Got No Time
david muldoon Lyrics


We have lyrics for 'Got No Time' by these artists:


Drowning Dog The morning is nice Nicer with you The morning is nice The …
G-Tops Got no time to be wastin Got more time for playin'…
Harry James & His Orchestra Why does the gay little dicky bird sing? What put the…
Harry James and His Orchestra Long time no see, Baby, what's the reason I get the…
It Lives It Breathes Rock this I'd say it's finally time you free your mind No…
J-13 The Go Getta Don't lay your roses Down on my grave Before you notice We f…
Jack Jenney & His Orchestra Why does the gay little dicky bird sing? What put the…
Juice WRLD D Savage Murda On The Beat So It's Not Nice Go with your…
Tommy Dorsey and His Orchestra Why does the gay little dicky bird sing? What put the…





The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos
Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Song not found
Most interesting comment from YouTube:

Zhou Wu

Big_Iron58

That's a good answer. But I have another answer that people won't like:

Popular culture and the way it's easier and easier for anybody to publish anything.

I would argue you've got a quality Vs quantity problem.

But this view is very undemocratic and very elitist.

It basically goes that the harder it is to do something, the more effort the people who do it have to try to get it done, and the higher the quality.

The easier it is to do stuff, the more the quality sinks down to the lowest common denominator.

I think that it's a very fine balance between an aristocracy, where a group thinks that they are innately better than everyone else and start to pretty much treat everyone else however they like, and that usually means badly, which you get in oligarchic or dictatorship type countries like Russia or China or North Korea. And on the other side of the coin, you've got absolute democracies, which I don't think actually exist, where everyone is equal, and there is no advantage in education or trying to get promoted or anything, which, in my opinion, is another form of hell.

But that's just my own personal opinion. But it's probably not going to be a very popular opinion, because people tend to look through the lenses of either:

'Everything Communist is evil'
Or 'Everything capitalist is evil'
Or 'Everything that has no real ideological moral backbone is evil', so basically, my position pretty much puts me into everybody's bad books, but there you go!



All comments from YouTube:

Current Comentor

Back when Politicians answered Questions and Journalists asked questions worth answering.

phvn100

Big_Iron58 and politicians weren‘t impolite buffoons

Zhou Wu

What happened?

Zhou Wu

Big_Iron58

That's a good answer. But I have another answer that people won't like:

Popular culture and the way it's easier and easier for anybody to publish anything.

I would argue you've got a quality Vs quantity problem.

But this view is very undemocratic and very elitist.

It basically goes that the harder it is to do something, the more effort the people who do it have to try to get it done, and the higher the quality.

The easier it is to do stuff, the more the quality sinks down to the lowest common denominator.

I think that it's a very fine balance between an aristocracy, where a group thinks that they are innately better than everyone else and start to pretty much treat everyone else however they like, and that usually means badly, which you get in oligarchic or dictatorship type countries like Russia or China or North Korea. And on the other side of the coin, you've got absolute democracies, which I don't think actually exist, where everyone is equal, and there is no advantage in education or trying to get promoted or anything, which, in my opinion, is another form of hell.

But that's just my own personal opinion. But it's probably not going to be a very popular opinion, because people tend to look through the lenses of either:

'Everything Communist is evil'
Or 'Everything capitalist is evil'
Or 'Everything that has no real ideological moral backbone is evil', so basically, my position pretty much puts me into everybody's bad books, but there you go!

Zhou Wu

Big_Iron58

I guess we can create a subculture of people who make an effort to understand stuff before writing or speaking within the larger context of the pop culture movement that isn't elitist to the point of exclusivity, but nor is it so populist, everybody's opinions carries exactly the same weight. I mean, this is just my posit for an initiative we could start right now, if you care to join me. But that's literally all I've got:

An idea for a group. There is nothing else. No name. No theme. No membership criteria. No nothing. Just a very vague idea.

Laurossas 온라인アイス

Good old days mate.

65 More Replies...

Ian Stobie

By the standard of today's interviews with modern politicians, he comes across surprisingly well. He answers most of her questions, and isn't afraid to commit to clear policy positions. So the audience gets some real information from the interview.

Today this would be very rare, perhaps because all politicians now are heavily media trained. They tend to dodge the questions they are actually asked and instead play safe, just regurgitating their prepared talking points and scripted sound bites.

So Biden in 1982 was way ahead of today's politicians, and worth listening to. But sadly the Biden of 1982 is also way ahead of the Biden we have now, 38 years later.

Edmund Bell-King

Its easy to be committed to a particular policy when you are not in government.

Ian Stobie

@Edmund Bell-King Yes, that's true. We are seeing it now with opposition politicians everywhere talking about how their superior policies would have beaten back the pandemic! But they didn't have to make the real decisions.

Back in 1982 Senator Biden had some power being on the Senate Judiciary Committee, and possibly the Foreign Relations Committee, but I don't know how how much power that actually gives you in the US system.

Ian Stobie

Jack Archer Yes. And perhaps a reflection of that, the journalist doing the interview was allowing him to answer. She didn't take an obvious side like they do today, or hector him.

More Comments

More Versions