1. Unfurl is post-metal band from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Introspective P… Read Full Bio ↴1. Unfurl is post-metal band from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Introspective Post-hardcore funneled through a black hole.

https://vnfvrl.bandcamp.com/

2. Unfurl is a metal band originating from Murmansk, Russia. They teamed up in 2007 and participated on "My Own Wolf: A New Approach", an Ulver tribute album. Their influences include Katatonia, Paradise Lost and Dark Tranquility.
The band is composed of:

Z-Skin - guitars, electronics, vocals
War-M - lead & rhytm guitars
Fears - bass
Damien T. G. - drums
Numeral - electronics

TRACKS

Genre not found

Artist not found

Album not found

Search results not found

Song not found

Зачем Я Здесь
Unfurl Lyrics

No lyrics text found for this track.

The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos

Most interesting comment from YouTube:

GuyWithAnAmazingHat

9y↑20

What I'm getting from the comments is that people really like having women give scientific TED talks, in fact the TED audience just loves people giving scientific TED talks more than anything.

This response shows that the general TED audience wants women to participate in the STEM fields and is a good thing.

Non scientific TED talks have a trend of getting a large amount of dislikes, and women seem to give more of these talks than men.

Non scientific TED talks given by male speakers, especially those in the entertainment and performance categories also receive a large amount of dislikes.

It is only correlation, but I conclude that the vast amount of dislikes on TED talks given by women are actually in response to the non scientific subject matter rather than actual sexism against having a female speaker.

Of course there is still a bit of sexism with the women having higher dislike over like ratios, but the subject matter is still the most important factor influencing likes.

All comments from YouTube:

kirsten goljar

4y↑3

absolutely obsessed with this woman's intelligence and determination, I hope Sara achieves her goal!!

Brian Rappleye

6y↑6

Sara Seager is my favorite astrophysicist. She's a realistic genius and an exellent public speaker. She continues to inspire us all.

Ruselyn Bondoc

You and i both!

GusenbauerAffe

9y↑8

I love how enthusiastic she is about her topic, you can clearly tell how much she loves what she does! good for her

Velvetrest

Why does this sound so condescending

kalif saladin

9y↑6

Very inspiring work. I can't wait for the star shade to fly and the first spectral data of Earth-like planets.

C Williams

9y↑17

An amazing person doing amazing things!!!! Bravo! Keep up this amazing work.

M

9y↑7

I think she did a beautiful job. Very professional and thorough.

Larry Nocella

9y↑1

Super cool. I can't imagine all the details that go into preparing that ingenious star shade thing! May you find what you seek!

Anand Hardas

9y↑1

Well done Sara.. Excellent talk.. All the best for your future research..

318Arnie

I've heard about this project when it was still a theory. Raelly nice to see that it's actually being done.

sol

318Arnie the project is actually in jeopardy . its very likely it will be canceled.

meaning

9y↑14

Since I was a kid I always thought that there're people who live in another galaxy or planet and they're wondering if they're alone or not

Clorox Bleach

9y↑6

Yeah me too. Probably millions of planets with life thinking the same thing. Some may have even found each other. Then there could be other universes with lifevin them & they are probably thinking "I wonder if there are other universes with life in them".

R Smith

9y↑1

It's crazy how little people know about our planet and the universe. A lot of people dont know anything about the universe and have no idea how big it is, and how lucky we are to live on this beautiful planet called earth.

joe tigo

6y↑1

She had two achievements as a scientist and as a woman breaking the stereotype in the male dominated field. She is a hero and a model to others. If the next generations found another earth they will remember you for sure.

SpacemanXC

9y↑236

Finally. A woman talking about science and not some stupid social issue.

Very refreshing.

Cold Ham on Rye

MassDynamic Exactly. I didn't even think about it.

Sebastian Kanfjäll

Yeah, that was my thought exactly while watching the presentation!

The Ravenous Rabbit

Salty Diarrhea You do know that education fully favors females, right?

16 More Replies...

Douglas Raddi

Great presentation. She is so intelligent. Sara has 1 of the brightest minds in science and astronomy, also Amy Mainzer is so intelligent. Finally woman getting recognition and respect from main stream scientists.

7seven7

Wonderful research.
If we began building our starships now, by time you find your Goldilocks planet we could be on our way. And a way to put people back to work.

