I Wanna Make It Wit Chu is a song by Desert Sessions, a loose collaborative… Read Full Bio ↴I Wanna Make It Wit Chu is a song by Desert Sessions, a loose collaborative project lead primarily by Josh Homme of Queens of the Stone Age and Kyuss. The song appears on The Desert Sessions, Vols. 9 & 10, more precicely on the Volume 9, titled "I See You Hearin' Me, right after the opening track, Dead In Love. PJ Harvey is singing backup vocals.

The song was later on covered by Josh Homme's primary project, Queens of the Stone Age on the album Era Vulgaris.

I Wanna Make It Wit Chu
Desert Sessions Lyrics

Jump to: Overall Meaning ↴ Line by Line Meaning ↴

You wanna know if I know where
I can't say that I do
Don't understand the evil, yeah
Or how one becomes two

I just can't recall what started all
Or how to begin, yeah
I ain't here to break it

Just see how far it will bend

Here again, here again

I wanna make it
I wanna make it wit chu
Again and again and again
I wanna make it
I wanna make it wit chu

Sometimes the same is different
But mostly it's the same
These mysteries of life
That just ain't my thing

If I told you that I knew about the sun and the moon
I'd be untrue
The only thing I know for sure
Is what I won't do anytime, anywhere

I wanna make it
I wanna make it wit chu
Again and again, again and again
I wanna make it
I wanna make it wit chu

I wanna make it
I wanna make it wit chu
I wanna make it
I wanna make it wit chu

I wanna make it
I wanna make it wit chu
Anytime, anywhere
I wanna make it
I wanna make it wit chu
Again and again and again and again and again

I wanna make it

Overall Meaning

The lyrics of the song “I Wanna Make It Wit Chu” by Desert Sessions is a reflection on the complexity of relationships and the mysteries of life. The singer admits to not knowing everything and not understanding the evil in the world or the process of how one becomes two. The lyrics suggest a sense of confusion and uncertainty as the singer admits to not being able to recall what started everything, but still wants to see how far everything can bend without breaking.

The repetition of the line “I wanna make it wit chu” throughout the song suggests a deep desire for a meaningful relationship, even with all the uncertainties in life. The lyrics acknowledge the fact that sometimes the same things can be different and how there are still many unknowns in life. Despite this, the singer still knows that he wants to be with the person he is singing to, again and again, regardless of the circumstances.

Overall, the song is a poetic portrayal of the human experience; the confusion and uncertainty that comes with it, and the deep desire for connection and companionship, even amidst the mysteries of life.

Line by Line Meaning

You wanna know if I know where
You're asking me if I know the way, but I can't say I do.

I can't say that I do
I don't know the answer to your question.

Don't understand the evil, yeah
I don't comprehend the concept of evil

Or how one becomes two
I cannot explain the process of duality

I just can't recall what started all
I cannot remember the beginning of this situation

Or how to begin, yeah
I don't know how to start over in this situation

I ain't here to break it
I don't intend to ruin things

Just see how far it will bend
I want to test the limits of this situation

Sometimes the same is different
Things that appear the same can actually be quite different

But mostly it's the same
However, most things remain the same

These mysteries of life
The inexplicable wonders of existence

That just ain't my thing
Those things don't interest me

If I told you that I knew about the sun and the moon
If I claimed to know everything about the universe

I'd be untrue
I would be lying

The only thing I know for sure
What I am certain of

Is what I won't do anytime, anywhere
Is what I refuse to do under any circumstance

I wanna make it
I desire to have a successful outcome

I wanna make it wit chu
I want to achieve this success with you

Again and again and again
I want to keep achieving success with you repeatedly

Anytime, anywhere
No matter when or where

Here again, here again
Returning to this situation

Lyrics © Universal Music Publishing Group, Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC, Downtown Music Publishing, Kobalt Music Publishing Ltd.
Written by: JOSH HOMME, ALAIN JOHANNES, MICHAEL MELCHIONDO, JR.

Lyrics Licensed & Provided by LyricFind

To comment on or correct specific content, highlight it

TRACKS

No Related Genres

More Genres

No Artists Found

More Artists Load All

No Albums Found

More Albums Load All

No Tracks Found

01Dead In Love4:43

02I Wanna Make It Wit Chu3:43

PT3M43S

Desert Sessions

03Covered In Punks Blood1:43

04There Will Never Be A Better Time4:11

05Crawl Home3:00

06I'm Here For Your Daughter0:47

07Powdered Wig Machine2:40

08In My Head...Or Something4:41

09Holey Dime3:35

10A Girl Like Me3:10

11Creosote2:34

12Subcutaneous Phat3:50

13Bring It Back Gentle5:48

14Shepherd's Pie4:30

Genre not found

Artist not found

Album not found

Search results not found

Song not found

Comments from YouTube:

@BTFishing

9y↑350

i played guitar on this track and i can assure you that's josh and polly singing. there were standing next to me.

