. She knows where he keeps his ties, what size gloves he needs and how he likes them -- not just the rough, thin leather, but lined with something soft. For all his show, Higgins is the same. Rough on the outside, but he is, in many ways, a child looking for someone who will accept him as he really is, and Eliza's the first to do it because she's the first to live with him long enough to know the real man. She has learned a great deal from him, but she's learned enough from Pickering to be more than just Hggins' creation. If she were just that, they couldn't possibly be together. Instead, she knows his mother well enough to go to her place when Higgins become insufferable, is welcomed ("I was happy to have her") and Mrs Higgins probably explained some truths about her son. She also probably explained to Eliza that the only way she'd make him realise what he was doing would be by taking his toys away and letting him stew, once he understood why. ("Without You") It takes him a while as he tries to hold on to the shell he's created to protect himself but, in the end, he has to admit to himself that she's cracked that shell and, if she leaves him now, he'll be weaker.

These are two very strong people, but they know each other's weaknesses. That makes them stronger together. If Higgins is looking for someone like his mother, Eliza could be argued to be looking for the best parts of her father. Not the violence or the drunkenness, but the honesty (and Doolittle is nothing if not remarkably honest about himself, his position, and the games he plays to keep going, "I'm one of the undeserving poor, that's what I am!"). After the ball, Higgins' raises his hand and she goads him to strike her -- something she's suffered many times before. He proves himself the better man by not doing that. He's says she has struck him and wounded him to the heart. She now knows that he can drink without going so far as to become a drunkard and he's not a physically violent man. After he's gone, she digs in the fire ashes to rescue the ring that, we're told, he gave her in Brighton. She contemplates it, and then puts it on the mantlepiece. He's not passed all her tests, but she's not given up on him... yet! She also, by now, knows that a lot of his offensive comments are a defence mechanism. Higgins is old enough to have felt attraction to women and, probably, been rebuffed, and so he pretends not to want them as its less painful. Instead of HIM being rejected, he's the one doing the rejecting. It's HIS choice. HE'S not an insufferable ar$e, THEY'RE not good enough for him.

The scene at Mrs Higgins' house is her making it clear to him that she will NOT be his servant. If he's to have a chance with her, he needs to accept that she is a strong woman who has earned his respect. Again, like a child, Higgins admits it while insisting on taking the credit. That's when she walks out. He's admitted that she's the 'consort battleship'. Now he needs to recognise that this makes her his equal, not his creation. Thus she leaves him to stew, telling him she's leaving for good. Will he get it? Accustomed to Her Face is his turn around: the recognition that she's changed him and the thought of carrying on without her is far from pleasant "I was serenely independent and content before we met. Surely I could always be that way again... and yet..." The only problem is that she doesn't hear this realisation... unless she was quietly following and watching him. If she was, then this is when she realises he's got it and that's why she returns so quickly. He's finally passed the test.

This is why their getting together at the end is satisfying to the audience. She was looking for a father figure, he was looking for a mother figure. Freddy would be a child to her, doting on her every wish. That might be satisfying short term, but just as she doesn't want to be Higgins' servant, so she wouldn't be able to tolerate a man who became hers. Their relationship simply wouldn't last and she knows it. She doesn't want to control someone or be controlled BY someone. At the end, Higgins knows he can play games of dominance and she'll accept them playfully but, if he pushes too far, she'll slap him down and put him in his place (just as his mother does). They'll have rows loud enough to lift the roof in private. In public, she'll correct his more childish behaviour with a look, and he'll nudge her if her social roots start to show, and together they'll be each other's bulwark against the world.

THAT'S why it works.



@kobaltkween

@@kaleytaber9237 So much to unpack. So first, you're just wrong about nice guys. The guys who tend not to get girls are guys who aren't actually nice, but judgmental alpha types who lack confidence. Every happy, pleasant nice guy I've known has had no problem at all finding someone to be with. Including introverts. As the geek daughter of a geeky father who grew up going to events with his geeky co-workers and socialized with geeks as from a child to an adult, I can tell you that while women are socialized to see manipulation as interest and abuse as need, actually decent guys who adore and worship their women have zero problems getting women.

Just as an example, I have a good friend who's a pale, thin, not tall programmer. He's goofy, geeky, and looked like a late teen without his beard when he met a woman who was tall, intelligent, good with finance, and used to do some modeling. They now have four kids, have been together more than a decade, and I don't think I've seen him get upset with her once. And just a bit before he started dating her, he was with a gorgeous petite woman.

All of my female friends have spent time either dating sweet introverts or crushing over them.

Second, most women want a mentor to just be that. Sure, some will go for the whole teacher thing, but most women who do whatever it takes to get knowledge they need from a misogynist don't give them their true selves let alone see them as romantic. They play dumb and subservient to get what the instruction they need. I watched this again and again in grad school. From random professors to Eric Raymond, fellow women automatically stroked men's egos to their faces, and made their opinion of their posturing clear when it was just us.

