TRACKS

No Related Genres

No Artists Found

More Artists Load All

No Albums Found

More Albums Load All

No Tracks Found

Genre not found

Artist not found

Album not found

Search results not found

Song not found

high
Huckster Lyrics

No lyrics text found for this track.

The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos

Most interesting comments from YouTube:

@Healitnow

Here is what I post all over the science channels.

The Big Bang Fantasy

Even with a grade 12 in 1967 I can see the big bang is pure fantasy.

The only explanation for our being here is an eternal being. Other than that no explanation of our existence can ever be, because at some point all other explanations have to have a beginning and there isn't one, yet we are here.

I have a much easier time believing in an eternal God, than to believe the ridiculous explanation that we exploded into existence from either nothing, or a pinhead of matter.

1. I challenge all atheistic scientists to take any combination of any elements you want "the size of a pinhead or smaller" and create an explosion that will rock one city block, let alone create an ever-expanding universe.

This is pure fantasy.

If not, let me know when you have assembled the products for your demonstration.

By the way, this will never happen because there is no such combination of products to assemble, just atheistic fantasies.

2. Next calculate the entire mass of the universes amounts of hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and all other elements. Then mathematically remove the spaces between the protons, electrons, neutrons, and other particles, reducing the solid components to a single, space free, lump of matter. Now take the calculated solid materials of all the universe, and condense all of them into a pinhead size.

Mathematicians will probably run out of space in the pinhead before condensing the volume of the earth, let alone the universe.

3. How would a pinhead of matter that would have infinity more gravity than a black hole, ever get a pimple on it, let alone explode.

This will be impossible, as highly condensed black holes show us. Each individually are much larger than a pin head, while having a lot less matter, yet neither light nor explosions can escape from them.

They observationally clearly show us that the explosion called the "Big Bang" is impossible.

In short, it would appear that scientists are teaching deliberate lies to children.

When they die and stand before God on the judgment day, having to account for all the souls they led to hell with deliberately false teachings, it will really suck to be them.

Hell is a lake of fire, and the punishment for sin is life in prison.

Just so you know, life on the other side is eternal for all of us, whether we were good or bad. Just the residence address is different.

@robertvann7349

Not all Christian teachers teach hell is conscious death. This teaching is Illogical impossible contradiction
A is B
A spiritual death is conscious
B spiritual life is conscious
A is B a false Christianity doctrine
As above so below
A carnal death is unconscious
B carnal life is conscious
Fire will UNCREATE this present world of sin. God will simply uncreate the wicked after the 1000 yr reign and a new heaven and earth. Day and Night will be uncreated only spiritual light will exist and God the Father will be All and in All 🎉🎉🎉

All comments from YouTube:

@rubiks6

2w↑27

We need to discuss this now because this is still in textbooks.

@alexhudson-

2w↑5

Public schools in general are the problem and the system absolutely needs revision. We are taxed on our property that we own for this system that we do not have any control over, which is preposterous. The government should not be in charge of our childrens education especially when we are paying for it.

@CosmicExplosion

1w↑1

I agree and we need to get it out of textbooks. Until then, keep up to date with Creation Evolution Headlines and Institute for Creation Research, of course. Never forget this is ultimately a spiritual war (2 Corinthians 4:4).

@reg7916

@CosmicExplosion thank you, I needed to be reminded of this verse🌻

@tobias4411

Most books nowadays are updated with real photos, much more detailed showing the extreme similarities between embryos. Yes folks, deal with the truth even if it may feel uncomfortable. It's 2024 not 1624. More and more christians also acceps evolution and big bang.

@thunderous-one

2w↑24

When your premise is a lie, all you can do is lie to defend it.

@StudentDad-mc3pu

2w↑2

Such as Gensis is an accurate description of creation - a clear lie.

@sabhishek9289

2w↑3

@@StudentDad-mc3pu The testable predictions in Genesis have been proven to be true.