@passiplasencia7409

9y↑55

Dude are you dean ween

@springheeledjacques

9y↑19

Holy shit I just looked him up and he totally is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Ween

@ThatGuyWhoLeaksStuff

9y↑19

thanks for the info Dean, much appreciated for clearing it up. Love your performance on Mosquito Song too.

@sleevynicks165

9y↑9

You playing on this track makes it that much more incredible. Love your work man. inspiring me to slay some poon to this song.

@famouspogs

9y↑6

BTFishing

yo dean did you have your fist up joshs ass to make his voice go like that? sincerely famouspogs

23 More Replies...

@steezeironpaw1916

7y↑16

In the desert sessions movie I swear Josh says this was recorded at like 5am after smoking lots, hence the voice. I love the rawness

@jekk23

3y↑18

I love this song. I am in love with this song.
Hello my dear fellow person if you are reading this, I hope it’s giving you something like the feeling it gives me,
Take care out there💜

@RushAnthem69

13y↑29

This is obviously Josh, though sounding a bit like Mark, his voice is not as 'dirty'. I would love to hear a version with Mark singing though that'd be amazing.

@PlannedObsolescence

6y↑21

I like that Dean Ween co-wrote this song.

@JordanLake25

9y↑41

Sounds soo old school and raw. Fucking love it.

@nworbrelytthefirst

10y↑21

he's (homme) got an effect on his voice which makes it sound raspier. lanegan couldn't do that falsetto before the solo nearly as smooth. i can't lie, i love that effect of his vocals. i haven't listened to this version since Era Vulgaris came out and i'm wishing he'd used it again!

@muaar

7y↑4

yea this version is the best.

@zacharythomas3125

6y↑2

He chained chain smoked for awhile to get his voice like that

@justynabokauszyn3443

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evITvUusgPE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbJXZhawhl0

@casedistorted

52w

@muaar I do agree that this version is better than the Era Vulgaris version, I still don't know exactly why they felt they needed to remake it. Maybe licensing or copyright issues putting it on the QOTSA album so they just redid the song?

@steeeez7139

10y↑42

apparently the reason his voice sounds so raspy is cus he stayed up all night writing playing and smoking then recorded this at like 5am or some shit haha. the man's an artist

on an unrelated note i dont even know how anyone (who is familiar with his work) could mistake that voice for anyone elses

@TheWrathOfKon

5y↑3

Best version.

@Shambler2

13y↑10

Sooo much better than the newer version! Not quite sure why, just love it

@rexbanner7256

49w↑1

It's his smokey filled throat.

@rafaelcariman3450

5y↑2

Temazo!

@f1ax

13y↑1

Love this tune!! :)

@BrunoMAguiar

13y↑4

Im sorry. This is Josh. All versions of this music, if you search on YouTube or read about it, are from Josh. This is the original one.

@longliveireland993

2y↑3

Am i only one that thinks this version is way better than the Era Vulgaris version? I remember when i heard it was going to be on the new album was amped but this version was and still is just so much better in my opinion. I always come back to this version.

@casedistorted

52w

Yeah I still think this version is the best.

@EzequielReis100

13y↑2

Música perfeita para transar !!!

@ig88ftw

13y↑1

So much better than the new version. I usually prefer the QOTSA versions of these songs, and had extremely high hopes for this one.

@loganbutler16

13y↑2

@Kickass1234567 You've gotta also remember how much earlier this song was recorded. I'm sure his voice has refined quite a bit more in the past 10 years or so :D

@lordtuck39

11y↑2

You're right, no one else sounds like him.

@TheFunkloft

11y↑35

This version is sooooo much better than the one on Era Vulgaris :(

@emfraridades7261

3y↑12

Not really

@casedistorted

52w

@EMF Raridades From the comments and my own feelings, I would say about 90% of the people grew up with this original version before Era Vulgaris, and prefer the OG version over the remake. But I could see if you listened to Era Vulgaris first you might like that one more.

@muaar

7y↑18

@2:40 favorite guitar solo ever

@k00patr00pa1

7y↑3

Fucking Deaner mang!!!

@visualcomedy7551

Diaz! Diaz! Diaz!

@HaNSoNnDaDrummer

12y↑1

@KIMMEspricht You do understand though that this is the real, like really real, original that appeared on the Desert Sessions CD, right? Or am I wrong here?

@martinsantur9384

is mark lanegan singing?? omg its feels so deep this version!!

