Part of Your Lie 1801 by Part of your Lie

@mcasur

2y↑25

@@cfgp Pois é

@CHMichael

2y↑65

It's called cyan

@isaaccarlson1561

2y↑13.1K

“I’m human, so are my parents” all right pal, sounds like something a lizard would say

@cafe-tomate

2y↑149

He started that by saying "like"

@yusufA125

2y↑65

@@cafe-tomateso your grandparent were like lizards 😂

@andyz7711

2y↑57

True, they are among us😂

@yusufA125

2y↑14

@@andyz7711 no I was pointing out how absurd and insane reply was “like”

@benteuno_salbahe5604

2y↑5

hahahahahahahs

@terrasai2857

31w↑225

This is the answer to the chicken and the egg question.

@sallys.silver392

31w↑5

Well... And when did eggs develop?

Edit: im pretty sure i was responding to a guy who said that egg was first cuz egg existed unchanged before chicken did but i dont see the coment here anymore so..

@SilverEye91

31w↑1

@@JasonUrOf course it's related Jason...

@BlueCanaryNightLight

30w↑1

@@sallys.silver392 evolution

@sallys.silver392

30w

@@BlueCanaryNightLight ? Elaborate

@adrianthom2073

28w↑5

The egg came first.

@edvinparmeza1298

2y↑997

Ok, there was no first human, but there must have been a first human who started to pay taxes.

@Jamesishappy

2y↑91

Yeah its called the first human to be extorted

@Adventurin_hobbit

2y↑38

Adam is the first human

@razahassan8756

2y↑66

Its probably some guy in Mesopotamia.

@aahhhhhhhhhhhhh

2y↑27

@@Adventurin_hobbitwho is that 😂

@littleboss2006

2y↑16

@@aahhhhhhhhhhhhhyour dad

@clownkid

2y↑5.2K

jokes on you, there's a bar at the bottom of the video on desktop showing me exactly when the end of the video is!

@stevevernon1978

2y↑314

and it doesn't loop, unless i tell it to !

@besmart

2y↑885

Touché 😂

@daa3930

2y↑120

@@besmart There is also browser extension that turns shorts into regular YT videos.

Because damn the shorts are terrible format. At least I wouldn't even watch them if I didn't have the browser plugin.

@hiiamelecktro4985

2y↑30

Also on mobile though?

@chechsman

2y↑10

@@daa3930 I need that plugin, what's that?

@anakyangbudiman8497

38w↑744

"MY LEG!" - My ancestor, 185 million years ago.

@unclesam6972

37w↑4

🤣

@unclesam6972

37w↑3

Full circle

@frost083

34w↑16

"My back"- tobey Maguire

@spencercox4092

33w↑10

*185 million generations, not years

@ryneagheilim9782

33w↑3

You mean, your waddlers.

-His great grandchildren

@RenderedEnder

24w↑9

Ok so I’m a fish? Yeah right. I’m swimming out of this joint. BLUB BLUB BLUB

@youknowshum8846

1y↑3.2K

My grandpa 180million years ago crawled out the water and now I have to work for the rest of my life 💀

@steze439

1y↑96

Literally every living creature has to work if it wants to live

@Lonewolf_Fx

1y↑8

lol

@cinephile0620

1y↑89

My grandpa 180 million years ago crawled out of the water and now I have to contemplate the meaning of life 💀

@Elle...

1y↑59

@@steze439yeah but do they pay taxes?

@jasonturner4269

1y↑20

@Elle... no they usually fight to the death on a daily basis

@tipsyshmurda492

2y↑1.9K

Mark Zuckerberg be like " see you guys, I'm technically human"

@saltyfish7626

2y↑25

sure... ☠️

@YWS_04

2y↑36

He’s the reason the uncanny valley became a thing 💀

@shreehari6762

2y↑15

So, if i eat fish then i am a cannabil 😮😮

@peyos07

2y↑6

He may be technically a human, but he was never biologically a human

@lisamain3723

2y↑2

Yep nothing unsual to see here

@Boundlxss_

1y↑990

Honestly I hate my grandfather from 185 million yrs ago for being able to walk on land now I’m over here paying taxes

@JamesHeller-if5kg

1y↑10

Corny

@ILLUTIX

1y↑13

You could just evade tho...

@cathcolwell2197

1y↑6

😂

@jamesmcinnis208

1y

"Honestly"

@VVestside92

1y↑3

In sea they work too but we don’t know how they worked 😂

@Annapainter267

10w↑1

Adam took this video personally

@confusedjpg

2y↑754

i knew diving into this comment section would feel like fully covering myself with lava

@kom2876

2y↑13

frfr💀💀

@frezydynecy

2y↑7

True

@JoeARedHawk275

2y↑104

Bro I thought there was nothing controversial with the video. I mean it’s obvious, evolution is a slow process. It’s very rare for us to pinpoint exactly when a species evolved. These are usually single called organisms. For more complex animals, changes just gradually occur until at some point, we can no longer call it the same species it was before. Certainly biology classes need to be redone because people have the wrong conception of evolution.

@DavidHereok

2y↑24

We didn't evolved from fish we were created by the god

@sorashou6229

2y↑95

@@DavidHereokhaa... How powerful a human imagination is yeah?

@cliffbooth35

2y↑1.3K

You sir.. are a fish
-Arthur Morgan

@j79n

2y↑22

Replying to this comment so it gets more attention, because it deserves it

@thatsupachamp8590

2y↑12

“You Don’t Get To Live A Bad Life And Have Good Things Happen To You”

@cliffbooth35

2y↑3

@@thatsupachamp8590 just be loyal to wat matters

@speedrunmcporridge286

2y↑4

“Ah it’s a toy boat!”

@justinhackstadt6677

2y↑3

"You're a fish" -John Marston

@BobJoushaSmith

2y↑1.9K

bro just called my greatest grandfather a fish

@alferrbidelspatch158

2y↑225

Our greatest grandfather

@nightizzat4574

2y↑42

I will apologize when the fish start to walk.

@brianarbenz1329

2y↑25

So swim around for a few minutes, eat a plankton or two and deal with it - the way your greatest grandfather would.

@duckyhub142

2y↑60

Our greatest grandfather was actually just some bacteria

@floppa_afton6282

2y↑46

He talking about hes family. Our father its adam عليه السلام

@Kerhuz

14w↑1

Human is just a category marking the "group" we belong to.
Therefore, there had to be a 1st human somewhere down the line that barely made it over the threshold, however undefined it may be.

@SilverEye91

14w↑1

Okay, now make that make sense with how we place lifeforms into these "groups", or "species" as we call them.

@Kerhuz

14w

@SilverEye91 it's abstract, i know. But wherever this human/non human boundary lies, that is where the first human being appears.

@SilverEye91

14w↑1

@Kerhuz There is no such clear boundary. Ergo, there was no first human.

@Kerhuz

14w

@@SilverEye91 if there is a boundary, there is a first human. A category has boundaries. 🙃

@SilverEye91

14w↑1

@Kerhuz There is no boundary. You're wrong. Humans may want structure and clearly defined rules, but nature does not work that way.

@pedroneves5864

50w↑941

I like to explain this by comparing it to how we age. When we compare ourselves one day to the next, or one week to the next, we see no difference. But if we compare ourselves when we were 10 to when we were 20 or 40, we will see the difference

@znation1491

48w↑28

Hmmm, and you are still the same person. Just drastically changed

@spaghetae5679

47w↑15

I like this thought

@danzoom

47w↑59

@@znation1491 technically, no. The only reason why we are the same, is because we think so. Chemically and biologically, a 2 yo, 20 yo and 60 yo are different organisms and their bodies even work differently.

@jeffreyjohnson7359

46w↑2

So when did I get old...

@azraphon

46w↑7

@@znation1491I am in no meaningful way the same person as the baby that became me.