Luis Salas Lastra

9y↑4

I loooove the way that she replied at the end to the question about the community "opposing" her views on exoplanets ."Us scientist are SUPPOSED to be skeptical" I was already seeing the conversation going to: Oh you see! they opposed you because you were a woman, right !? and you showed them! you go girl!.....no, she immediately show that is not about gender, it's about ideas, being persistent and backing up with evidence, I loved the talk.

Red The Beard

Spectacularly brilliant.

Kevin Rahman

9y↑2

This is refreshing in terms in info. yay Tedtalks!

Strength And Philosophy

9y↑1

Love this!!

Chris Green

9y↑46

you could kind of tell she was nervous but still very interesting discussion

Sammy Video Plex

I think that's how she talk, Lisa Randall, looks very nervous when she talks but get her point across. Ms. Randall, play in hair a lot why talking. But she's very effective and have great lectures.I have learn so much from her and Lisa Randall. Great video ❤

Mat Broomfield

9y↑1

Chris Green Yeah, her final laugh before questions made that clear.

Yvaelle

9y↑8

Chris Green It's an intimidating audience for any nerd to stand up and talk in front of - sales people have that confidence to pitch anything to anyone, but her brain has all the information: and she has to filter it, and qualify the limitations of her claims, because that's how good science works.

So I don't think it's nervousness so much as thoughtfulness, she knows way more on the subject than she has time to explain - so she has to reduce complexity without losing essential details. Take for example the last little bit about how the next generation of telescopes will be able to spot other Earths, she pauses and stutters before she says it - but that's because in her mind she has the full technical specifications of the new models. She's interpreting that they will detect gravity 3 times more precisely, or that they'll have 10 times the precision for atmospheric composition analysis (made up numbers) - but the audience doesn't need that because they have no frame of reference - all they want to know is what that means: that instead of being able to spot Jupiters, we will be able to identify Earths.

As far as public speaking goes, too much subject knowledge is a curse :)

Chris Green

9y↑2

cary pt it was just an observation. i also said i enjoyed the discussion.

4 More Replies...

Mynor Chinchilla

I think about this every single day. I hope we meet someone or some thing halfway.

Luna

4y↑1

I'm studying English with this video. Too difficult to learn but I will finish to the end.

Christopher Grey

The 3-d star map program in the beginning of the video was amazing.

tsjoencinema

Very interesting talk.

Rose Du Sahel

Fascinant !! " Et en matière de savoir vous n'avez reçu que très peu'' Coran <3

James Nazon

3y↑1

I love Sara, she is so passionate about her work. She makes astronomy sexy

haudace

9y↑2

she is my hero!

GuyWithAnAmazingHat

9y↑20

GuyWithAnAmazingHat

9y↑2

***** Haha I'm flattered, I mostly subscribe to educational channels, I guess we both have an interest in learning.

Yuri Plantagenet

9y↑2

GuyWithAnAmazingHat Hey man. I've seen you around the world wide web and I have concluded you're a very funky intelligent person. I like it. Keep on surfing AmazingHatBro, don't let the byte waves throw you off course.

mastertheillusion

The search for what could end up being a second home world

Steven Turner

This is a brilliant example of the potential of science. 200 years ago theorists begin to understand optics mathematically. Then come advancements in engineering and materials science that allow us to build better telescopes. Then rocketry is developed and allows the telescopes to be put into space. Chemistry and biophysics are advanced and we learn that we can detect the presence of life from dozens or hundreds of light years away. Computer technology advances and allows data analysis that was impossible 30 years ago. The factors combine and we start finding planets around almost every star. Soon we will find earth like planets. If there is life there, we will know it. I hypothesize that just as we found exoplanets everywhere once we developed the ability to detect them, we will also find life on almost all earth like planets. After all, life bloomed here almost as soon as it was chemically possible. Intelligent life could be much more rare. There have been only a few species on earth that would be called intelligent by our standards. It is also likely that intelligence is such a powerful advantage that only one species per planet could develop with human level or higher intelligence. In the far future (not really so far, maybe 1000-2000 years?) we might be the interstellar traveling aliens we have been looking for. Is it possible that one day the children living on a dozen earths will read about a time when people thought looking for exoplanets or building telescopes was a waste of money and time?

Rafael Rabinovich

Exobiology is one thing. SETI is something else altogether.
Certainly, life is a prerequisite for intelligence, but the opposite isn't.
Common sense dictates that finding extraterrestrial life must be a lot more likely that finding extraterrestrial intelligence.
Unless they are trying to contact us already.