@ExistentialRyan

13y↑1

@brunumaguiar i dont know what u mean by "this" music, but desert sessions is a recording studio that josh owns and has done many collaborations, plus most of it he dosent appear as a vocalist. but you are right, this is josh. dosent even sound like lanagen(?) lanegan would be rumbling the desk that your monitor is sitting on with his voice alone.

@TaffyRaphie

13y↑2

This doesn't sound like Lanegan. It does sound like it could be Josh though. and if the liner notes say it, I agree.

@Whinny_Horseface

12y↑1

@HaNSoNnDaDrummer exactly. as i said, i forgot the song was written and first performed by the desert sessions crew (9&10). i always thought the "clean" version (off vulgaris) was the first release of the song, released on the actual desert session record. my fault.

@ageeben

11y

i miss the desert sessions version where he's impressing mark laneganagainagainagain. this is still fine. "like a drug" is apparently not like i remembered. not a problem.

@Gokhan0114

5y↑2

what a voice Lanegan 👿

@michaelmccrary2486

10y↑7

the f*ckin jam

@jodysoldman

13y↑2

no matter what the liner notes may or may not say, that's Lanegan

@88Eab

5y↑1

WOW

@Ice4711

13y↑2

I also would say it is Lanegan. Very sure about it. If it is Josh, than he is trying to sound like Mark.

@forthedoggiesguitars2277

6y↑2

Lanegan fits perfect on vocals here!✌🎸

@cmeza1985

14y

yeah boy

@foefen

13y↑2

Mark lanegan dudes... Josh doesn't have such a raw voice.

@Whinny_Horseface

12y

@HaNSoNnDaDrummer touché. i talked about the vulgaris release. that pj harvey thing wasn't on my mind although i own the record. got me.

@simorado

10y↑9

this is Lanegan folks, he sing in a few other tracks of the desert sessions

@BuddhaDog93

7y↑3

simorado
it is lanegan for sure.
vocals sound identical to "in the fade" off of the Queens' Rated R album.

@NO-tx8vs

7y↑12

wtf its josh lanegan sounds nothing like this lmao

@Imikacic

super stvar, al mislim da je usporena, da original ide mrvu brze

@88Eab

wow

@Flamengo1981

Markinho é Markinho.

@horstkohlicke6155

11y↑16

He's not right, this is 100% Josh. Lanegan didn't even collaborate in Desert Sessions 9&10...

@nahueel6637

4y↑1

dean ween co wrote the song, also he played the guitar

@franciscoalvar7183

4y↑1

Thats Mark

@HaNSoNnDaDrummer

12y

@KIMMEspricht By 'original', do you mean the version that appeared on the Desert Sessions or Era Vulgaris?

@mrroboto790

13y

@Ice4711 i mean when you're wrong about such an easy thing, and you are very sure about it..then i doubt how you can function

@HaNSoNnDaDrummer

12y↑1

@KIMMEspricht No problem, dude. Just a bit sporadic ;)

@muaar

dat tone tho

@jlrhind94

11y↑2

I think that this version's sexier.

@Slammerovo

13y↑1

@Kickass1234567 Mark Lanegan

@Kickass1234567

13y

whos singing?

@Whinny_Horseface

12y

@brunumaguiar it's not the studio version. if you search in your record collection and listen to the song by record, you'll recognize that this version isn't the actual recording. i cant figure out where this one is from, but if you compare it to the official released studio version (NOT YOUTUBE...) you will notice this song sounds completely different to the original. BUY that shit...

@JWTF92

8y↑2

Who is Polly?

@mojoblues6919

7y↑5

I think Polly is Polly Jean Harvey, best know as P.J Harvey (she's a famous singer and musician). You can also see her doing backing vocals (i don't recall the exact word; english isn't my first language) in a live performance with them at Jools.

@BrevityLC

13y

@SeasideSymphonyOFFCL 1 person doesn't want to make it with you.

@Ice4711

13y

@mrroboto790 I am very impressed by your genius comparison of problem solving and talking about bands. Get a life. You definitely need one.

@papitou4140

5y↑1

delicious

@Kickass1234567

13y

@kingsomething2008 really? doesnt sound like him much

@mrroboto790

13y

@Ice4711 well you are very wrong. would like to see how you solve simple problems...

@StrokesDrummer

13y↑1

@Kickass1234567 Mark Lanegan is the signer, not Josh

@TurncoatTony

10y

lol joshua tree. :D

@jfdblues

43w↑1

Mark lanegan.

@elemkay5104

12w

Confirmed by Dean Ween in the top comment, who actually played guitar on the track, to be Josh.

More Comments

just now