Thera are at least 4 bands or artists called Anode;
1), The Anode is… Read Full Bio ↴Thera are at least 4 bands or artists called Anode;
1), The Anode is a Swedish electronica producer, based in Stockholm and an active member of The X-Dump Electronica Collective.
2), Anode (band) has been around since 1971, either as a production facility or as a band. The "band" has at various times included other people but it's mostly just Robert Carlberg and Ethiopian drummer I'taj Ajae.
Anode has released tracks on a number of different compilations (including "The American Music Compilation," Eurock Records 1982), and has recorded a dozen albums that have been privately issued only. Anode also has 20 albums released of phonographic sound environments (see phonography.org).
Currently in production are four new albums, each with a different modus operandi. In these days of internet distribution they may even get to release, who knows.
3), There is also a Japanese hardcore band called ANODE.
4), There is also a Dutch experimental electronica producer (name: "Ron Ruedisueli") called "Anode" and which is a member of the Konfliktzone Studios, The Netherlands. A musician for more than 16 years and produced music under many different names.
This guy is unafraid to cross borders between smooth organic experimental electronics, raw glitchy beats, blissful guitarscaping ambience, rhythmics and artistic speedcore. Explore the shattered remains of majestic rhythms and textures to discover the electronic nature that grows within.
1), The Anode is… Read Full Bio ↴Thera are at least 4 bands or artists called Anode;
1), The Anode is a Swedish electronica producer, based in Stockholm and an active member of The X-Dump Electronica Collective.
2), Anode (band) has been around since 1971, either as a production facility or as a band. The "band" has at various times included other people but it's mostly just Robert Carlberg and Ethiopian drummer I'taj Ajae.
Anode has released tracks on a number of different compilations (including "The American Music Compilation," Eurock Records 1982), and has recorded a dozen albums that have been privately issued only. Anode also has 20 albums released of phonographic sound environments (see phonography.org).
Currently in production are four new albums, each with a different modus operandi. In these days of internet distribution they may even get to release, who knows.
3), There is also a Japanese hardcore band called ANODE.
4), There is also a Dutch experimental electronica producer (name: "Ron Ruedisueli") called "Anode" and which is a member of the Konfliktzone Studios, The Netherlands. A musician for more than 16 years and produced music under many different names.
This guy is unafraid to cross borders between smooth organic experimental electronics, raw glitchy beats, blissful guitarscaping ambience, rhythmics and artistic speedcore. Explore the shattered remains of majestic rhythms and textures to discover the electronic nature that grows within.
More Genres
No Artists Found
More Artists
Load All
No Albums Found
More Albums
Load All
No Tracks Found
Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Search results not found
Song not found
partiklar
Anode Lyrics
No lyrics text found for this track.
The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos
The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos
Paul Mawdsley
"Sorry, you obviously have no understanding of plasma physics."
- I wouldn't say no understanding. I have some and look to expand what I have. However, the primary focus of what I wrote was about the nature of causal dynamics and causal intuition. Is there a reason you prefer to attack my plasma physics qualifications and don't want to engage what I wrote on the subject of causation?
"Real plasma physicists do."
- Real plasma physicists like Anthony Peratt?
"Alfven's one giant exploding DL was shown to be wrong in experiment."
- References? I am actually looking for the truth and am open to evidence.
"And we can see solar flares being powered by reconnection."