Willy Durf

There is a lot more out there than anyone can imagine..

foggyblues13

9y↑2

Very cool. But I don't think the star-shade would survive the space debris flying around. It would rip it to shreds.

Cold Ham on Rye

foggyblues13 Bill Nye Debunked that on a Star Talk about the Solar Sail. Micro meteorites are vastly over exaggerated.

DON

Haha yeah, ksp is great!

Matt Conbeer

Iirc, this telescope was going to orbit in one of the Earth/Sun Lagrange points, out near where the future James Webb Space Telescope will be. Micrometeorites fall into the gravity well like everything else. If you're not actively trying to balance something there its pretty hard to get it stuck. Trust me, I play Kerbal Space Program!

RealTwistedTwin

sol ok but I still think that the astronomers thought about that. Anyways now I'm curious how they are gonna prevent the destruction from happening.

sol

RealTwistedTwin the concern is not about debri.
micrometeorites are not a earth orbit phenomenon, they are potentially dangerouse all over the solar system, and potentially even beyond.

8 More Replies...

Kansas City Chief

9y↑2

Ironic. Humans wanna search for life on other planets but don't even value the life we have on this planet.

Dani was invented

The infinite random coincidences which happened to Earth that allowed intelligent life to exist and continue existing at this capacity simply cannot be repeated anywhere nor any time. The odds are one to an immeasurable exponential number. Other than the likely possibility of microbial alien life, we must be alone in the grandiose scope of the universe. I love the idea of extraterrestrial intelligent life as much as the next guy, but scientists like her will never have the results they desperately hope for. But in the process at least we are expanding knowledge of our surroundings. Learn to be happy and appreciate this life you have; it really is a miracle.

sekytwo1944

8y↑5

SHES AMAZING

D S

Aliens do exist. They do visit our planet. All I hope for is that the cover-ups are uncovered and officially acknowledged by the governments. Would be cool to have them walking around with us. Would be cool to call some of em as my friends, go for a drink with em perhaps? Jokes apart.. all I look forward to is acknowledgement of what is already out there.

TheJess Ylleg

9y↑1

I love her!

wpgjetsfan Forever

I loved her first

Salty Diarrhea

Eyes on Exoplanets, I can barely find my way around while traveling... good grief.

A.

Anyone knows where the picture at 0:33 was taken ?

Rafaella Fuentes

9y↑1

she's awesome!!! omg i wanna be her

James Serhan

James Webb launching in 2018, ...D'oh. Hopefully that will happen before the end of 2021.

HigherPlanes

9y↑2

Alien life may already be present here on Earth but we haven't detected it because we have a myopic and outdated definition of "life"

HigherPlanes

KING123 so you say.

KING123

9y↑1

Alien- supposedly from another world: extraterrestrial- Oxford English Dictionary
So, no.

Abhishek Nigam

Our Generation :-)

i .

With exponential progress we might get to Mars much sooner than 2030.

Noodle Dream

this is 5 yrs old and i thought we were "close" so where the aliens at?

Myrslokstok

It moves fast now!

Sammy Video Plex

❤

CinmarRS

anyone know, If there is a possibility of other life having different type of lungs, to breathe different things to survive?

Cold Ham on Rye

CinmarRS They do consider that. As CinmarRS said, many scientists think that Silicon life could be possible. The only reason we are looking for oxygen and water is, because to our current knowledge, the only kind of life we know about is made from carbon, oxygen, and water.

Bruno Cesar VS

funny_monke6 Very interesting, I didn't knew that, well it makes my creativity explode trying to imagine how life could be formed in other planets, maybe we can even find them and dont notice them, as they are completly different from what we understand as living beings.

funny_monke6

9y↑4

CinmarRS Bruno Cesar VS Actually, there are other substances than carbon, oxygen, and water that can form life. Silicon can bond with itself and other elements like carbon. Instead of oxygen, sulfur works well with silicon. Methane and ethane can be used as solvents. As far as the elements not being common, even places near us like Venus could host some of these alternate forms, which just shows how hostile of an environment life could be in.

Even with just carbon-based life, there are so many possibilities of what could arise that it's almost impossible to create a single definition of life. What we find elsewhere may not be anything like life here. As an example, all our life runs on dna. Other creatures might not have dna, but maybe they don't need it because, say, they don't reproduce, they just life forever. The probability that some other alien life has "breathing" in any form could be low.

Bruno Cesar VS

CinmarRS No prob, knowledge is to be shared :)

CinmarRS

9y↑1

Bruno Cesar VS that makes sense, thanks for answering.

