Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Song not found

Fuge g-Moll
Till Fellner Lyrics


No lyrics text found for this track.

The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos
Comments from YouTube:

Erik Vertriest

One of the best Bach interpretations I ever heard!! Such a harmony & balance...

Alguandre

@Neardelight Yes! Fellner's rendition is a masterwork: always credible tempos, judicious & exact sense of rythm, perfectly distinguished voices -great couterpoint!-, rich piano sound. It's a dream. I wish people left those stupid fundamentalisms behind and used their ears... as you do! Thank you for appreciating.

Neardelight

could not agree more, Till Fellner's WTC is so rich and expressive, yet not too romantic... one of my favorite recordings of this devine book thank you for uploading

dong dong

great!!! One of best recording which i ever heard of bach. Great balance, voicing, understanding. I like a lot the way he uses pedal which brings this charatcer to this piece and beatiful singing line

Alguandre

Because the -slight- use of the pedal enhances the "cantabile" mode which Bach himself always pursued. IMHO, of course. I hope Fellner records the WTC Book II soon. Thank you very much for your comment.

alger3041

Further comment regarding the description "best pair in WTC Book I."  I agree that these two movements are among the finest in the entire WTC collection, both books, but I feel that this is too sweeping a statement.  I feel that (for example) the G Minor set in Book I (BWV 861) and the E Major set in Book II (BWV 878) are at the very least equal to this wonderful F Sharp Major set.  How do others feel about it?

alger3041

Whatever positive impressions I have of this rendition are confined exclusively to the Fugue.  It is nicely shaped, with the tempo altogether acceptable even though I would perhaps take it slower a notch or two.  The trill in the top voice at 1:59 is missed here
as in so many other renditions, but I feel that some effort should be made by a pianist
playing this movement to execute it properly, and not omit it, as it is a part of the subject.

I do not like the Prelude in this rendition.  The tempo is far too fast, totally obliterating the essential tranquil quality of this movement (as with the Fugue).  Also, I do not like the manner in which the trills are executed - I feel that they should be extended out to the full value of the principal note, and in addition, totally despite performance practice as handed down to us (which should never be followed blindly anyway), I strongly feel that they should all begin on the principal note, in order to preserve motivic integrity which I feel is very important - in this case the aspect of the repeated note with which this motive ends.

nestatim1

i do agree very much with you. beautiful touch but the pedal ruins it quite a bit. and as it may serves the purpose of cantabile it does not serve the use of the counterpoint

Alguandre

@Erik83474 I'm waiting for his rendition of Book II... Thanks for the comment.

ghostwriter11

Exquisite understanding of and feeling for the music. But why so much pedal? (Why *any* pedal?)

More Comments

More Versions