- So, lines of force, that are merely conceptual models projected from minds to categorize a set of observed net effects, are to be considered as having distinct physical existence independent of electric currents and act as separate causal entities that can disconnect and reconnect? I believe you are making a causal category error. Let's consider some causal basics. I assume that there is no such thing as unextended entities or disembodied actions. That is, there is no existence without there being a physical thing that exists and there is no action without there being physical things that act. In other words, there are no such things as gods or ghosts or magic. Given this, there are then 4 categories of existents: 1) there are things; 2) there are the actions of things; 3) there are the interactions of things; and 4) there are the net effects of the interactions of things. In causal language, a water wave is not an integrated, separate thing with an existence that is non-transient. It is the net effect of the interaction of things. In the same way magnetic fields are also the observed net effects of the interactions of things. Charged particles are things. They act and interact and cause net effects, one of which is magnetic fields, which are essentially the result of the motion of charged particles shaping the space around them. Magnetic fields are not things in themselves and cannot have actions and interactions like a thing can have. So they can't disconnect and reconnect. To claim they can is to make a category error, to reverse cause and effect, and basically to claim that ghosts exist. It's bad logic. Also see the video on this channel: The Way Astronomers Model Plasma in Space is FLAWED - A Critique of MHD
Electro-Cute
Both the electrons and the positive ions experience the same force from the electric field. Since they have the same magnitude of charge.
F = E*q
There is a difference is mass though. Where the lightest ions are 1008 times as heavy as the electron.
F = m*a
We know that...
F_electron = F_ion
This means that...
m_electron*a_electron = m_ion*a_ion
=>
a_electron = a_ion*1008
All of this leads to the electron rushing faster to the positive electrode. Forming negative concentrations of electrons.
This negative concentration forms its own electric field that stops it self from growing.
This forms a very concentrated separation of charge in the form of two sheets.
When it comes to temperature differences you find similar effects.
In any somewhat gass-like substance you find thermal motion.
This is the random motion of particle that makes warm air feel warm.
The particles all have different speeds. But you can figure out the mean speed in one direction.
This is: |v| = square_root(8*k_b*T/3pi*m)
There is a bunch in here. But we can ignore everything but the "m" and "T" for now (mass and Temperature).
This means that the mean velocity is proportional to square_root(T/m).
This means that the mean velocity of electrons is sqrt(1008) ≈ 32 times higher for electrons than protons.
So when ever temperature, density and level of ionization differs from one point in a plasma to another you will find double layers.
This one will not be as obvious as that of an electric current. But still very much important in plasma physics.
The colder, less ionized or less dense part of the plasma will become negative.
This is also the reason why a negative sheet tend to form along the surface of the current and a positive column in the middle.
There is also electromagnetic effects that leads to layering that plays together with this.
paul maydaynight
label; description. An ion is a charged atom or molecule. ... When an atom is attracted to another atom because it has an unequal number of electrons and protons, the atom is called an ION. If the atom has more electrons than protons, it is a negative ion, or ANION. If it has more protons than electrons, it is a positive ion.
when two particles side by side, spin in opposite directions they attract.
when two particles above/below, spin in the same direction they attract.
when two electromagnetic coils, one inside the other, have/are fed opposite polarity, a stable electromagnetic field is induced in an aluminium ball above the coils, holding it there ,in stable orbit.
when an electromagnetic wave traveling in the single copper (tesla) winding with iron core has a aluminium ring placed over it the ring will float offset... however force the ring down then place a free copper wheel next to that aluminium ring at right angles & it will spin upward at the same speed as the upward flowing something C.O 'Professor Eric Laithwaite: The Circle of Magnetism - 1968'
more tools...
'electromagnetic fractal analysis'
open your mind ...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2bPV2AVMqW0
"It's My Own Invention" Eric Laithwaite 1974 RI Christmas Lectures, Lecture 6
Professor Eric Laithwaite presents his second televised series of CHRISTMAS LECTURES exploring the world of engineering.
A sequel to his 1966 series, 'The Engineer in Wonderland', Laithwaite was the first person to present two series of Lectures on national television.
Lab Rat
Although the data is correct the explanation of the cause is, in my opinion, incorrect. It has been accepted physics for many years but my research tells a different story. It says in the video that the people studying this are not electrical engineers nor experts in electricity, magnetism or motion physics (mechanical engineering) they are astronomers.
Point: After watching this video can you explain what an " electrical double layer" is ? Yes, great prove me wrong., No .. great keep reading.