1 More Replies...

BinaryFour

9y↑2

not to mention all these possibilities are carbon-life based ...
what about non-carbon-life habitable planets ?

titch glover

9y↑1

Cool I think she's an alien but I love her anyway.

DAVIDBLADE94

6y↑1

Sara <3

Luka Gorgadze

I dont like that she is saying "there are billions galaxies and billions of stars" when she is talking about existence of life, but she is not talking about whats chance of creating life from dead mattery.
maybe someone can answer on this? but only if someone has deep knowledge about it and not just faith that there is quite good chance from dead mattery life to be created randomly.
I think its or impossible, or its just such small chance so that this chance multiplied on billions still gives us much smaller number then 1

Curated Playlists℠

#SaraSeager_

Alan Agazarian

3y↑1

Oh Sara! How I love thee Let me count the ways

Areck

Etherlife we know, we know dimensionnal ET exist

Bernat Ferrer

4y↑1

Nice talk, but check the mistakes before publishing a book please.

TheJess Ylleg

9y↑2

There is nothing more arousing that a smart woman. She is one hot looking woman!

Is Taxation Theft?

9y↑2

Is Keplar 16 b K-PAX?

MeTwoFirst

Don't worry about going to find others since they will come here looking for new protein in there diet.

mpking1374

I think looking for life elsewhere in the universe is about the most useless and wasteful thing to do.

TurtleDeity

7y↑1

3:52 Bill Gates???

Huzefa Saifee

I somehow don't like the idea of sending a kite to block away star light. Couldn't there simply be better technology?

Matt Conbeer

If it gets off the ground, its going to be really really far away (about 1 million km). It won't block any starlight from you, it will be too small. It will only block the starlight from the (relatively) nearby telescope.

Shadowstray

Nice talk, but sounds like a re-hash of what I already heard on this very channel. Still, thumbs up.

TheGerogero

Space is the shiet, yo.

PJ A

Trust me you unchangeably can't stop reading this post until the 3rd full stop. I cancel all your thoughts+beliefs+imaginations+minds out of life. I birth infinite permutations of your thoughts+beliefs+imaginations+minds+creativities irreversibly unchangeably towards utopia into life.

Ermiland

why can't scientist do the simplest thing to find out the answer. like putting out a lot of nodes/bases into space(like the internet but telescopes) and each nodes are driven by solar power. by that the scientist will have a node out of our solar system and will be able to take a closer and clearer picture of the galaxy. they are lot of ways of sending files from and node to another.

Cold Ham on Rye

Ermiland Actually, the Planetary society is already working on that. Just a few weeks ago they launched their first solar sail. Paraphrasing of Bill Nye (the president of the society), it trades money for time. The thing may take forever to get to mars, but it costs next to nothing to make and is literally pushed by the sun.

Paul Coddington

9y↑3

DiamondToes And no-one knows how to make a machine that can keep working that long unattended without material decay and malfunction.

GiggleBlizzard

Ermiland It also requires money.

MultiGoban

DiamondToes I was overestimating...

Dimentoes

MultiGoban actually it would only take about 17,000 years max.

1 More Replies...

Cee Pee

Why can't other life forms live on hotter or colder planets unlike humans and animals? The planet just right for humans and other animals on EARTH may not be just right for other life forms we may not know about.

Doug Raddi

5y↑1

Sara Seager and Amy Mainzer are 2 of the most intelligent women in the world, plus not to be rude but they are hot

Smoke Jones

9y↑1

Space contains an infinite amount of stars and galaxies. Saying 100 billion, is an underestimation.

רשת/24 הנשמה . FN. רוזנפלד שי שדרן 24

הי 👋

Tyler Johnson

i already failed november

Tyler Johnson

im finna bust

c#M

Just saying good luck finding a new EARTH it will take at least 2bilion years. Maybe it just depense if the technology got beter. I don't about science so ya just saying that it will take alot of time. At least humans is creating history of science...

c#M

Xeno Morph K...

Xeno Morph

9y↑1

Chrysdon Mape I don't think finding a Earth #2 will / is be the problem, they are out there and found allready, just getting humans there to explore inhabit is the challenge.

Shaquille Davis

so what if there's a planet with life 5 million light years away? What are we gonna do about it? Why not just give me the money thats gonna be spent on a giant telescope instead of trying to prove something thats actually quite pointless, just interesting.