The problem with the entire narrative is that it's not Eliza's story. It's the douchebag whose ego she needs to stroke's story. He's the main protagonist, and it's his skewed and inaccurate perspective we share. And that might work if he had an arc. But he doesn't change. She does.

We see Freddy like you describe, because we share the perspective of the one character who doesn't actually understand people, let alone affection. And because we focus on his efforts, not Eliza's life as a whole, most want the obvious payoff of him getting rewarded. If we followed her perspective, I doubt we'd think of him as much at all.

And yes, he is a bad guy. We just aren't shown any of the actual consequences of his cruelty, or we're shown them from his perspective. As foolish, hysterical outbursts. The narrative allows us to ignore the harm he does as much as he does. But he's cruel, arrogant, ignorant of anything outside of his privilege, and has pretty much nothing to give as a person outside of his money and what knowledge he already gave her.



@montecarlo1651

Very interesting review of this subject Ms Draper. I really enjoy your other work too and have referred it to my friends on numerous occasions. On this subject, there is an elephant in the room: class.

A lot of cultural works, arguably all, are made by bourgeois people. They reflect bourgeois sensibilities and characterize them as if true, in every sense. What Shaw did in this play is to essentially, though perhaps unwittingly, recreate the original story: he created Eliza Doolittle. He gave her agency, independence of spirit and a separate life, however he remains her creator, the character cannot escape this truth.

Consequently, the idea that, with some polish, someone as raw as Eliza Doolittle could actually successfully cross the class boundaries on a permanent basis is highly dubious. By opening Eliza to a world she can never fully enter is to wound her in perpetuity. She is now stuck. Higgins has made her return to her own class painful for now she sees its many problems from the bourgeois perspective and yet she can never enter bourgeois society without being a perpetual actor in her own life, she lacks authenticity, through no fault of her own. Really looked at from Eliza's position, the story is more akin to Shelley's Frankenstein. Higgins has made a monster that can never be accepted. This reflects not one jot on Eliza, it does reflect very severely on Higgins.

It is likely that Shaw was influenced by the Womens Movement, notably suffragists, of his time when giving Eliza/Galatea a perspective and agency. In doing so however, he did not free himself from being Higgins/Pygmalion, nor perhaps could he, any more than he could free himself from his class. The hidden biases in bourgeois works is, to someone like me, from a working class origin, infuriating. A strong argument can be made that working class women have as much or even more agency than working class men, certainly much more than bourgeois or upper class women. The working classes are all relatively powerless in comparison with those other classes and survival requires all parties working themselves to the bone to survive, let alone succeed, the latter may not even be possible. The biggest burden to working class women of Shaw's time, in addition to the burdens of their class that required perpetual work, was their additional enslavement to fertility - the constant pregnancies. Oh the happy lot of a woman who could not have lots of children!

As for Higgins, I was gratified to see that Shaw loathed a romantic outcome for him and the 1938 film was, in my view, the most faithful to the idea Shaw had in mind about Eliza, at least up to the point when she left with Freddie. Indeed the best option for a real Eliza, accepting that marriage was the desirable option (which it isn't necessarily for women), was to marry a Freddie who (a) loved her (if that is possible in the short time he knows her) and (b) he steps down, closer to her class, as she steps up slightly to shopkeeper class. Arguably Freddie has the harder time in this scenario than Eliza would but at least Eliza is not irreparably damaged by that swine Higgins. By any standards, marrying Higgins is a disaster for Eliza. She would trade some material comfort for all agency in her life. She would become a type of Stepford wife. To someone as vital and alive as Eliza Doolittle, that is a horror beyond imagination.



@chrissyr8387

I think theres a satisfy ending.

Henry Higgins after singing accustomed to her face gies to the study and listens to the record. His mind wonders. He imagines the epiloge of Eliza opening her shop. Having high clientel in the fanciest shop in town. There's no Freddy in the image. Just Eliza.

The scene goes back to higgins. Eliza gramaphone line plays and the record stops.
He smiles a tear in his eye.

His last words are.

If a line can be changed " Best to you my Galatea. "

If not. "Eliza" smiling with pride he stands up and walks off stage " Now where the devil are my slippers"

With this ending Eliza is content her future bright ahead of her. Higgins is left with the last line but he's left with bittersweet pride. Pride in the Lady he created and the woman she had become.



@bobashby3106

About the ending: Higgins is in his study, listing to the recording. Eliza comes in. "Eliza, where the devil are my slippers?" (perhaps Henry delivers the line as in the 2018 clip in the video). The props crew has pre-set the slippers between Henry's chair and Eliza's position when she enters. She points to them. The two go to the slippers together, Henry perhaps kneels to get them while Eliza watches, getting closer to him. The "romantic" ending is preserved, while we see that Henry, after all, has learned something and come to realize that he cannot simply be a domineering jerk.

