Emulating
Peter started playing music at around the age of eight, learning the violin… Read Full Bio ↴Peter started playing music at around the age of eight, learning the violin and
recorder at school and also used to bash away at his father's piano. During his
teens Peter attempted to teach himself the guitar without much success, being left
handed was probably a contributing aspect but this didn't stop him being in several
teen bands though.
Peter started playing keyboards with various 'pub' bands in the late seventies and
early eighties and following a visit to the first UK Electronica at Milton Keynes,
decided to launch a solo career and released 'Eve of Dawn' in 1983.
After his third album 'Prismatic' was released in 1984, Peter was invited by Andy G
(of Lotus Records, who sold Peter's albums) to play in the afternoon set at
Stafford Gatehouse Theater at UK Electronica 1986. Peter was then invited back to
the next year's UK Electronica as opening support to the evening headliners,
Wavestar.
Peter continued to release albums up to the end of the decade by which time, with
the advent of digital samplers, his music had taken on a more experimental vein.
Peter then decided to take a few years off and returned to his solo work in 2000.
Peter released the techno influenced album 'Dreamstates' in 2001 and 'Zwölf' released
in 2002 was a very successful album of melodic EM. In 2007 Peter recorded
'Timeslip', the first of his Berlin School inspired albums in the 'Time' series.
Peter has also started a series of space ambient albums, the first of these was the
free download, 'Dark Memories' followed by the 'Origins of Species' album.
TRACKS
Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Search results not found
Song not found

Emulating
Peter Tedstone Lyrics


No lyrics text found for this track.

The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos
Most interesting comments from YouTube:

blue cloud

@Nugget I hope this is the last comment of this article.
First:
Every electric device using semiconductors. In general, it make abort or prevent the power circuit.
Which very similar with redstone and redstone torch if you connect it right. And it doesn't same with your "door" because it can't abort or prevent the signal.
Second, if it can set, store, process something and using electric it is computer. Yes the calculator is a "computer". Your phone is a "Computer". Your television is a "computer".
But we can't talking like
"hey do you have computer?"
"Yes i have computer."
"Good. Wait. I forgot turn off my computer and computer. Do you borrow computer?" Or something like that.
Sound super dump. So the inventer decide to name it with their purpose.
Not like paper you draw randomly because it not a electric component and can't do anything like store, process, and set sth.
If you say no then your mother is a computer. Right?

Fact: somebody already made a computer in paper. Obviously not you.



Nightmare Court Pictures

@Nick MaGrick
"this is making me think the system would then be limited by the complexity of our systems, our brains and bodies, and all the possible different combinations of thoughts we could have. Which I suppose when you get down to it there would be a fixed amount as well. Maybe, idk for sure."

And this would be exactly the right conclusion to draw, and it's the central tenant to computational irreducibility...that in essence we can't simulate the universe because you can think of the universe as a giant computer, a computation that only the universe itself can compute, and the result of the computation is the universe itself. It took 13.7 billion years so far to compute the big bang up until now, so if we were to make a Turing Complete simulation of the universe, it would also take us 13.7 billion years, and we would need the same number of objects with the same dimensionality that the universe has. In this way, the universe prevents it's own paradox.

There is a lot of philosophical and existential consequences from the study of this field. You asked if I'm a physics student or a hobbyist. I'm a hobbyist that's studied physics since I was a child, but I never wanted to pursue physics as a career. I'm a creative that makes music and movies, and my study of these things help me make new and interesting ideas for stories.

I really began independent research when I first saw a tornado in Texas. I think seeing one of these things is probably the most intense feeling you'll ever get to experience in life...something so beautiful and yet so powerful and destructive, that ever since I've always wondered why tornado's are made and what causes them...it took me down a very large rabbit hole...starting with Turbulence and Chaos theory...those are very cool things to study, but even then there were many questions I couldn't wrap my head around...like why does chaos actually exist at all? Why are fractals even a thing in the first place? Those questions lead to my study of something extremely important called Scale Invariance. Scale Invariance is probably one of the most important things that I've ever learned and I think most people gloss over it because it's really not very interesting when looked at out of context. But it turns out that scale invariance is the reason that systems can actually evolve...it's a mathematical way for things to change (It's also very similar to what resonance actually is). It was no longer a surprise to me to see why tornado's happen or why fractals exist in almost everything we see...it's because scale invariance is deeply embedded into general system evolution. This finally lead me to complexity theory...how complexity is intertwined at the hip with scale invariance, in how simple systems evolve into complicated systems...and then it turns out that complexity theory and computation are part of the same structure...that complex computation is the fundamental building block of system evolution, and it is this very simple computational process of state evolution to other states that create scale invariance in finite systems.

So that was just a little bit of information about me. You seem to have the same spark of curiosity and interest. I would totally recommend following a similar path, of learning as much as you can about what we currently know now...and then build off that understanding to accomplish your goals, whatever they might be.



All comments from YouTube:

YeetMan

This thing has more cores than my actual processor.

KingOfGold

Same I only have dual core

Orbit69

Why have I been wasting my money

Neppie14

4times more than mine

KayKay~Dec17

I have no idea how many cores my processor has, all I can say is that my computer runs on Intel.

Oliver Schulte

@Cylo A computer in a game is limited by the computer its run on

42 More Replies...

BrockPlaysFortnite

How do you even begin to plan this

moinmeister 1192

its not that incredible hard. basic programming with "or" "and" gates

KayKay~Dec17

I agree, HOW???

Marcus Aurelius Regulus

Pencil and paper lol

More Comments

More Versions