if
??P Lyrics
Jump to: Overall Meaning ↴ Line by Line Meaning ↴
Who are called by my Name
Will humble themselves and pray
Seek My Face, turn from their wicked ways
I'll hear them, forgive them, and heal their land
If My People
Who are called by my Name
Will humble themselves and pray
I'll hear them, forgive them, and heal their land
You are the Author of Creation
Every knee in Heaven on Earth and under bows before You
You are the Author of Creation
Every tongue confesses and takes an oath that Jesus is Lord
You are the Author of Creation
Every knee in Heaven on Earth and under bows before You
You are the Author of Creation
Every tongue confesses and takes an oath that Jesus is Lord
If My People
Who are called by my Name
Will humble themselves and pray
Seek My Face, turn from their wicked ways
I'll hear them, forgive them, and heal their land
In this song, ??P is referencing a well-known passage in the Bible, specifically 2 Chronicles 7:14 which says: "If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land." The song emphasizes the importance of repentance and asking for forgiveness in order to receive healing and restoration.
The first part of the song is a direct quote from the Bible, and the lyrics continue with a declaration of God's power and authority over all things. Every knee in heaven and on earth bows before Him, and every tongue confesses that Jesus is Lord.
Overall, the message of the song is one of hope and faith, encouraging listeners to turn to God in times of trouble and trust in His ability to bring healing and restoration.
Line by Line Meaning
If My People
In the event that the people who believe in me,
Who are called by my Name
Those who identify themselves as my followers,
Will humble themselves and pray
Will show me respect and pray to me,
Seek My Face, turn from their wicked ways
Find me and turn away from their sinful actions,
I'll hear them, forgive them, and heal their land
I will listen to them, pardon them, and restore their land to its former glory
You are the Author of Creation
You are the creator of the universe,
Every knee in Heaven on Earth and under bows before You
Everyone in heaven, on earth, and under the earth, submits to you,
Every tongue confesses and takes an oath that Jesus is Lord
Everyone declares and takes an oath that Jesus is their Lord,
Lyrics © DistroKid
Written by: Cynthia Shange
Lyrics Licensed & Provided by LyricFind
@h3nry_t122
I thought if p and q as a promise
I promise that:
if p happens then q will happen too
if p happens -> q happens : True (promise is upheld)
if p happens -> NOT(q happens) : False (promise is broken)
if NOT(p happens) -> q happens : True (promise is upheld)
if NOT(p happens) -> NOT(q happens) : True (promise is upheld)
example:
I promise that:
if you have a dog then it is blue
have dog -> color is blue : True
have dog -> color is not blue : False
have cat -> color is blue : True (original promise about dogs being blue is still True)
have cat -> color is red : True (cats being red doesn't affect my promise)
just because you have a cat doesn't mean my promise is broken. cause my promise is about DOGS being blue. cats got nothing to do with it.
@wintutorials2282
@@Juan-yj2nn yes it does its kinda hard to explain but p implies q means:
First: if p is true, q must be true (p=true IMPLIES that q=true)
Second: if p isn't true, p IMPLIES q is also true, no matter what q is. (Think about it: if p isnt true, it's still true that a case where p is true, q is also true)
Now what is true in any case here, if p-->q is true? If we look at both rules we find that the statement is always true when q is true or when p is false
This gives ~p v q
Now is this a coincidence or re they logically the same in any way? Well.. using human language to describe logic is difficult because human language is vague. The words we use to describe logic (if p then q / p implies q / p AND q etc) are ways to emulate the meaning of logic to human language. If the logic is the same, it's the same, in real life, anywhere. It means the same, it is the same in any way same or form. The thing that's different is our emulation of the logic.
The word AND, is the closest we'll get to the real "logical meaning".
The best way to emulate in human language/think about p --> q in my opinion is like this:
--> is a logical operator that evaluates the truth value of a *promise of a theory leading to a conclusion* , where p is the hypothesis and q is the conclusion. Might sound difficult but if to bring it a little closer to human language: think of it like a scientist that promises you that if p is true, then q is true. Whether his promise is held or not determines the truth value . So if p=true leads to q being true, he doesn't break the the promise. If p=true leads to q being false, he breaks his promise: his theory didnt lead to the right conclusion. If p=false (his theory doesnt work) his entire promise isn't broken. It's the PROMISE (and the promise and all the logic, in whatever way you interpret that, what represents the logic of -->).
For the promise to hold, the hypothesis being true what makes the conclusion being true a necessity
For the promise to hold, the conclusion being false is what makes the hypothesis being false a necessity
This is the relation of -->
In logic terms:
For p--> q to be true:
p being true, REQUIRES q to be true
(it won't hold when q is false)
q being false REQUIRES p to be false
(it wont hold if p is true)
Hmmm.. so the logic is based on 2 requirements for two situations and all other situations are true it seems.
(Just like how the logic of AND is based on 1 requirement: p and q need to be true at the same time)
The 2 requirements, things that need to be true at least are: p being false or q being true
In other words: ~p v q
@yuriroiter2167
Thank you, I finally got it looking this and other your videos!
I had to develop a bit more resonating with myself explanation though.
Hope it will help somebody more as well. :)
Say, my (actually yours from another video :)) implication is:
If it is a dog, then it is a mammal.
Then, my implication is considering a dog (being a mammal) only, not a cat or a table.
I agree (It is true) that when it is not a dog (p = false), then it can be anything -- mammal or not mammal (q is true or false).
Thus, my implication is TRUE in both cases when it is not a dog -- then everything is all right with my implication, and I AGREE that (not a dog) can be anything.
But when it is a dog, then my implication is ONLY TRUE when it is a mammal -- because it is what I specifically imply!
Otherwise, my implication is FALSE. I.e. when it is a dog, and it is not a mammal -- then and only then my implication FAILS.
Only then my implication is WRONG.
CONCLUSION: Implication is FALSE ONLY when it is WRONG!
Let's create a new boolean result: WRONG! :))
@matalebtube4900
If I study Hard -- then I will pass == Satisfied with result :)
If I study Hard -- then I don't pass == not satisfied with result :(
If I don't study hard -- then I pass == F**k Yeah I am satisfied :D
I I don't study hard -- then I don't pass == F**k it, I didn't study so I am satisfied with results :)
I hope this made better sense, these YouTube videos makes it more complicated sometimes :D
@sulemanahmed6770
you are a fucking legend. You helped me so much i was strugling to remember the if then table now i will not forget it. Thanks my g
@naff9n435
i knew something like this was similiar to domain and range fungtion. except the x variable where change to Truth varioable.
@lohitharudra7502
Helpful🔥
@leungwallace8552
Seems like not studying makes us satisfied anyway
@susanlaime1318
Thanks, now I remember.
@jbonceu2457
My thought process for this have always been:
-If I guessed RIGHT then answered RIGHT, it make sense(it is RIGHT)
-If I guessed RIGHT then answered WRONG, it doesn't make sense (it is WRONG)
-If I guessed WRONG then answered RIGHT, it still make sense (It is RIGHT)
-If I guessed WRONG then answered WRONG, it still make sense (It is RIGHT)
Basically if you guessed Right in the first place, there's no reason for you to answer wrong, otherwise it will make the whole statement wrong(doesn't make sense). But if you guessed wrong in the first place, you cannot assume your answer will be right or wrong. So either way, any kind of conclusion will make the statement right (make sense)
@fallenangelonline3930
omg this is so helpful, i learn faster this wayyy
@ahmed_mahrouky
wow , you are brilliant, thanks
@ycombinator765
WOW, You are a genius. Thanks for this so much!