Just The Way I Feel Inside
Hi-Risk Faktor Lyrics


We have lyrics for these tracks by Hi-Risk Faktor:


Heart Skips A Beat Is the moonlight tonight enchanted, It fills me with longing…
Once In A Lifetime Once in a while will you try to give One little…


The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos

Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Song not found
Most interesting comments from YouTube:

@joespinelli5421

@Robert "At any point in time, did you ever authorize the McMichaels to ... confront anybody on your site?" prosecutor Paul Camarillo said during the deposition.




"No," English replied.




Camarillo also asked whether English had given the McMichaels permission to go onto the property, or whether he had told them they couldn't go on the property. English also answered no to both.



@joespinelli5421

@Robert Ok Ill look for that. Keep in mind that doesn't mean that is actually Ahmaud Arbery. Also, English never said Ahmaud took anything or that he couldn't be on the property.

"At any point in time, did you ever authorize the McMichaels to ... confront anybody on your site?" prosecutor Paul Camarillo said during the deposition.


"No," English replied.


Camarillo also asked whether English had given the McMichaels permission to go onto the property, or whether he had told them they couldn't go on the property. English also answered no to both.



@iMatti00

🧠🤔 @2:43:19 ~ I’m sorry, but Terri from Law&Crime is often an ill prepared legal analyst who doesn’t give correct legal analysis too often. I often agree with her on a personal basis based on her being a little stronger for many criminals and wanting them to get a higher prison sentence, and I generally like her attitude. But one thing that’s really offputting is that her job is to give true legal analysis but she has made mistakes multiple times.

I was blocked/muted from that YouTube channel because I put negative comments about her mistakes, though I was completely respectful and polite and detailed when doing so. Maybe they didn’t like that my comments were too long and I explained in detail when someone would mess up. I would also comment about cases sometime too. But basically what I was doing was watching all the old L&C Daily Update shows that are each about 22 minutes long that they have daily. She’s both made legal analysis mistakes and also been ill prepared for very simple commentary. I think the simple commentary has only been once or twice that I know of, but that’s still too many. Basically when she watched a video it seems like she watched it live on air and gave a comment rather than reviewing the material she was supposed to comment on before the show went live. I understand when somebody watches a video sometimes they’ll make a mistake and they’ll see something in the video wrong, but that’s why you should be preplanning. It was a simple as her watching a video and missing the whole point of the video because she missed a single word that somebody said. And example is if somebody says a sentence and uses the word “not“, but if Terri where to not hear the word “not“ then that could completely change the entire meeting of the video clip. And that’s understandable for her to do, but she should be looking at the information at least one time if not two times before she goes on live television.

The most recent mistakes you made was on an even bigger national scale so I don’t know why she wouldn’t have done her homework. She specifically said that the prosecution may appeal this trial or ruling by the judge not to reinstate the black potential jury members that the defense team struck with their strikes. But even me as a non-lawyer knows that the prosecution virtually can never appeal after the fact because of a constitutional principle called DOUBLE JEOPARDY. So for a second I even wanted to give Terri The benefit of the doubt and think that maybe she was talking about an interlocutory appeal. But once the 12 person jury (plus alternates if they choose) is actually seated then that is when double Jeopardy attaches to the defend it. So after then the jury cannot change and the prosecution cannot make an appeal. Now after a case is over the defend it can appeal if they’re found guilty, but the prosecution cannot appeal if they’re found not guilty. I’m not a lawyer, though I am extremely knowledgeable for a lay person regarding legal topics, but even I know about double Jeopardy. So I don’t understand how Terri didn’t know.

Now there’s always a chance that I am mistaken and that even though everything I’m saying about prosecution how they can’t appeal after the fact and once a jury is seated that double Jeopardy attaches, maybe there’s a chance that an appellate court could keep the original jury but add more members and make them do another round of jury strikes, and maybe possibly that would not violate double Jeopardy. But I would be extremely surprised if any knowledgeable lawyer would say that’s definitely something that can be done. So I’m not saying that I’m absolutely positive but I’m saying I’m pretty close to being positive. And after I wrote my comment a few days later I actually heard another lawyer talking about it and they even basically said what I said and confirmed what I said was correct. So I don’t understand why Terry wouldn’t know this. And I love to have her comment on it. And I’d also like to know why they blocked me for providing frank, detailed, respectful, and even polite criticism.


(P.S. I hope there’s not too many typos in this comment. I wrote it with my old iPhone 6 voice dictation feature. Lotta times it will mix up words I say. Sometimes I’ve said “police officer“ but it has typed “please offer“. And there’s been other times that it has messed it up way worse than that to the point I don’t even know what I meant to say. Funny enough, my old old iPhone 4S was nearly perfect with voice dictation but this one too often stinks.)



@B.L.A.C.K.1.

"The worst place for a Black man to live, is in the mind of a white man." ~Chris Rock.

This entire trail has been about the perception of Ahmaud Arbery by the defendants and witnesses. In every Police report so far the statements of the defendants is that of contempt for the fact that Ahmaud would dare to be in their neighborhood. From the owner of the property who contacted the neighbor, who went after Ahmaud with a revolver on his hip. To the defendants who pursued and murdered Ahmaud. Their description of him seethes with contempt.