@VegetarianLoin

2y↑274

Bro called me a fish in 32 different languages

@saltyfish7626

2y↑14

You mean in one language?

@motherisape

2y↑1

@@saltyfish7626lol

@saltyfish7626

2y↑4

@@motherisape I actually don't get it. Why 32 languages? I feel like I am missing a joke.☠️

@JarodJoseph

2y↑7

@@saltyfish7626he just wanted to do the trendy “Bro did something” to be cool post but didn’t think it through

@romuluscerchez2883

2y

That is stupid. No kne has ever wornessed a soxies turninh into another, and there is no evidence of any in the fossil records.

@TriedNot2Hate

2y↑912

As far as my memory serves me, my greatest grandfather was an amino acid.

@KREEZY.

2y↑30

ADAM WAS THE FIRST MAN HUMANS THROUGHOUT HISTORY SINCE THE DAWN IF TIME HAVE SAID THIS AND THERE ARE WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE AND TO THIS DAY 70% HUMANS BELIEVE ADAM WAS THE FIRST MAN
DENY THIS AND YOU DENY ALL WINTNISSESS AND PROOFS AND MOST OF HUMANITY AND TIME ITSELF.

@Amberkiz

2y↑90

@@KREEZY. How can you say facts when you don't know that for sure yourself?

@TopG20073

2y↑2

💀

@ThizzyMan

2y↑37

@@KREEZY.How you know thats a fact? You a friend of his?

@tyrannosaurustits7083

2y

@@KREEZY. Yeah, religion implies that we are all products of incest

@josuelucero6933

10w↑1

Why did I want to go take a Picuture😂

@randomed404

2y↑595

I'd like to claim the Atlantic ocean as my Great great grandpa's property.

@shaun7711

2y↑9

😂😂😂😂😂

@internet-gangsta2162

2y↑26

You mean Our

@randomed404

2y↑32

@@internet-gangsta2162 Bro you take the Pacific ocean.

@theemirofjaffa2266

2y↑1

Good luck on that 😂

@internet-gangsta2162

2y↑5

@@randomed404 I'll take the Pacific and Arctic,do we have a deal?

@imranothman219

2y↑6K

Dont worry guys, He's talking about his side of the family

@owWaleed1

2y↑109

true hahahaaah

@Shigellosis

2y↑44

Beautiful

@Gbgvkiiujkc6892

2y↑175

He is talking about Humans but not donkeys (No offense just responding similarly to the 1st comment)

@fruitytarian

2y↑9

😂😂

@israelchetachi683

2y↑4

😂

@merlinkater7756

2y↑983

Analogy: take a gradient that goes from yellow to green, and try to mark the exact point where it stops being yellow and becomes green.

@avengers363403

2y↑68

Except you can make a distinction at some point with non continuous sets. Species have distinct points asking the spectrum (each individual is a new point). So yes you could select a single point and call it human

@robertoarmstrong7317

2y↑21

I’m colour blind! Help!

@jordantyler148

2y↑93

@@avengers363403 you can select a point, but that point isn’t real, these categories are constructed

@strachu7689

2y↑7

I personally think that it is a great analogy, and when I thought that this guy’s opinion is non factual, u kinda cleared it for me, cheers!😁👌

@merlinkater7756

2y↑2

What I find extra funny about this analogy is that I remember my brother and I would disagree about the color of trans-neon-green Lego pieces. I was convinced they were Green but my brother was certain they were yellow. (mind you this was back before online lego resources like bricklink so we didnt know the official name) Everybody sees color differently. Endless discussion!

@QuenjemTumaque

8w

Bro my father 185 million generations ago was chilling bro

@eitancahlon

2y↑1K

It's like if you have a short hair and you let your hair grow, there is no first day with long hair. The hair looks (almost) the exact same after a day but when you look at your hair in different months you can notice drastic changes.

@portal7314

2y↑110

I agree, great analogy.

@MahmoudS

2y↑30

Yeah but your hair is still hair. It doesn’t change in anything but length. In any case, even with the Color spectrum as an example, Color’s are our perception and the names we give them based on what we see. I think that evolution differs in that we can determine stages based on speciation, or specifically: how many generations or mutations it takes for two estranged groups with the same origin to no longer be able to reproduce with one another. There has to be a certain point where the dna is no longer compatible and I would speculate that is when the first of a new species arises.

@Typical.Anomaly

2y↑94

@@MahmoudS But blah blah blah... it's a good analogy.

@DETahaX

2y

@@Typical.Anomaly I think you've just proven the theory to be correct, because you're acting like a monkey right about now. Listen to intellectuals next time instead of going "blah blah" to their face like come kind of vampire.

@dallas5609

2y↑6

What about when men shave and next day they got the 5pm shadow hair? You can literally see your hair grow bro

@SaudiaMan

2y↑1.6K

The science teacher trying to explain to the religion teacher about evolution be like :

@anthonybrett

2y↑5

Actually, I think its more the science teacher trying to teach the woke ideologues that seem to think we were dropped off here by aliens. They don't believe that humans have a nature. They believe that everything is socially constructed. They deny that the very essence of who they are was blessed to them by millions of years of evolution, ergo, they deny reality, no different than a religion, because "woke" IS a religion.

@AesthetixVB

2y↑34

@@anthonybrett… that is the single most idiotic thing I read all day pffftt

@BB-np4ib

2y↑15

@@anthonybrett lol what?

@gregoryhancock8605

2y↑48

I find it hard to believe in that with the lack of the stages of evolutionary bones. Even his explanation doesn't make sense as there should be some sort of little changes in bone structure as evolution took place.

@matjaz5684

2y↑132

@@gregoryhancock8605literally says in the video that a species only looks different when you compare two distant generations and that for example a parent and a child would be virtually identical because the differences are gradual and only apparent after a certain amount of time

@Adarsh_amd

2y↑497

"Don't cry, I am just a fish"

~Grandfather 185 million generations ago probably

@MahdiHassan-sv8fe

2y↑31

Im only a fish afterall, dont put the blame one me

@Why_did_YouTube_add_handles

2y↑3

now this shits about to kick off this fishy looks wack lets take back to straight fishhop and start it from scratch

@akshayhere

2y↑3

There's no such thing as a fish

@suryanshawasthi1815

2y↑1

185 million generation not years

@Adarsh_amd

2y↑1

@@suryanshawasthi1815 thank you

@Addicted_mel_fan

30w↑2

Adam and Eve:👁️👄👁️

@SPZ909

2y↑588

It’s like asking when does a child become an adult. Of course for the law it’s on the 18th birthday, but we all know it’s a gradual process and you can never pinpoint the moment a child became an adult.

@greenisgood8219

2y↑15

At the age of forty.

@joshuadeu6603

2y↑3

members of a species are a group of organisms capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring. Different species typically have distinct physical characteristics, behaviors, and genetic makeup, which can set them apart. The inability to successfully reproduce with members of a different species often leads to reproductive isolation, reinforcing the separation between species. Other factors like ecological niche, geography, and evolutionary history can also contribute to defining one species from another.

@miricobladetail9670

2y

It varies from place to place and also what you are talking about. For example people can't purchase alcohol legally until they are 21.

@internetuser4210

2y↑9

"-So, to answer your question officer, yes she was old enou-"

@richardlemon8896

2y↑1

i now understand

@orathaic

2y↑788

"I'm human, so are my parents" - is exactly what someone who wasn't human would say...😏

@EricXia-k5b

2y↑15

Its also someone who IS human would say.

@RJ-mh3ox

2y↑23

@@EricXia-k5bnaaa a lot of the people in my highschool just called their parents racist or absent 😂

@navneetrout8193

1y↑1

Actually only a human can "say". Ridiculous.