@StudentDad-mc3pu

2w↑1

@@sabhishek9289 Really? Can you give an example?

@sabhishek9289

@@StudentDad-mc3pu Testable predictions that were proven to be true included from the top of my head are as following: there was one single super continent in the past (confirmed Geography), the mother of humans living just around 6000 to 7000 years ago (confirmed by observable pedigree substitution rates), the ages of early biblical patriarchs being nearly 1000 years (confirmed by Gerontology and Data Science), Few mutations in the mitochondria (confirmed by Genetics), Homologous genes (confirmed by Genetics although the prediction of Homologous genes have been hijacked as proof for evolution through the Texas sharpshooter fallacy) etc.

@sabhishek9289

2w↑4

@@StudentDad-mc3pu @StudentDad-mc3pu Testable predictions that were proven to be true included from the top of my head are as following: there was one single super continent in the past (confirmed Geography), the mother of humans living just around 6000 to 7000 years ago (confirmed by observable pedigree substitution rates), the ages of early biblical patriarchs being nearly 1000 years (confirmed by Gerontology and Data Science), Few mutations in the mitochondria (confirmed by Genetics), etc.

66 More Replies...

@TRFrench

2w↑8

...and these drawings are undistinguishable (and in fact IDENTICAL) with idol crafting. I wonder if we can get them in silver...

@tccsatwincitiescreationsci6416

1w↑5

Dr. Guliuzza is the best!

@guylelanglois6642

2w↑18

Scientists seeing junk DNA is like my wife looking under the hood of our car.

@JesusRodriguez-zy3wj

1w↑1

My wife of 44 years and I both salute your wisdom and courage sir! It is time to get back to being able to laugh at all sides.

@guylelanglois6642

1w↑2

@JesusRodriguez-zy3wj married thirty-nine years this June. She doesn't service the cars and I haven't sewn clothes in all our years and we both like it that way. I was very fortunate to find one of the last great homemakers. I construct and she nurtures. As God intended.

@JesusRodriguez-zy3wj

@@guylelanglois6642 My youngest daughter is still on the market. One of the things I NEVER say to my wife is that my youngest daughter's cooking surpasses everyone. The BEST chicken marsala, croque monsieur, picadillo, filetillo salteado and many other dishes comes from her and everyone agrees though we all studiously avoid saying so at our frequent extended family gatherings. Even my middle daughter who spent years at cooking classes can only outdo her in a few dishes, like Thai peanut dressing. Her brownies are death traps. So, if you have a young man interested in a young earth creationist who might make him ask Christ to delay the rapture just so he can have one more bite; let me know.

@guylelanglois6642

@JesusRodriguez-zy3wj Unfortunately, sir, I raised four daughters, and they are all happily married. "To men" . My grandsons are a bit young but would definitely be looking for a cook that could match their mother's and grandmother. Sounds like your daughter will make some lucky guy very happy.

@akmurf7429

2w↑17

Blind cavefish. The fish is genetically broken and will never gain eyes again. Place it in the wild, in open daylight and it is toast (nowhere to hide)! It's relatives with eyes might survive, but it won't. The only reason it survives in the cave is because it is in the dark and that evens the playing field like giving a 100-pound woman a gun to defend herself against 200-pound men. The regaining of pigmentation is like the arctic fox regaining its pigmentation during the summer months. There are intelligently designed switches in the DNA that can be turned on and off with respect to environmental pressures. But the information is already there, it doesn't evolve every season. Anyone who cannot see the design in nature is like the cavefish. Blind!

@tobias4411

2w↑1

Hi, with respect I suggest you study vestigial structures in living organisms. It means that some parts of an organism's body no longer have any apparent use. They are leftovers from a previous form of the species before the speciation.The species accumulated several adaptations which made the extra part no longer useful/necessary for survival. Then, at some point during evolution it disappeared or stopped functioning. The vestigial eye of the blind cavefish is a good example of vestigial structures.Their eyes don’t allow them to see, due to loss of eye tissue. Cavefish embryos initially develop eyes, but they degenerate and become vestigial structures embedded in the head. We have flightless island birds with vestigial (non-functional wings) Examples: Penguin, kiwi, ostrich, kakapo, steamer duck.
Hindlimbs in snakes and whales are another examples of vestigial structures (vestigial limb).