How do we get there? First, by understanding that there is sexual tension between the two. Shaw was notoriously skittish about sexuality, but it is implicit in the Henry/Eliza relationship. There was a lovely moment in a Stratford (Canada) production of MFL some years ago when, during "Rain in Spain" Henry lifts Eliza down from the sofa and there's a brief, but intense, look between them. What is it? Neither one really knows. Henry - confirmed bachelor. Eliza, with her lower class prudery (e.g., her disapproval of her father's relationship with his partner), are as inexperienced in sexual feelings as can be. But sexuality can be a strong pull even if unrecognized and unexpressed.

Where does it some from? Henry is the smartest person Eliza has ever met. Eliza, accent and all, is the smartest person Henry has ever met, even though because of his class prejudice he doesn't realize it for a long time. That mutual, whip-smart intellectual electricity can readily lead to an attraction that neither can ignore, deny it though they might. It is something she can never get from an amiable twit like Freddy, and deep down she knows it, which is a plausible reason for her to come back at the end of the show.

And who is Henry? Suppose we play him as someone who is so in love with his ideas, living so much in his head, that he genuinely lacks awareness of others around them and their interests and feelings, often manifesting as being an emotionally abusive jerk.His mother adores him -- the Henry-Mrs. Higgins relationship is one of the most important in the show -- while being utterly realistic about his blind spots.

And at some level, Henry lives afraid of things, parts of his humanity, that he cannot understand. His nastiness is a defensive wall. But his getting to know Eliza begins to chip away at that wall, and he can't deal with it. I'd like to see "A Hymn to Him" played not simply as a mysoginistic rant, but as something close to a panic attack. A woman like Eliza
gets inside that wall, and it terrifies him. So when it comes to the "Without You" scene, he already has some, not yet articulated, sense of how much he needs what he has with her - consort battleship and all -- which he finally articulates in "Accustomed to Her Face" which, if the actor is any good, is about a lot more than familiarity. He has learned some sense of what it means to be on a path to becoming fully human. Which is why at the ending, as I see it, he goes to meet Eliza halfway at the slippers.

This reading gives Henry an actual character arc, the absence of which is a major flaw in most productions.



@SadisticSenpai61

@@DiegoBosch90 I didn't say it was romantic. But it does very much remind me of the melancholy of a divorced misogynist missing his ex-wife. He misses her, but he still ducking hates women!

I only meant to clear up the ambiguity where the song is unclear as to exactly why he misses her and exactly how he feels about her.

And I think that clarity is needed specifically because our culture likes to assume romance between any man and woman that aren't related, but grow close to each other - no matter how very much not romantic their relationship is depicted.

And with him having been her teacher and being like 30 years older than her, it does make sense that a father/daughter relationship might make itself known.

We're also used to seeing "distinguished older gentlemen" and very young women being put in romantic relationships by Hollywood - although it doesn't happen as much these days as it used to. And frankly, that's a particularly gross image that needs to die. Cradle-robbing is not cute or romantic!



All comments from YouTube:

@spiritualanarchist8162

What the ending needs is Eliza throwing a slipper full force , hitting Higgins in the head 😂

@WrestlingErnestHemingway

Then he laughs and says, "Sit down & have a seat you beautiful guttersnipe." And she does with a smile. 😁😂😉

@Ratigan2

OMG YASSSSSSS

@kikidevine694

Or just slapping him across the face with them

@RamblingSailors

I'd pay to see that. She slowly comes back, wanting to give him another chance, he completely misreads, says "where are my slippers!?" and utterly blows his chance; she shakes her head like "what was I thinking?" throws the slippers at the back of his head and fully walks out. Henry kicks himself, as he will do forever. Curtain.

@frankharr9466

I like that. :)

7 More Replies...

@ticketmanager7940

I recently saw a community theatre production of MFL and the actress playing Eliza was already on stage, seated in Higgins’ chair, partly in shadow when he enters. Not noticing her, he plays the recording & when it stops, Eliza continues with the “I washed my face...” line. Higgins turns and shows a slight affront to her being in his chair. He asks where his slippers are & Eliza lifts her skirt slightly to show she is now wearing them. He smiles & nods, as if to say “Well played.” Lights fade...

@JDraper

Okay, this is my favourite.

@user-sv5rs1rz2i

I like the 2001 finish with Jonathan price. When Eliza turns off the phonograph, Henry says the crown phrase about the slippers and stands up, folding his hands on his chest. Eliza copies his pose and facial expression, after which both laugh. Curtain

@cturtleGA

I love it!

More Comments

More Versions