@marvellbgry

1y↑1

😂

@abbskebabs6288

1y↑2

That reminded me of that one clip of mark Zuckerberg being like "I was human, I am human....still" 😂😂

@flatsunsociety8172

2y↑604

Ahh, I wonder what nice and lovely things people have to say in the comments

@zackhershey6714

2y↑30

Yeah, I already knew what the comment section would be like before I looked

@sjl197

2y↑34

The comments section is like we gave a million monkeys typewriters, and hoped for one writing Shakespeare.

@moisesbeyond

2y↑5

If you are human and you came from a human couple and each generation before were less people then if you keep going back there will be a first pair of human, the original first human couple.

@purpleAiPEy

2y↑19

i left youtube for a few years, now its just full of stupid. the algorithm shows me garbage and comments on interesting videos are deluded. wtf happened

@TheGoose8299

2y↑28

Evolution is a well-established scientific theory supported by a vast body of evidence from various fields such as paleontology, genetics, molecular biology, and comparative anatomy. Some of the key evidence includes:

1. Fossil Record: The fossil record shows a clear progression of life forms over time, with simpler organisms found in older rock layers and more complex ones in younger layers.

2. Homologous Structures: Similarities in the structures of different species suggest a common ancestry. For example, the bone structure of vertebrate limbs (like the arm of a human, the wing of a bird, or the flipper of a whale) shares the same basic arrangement.

3. Comparative Anatomy: Comparative studies of different species' anatomies reveal similarities and differences that align with their evolutionary relationships.

4. Molecular Biology: DNA and genetic studies show patterns of shared genes and molecular sequences among different species, providing strong evidence for common ancestry.

5. Artificial Selection: The process of selective breeding, as demonstrated in domesticated animals and plants, mimics natural selection and leads to observable changes in species over generations.

6. Transitional Fossils: Fossils that exhibit characteristics of both older and more recent species provide evidence for gradual changes over time.

7. Biogeography: The geographical distribution of species aligns with evolutionary predictions, suggesting that organisms evolved in specific regions and then migrated to other areas.

8. Convergent Evolution: Unrelated species in similar environments can develop similar traits due to similar selective pressures, indicating the role of natural selection in shaping adaptations.

The overwhelming convergence of evidence from these diverse fields supports the reality of evolution as a fundamental process shaping the diversity of life on Earth over millions of years. It is essential to recognize that evolution is a scientific theory backed by evidence and not merely a hypothesis or speculation.

@ashikafreen8599

7w

My brain is not braining

@harrywilliammcbride9910

2y↑1.1K

"Just like you cant tell when this video starts and ends....."

The red line at the bottom of the short: Ima end this man's whole career.

@christianthomas8069

2y↑12

You can learn a lot about evolution from the red line

@digimonlover1632

2y↑1

Sometimes it doesn’t show up though.

@hereisapictureofabroom

2y↑8

Short pause at the end of the short: "Allow me to introduce myself :)...."

@plant_12

2y

My memory:

@mandown3448

2y

💀💀

@mayurdahiwale5907

2y↑675

Its like a flipbook, where two sequential pages are identical, but distant pages are different

@bfboobie

2y↑23

Identical is not the correct word here

@mayurdahiwale5907

2y↑3

@@bfboobie so what do you suggest

@bfboobie

2y↑72

@@mayurdahiwale5907 very similar, or nearly-identical, for the flip book example. I guess in some high page count flipbooks, there might be identical sequential pages if the artist is creating a "pause" in the action, but in flipbooks I've made and seen from others, each page is gradually different, ie NOT identical

"identical" is a very specific term, and if offspring were identical to parents (no mutations or varying gene expression), then evolution would never happen

Identical means exactly the same. Identical from one to the next in a sequence means ZERO change.

Maybe an improper example here, but one might say that 2.001 and integer 2 are very similar, but not identical. In math for instance, the equal sign = means identical, while the wavy bars mean approximately equal, or similar (I can't find that math symbol on my phone)

@mayurdahiwale5907

2y↑21

@@bfboobie okay, you have a point. Accepted. Btw i feel this similar vs identical etc case can be more elaborately explained by VSauce 😅

@bfboobie

2y↑11

@@mayurdahiwale5907 I don't mean to disagree with your premise because you make a good analogy with the slow gradual change of a flip book between sequential pages versus comparing pages that are far apart. I just felt the need to nitpick about the specific use of one word. Lol

I agree with your analogy

By the way what is Vsauce?

@gradesam

1y↑148

Evolution of physical appearance is like painting with a tiny brush, one small stroke at a time, placed in random locations

@soracroissant

1y↑9

id say thats a better analogy than some others ive heard! good comparison

@joshmcgill4639

1y↑1

But many weren't small but big strokes.
And certainly not just at random.
I believe in evolution but the idea that our ancestors was another species is a specuation very similar or course but not the same Growth wise.

@chasecoleman9895

1y↑1

@@joshmcgill4639when people talk of micro evolution i.just think adaptation

@eletraf

23w↑4

It’s similar to a paradox I once heard but can’t recall. What is the minimum number of grains of sand to make a hill. For the sake of the analogy let’s say it’s 1000000 grains for sand. But if you remove one is it still a hill? Of course, but at what point is it no longer a hill.

@karlvuleta

2y↑818

It's like age. You weren't a child and then suddenly you were an adult. You didn't suddenly go from adult to elderly. It's a gradual change we can't see, but we can easily categorise

@abedbbb7083

2y

no that analogy doesn't work here, the concept of biological evolution is pseudoscientific and lack experimental evidence, they are digging things from the ground then compiling suggestions about it, and from chemical perspective and statistical one too this evolution is very very very unlikely to get one correct functional protein with specific structure by abiotic synthesis takes billions of years from a probabilistic point of view ,so when you take a whole organism that's another whole dilemma, changes can happen within species through several mechanisms like genetic crossing over and transposable genes but to diverge to another species by mutations that's also very unlikely because the genetic program is pretty much holistic which is not the appropriate term but the most close to what is in reality , a drastic mutation in the genome is very likely lethal for an organism, the viable ones can't change too much in the genetic program to produce a whole new specie, so the probabilities are very slim and the scientific method is pretty much altered in this theory

@bretert

2y↑61

Well legally you do go from child to adult in 1 day.

@allan710

2y↑106

@@bretert which is absurd, but legally, it is good enough.

@disinfect777

2y↑17

@@bretert Biologically you go from child to adult over night as well. The day you start puberty is when you biologically enter adulthood.

@apjgraphix

2y↑109

@@disinfect777There isn't a a day where puberty starts.Your hormone levels begin to increase way before you start to show any physical signals that you are entering puberty. Is not like you go to sleep and the next day you wake up with a mustache hair on your parts and acne on your face 😅

@whoisthebossimtheboss

2y↑471

Right now humanity is closer to the last human than the first.

@sharanpaulsinku1096

2y↑17

💀 don't worry evolution is fun as long as you're not the first.

@amevlia

2y↑34

@witheringleaves5431 nope! Humans are always evolving, among the things we will lose from evolution will include things like toes and beards. We just won't be alive to see it but we are always evolving and will always continue to, even though you can't see it. Cheers!

@rahulsharma3911

2y↑8

@witheringleaves5431I wouldn’t be so sure of that. Give it some hundred thousand years, advancements in civilisation and changes in environment.

@Qwert-4960

2y↑9

@witheringleaves5431 our design isn't anatomically perfect therefore our body will evolve whenever it's an benefit on what ever we do constantly like the some native people in my country they have 50% larger spleens because every day they go hunting in the water for 1 to 2 minutes multiple times a day
Or people who lives in low density air they have better breathing being I think without 40% out of 100 of air

@emericswitch2718

2y

@witheringleaves5431Well no, evolution is still happening. I'm assuming the commenter just meant we're going to go extinct sometime soon due to our killing of the planet.