Cold Ham on Rye

9y↑1

Shaquille Davis Hey, when the magnetic force was first discovered, all they could do with it was make a little wire wiggle. Faraday would just show it off because he thought it was interesting. Now it powers literally everything and is how electric motors work. Just because it seems pointless doesn't mean it is. That mentality is how the middle east went from being one of the most scientifically advanced places in the world to what it is now.

Micah Bennett

4y↑1

Damn shes kinda bad tho

Tyler Johnson

facts micah

Username

9y↑1

nice talk, but rly nothing new

Danny Lam

9y↑1

The larger lady at 4:51 doesn't understand the joke. I don't blame her, she's probably thinking if Kepler 16b has food or not.

Technocrawl N4

9y↑1

Instead of wasting so much money to make a space telescope they could save every human in Africa....

Danny Lam

Technocrawl N4 Why should we take care of them? It would benefit everyone greatly if we didn't help them.

alejandrinos

9y↑1

Technocrawl N4 "Managing" a planet is outside of our technological capabilities. That's why we are looking for other planets.

Technocrawl N4

alejandrinos we can't even manage our planet and still we want other planets

alejandrinos

9y↑3

Technocrawl N4 If you look at the bigger picture, saving every human in Africa is a waste of money, since you could only save them for a limited amount of time, compared to the permanent knowledge that we get from using the money to find exoplanets.

Tyler

This research is cool, but how could we ever put it to use? The closest exoplanet in the habitable zone is about 11 light years away. The fastest thing we as humans have ever made is only able to go 0.0000013% the speed of light which is about 90000 mph. Which means it would take about 718483311 years to get to the closest exoplanet. I think we could be using funds to develop more practical things for right now, like alternative, greener and renewable energy sources or medical research. If the oppurtunity presents itself, I say we pump money into it. But we need to focus on being able to get near light speed to make any of this applicable.

Tyler

DynamicUnreal how could humans inhabit anything if we just send out drones? It would just be drones that we built, not actually us.
I am not thinking in selfish terms, I am being realistic, if there is no point in doing something, why do it?

The point in investing in education is to improve schools so that all children are educated, so they can create new ideas (that are actually practical and not science-fiction esque) and so they can be positive members of society that work and are not degenerates.

Edited for grammar.

DynamicUnreal

9y↑2

GingerJesus28 What makes you think we need to travel at the speed of light? We can send literally millions of self replicating drones out into the Universe 100 years from now, and they could travel at 10% light speed. Once they get to a suitable planet they can scavenge materials to rebuild themselves, and when they are ready artificially grow humans. In 1.5 million years humans would colonize the entire galaxy by this continuous expansion of self replicating drones. You are thinking in selfish terms "I am never going to get to see this so why should we try"? What's the point in investing in education if we don't invest in research that can yield us new things to teach?

Cold Ham on Rye

9y↑1

GingerJesus28 I think you missed the point. We probably won't ever travel those distances by traveling at light speed. it's most likely going to be a form of science we haven't discovered yet. Most things are impossible before we try to do them. Just because you can't fathom how we will do it, doesn't mean we can't. I'm sure most people thought flight was impossible until 112years ago.

Tyler

vinaloi41 Even if we advanced as far as possible in science and were able to travel the speed of light or very close to it, it would still take too long to get to these planets. That's my point, no matter how quickly or how far we advance, we know that nothing can go faster than the speed of light. So maybe we do advance really fast, but it is impossible to go past it. The same scientists researching this are the same ones saying that it is impossible to go the speed of light.

Side note, if we were to get up to the actual speed of light, it would become impossible to stop, because the object would have infinite inertia.

Cold Ham on Rye

9y↑1

GingerJesus28 That's kind of the point to science... we have to find a way to get there. It would be stupid to waste our time now, not finding these planets. I'm just going to leave you this nugget here, the Wright brothers first flight was in 1903. The moon landing was in 1969. Within 66 years humans went from never even leaving the ground to having the first earth born creature to ever leave the Earth's atmosphere and set foot on another celestial body. In less than a generation, sciences of unbelievable complication were discovered and perfected. Things that took extreme precision and very complicated theoreticle thermodynamics and aerodynamics. We probably won't get to those planets with any current technology, but all it takes is a spark and we could be there. It's not silly to fund these programs because who knows what we will accidentally discover.

6 More Replies...

612Tiberius

Why do you consider social issues "stupid"? Are you not a part of society, to be affected by such "stupid" issues along with everyone else?

Very short-sighted.