Double layers form when ever electrical energy is created. We separate the positive / negative charges and they don't like that. Positive and negative are of course only words which we assigned to the effect of charge separation. In a vacuum tube we use the designated negative symbol to the cathode which we heat up in order to "free up electrons which emit easier from the hot surface" as we are taught. The Anode, or positive side seems to attract the "supply of electrons" however we do know that changes in the positive side can feed back through the circuit so it also seems that something goes from positive to negative too. We call that Positive Ions and yes that seems to happen but what about these double layers ? How do we understand what they are ?
Well .. To think about a particle or a planet in the same context is tough for some people but if you do for a moment just imagine that Jupiter has an immense electrical charge stored in it like a capacitor. Not hard to do right ? not so fast ... a capacitor holds its charge in a dielectric field which stores the energy across super high resistance of the dielectric which separates the layers. Easy right ? A natural property of electricity is that the difference of potential (AKA Separation of Charge : AKA Voltage) attracts the counterpart of itself in order to balance itself out to relative Zero. Current flow is the rate at which this happens and is measured from - to +. Remember that the symbols represent something other than what the words mean. You don't need electrons (imagined particles of matter) to actually move and so you don't need ions either. You need only understand the fact of dielectric insulation between charges of different magnitudes in proximity to each other. Are they positive or negative ? We can't tell because we are "bird on a wire" and yet we can apply what is known to the question of double layers ... and that is counter rotation. Jupiter's bands of clouds move at different speeds but if you synchronize your view on one layer then some of the others go left and some go right. Saturn's rings seems to move at different speeds and small bodies with those bands create disturbances called "propellers" which they have no explanation for. Simply apply the dielectric force across a vacant area in a double layer and put a conductor in the path and you gat a sweeping discharge path which disturbs the layers. Synchronize your orbit with the body/particle in the path and you will see that it is on the boundary layer of a counter rotation system.
Electrical Double Layers also are fractal in nature and so are magnetic fields. You can see this with magnets by using magnetic film and putting a few small magnets together and put the film right on the magnets. There you will see the separating lines where a small inversion occurs. Then as you pull away it rapidly disappears from the film because the double layer is encapsulated in the proximity between the magnets. To us it may seem like they are touching but in molecular terms they have quite a distance between them still. The same thing happens in electric fields where the inverse square rule dictates the distance at which the voltage falls to half. This is not a linear equation and so as double layers on a spherical object counter rotate and also create nested charges which operate in reverse of the bigger field they are nested in. this creates an area of resistance which holds a charge and if it finds a way to discharge it will cancel itself out and be gone. Nested charge differentials created by the fall off radius which sees an unbalanced polarity and charge value at equal distance from it's reference point. In other words the charge is more intense at the center of mass than at any distance (x) and 1.414 time less at 2(x) ... for that band of energy, from its reference point, it is out of balance by a ratio of 1 to 1.414.
Double Layers are natural capacitive dielectrics which form where counter rotating, field aligned currents, naturally separate by voltage gradients at distance and because they are charged plasma they emit frequencies which they generate and reflect as the layers spin past each other which we sometimes see as light but we can certainly pick it up with our instrumentation.
If you have a better explanation then I will be open to learning new things but know that electrons and ions are the favorite playthings of experts but they do not explain everything ... not even close and I have very little confidence in that idea anymore.
YK Chan
Another digest version, this time on double layers. Thank you.
JVB
Biology and Cosmology are morphing together. Cool.
Paul Mawdsley
I am constantly struck with how bewildering it is that the physics and cosmology establishment doesn't get the causal nuance and complexity of plasmas. I've been following plasma theory and plasma cosmology since I came across an article written by Peratt in the early 90's. I was studying the nature of our intuitions around causation and the development of what can be called causal intuition as a mental capacity when I came across and was drawn to Peratt's work. Our causal intuition is a lens that shapes how we see the world and a framework from which we build our understanding of why things behave as they do. If you have never studied the behaviour of electromagnetic phenomena in general, and plasma physics in particular, your causal intuition will not include the behaviour of plasmas. You will not understand how profoundly important concepts like double layers and force-free filaments are to the development of our causal intuition. You will essentially be blind to causally processing much of the evidence that has emerged in plasma physics. You will be stuck using the limitations of Newtonian mechanics as your lens and framework for building causal models. Despite special relativity and quantum theory breaking with the Newtonian causal framework, we have never gone back to question the causal framework. Instead, we have thrown out causation and the value of causal intuition, which is the capacity that is best connected to experimentation. Einstein was right. Causality does go all the way down. We just haven't caught our causal models up with causal realities yet.