@jehkcraw4d

2y↑479

I took Philosophy of Biology during my undergrad and the professor hated my “it is what it is until it isn’t” approach to defining species. That’s how I knew he was more of a philosopher than a biologist.

@Bozon38335

2y↑9

okay what is a cat lion also cat right. stray cat and lion have %95 common dna and also have different sound box, longer(lion) and shorter(pet cat) skull. now look human and chimpanzze they have %98,7 common dna. same amount hair in same amount area. similar instict, charcteristic and organs, same amount bone etc. so if lion is a cat and have common ancestor. must be logically humans and chimps also have common ancestor.

@iantino

2y↑4

More importantly, we see which believes he has to ontology.

@sharlena-jc5zw

2y↑1

@@Bozon38335It's been said we share more dna with a banana 😅 Whats normal for the spider,,, is chaos to the fly...🍌

@Bozon38335

2y↑5

@@sharlena-jc5zw its false information. yes we have similar gene with plants approximately %35 - %45 percent. animal and plant common ancestor live 1.5 billion years ago. we share same gene with spider approximately %65 - %70 percent and common ancestor live 500 million years ago. some creatures have short life cycle and quickly jump generaton. example rat. they live 2 years and made many babies. this make them geneticlay more diverse and quickly change dna. even rat closer to us by common ancestor. we have %90 similar dna with dogs, only %88 similar dna with rat. similar thing apear some plants and other animals.

@jorgechavez6723

2y

Had To Be Created By Other At The Same Time Or Just A Couple Or Just One?

@RumBuDum

25w↑3

It's a product of people in many of our societies being trained to think the world and everything in and around it fits in to neat, clearly separate boxes and that nothing is a gradient.

@jirredvang901

1y↑428

Jokes on you my grandfather 185 million years ago was actually a squid

@hackman669

1y↑11

Really, just took a DNA test and mine was a newt. Further down the link great grandpa ape saw a pretty Neanderthal abs the rest was history. It's all in the DNA. 😊

@arlandolittle7625

1y↑3

@@hackman669God did all this sonny boy!

@arlandolittle7625

1y↑2

@Raptor_Ren how could a planet or sun make itself?

@arlandolittle7625

1y↑1

@Raptor_Ren just what NASA knows about!

@SnuggieMaple

1y↑1

Real

@notcharlie7107

2y↑158

Its like aging, nothing looks like its changed day to day, but if you compare two decades a lot has changed

@CanariasCanariass

2y↑11

Good example :)

@frailvoid5844

2y↑6

I notice things changing day to day but I suppose others aren't cursed to be as observant and self aware as I am, but I stay humble towards my abilities for the pain it brings me despite enlightenment. Sorry for the ramble, hope you have a nice day

@hopelessnerd6677

2y↑6

Probably the most relatable analogy possible.

@shwet218

2y↑1

@@frailvoid5844 are you neurodivergent?

@frailvoid5844

2y↑3

@@shwet218 my original comment was half joking since I don't actually view it as enlightenment and just thought it'd be funny to act cartoonishly pretentious. But yeah I do have add, ocd & dysmorphia, ptsd and I've had a couple psychological evaluations and the doctors couldn't tell if I have autism or if it's just anxiety symptoms causing similar symptoms. Anywayz thanks for listening, Shweta

@josephsanchez5697

2y↑245

“There is more wisdom in your body than in your deepest reason “

-Nietzche

@abdfever

2y↑3

Cool quote, but than *

@MetallicSZN

2y↑2

@@josephsanchez5697You used “then” instead of “than”

@danajohnson6566

2y↑3

THAN! DAMMIT!

@jennyanydots2389

2y↑1

@@josephsanchez5697 Cool quote son but it's not from Freddy Numbchucks, it's actually a quote from Steven Seagal back in the late 1990's when he was playing professional football on the side.

@josephsanchez5697

2y↑3

@@jennyanydots2389 Nietzche said this in 1884 on his book “thus spoke Zarathustra “

@MiloSatori

34w↑2

The idea of an alien interbreeding with a monkey sound less extravagant.

@doyouvivek

2y↑331

It's very similar to the "sorites paradox" that Micheal talked about in his video "Do chairs exist?"
He talked about when does a chair stops becoming a chair if we remove very little parts by scratching enough times

@thaumaTurtles

2y↑60

I like that you can just say Michael and we all know which one you mean

@Disiplyn

2y↑35

@@thaumaTurtlesYea, everyone knows Micheal Jordan

@Leo-ok3uj

2y↑8

I honestly have no idea what Micheal he is talking about

@HC-ur9no

2y↑7

@@Leo-ok3uj How the turn tables - Michael Scott

@Querez8504

2y↑20

@@Leo-ok3uj Michael Stevens from Vsauce, a popular YouTube channel

@raghav1026

2y↑370

Fun fact: Our greatest grandfathers were stars. Many of the heavy elements in the universe were created in the cores of stars or when neutron stars collided.

@The_E_Lord

2y↑43

Yep, but we were also gases before we were stars.

@lolxd1434

2y↑30

so u mean that we were gas, later an star, later a fish, later humans? wtf

@dfuma213

2y↑23

@@lolxd1434takes a star to form planets. By sheer luck, we got a mix of all the elements, at the perfect distance, with perfect temperature, and perfect tilt, and boom elements create us all

@The_E_Lord

2y↑18

@@lolxd1434 Do you believe in a floating man who made us?

@lolxd1434

2y↑5

@@The_E_Lord u mean a powerful God?

@MrArdytube

2y↑404

For me, it is like getting older. Every morning you look in the mirror and see exactly the same person. Then, one morning you wake up on your 74th birthday…. Wondering why all the people around you seem to have aged so much

@brightshining

2y↑6

Ah, I love this
Bless you so much 😊

@zackerythomas3675

2y↑1

👍👍👍

@ermiasassefa3012

2y↑1

exactly.

@truthdawn7773

2y

there must be a creator that knows that theres a sperm must reach an egg , the sperm wont ever know that theres an egg to go to ,never knew that theres a certain PH in the womb or before it, never knew that they must be in a huge nomber,
Every male and female depends on each other to exist ,so they must be existed at the same time ,with the same suitable functionality,to manage to reproduce and last ..
Any disorder or a difference in any complicated functionality of both of them ,they will just die.

@easybandzofficial6456

2y

You’re still a human being just old. You don’t become a fish when you get old smh

@Arihant_Bhat

8w↑2

Maybe cause the process is too slow? That's why the next generation always has small, unnoticeable changes that slowly grow more and more in thier successors. Maybe that's why when we see those changes on a large scale we can notice them but on a small scale like only 1 generation, we can't tell a difference.

@SilverEye91

8w↑1

Correct

@OtherPeople159

42w↑121

just like how in the color spectrum, if u look up very very closely, every color is very identical to the one next to it and to the ones that follow..u won't be able to say "oh, theres the change now"..

@OctaviaVega8

42w↑5

Oooo I like this example.

@gregoryholden3255

39w

Sorry! Every color IS NOT very like the others. Red is vastly different from green. Black is vastly different from white. The only sameness is that they are colors! Such desperation to discount the need for a creator ____that takes a lot of faith...no facts. Just like the NEED for the evolutionsts' declaration that microevolution and macroevolution are one and the same. There is YOUR need within such a faith but no facts. Before trying to contest the reality that I just pointed out, consult ANY definitional resources. Simply take a little bit of time to look up words with micro and macro as prefixal assignments.