@user-zu2zo8ji4n

@akmurf7429 Cogent points! Unfortunately , some people will choose to not to believe.

@ianmonk6211

@@tobias4411 I suggest you restudy it. There's no vestigial organs etc. Everything has a purpose. All vestigial arguments out forward by evilutionists have been proven false

@tobias4411

1w↑1

@@ianmonk6211Can you show me one example of an vestigial structure proven false? Provide a link to back it up thank you.

@ianmonk6211

@@tobias4411 tail bone. On us and whales. With whales it's for reproduction. Appendix. While we can live without it it has a purpose. I think the thyroid too. Just Google lies in the textbooks by Kent hovind I think it's in that lecture. With all the proof you need

3 More Replies...

@reg7916

1w↑3

Absolutely, they hear and listen to what they want, too!!!! Thank you for continuing to push back on what does not line up with His Word🌻

& yes, they were designed. I agree we need to examine ourselves... so again, thank you for admitting this.

@list1726

2w↑6

Thanks for posting

@freightshayker

1w↑3

What can be said about evolution and the so-called natural selection that is going on today ... in terms of not seeing something like humans developing gills or wings?

@Matt-jc2ml

That's a huge jump that would take millions of years, and there also has to be some type of survival benefit. You wouldn't just give birth to a fish, it's not x men

@tobias4411

Of course, dogs not growing as big as Texas, whales not walking on the streets, humans don't grow wings on their backs, amoebas don't grow arms... So evolution theory must be false! 😂. Oh wait...

@richardg3232

2w↑25

Why are you still dancing around the truth? Haeckel lied deliberately. Yet, you allow terms like exaggeration, over zealous and artistic license to still be used in this video that downplays his outright lies. Yes, you did say fraud but even implying that his fakes might not be deliberate undermines the level of fraud that has persisted for 100+ years in textbooks.

@loulasher

2w↑10

Yes. His lie, which I believed for decades because I was taught it in school (like everyone else), did so much damage. That, and sign language in primates (another set of lies) I just accepted as true.

@tobias4411

Hi. Have already explained this topic in a post above. If follow-up questions, Im willing to answer in a respectful matter from both sides.

@hrvad

It's perhaps that people like him lie, and worse: when they lie, they do so with the blessing of their own conscience, because it's all for a good cause, don't ya know?

It's like the Woke Left today. "Operational success" is more important than truth to them.

@ianmonk6211

1w↑3

He was taken to court and prosecuted by his employer

@captivedesk3168

No he wasnt

@ianmonk6211

@@captivedesk3168 yes he was he was working for the university and the prosecuted him for the falsehoods

@captivedesk3168

@@ianmonk6211 citation?

@jameswelsh3433

You might consider changing “random science question” to “surprise science question”.
You can’t call them random if they always pertain to the day’s topic. This happens a lot!

May God bless you all in for the work that you do!

@icrscience

Unintentional, but true!

@inhisimage

3d↑1

These embryos were presented to me as fact in my grad degree in 2022.

@lovesickforone

2w↑4

I know a few humans who show their tails... but we don't actually possess a tail at any time in our existence

@globalcoupledances

2w↑2

All Great Apes also are missing the tail. All inherited from a common ancestor

@lovesickforone

2w↑1

@@globalcoupledances If you want to believe your ancestors were great apes, that's your choice. It doesn't make it true, but it is your choice anyway.