Code Tech
Mainstream Physics / Cosmology is a religion.
Paul Mawdsley
@Code Tech Religion is just another narrative built from a different causal framework that also lacks the nuance and complexity of the causation found in reality. Even though both religion and mainstream physics/cosmology each have great truths and wisdom contained within their stories, they are built on insufficient causal foundations, which ultimately leads their stories astray. This creates a locked paradigm when we lose the causal frameworks at the roots of these stories. We can't untangle the stories and instead get stuck in them, perpetuating them at every turn. This is how religion and the culture of modern physics/cosmology are similar, but there are many differences that arise from their being built from very different causal intuitions, from which emerge very different epistemic principles. The answer is to change the causal formula that shapes the story, and then go back to reinterpret all the evidence and wisdom contained in the less inclusive paradigms. By focussing on the causation of plasma physics, and not forgetting the classical physics roots of the modern physics paradigm, this may be what Gareth is engaged in.
Paul Mawdsley
"Sorry, you obviously have no understanding of plasma physics."
- I wouldn't say no understanding. I have some and look to expand what I have. However, the primary focus of what I wrote was about the nature of causal dynamics and causal intuition. Is there a reason you prefer to attack my plasma physics qualifications and don't want to engage what I wrote on the subject of causation?
"Real plasma physicists do."
- Real plasma physicists like Anthony Peratt?
"Alfven's one giant exploding DL was shown to be wrong in experiment."
- References? I am actually looking for the truth and am open to evidence.
"And we can see solar flares being powered by reconnection."
- So, lines of force, that are merely conceptual models projected from minds to categorize a set of observed net effects, are to be considered as having distinct physical existence independent of electric currents and act as separate causal entities that can disconnect and reconnect? I believe you are making a causal category error. Let's consider some causal basics. I assume that there is no such thing as unextended entities or disembodied actions. That is, there is no existence without there being a physical thing that exists and there is no action without there being physical things that act. In other words, there are no such things as gods or ghosts or magic. Given this, there are then 4 categories of existents: 1) there are things; 2) there are the actions of things; 3) there are the interactions of things; and 4) there are the net effects of the interactions of things. In causal language, a water wave is not an integrated, separate thing with an existence that is non-transient. It is the net effect of the interaction of things. In the same way magnetic fields are also the observed net effects of the interactions of things. Charged particles are things. They act and interact and cause net effects, one of which is magnetic fields, which are essentially the result of the motion of charged particles shaping the space around them. Magnetic fields are not things in themselves and cannot have actions and interactions like a thing can have. So they can't disconnect and reconnect. To claim they can is to make a category error, to reverse cause and effect, and basically to claim that ghosts exist. It's bad logic. Also see the video on this channel: The Way Astronomers Model Plasma in Space is FLAWED - A Critique of MHD
Hisham Mohsen
What i cannot understand is how can someone admit the existence of a magnetic field but cannot understand that there is an electric field, were Faraday 200 years ago proved that there can not be a magnetic field without an electric field and vice versa! Its like ignoring the very first rule of electromagnetism! Amazing new series Gareth your work is very much appreciated!
Big Bang Theology Is A Fallacy
Because they know the implications if they admit to that; their big bang will fizzle out.
espacio hexadimencional serna
there is an electric and a magnetic, an up and down, left and right, heat and cold but always one in between all of them, heat and cold producing warm etc.
Roger Isaksson
Does it exist any paper with RF/microwave emissions measurement in the vicinity of the anode and cathode?