@OtherPeople159

39w↑3

@@gregoryholden3255 bro whatttt in the dictionary u just wrote..when have a i ever compared a red to a very far away color in the spectrum, a green to it? yo take a break from the weed or whatever u smoking

@gregoryholden3255

39w↑1

@@OtherPeople159 Well, I stand corrected! However, you are the one who compared colors to evolution. But no matter how hard you try ,red doesn't evolve into a white. No more than a dinosaur evolved into a bird. Yet , the Archaeopteryx is SUPPOSEDLY proof of such a thing! And the land animals ____Pakicetus ____they evolved into whales, according to YOUR persuasion. Man, I'm sorry. But that actually is funny.And you seem to wonder what I'm smoking. Well, I could be smoking that algae that came from the water and became trees! Evolution says that it happened ____algae became trees. If you don't find that ridiculous, there is no such word as ridiculous. But back to what I'm smoking, I think I smoked that kind of algae that had not completely "EVOLVED!" I should learn to wait the required billions of years. Damn.😁

@MissxLariz

34w

It looks magical

@Jonconji

2y↑82

Next time someone says i have those fish lips, i know it’s just my ancestral genes showing

@justbendy

2y↑3

you got those fish lips

@jameskhumalo-nh7hv

2y

😂😂😂😂

@ADF18

1y↑252

It’s like growing out your hair you don’t wake up one day and your hair is drastically longer. But when you compare two pictures months apart you see a drastic change.

@alansabin7487

1y↑3

yes the hair got longer but it is still just hair
so your just like does not fly or it may just
be in your face lol

@Besotted85

46w↑3

How does that compare to macro evolution? I want to know an example of changes of a species.😅

@omerta5591

45w↑13

@@Besotted85 I assume you accept microevolution. How can you not wrap your head around the fact that macroevolution is just microevolution on a larger scale?

@Besotted85

45w↑2

@@omerta5591 its called adaptation. Not a change in kinds. Which all of us do, or we wont survive.

@omerta5591

45w↑11

@@Besotted85 …. Brother, you are lost in the sauce. They don’t change to a different ‘kind.’ Adaptation and microevolution are not the same thing. It’s like you’re looking at evolution backwards. The common ancestors of two different species usually possess the traits of both species. Given enough time those adaptations add up, making them speciate. It’s really that simple. You are drawing an imaginary line between microevolution and macroevolution. Everyone that genuinely understands evolution knows that is just flat-out foolish.

@BigBoss11121

13w↑1

My grandmother was a frog 🐸

@terrencehamm4662

2y↑394

take a picture of your child from age 2 on everyday. You’ll never notice a difference from day to day, but someday they become a full grown adult and only by comparing different years can you see the change.

@matthewdean7825

2y↑22

but they did not change species at any point.

@AngelEmfrbl

2y↑52

@@matthewdean7825tgats because age is not evolution.😅

@terrencehamm4662

2y↑46

@@matthewdean7825 just an analogy.

@johntrains1317

2y↑3

@@matthewdean7825face palm

@madman7544

2y↑4

@@matthewdean7825Wow you really said that.

@12fulworld69

2y↑278

the first statement was so vsauce-like I was surprised when the music didn't hit.

@sprankbomskuarpanz2276

2y

real

@MaxiDaWaxy

2y

@@sprankbomskuarpanz2276sbonch pop

@Ytekai_

2y

I wanted to add that the first human was created by God when he breathed in a soul into Adam, but my grandfather 185 million generations ago was a fish

@total_blasphemy

2y

@@Ytekai_real

@You-vv1xv

2y

@@Ytekai_???

@travisandfreddy2176

2y↑592

That means my dad is more monkey than me, let's gooooo

@vikeniswaranpathma8524

2y↑5

😂👍🏽

@shwet218

2y↑5

😂😂😂

@CanKicker68

2y↑5

Ape

@Sam-og1xd

2y↑3

@@CanKicker68 shawty ape and monkey the same thing different word

@Blackmark52

2y↑9

@@Sam-og1xd"ape and monkey the same thing"
Monkey is a broader term. Apes are monkeys, humans are apes so humans are technically monkeys, but monkeys aren't apes. Apes never have tails.

@TheElevenFirst

30w↑1

think about it this way, only once you know how to define a human can you learn what is or isn’t one. think of this example: say there are two types of dogs, small dogs and big dogs, and many cross breeds which you must identify as closer to one. now you’d have a hard time accurately labeling the many which are very close to the middle between the two breeds. so you would say any dog with 200 square centimeters or more of mass is a big dog, and any less is a small one. now that you’ve made that definition of a big vs a small dog, you can easily label them. now there are many factors with humans but all it comes down to is defining and placing a measurable number onto these factors which lets us classify someone as human.

i would use traits like bone size, brain composition size, hight and musculature, face shape, and hair. i am of course not an anthropologist, so some better and more accurate traits could’ve been chosen, though the point is that one must simply choose traits such as these to measure and give them a lower limit of which upon passing causes the individual to be considered nonhuman.

@alihesso2233

2y↑191

"my greatest grandpa was a frog" 💀

@coolgamrprorobpozswagger69420

2y↑5

“my greatest grandpa was a germ”

@poozer1986

2y

Very possibly

@FuzDoesStuff

2y

the french be like /j

@DIDDYSSON2

29w

ITS HARD TO THINK ITS TRUE BTW ITS NOT LOL 💀

@uzumakiitachi644

2y↑308

Bro really thought he had a clean loop video but we all noticed the beginning after the end

@extxvlogs

2y↑6

Yeah, I've seen so much creators and videos forcefully trying to make that loop clean and they always suck so much 😂 I've seen like 1 or 2 tops that actually achieve it

@zephyr.8850

2y↑3

@@extxvlogsMost of them will not get paid for this, if you think this is not good enough, so please at least appreciate their time and energy to make this content

@extxvlogs

2y↑3

@@zephyr.8850 who told you I didn't appreciate the whole thing? Who told you I base my whole judgment, praise and critic of their content on just how poorly executed and planned their loop mechanics are? Because I'm for hell sure I didn't say that on my first comment, if you have the mentality of never criticizing anything, good for you, but don't expect others to never point out faults and expect improvements. Those things are minor and inconsecuential, that's why I made light of it, but it seems that even that is way past the moral and human line that shouldn't be crossed! 🙄 I really like this an other's channel content and when I do, I make sure to let them know, so please, for a second, get off your high and mighty horse.

@zephyr.8850

2y

@@extxvlogsI was just saying it's important to respect their efforts. And Calling other people's work sucks is totally not a criticism, And I'm sure anyone else reading your 1st comment thinks the same thing

@uzumakiitachi644

2y↑1

@@zephyr.8850 You are telling to appreciate his efforts. Efforts for what? For teaching us nonsense like there's NO first human and our ancestors were FISH.

@trevorworkman8191

2y↑266

He was so proud he made a loop LMAO

@KeithGroover

2y

Haha

@mrspybes8502

2y

daaaammmn

@mysterypie

2y↑3

Ok dude. No need to br rude

@Scarred4life420

2y↑1

That skipped

@randyrudd5594

2y

I most certainly can determine when the message began- twenty eight seconds before the end of the loop.

@terryjames548

23w↑2

There must have been asexual reproduction in the beginning too. Imagine that.

@qwertyqeys

2y↑103

There's a point in time where we might decide "that thing has enough traits I recognize it as a human" but you might also recognize that it has traits you don't carry and vice versa. It gets even trickier when you question what we use to determine humanity. If we go by level of mental function then that's just dangerous, it has a high risk of diminishing the personhood of those who are mentally impaired, either due to genetics, injuries, or underprivileged backgrounds. Most of what we consider unique to humanity (written/spoken language, invention) we can also find missing in people born today, varying levels of illiteracy, nonverbal behavior, or lack of problem solving skills. Yet we recognize them as human, or at least anyone worth listening to does

@explorateur8159

2y↑4

Well we could define something by the development of a species in terms of general characteristics even if, within the species, there are mutations or different morphs, etc.

What, then, would define the species was WHEN the species came to have a collection of traits, such as intelligence, which may have first culminated in a single individual.

Although we might agree that criteria formation may be somewhat subjective or contextual.