@tobias4411

2w↑2

Human tailbone is a good example of an vestigial structure, it's a tailbone without a tail connected to it anymore. We knows that the tail disappeared around 25 million years ago, when Great apes diverged from monkeys. This could be a result to preserve energy and calories while evolving better balance. There is actually new research (published Feb 28 in the journal Nature claiming the connection of tail loss and a type of birth defect. It was a unique DNA mutation in the gene TBXT. If this is accurate, it's just another fine example how mutations actually can lead to something beneficial for species. Either way, or a combination of both its without a doubt that we once upon a time had a tail :-)

@tobias4411

2w↑5

@@lovesickforoneIt actually doesn't matter what I, you or he thinks about the fact that we are apes. There are overwhelming evidence for it, Independent to what people think.

@globalcoupledances

@lovesickforone - Hominids are the "kind" great apes. And where are Apes or monkeys mentioned in the Bible? Adam and Eve were just also ancestors of monkeys and other Great Apes. Picture of God is not a White Man, but a far ancestor

11 More Replies...

@user-mk9qy4yd5t

It would be good to show the real images of embryonic development against the fake drawings, for comparison.

@RandyFelts2121

2w↑3

Today it appears to go from complex to simple, but then there's a reason it's called dope.

@poliincredible770

1w↑4

Acceptance of scripture requires acceptance of historical events. Acceptance of darwin's hypothesis requires imagination.

@tobias4411

Acceptance of evolution theory requires acceptance of science. Acceptance of scripture claims like man walking on water (unless he had anti-gravity in his sandals), man living in the belly of a whale., talking snake and donkey.. requires imagination.

@poliincredible770

@@tobias4411 can you name anyone in your family lineage who was not a human, or do you have to imagine that you descended from an ape?

@tobias4411

@@poliincredible770 Sahelanthropus tchadensis

@poliincredible770

@@tobias4411 did you actually trace your ancestry back to this creature or did you imagine that you are related to it?

@tobias4411

@@poliincredible770 I did not trace it. science did. Creationists assert that apes and humans are separated by a wide gap. If creationism was true and there was a large gap between humans and apes, it should be easy to separate hominid fossils into humans and apes. This is not the case.

6 More Replies...

@dadsonworldwide3238

1w↑1

Had the great debate listened, then biology would've began almost day one on code of life DNA by the Swedish discovery rather than a combative 100 years of playing connect the dots which I also remember the textbook perception management dope used in 70s & 80s.

@stuartofblyth

5:25. No, Sir, it's the other way around - "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny".

@forestgiest1380

Well, we have pictures today. And they look the same.

@christhewritingjester3164

2w↑2

They have to leave these blunders and fruads in becuase if they didn't they would have to claim they don't know, which leaves room for other theories to come in. And the only other viable theory leads to God, whom they hate.

@stormythelowcountrykitty7147

1w↑1

I was a believer in Darwinian evolution - I thought that’s how God made the world. The more I learned however the clearer it became that Darwinian evolution does not work. That doesn’t mean young earth creationism is right (although I am tending that way). I suspect most of the fake evolution stuff is not intentional but rather seeing what is expected. It’s hard to be truly neutral!

@robertvann7349

How old would a modern day Doctor claim Adam's age was when he was 1 second old? 20 yrs old would produce a % error in the millions. God created the heaven and earth with the appearance of age. Dating techniques assume the world came into existence without the appearance of age.🎉🎉🎉🎉

@captivedesk3168

1w↑1

Vestigiality is the retention, during the process of evolution, of genetically determined structures or attributes that have lost some or all of the ancestral function in a given species. Assessment of the vestigiality must generally rely on comparison with homologous features in related species.

@hansdemos6510

1w↑2

There are also textbooks that use actual photos of various embryos to make the same points. The old drawings might have been rubbish, the facts are the same. Do these people seriously think that pointing to a mistake by some German dude 150 years ago negates the whole field of biology called Evolutionary developmental biology or "evo-devo"?

@kelleemerson9510

1w↑2

Am I the only one that believes it's both and only both makes sense?