I bid Black people to pay close attention to the outcome of this trail. I know the Rittenhouse trail is all the rage, but the key difference here is that Kyle killed White people; Ahmaud got killed. See the marked value that the justice system gives to a black life verses how much it values the existence of murderers; it's not like we haven't see it before, Eric Garner or Treyvon Martin anyone?

My question then becomes, how do we (as black people) move forward? When any White man with an attitude can murder one of us without serious consequence?

I know the bigots will come for me. Come, I welcome the discourse.

Edited: For Grammar.



@thedeal9526

I think that the prosecution has already proven that all 3 defendants didn't meet the requirement for effecting a citizens arrest. Therefore the defendants had absolutely no right to attempt to apprehend, arrest, restict Ahmaud' Arbery's movement and absoulutely no right to kill him:

1. The defendants had no immediate knowledge that Ahmaud Arbery had committed a crime;

2. There is no evidence that Ahmaud Arbery had committed a crime immediately before the defendants pursued him;

3. None of the citizens had told Ahmaud Arbery that he was under a citizens arrest;

4. The defendants admitted that they had no immediate knowledge that Ahmaud Arbery had committed a crime;

5. Defendant Roddie Bryan attempted to harm Ahmaud Arbery with his vehicle.

6. In the immediate moments before Defendant Tragic McMichael shot and killed Ahmaud Arbery his father had threatened to kill Ahmaud Arbery and

7. Ahmaud Arbery had every right to attempt to subdue Tragic McMichael after he pointed his shotgun at him. This is just like a police officer has every right to attempt to subdue a subject (including using lethal force) if the subject points a firearm at him or her.

The evidence and the admissions of the 3 defendants themselves prove that they are guilty as hell. What the verdict really rests upon is what's in the hearts of the jurors. So the real question hinges upon whether or not the jurors have had enough of the senseless racially based killings of Black people in America or if they're not going to view Ahmaud Arbery as a human being who had a right to live and move about freely and fear for his life as White persons do. I know what the jury should do; I just don't have faith that it will do it.



@gamerasdf

Jesus Christ saves from sin.
Romans 3: 23
For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
Hebrews 9: 27
And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
Isaiah 64: 6
But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.
Revelation 21: 8
But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
Romans 5: 8
But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
John 3: 16
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
John 14: 6
Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
Romans 10: 9-10.
That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Jesus said John 5: 24
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
1John 5: 10-13
He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.
And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.
He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.
These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.
Ephesians 2: 8-9
For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
Not of works, lest any man should boast.
Romans 8: 1
There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
1 Corinthians 15: 3-4
For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
2 Corinthians 5: 21
For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.
,.................................................................................................................................................................................



All comments from YouTube:

@aaronparker898

If I have 3 grown men chasing me in trucks, 1 with a gun standing up in the back of a truck, and another that exits a vehicle with a gun, I'd damn sure attack him. That to me would feel like my only chance of survival.

You see this kind of stuff in horror movies.

@EskiLdn

Thats rather crazy to me.

@bensmith8240

Bullshit.

@EskiLdn

@Ben Smith Chill bro. real men fight off 3 guys, 1 with a gun, its normal.

@mobiusZero2

Having 3 guys point guns at me, fighting back is a last option

@loraknox-kn4eb

Exactly

6 More Replies...

@n2deep637

When she asked him to have a seat after he explained the route. She never asked as what point in the chase did he corner off the victim.

@iMatti00

@3:11:47 ~ The police witness was wrong in his testimony. The cop DID have his gun (a.k.a. revolver) out when he search the house. You can hear the gun being taken from the holster and you can see it for a split second at @2:06:27. There’s other times in the search of the house where you can see the gun for a split second to, and you could also see the second cop take out his gun when he climbed the ladder to go into the attic.

@iMatti00

… Update: @3:31:45, The witness is now testifying that there was a second time they came out to the residence and this time they did pull their guns out to search. So maybe I was wrong on my original comment and the cop was talking about the first time they came out they did not use guns, but the second time they came out they did a search with their guns. I’m not sure if I misunderstood or if the cop was wrong like I said but he’s just talking about another time where they definitely did pull out their guns to search. I’m guessing that it was me that misunderstood so my original comment is wrong. Like I said maybe I am right, but my assumption is that I was wrong on my original comment. So I just wanted to correct the record.

@BtheOutLIer

You make a great point..... at the same time the initiating call was different. 1) Travis actually SAW Arbury inside of the house; 2) Arbury "reached" in his pocket for a weapon. On Feb 23rd they didn't see him in the house also The Mcmicheals had no reason to believe that Ahmaud had a gun on that day, completely different situation.

The defense is trying to make it seem as if Arbery was a burglary suspect BUT they acknowledge that they didn't think that he stole anything. Think about it... Murders are happening on my block; I tell people that I don't actually think that the person murdered anyone yet I'm performing a citizen's arrest on the person for murders? That sounds foolish.

More Comments

More Versions