@rickojay7536

2y

No a specific point actually

@tufigeat1781

2y

art? Spirituality? self-recognition in the mirror? thoughts on the afterlife? honour? dignity?

@echiko4932

2y↑1

@@tufigeat1781so mental functions, some of which can be found in other species and some of which are lacking in humans.

@echiko4932

2y↑2

I judge peoples humanity on how good they cook. If they're tasty, def human.

@Tyrnak_Fenrir

2y↑161

Someone compared it to languages. There is no way to tell exactly when Latin turned into Spanish. No point in time where you'd say "your parents speak Latin, but you speak Spanish" it's all about those small changes adding up over time.

@lamborghinifan13

2y↑2

Fall of Babylon

@Lucciii32

2y↑24

@@lamborghinifan13never happened 😭

@Juanes1309

2y↑1

Language evolution does not work like that

@Pengouinn

2y

Yes, I speak french but im technically speaking latin

@MattSuguisAsFondAsEverrr

2y↑5

this is why "vulgar latin" is a vague classification

we dont know exactly when "coraticum" turned into "coragium"

@kazumi1315

2y↑2.2K

this man made all religious people mad in an instant

@thegreatsoutherntrendkill272

2y↑340

I mean being a staunch evolutionist requires stupid amounts of religious blindness lol

@thevvitch7585

2y↑615

@@thegreatsoutherntrendkill272I love irony

@BrockGarrett-y8o

2y↑536

Actually he made us laugh. I love hearing a good fairytale. Especially one about the earth magically creating itself and humans evolving from fish mutants. I needed this laugh and I thank you and the other Darwinist below you. 🐠 <- You believe you were a fish.

@terrence6921

2y↑739

@@BrockGarrett-y8odespite your incredulity, there is actual evidence to support that we did, in fact, evolve from fish. In 2008, University of Chicago professor Neil Shubin wrote a book entitled, Your Inner Fish, which discussed human anatomy and embryonic development that specifically resulted from our time spent as fish. Also, I must say nobody asserts that the earth "magically created itself" other than creationists who strawman arguments that contradict their beliefs. You say we, the atheists are the ones who believe in fairytales. Don't you find it ironic that you believe a man and woman were created out of dust and deceived by a talking serpent into eating a magic apple that then brought evil into the world, despite the fact that there is no evidence for that?

@wyattcole5452

2y↑85

I’m not religious and I was a little ticked by the “actually, I was there” attitude he exhibits

@ppbb2820

28w↑3

I know the comment section will be entertaining

@rohitbishnoi1139

2y↑760

"my grandfather 185 million generations ago was a fish"

@raymondcava4669

2y↑46

This helps to paint a picture of evolution

@madeline6951

2y↑38

taxonomically we all are in fact fish

@girlofanimation

2y↑3

Lol. Ok, Vardaman.

@seanA416

2y

So did we have lungs or gills or both when we evolved onto land? There has never been one example of a species change. Evolution is blind faith.

@Jayk-w8x

2y↑19

Philosophically we all are a fish

@s.t167

2y↑123

If this still sounds insane in 2023, I don't know what sanity is

@sharanpaulsinku1096

2y↑9

This is society

@doller6584

2y↑1

Satin is a fish

@spackseries4400

2y↑2

This is Patrick

@H8Felt

2y

This is my kingdom come

@BlueHaloStar

2y↑93

I shall now own the ocean because its my great grandpa property 300 million years ago

@CherryMosley

2y↑3

Native American logic

@poozer1986

2y

Ridiculous comment

@mioki-leaf2

2y

It's our, you're not the only fish here

@hackman669

1y↑1

Russian logic. I owned Alaska a long time ago. Now I want it back. Putin: I want it my way.
Media: Tell me more. Tell me more.
Putin: A long time a go there was Tsar. He was caught in a jam.
Media: Umm. Ha
Putin: He was late paying his finance!
Media: Tell me more. Tell me more.
Putin: He didn't have the funds to build his palace.
Media: Umm.. Was he drunk or just down on his luck?
Putin: He went to his father but didn't have a buck. Barrowed from his bro. Couldn't pay him back.
Media: Umm... ha. What did he do to pay him back?
Putin: One day he heard a knock. It was Uncle Sam. He offered to buy si really cheap land.
Media: Then what?
Putin: Then he sold them Akaska. Now I want it back!

@IJebronLamesI

24w↑2

Yeah, evolution is a spectrum… that was obvious to me even as a child.

@zedowskyy9290

2y↑57

I like to imagine the evolutionary progress like growing grass.

You look at it for seconds, minutes, hours and you don't see it changing at all, but it did, it's just such a small change that you didn't even notice. You will notice the change if you come back to check maybe in a week.

@MrGeorgewf

2y

So why did evolution stop?
No apes evolving to humans now.

@potatopotpie6108

2y↑91

seeing my first ancestor walk on land GO GRANDPA GO!

@Supernova-io6iv

2y

Same here bro😂

@EzaleaGraves

2y↑2

I'm about to go kick my grandpa back into the ocean.

@josuemontero2675

2y↑125

This confirms that the egg came before the chicken.

@manhunter3429

2y↑5

how did the egg get there

@lindenh2014

2y↑26

@@manhunter3429 It was produced by an eggplant 🍆

@josuemontero2675

2y↑21

@@manhunter3429 if animal species came from a previous animal species that means a proto-chicken laid an egg that was a chicken egg.

@Your_Average_Warlord_Titan

2y↑7

@@manhunter3429egg laying species existed way before chickens did

@greenaum

2y↑7

Chickens evolved from reptiles. It's thought that birds are the closest living relatives to dinosaurs. Reptiles lay eggs. Checkmate.

@adoramay9410

31w↑2

I always think of it like language. At no point did two Old Norse speakers give birth to a child and boom, their child starts speaking Swedish. It's slow miniscule changes over decades and centuries. And that's how it always will be. If you were in a 100 year coma you'd definitely notice a difference. It's possible that your native language won't even be intelligible to you. But if you lived through those 100 years it would be nearly impossible to denote when that change happened. So in the same way there was no first human, there was no first English speaker.

@respectyasuomains8791

2y↑97

Now i can formally identify myself as a millennium fish

@truthdawn7773

2y

there must be a creator that knows that theres a sperm must reach an egg , the sperm wont ever know that theres an egg to go to ,never knew that theres a certain PH in the womb or before it, never knew that they must be in a huge nomber,
Every male and female depends on each other to exist ,so they must be existed at the same time ,with the same suitable functionality,to manage to reproduce and last ..
Any disorder or a difference in any complicated functionality of both of them ,they will just die.

@artsamurai-kun4647

2y↑1

You have my blessings to become millennium falcon as well 😊

@Ibuyshort

2y↑1

Stop the cap g

@poozer1986

2y

@@Ibuyshortno cap. Evolution is a fact

@fleshwound5149

2y↑268

We're all distant cousins. You and your cat have common ancestors, even the trees around us are family. We're all related!

@Jasel2892

2y↑41

The fact that we are related to both cats and trees should let you know that the concept of common ancestor is not at all related to ancestry and is actually just proof that all living beings are created in likeness and therefore share similarities which DO NOT necessarily indicate that they are related.
When have you ever seen a species of animal mix with a human biologically? Or a human tree hybrid? Though we share half our dna with bananas we are neither able to evolve nor devolve into bananas, we are completely seperate beings which are incapable of mixing. Our similarity in DNA is just that, a similarity. Not even the top scientist in the top labs can mimic the “evolution” from one species to another not even in a lab but people will blindly believe anything.