@howardthompson4844

1w↑2

Remember Ernst Hardware store?

@captivatingbitter

...

@JRRodriguez-nu7po

2w↑7

Actually the correct translation is a little lower than God. We will judge angels. They were created to serve us.

@bh5317

All the scholars in several of the translations got it wrong. Thank you for clearing that up.

@JesusRodriguez-zy3wj

I am a young Earth creationist, so please interpret this as CONSTRUCTIVE criticism, pun intended. Just as an error (in this case knowing fraud) once lodged into a fiel becomes at times nigh immutable; this also happens with creationist science and Bible translations. In creationist science, explanations of the second law of thermodynamics are ROUTINELY butchered. While I'm no physicist, I did work on the equations at a graduate level ~45 years ago for a semester (oddly, as part of one of my 4 STEM bachelors, but that's a long story as I did a bunch of graduate work). Without the active disorganizing force of the second law, biological life is IMPOSSSIBLE. Anytime you hear/read someone say that any of the 4 (0,1,2,3, yup) laws of classical thermodynamics or their information/chaos theory analogues were not operational in the Garden; you can be certain that person does not know the subject well enough to give an opinion.
As to Bible translations, the most destructive mistranslation of a Bible verse is Matthew 7:1 “Do not judge so that you will not be judged." Koine Greek has TWO different words for no. Ou means absolute no, as in "no means no". Mei coincidentally means "maybe don't do it" or "be careful if you do it, try to do as little of it as possible" or similar. It is a cautionary warning no; NOT an absolute no. The context makes it abundantly clear that Christ NEVER said not to judge; simply warned that the same yardstick you use will be used on you. Unfortunately in this feminized "unconditional so called love" modern Churchianity; this is commonly ripped out of context to excuse all manner of sin. That said, I am no Greek or Hebrew scholar either, however, I have noticed quite a few poor translations that are just copied from one translator to the next. My next most egregious is Gen 1:27. Look up the ACTUAL Hebrew words, including the etymology and how used throughout Scripture and you will be surprised.
Look, my first week in med school I stood I informed the chairman of the department, in open class, that not only he, but ALL medical textbooks were wrong about normal vital signs. It wasn't until the year after I graduated that the normal ranges for human vital signs were changed to what I said that day. Yes, I am a loose canon. Yes, I am a sinfully horribly arrogant man. But I am also a little child who can still see that the Emperor has no clothes and say so. Errors abound since even BEFORE the fall. Yes, there was error before the fall.
Who told the woman (who was not yet named Eve, and that's very important), not to eat or even touch the the fruit? Check out the Hebrew of Gen 1:27 for the first of a very long set of clues sprinkled throughout Scripture. There's nothing deeper, more accurate and precise than Scripture. However, many gems lie hidden that you will NEVER find in commentaries .

@akmurf7429

2w↑1

Refer to, Heb 2:7,9 and Psa 8:5. In the book of Hebrews, Paul renders it Angels in the Greek (messengers G32). Although it can be rendered God in the Hebrew in the Psalms, we clearly have less power than the angels but are created in God's image, unlike the Angels. But we are also fallen like some angels. Paul states in 1 Cor 6:3 that we will judge the angels, after the rapture of course, but then we will be like them in our glorified bodies, Mar 12:25. Angels were created like us, to serve God and glorify Him, not man.

@tshkrel

We'll judge "certain" angels. Not all.
And they were not created for that specific reason, though "some" do serve. Some dont want to

@noahlarson1861

@JesusRodriguez-zy3wj Any chance you could expound a little more on the second law you mentioned there and how it pertains to creation?

