EofE are Tom Harris (vocals), Dan Bremner (guitar / backing vocals), Luke B… Read Full Bio ↴EofE are Tom Harris (vocals), Dan Bremner (guitar / backing vocals), Luke Bradley (bass/ backing vocals) and Nicky Waters (drums). Born out of the Black Country in 2013, the band has been described as ‘perfect crossover rock’. Each track is delivered with soaring vocals and stunning riffs, backed up by thumping Bass lines and Drum beats. They have been confirmed to join McBusted on their massive nationwide arena tour across April, May and June 2014.
Lifebooat
eofe Lyrics
We have lyrics for these tracks by eofe:
Bridges You can say your goodbyes, That's been taking you so long An…
Get Caught I wanna Taste your tongue I wanna Be the only one Too busy t…
Lust I cant help myself I need to keep away from you I'm…
The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos
More Genres
No Artists Found
More Artists
Load All
No Albums Found
More Albums
Load All
No Tracks Found
Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Search results not found
Song not found
Charles B
LIfeboat Ethics Variation
Survivors of an ocean liner sinking are on a lifeboat in the middle of the ocean. Because of an error at launch, the lifeboat’s food stores were not filled and so there is very limited food and water on the boat. It There are 5 survivors:
The captain who is an expert seaman and navigator
A ship’s doctor who is trained in all manner of maritime survival medicine and who can use the available medical supplies to keep them alive
The ship’s chief engineer who can repair leaks and maintain the lifeboat and who says that he can given enough time get the lifeboat’s damaged radio beacon working
The ship’s chaplain who promises to beseech god for their rescue
You
Days pass and starvation and dehydration have set in. In order to maximize the use of the remaining supplies, one passenger must be thrown overboard. Everyone agrees to this choice. You have been given the responsibility to make this choice and you cannot select yourself. Who would you select?
Enigmafiresup
Again, another unrealistic psychological problem.
Too many variables here. Finding food shouldn't be that rare either, where it would come down to cannibalism. They wouldn't have much, but they wouldn't have no catches in 2 weeks.
Kid was also sick, so he would have died regardless before help arrived. Thats the entire reason the captain killed HIM, because he was dying anyway, so they needed to harvest what they could before they all ended up dying. Sacrificing yourself you say? Wouldn't work. Like we said, the kid is sick and dying. They would both die regardless, and not only that but the kid could risk making the whole ship ill.
These are life and death survival scenarios. Morality plays no part in it. Id you're on the verge of death, after starving for 8 days, the last thing you care about is the morality of killing someone for survival. In these situations, as a leader you have to take initiative and make the controversial decision that keeps the civilization moving forward. This captain did just that, dirtying his hands to kill the sick child so the rest could live on. If there truly was no other way, then it was the right decision, even if they destroy morals.
But again, these situations are still unrealistic and stupid. You need more context instead of taking it at face value.
Harvard Online
Learn more in our free online course, “Justice”: https://harvardx.link/cjm2j
Pegglez
It's the same as stealing. You sacrifice someone else's financial stability to better the financial stability of your entire family. Like killing one competitor to allow many others to succeed. Destroying one business to allow local businesses to grow. Just because net gain is more than the loss doesn't make it moral.
Rahul Roy
You are missing the point, if no one is killed then probably all of them will die from hunger. You cannot compare with thieves or stealing, because the financial stability of a rich person and the poor person is not in the precarious state.
Max Me
Bigger fish always eat the small fish so if small fish has a chance to take a bite from the bigger fish, they should do it.
Mike B
The captain was responsible for his crew. The captain failed to do his job and further more sacrificed one of his members for self preservation. 'Whosoever dies first shall be eaten.' Should've been the rule. needles to say, non of us can come close to comprehending the amount of odds stacked against them.
Hala Hasan
I fully agree but what if it took to long to wait for one person to naturally die and two accidentally end up dying at the same time? That could extend the issue further.
Antonio Robateau
Mike B The perception of odds is an illusion of the mind based on one’s limited personal experience. Imagine being rescued as he was stabbing the cabin boy. That could have also been a possibility although unexpected. The only moral actions apart from inaction is some form of self-sacrifice (not necessarily death).
Matt
I guess it really depends. The idea of killing someone and eating them or them dying previously then eating them. The latter is obviously the easiest choice. I do think the murder of the cabin boy was slightly wrong however they did it to survive. A sacrifice had to be made even if it was a disgusting, arrogant and self serving one.
Jhasmine S
Yeah but when you look at the captains journal he had no remorse when talking about eating the boy. They’re jus murderers he knew not everyone would agree to doing a lottery in fear that they would be the ones who are chosen to be sacrificed so he got them all to gang up on the most vulnerable one without giving him a say in what the options could be. What they did was immoral and there’s no justification for it.
Jake Morrison
Michael sandel is awesome, great books