@adude68

2y

@@Jasel2892 In your case, the percentage of DNA you share with bananas is very likely over 90%

@13Nader7

2y↑3

@@Jasel2892 now that's a comment with a good thought

@Adarsh_amd

2y↑7

@@Jasel2892but I saw a human tree hybrid in doraemon 🥺

@benmorris7448

2y↑12

@@Jasel2892 you don’t believe in evolution?🤨

@hellothere5797

2y↑916

My laptop wasn’t built in a factory, it was just a bunch of random molecules that collected over millions of years to form this 15” Lenovo laptop

@youngbloodnba

2y↑83

This man gave an argument against himself 😂

@sulyvahnthetyrant7378

2y↑58

That’s exactly what happened

@andfox78459

2y↑11

I don't even see his point

@adilhaneefmd

2y↑42

A thing as simple as laptop doesn't get randomly selected, what makes these foos think human randomly formed, this is to the evolutionist~Adam and eve

@MkSkribble

2y↑87

You're not a laptop though. Besides a laptop is designed with all the perfect pieces in place. And if you're absolutely convinced humans are a great design then realize how dumb it'd be for a car's exhaust pipe to be the same place where you add oil and gas

@Sevenseas0

23w↑1

So if there wasn’t a first human, was there a first fish? 🐟

@SilverEye91

23w↑1

First you need to answer this question: What is a fish?

@TheBaconWizard

2y↑65

Which came first, the chicken or the egg? The egg, because if you go back enough generations there was a time when they weren't chickens, but they were still laying eggs.

@trustmebrobro

2y↑5

The Chicken came first. I had this debate in university. If evolution is correct, the predecessor to the chicken would have evolved to be a chicken. Which would have mated and laid eggs.

@memetrain2702

2y↑11

Nah, God created all things.

@TheBaconWizard

2y↑20

@@memetrain2702 Obvious troll is obvious.

@memetrain2702

2y↑2

@@TheBaconWizard What does that even mean?

@maximusstirnimus5210

2y↑4

@@trustmebrobro
It's just as likely that that mutation would happen to the egg being laid. Many animals are born/hatched with mutations

@whoisadaline

34w↑61

its just us humans wanting to organise everything into neat little categories

@Therealky777

8w

Fr it’s stupid

@prof_jesus

2y↑1.1K

When dumb people think of evolution, they think we're suggesting a Pokemon-esque kinda evolution.

@afriendlycampfire260

2y↑14

Like pawmi to pawmot or feebas to milotic or remoraid to octillery

@RajMGandhi

2y↑14

I mean it does happen with butterflies though...

@Patriotic_Hindu

2y↑60

Even tho I'm a religious person this made me laugh out loud 😂

NOTE: I am religious but not a stupid blind follower 😅😅

@kevinsosa2906

2y↑2

Whose your favorite pokemon?

@TechySeven

2y↑78

@@RajMGandhi Nah, that's called "metamorphosis" and it too is something that had to evolve over time.

@EngAziz

11w

Why did he crawl out of the water , I would be a perfect jaw 🤣

@Cythius

2y↑221

As soon as I saw over 20k comments under a video about evolution, I knew damn well what's happening 😅. More entertaining than watching actual clowns 🤡

@Ivory-f5b

2y↑74

Evolution denyiers are smth else

@wafflemation6887

2y↑3

@@Ivory-f5bthey call us fools for believing we came from fish (which, in of itself is a gross oversimplification) but they themselves think that a more righteous, or more feasible explanation is that they came from two humans created by a divine entity who got decieved by an evil snake and got kicked out of lalaland

@Cythius

2y↑14

@@Ivory-f5b fr lmao

@user-do5mm7lv2t

2y↑15

@@Ivory-f5b
They really are.
They're even smart enough to have basic grammar and spelling skills.

@Letsbesalty

2y

Give solidified proof of evolution of millions of years that isn't a scientific theory... you can't

@AMH793

2y↑27

Theists will never understand this concept

@Richard--Fox

2y↑2

Exactly

@truthdawn7773

2y

😆lol there's no gradual change even over millions of years , that's a belief,a mythology without an evidence.
In science, there's mutations causes illnesses, disorders and disfunctionality.

Even so , the creature will die before even creating a single function ,before even finding the same changed creature with the same changes but a female in the same area and the acceptance to reproduce,or they will just die with their changes😂

🤓Growing for humans and animals prove also the parents wont accept the changed child and it wont last.. so every created period of the creature from the sperm to the growing baby ,wont accept the changes🤣

@truthdawn7773

2y

@@Richard--Fox 😆lol there's no gradual change even over millions of years , that's a belief,a mythology without an evidence.
In science, there's mutations causes illnesses, disorders and disfunctionality.

Even so , the creature will die before even creating a single function ,before even finding the same changed creature with the same changes but a female in the same area and the acceptance to reproduce,or they will just die with their changes😂

🤓Growing for humans and animals prove also the parents wont accept the changed child and it wont last.. so every created period of the creature from the sperm to the growing baby ,wont accept the changes🤣

@truthdawn7773

2y

there must be a creator that knows that theres a sperm must reach an egg , the sperm wont ever know that theres an egg to go to ,never knew that theres a certain PH in the womb or before it, never knew that they must be in a huge nomber,
Every male and female depends on each other to exist ,so they must be existed at the same time ,with the same suitable functionality,to manage to reproduce and last ..
Any disorder or a difference in any complicated functionality of both of them ,they will just die.

@PulchritudinousCognoscenti

2y↑4

They are fools

@jeffmcdonald101

2y↑309

This is a great way to melt someone's brain who asks the chicken and egg question!!

@bernier42

2y↑57

That, or you point out that eggs evolved (in other species) before chickens did, and they get annoyed at you for missing their point.

@Gabitza379

2y↑17

Don't worry, I ordered them online. I'll let you know

@wokeupinapanic

2y↑4

@@ronaljitningthoukhongjam8325 I’m not sure I’m understanding you correctly. Are you saying that modern chicken eggs appeared and have no traceable origin to any chicken ancestors? Because that’s blatantly false lol.

You may be confusing the part about how we don’t know when the first amniotic eggs came to be, because that amniotic layer cannot be fossilized, but that’s a completely different idea altogether, and occurred millions of years before chickens or their direct modern ancestors began to appear.

@wokeupinapanic

2y

@@ronaljitningthoukhongjam8325 could you back that claim up with any sources? I’ve been googling trying to find what you’re talking about, and cannot come up with anything remotely close to what you’re talking about…

What bird was “confirmed” to be early wild chickens with entirely different shell composition? I can’t even find discussions about shell composition at this point lol.

Basically, this is information I am not seeing anywhere except from you, so if you know what it is or what you’re referencing, I’d love to take a look at it, because I currently don’t believe you, but I’m certainly interested in being educated if I’m wrong and/or don’t have access to the correct information!

@mamatmag

2y↑7

Chicken.
The egg is a potential chicken, not a guaranteed chicken.

@dianasohn2515

21w↑1

So basically there WAS a first human and we evolved

@SESKE_5

21w

No

@simonmandel2621

2y↑68

It’s also comparable to growing and ageing. There wasn’t a day where you woke up a toddler after having been a baby, a day where you woke up to being an adolescent after being a child, or a day where you woke up an adult. Or a day where you woke up ‘old’. It all happens so gradually. There’s no way to pinpoint an exact time.

@zzzzzzhhhhh678

2y↑5

Idk why but this messed with my head lol

@simonmandel2621

2y↑4

@@zzzzzzhhhhh678 😄😅😂 yes! When I heard this analogy a while ago from an interview of evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins it also resonated with me. It helped me understand the gradual transition from one species to the next.

@alexfengerson7982

2y

Wait I still don’t understand. Is this video stating that monkey, chicken, and human all come from the same ancestor? I hope someone could clarify for me. Thank you

@simonmandel2621

2y↑4

@@alexfengerson7982 All life shares a common ancestor 😊

@miguelbarahona6636

2y

@@simonmandel2621 Who said that?