5 More Replies...

@martinlag1

1w↑2

The theory of ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny was considered by early biologists such as Haeckel and this is now rejected. This is the ONLY detail of the theory of evolution that was modified. Drawings of embryos are always exaggerated, for example relative sizes are adjusted to fit together on the same page. Now these drawings have been replicated by photographs, also scaled for size. Many modern textbooks use photographs now, to avoid this insidious overreach of the criticism outlined in this video. Shall we say the photographic series is also fraudulent? Of course not.
Associated evidence from embryology such as homology are strong evidence for common descent. This is still accepted by biologists because evidence is evidence even if it is rejected by ICR. Pharyngeal arches, or gill arches (no, not gill tissue) are an example. This is understood and accepted by scientists. This video claims that common descent is part of the mistaken theory of Haeckel. This video is misleading.

@laurieshouse

Oh, just maybe, the common factor is a common designer, rather than a common ancestor.

@richrogers2157

Excellent and clear refutation to the foolish continuation of the disproven theory of design in this video , thank you.

@deannesanv8931

Interesting. Could you provide a link to the photographs you’re referring to?

@Healitnow

@robertvann7349

Keep it simple bro. Evolution is based on Illogical impossible contradiction being true which are ABSOLUTELY OBJECTIVELY FALSE. A is B impossible?
A non life caused the effect of
B life
A is B a false scientific hypothesis never evidenced in nature or labs

@robertvann7349

Keep it simple bro. Evolution is based on Illogical impossible contradictions being true which are ABSOLUTELY OBJECTIVELY FALSE. A is B, law of contradiction, logic science 101
A is B
A non life caused the impossible contradiction effect of
B life
A is B simply a ABSOLUTE OBJECTIVE FALSE SCIENTIFIC HYPOTHESIS
A non cell caused the impossible contradiction effect of
B a cell
A is B another evolution false scientific hypothesis never evidenced in nature or labs 🎉🎉🎉🎉

@robertvann7349

@tobias4411

Nonsense.
Big bang is the best way to explain the beginning of universe. It's supported by the observable expansion of space through Hubbles law, and redshift of galaxies, and the discovery of CMB which is accurately measured with orbiting detectors. This together is good evidences for that the Big Bang theory is the best and most accurate explanation of how universe came into existence
The Big Bang follows the laws of physics as we understand them, ok? Every test they throw at it comes back in support of the theory. And don't forget, there was also the Nobel Prize given so, it can't be that bad can it?

@tobias4411

@@robertvann7349Your misconceptions make you draw wrong conclusion. You mix things up. The transition from non-life to life (abiogenesis) on earth has never been observed experimentally. I think we both can agree on that, ok? Evolution isn't abiogenesis. They are two completely different things. One is about changes, the other one is about origin of life. The first one is a theory, the second is a hyphothesis. The evolution theory is extremely well supported by overwhelming evidence.

3 More Replies...

@yibaibashimu6223

2w↑2

He didn't exaggerate or fake anything! He drew then exactly as they were--it's just that, since his era, embryos have evolved into more complex forms--just as evolution predicts they will. Cling to our evolutionary beliefs till death! Cling on, brothers and sisters (am i still allowed to say "brothers" and "sisters"?) CLING ON! CLING ON!

@KenJackson_US

Sarcasm is difficult to convey in prose.

@JesusRodriguez-zy3wj

@@KenJackson_US I think his sarcasm was extremely well conveyed.

@howardthompson4844

@@KenJackson_US you've got to be giving us sarcasm. If not you're an idiot.

@S_raB

1w↑1

Evolution requires millions & millions of years. Also, evolution can be visibly observed in just 170 years. Please, document how both can be true.

@tobias4411

@@S_raBThere is no barrier between microevolution and macroevolution. They are just two sides of the same coin. They are both evolution. A lot of small scale things are going to make a big scale thing. A lot of bricks make a house.

4 More Replies...

@jkcrews09

Suggestion: adjust your beginning opening, “Welcome to the creation podcast. The show where we discuss the science that confirms scripture.” This could be understood that science and creation don’t align all the time. While that might still be obvious that they don’t always, that is an interpretation understanding by finite humans. The Creator of the stuff we humans do science on spoke all that into existence. By definition the two align with each other.

More Comments

just now