@lauroralei

2y↑224

Ah, some of my fondest childhood memories are of paddling in primordial shallow seas listening to great grandpa fish tell his stories

@sammer28

2y↑7

That's not how any of that works

@MkSkribble

2y↑3

I love how he specified 185 MILLION years between current humanity's relation with fish and all you heard was...
Humans related to fish, evolution man dumb I not fish I person🗿

@danielgallacher5216

2y↑1

You not understanding the argument doesn't make it untrue

@ReallyBigHead

2y↑75

“You can’t tell when this video begins or ends”

YouTube shorts: creating a small cut after the shorts end and restart

@renab2581

7w

I understand completely … it’s like at one point did I become so old 😢

@u-free370

2y↑266

His grandpa was a fish, but my grandpa was a fisherman. Don’t call my grandpa fish again 😠

@brazenbull36

2y↑16

my granpa had 5 schlongs

@aneesahussein1522

2y↑24

We all started simple. From our original father Adam and our Mother Eve. End of story. This bonzo in the video makes no sense.

@brazenbull36

2y↑64

@@aneesahussein1522 Cool fairy tale bro

@TGnM

2y↑53

@@brazenbull36 shhhhh. These people are a little slow in the head, don't call them out bro

@evaraee7083

2y↑3

Hmm kinda fishy..

@rocketgirl3366

2y↑344

Imagine being born a different species than your parents.

@Jamesishappy

2y↑9

@Tovalokodoncthe video is rediculas and so is the concept of course there HAS to be a point where one species became the next because ITS A NEW SPECIES just cause you cant tell the difference doesnt cange the obivious fact

@fduck3794

2y↑61

@@Jamesishappygradual change is the key. There is no point where a bloodline changes species or genetics completely. To see a different species is to compare with far away cousins or far away ancestors. Don't say it's ridiculus just because you don't understand what he explained.

@littleboss2006

2y↑3

@@fduck3794gradual change theory. Let scientist cook

@ddd54321

2y↑16

@@Jamesishappyif you take it literally it is ridiculous, which would be ridiculous to do so. He refers to the fact that the change was never too big. The difference between one generation and the next would be extremely unnoticeable, like having the nose 1milimeter shorter or stuff like that. It's not that hard to get the point.

@dumbwit

2y↑14

@@Jamesishappylooks like you failed both science and english class

@ripig111

2y↑90

I enjoyed this short and it makes a good point, although it is not strictly true in all cases. It applies to most animals, including humans. But some plants, and even a few animals, have undergone a form of "instant speciation" called polyploidy where the number of chromosomes increases in a single generation, such that parent and offspring can no longer interbreed.

@jpe1

2y↑11

Thank you for making this comment! I was afraid I would have to write it myself, I’m really glad someone else already pointed it out.

@giannipiccioni8411

2y↑6

In a sense that's a special case of the rule.

@karbonkillershorts8551

2y↑2

Also he failed to prove that the first human didn’t happen, he just said we can’t prove there WAS a first human.

@madhououinkyoma

2y↑12

@@karbonkillershorts8551 no that’s not what he said

@harry4rrtiiurrr

2y↑3

@karbonkillershorts8551 there is literally no such thing as the first human

@kimborealis

21w↑1

It is looking like our current species is a hybrid of numerous branches of hominids who interbred over the millenia.

@stephaniefogelvik4756

17w

Nope. Read Genesis.

@hydrabyss-4482

2y↑69

Imagine a gradient of blue to green, each end is different but in the middle its very hard to say when one stops and the other starts

@I_gayming

2y

pretty cool way to understand it ngl

@thecapitalisticdictator2256

2y↑2

The only problem is this analogy probably doesn't apply to humans. The theory is the fusion of chromosome 2 happened over a single generation, and that possibly resulted in higher cognitive capability. Either way going from 48 to 46 chromosomes, is a substantial enough change you could consider the new off spring a different species. So there probably is a first human at that point in particular

@dishwasher69

2y↑1

@@thecapitalisticdictator2256mutation

@homer1273

2y

there is no proof for blind evolution and many miniscule differences leading to new organisms or new organs. this atheist claim that has never been proven, but widely believed because of atheist brainwashing people from kindergarden. for any significant organism to survive it need to have all the necessary parts for its survival. an organism with half of an organ can not survive

@tarlochansingh620

2y↑60

Bro literally has the photos of his five generations. I don't even have a picture of my grandfather

@Number2kanyefanueheh

2y

So

@Abdulilkebabbaro

2y↑2

I don't even have a picture of ME

@Number2kanyefanueheh

2y

@@Abdulilkebabbaro so

@Bigbballbadmint9n

2y↑1

@@Abdulilkebabbarowhy not

@Abdulilkebabbaro

2y

@@Bigbballbadmint9n I don't like taking selfies, I only have photos of my friends and landscapes

@BrothersTillDoom

2y↑358

"so, just like you can’t tell when this video begins or ends"
Me: looks at the red bar on the bottom
Edit: I also know how the short started

@AFederalbureauofinvestigation

1y↑4

😂

@aladynamedSusan

1y↑5

Facts same 😂😂😂😂

@chuck9380

1y↑1

Right……….that part!!!

@Matthew19002

1y↑1

I was thinking, ontop of the shorts don't loop smoothly.

@gnosticwitch

1y↑1

All of us

@philliplopez8745

28w↑1

Undoubted there were many odds and sods between the dominance of one homnid after another and undoubtedly this evolution continues although without the pressure of predation we evolve at a much slower pace .

@robbob7444

2y↑284

Soo, let's read the comments.. (pops some antidepressants)

@xanander4693

2y↑12

Brought some popcorn for all the salt 🍿

@notusneo

2y↑65

My ass wouldve stayed in the primordial soup if i knew there was gonna be day like this

@nialloloughlin8378

2y↑18

Exactly, italian and spanish came from Latin,there wasn't one day a baby born who just started speaking Spanish

@angryyoungman66

22w↑2

Just like There was no first French speaker , the language developed gradually from latin & german, and there is no specific generation who we can say spoke french

Part of Your Lie 1801Part of your Lie Lyrics

@TheGoose8299

@hackman669

@ramsey627

@asheep7797

@Wordsmith00

@PoisonStore

@kurtsnyder4752

@WhatWhy42

@jaydub6313

@777Skeptic

@cfgp

@elmojackson6621

@mcasur

@CHMichael

@isaaccarlson1561

@cafe-tomate

@yusufA125

@andyz7711

@yusufA125

@benteuno_salbahe5604

@terrasai2857

@sallys.silver392

@SilverEye91

@BlueCanaryNightLight

@sallys.silver392

@adrianthom2073

@edvinparmeza1298

@Jamesishappy

@Adventurin_hobbit

@razahassan8756

@aahhhhhhhhhhhhh

@littleboss2006

@clownkid

@stevevernon1978

@besmart

@daa3930

@hiiamelecktro4985

@chechsman

@anakyangbudiman8497

@unclesam6972

@unclesam6972

@frost083

@spencercox4092

@ryneagheilim9782

@RenderedEnder

@youknowshum8846

@steze439

@Lonewolf_Fx

@cinephile0620

@Elle...

@jasonturner4269

@tipsyshmurda492

@saltyfish7626

@YWS_04

@shreehari6762

@peyos07

@lisamain3723

@Boundlxss_

@JamesHeller-if5kg

@ILLUTIX

@cathcolwell2197

@jamesmcinnis208

@VVestside92

@Annapainter267

@confusedjpg

@kom2876

@frezydynecy

@JoeARedHawk275

@DavidHereok

@sorashou6229

@cliffbooth35

@j79n

@thatsupachamp8590

@cliffbooth35

@speedrunmcporridge286

@justinhackstadt6677

@BobJoushaSmith

@alferrbidelspatch158

@nightizzat4574

Part of Your Lie 1801
Part of your Lie Lyrics