Władysław Szpilman (December 5, 1911 – July 6, 2000) was a Polish pianist, … Read Full Bio ↴Władysław Szpilman (December 5, 1911 – July 6, 2000) was a Polish pianist, composer, and memoirist. He is best known as the protagonist of the Roman Polański film The Pianist, based on Szpilman's autobiographical book recounting how he survived the Holocaust.
Szpilman was born in Sosnowiec, Congress Poland, Russian Empire, to a Jewish family. After early piano lessons with his mother Esthera, he continued his piano studies in the early 1930s at the Warsaw Conservatory under Aleksander Michałowski and at the Academy of Arts (Akademie der Künste) in Berlin under Artur Schnabel and Leonid Kreutzer. He also studied composition with Franz Schreker.
The Nazi-led General Government established ghettos in many Polish cities, including Warsaw, and Szpilman was forced to move to the Warsaw Ghetto with his family. He continued to work as a pianist in restaurants in the ghetto. Szpilman remained in the Warsaw Ghetto until it was abolished after the deportation of most of its inhabitants.
None of his family members survived the war. As set out in his memoir, Szpilman found places to hide in Warsaw and survived with the help of his friends from Polish Radio and in part by a German captain, Wilm Hosenfeld.
From 1945 to 1963 Szpilman was director of the Music Department at Polish Radio. During this period he composed several symphonic works and about 500 songs, still popular in Poland today, as well as music for radio plays and film.
In the 1950s he wrote about 40 songs for children, for which he received an award from the Polish Composers Union in 1955.
In 1961 he initiated and organized Sopot International Song Festival in Poland and founded the Polish Union of Authors of Popular Music.
Szpilman also performed as a soloist and with violinists Bronislaw Gimpel, Roman Totenberg, Ida Haendel and Henryk Szeryng. In 1963, Szpilman and Gimpel founded the Warsaw Piano Quintet, with which Szpilman performed worldwide until 1986.
In November 1998 Wladyslaw Szpilman was honoured by the president of Poland with a Commander's Cross with Star of the Order of Polonia Restituta.
Szpilman died in Warsaw in 2000 at age 88.

TRACKS

No Related Genres

No Artists Found

More Artists Load All

No Albums Found

More Albums Load All

No Tracks Found

Genre not found

Artist not found

Album not found

Search results not found

Song not found

Debussy Images Set 1
Władysław Szpilman Lyrics

No lyrics text found for this track.

The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos

Most interesting comments from YouTube:

Anthony

1y↑1

Debussy never recorded “Clair de lune”. In the cd titled “Debussy plays Debussy”, the composer actually plays 7 of the featured works. “Clair de lune” is played by Suzanne Godenne (the same recording can be found on YouTube under different url addresses ~ with Godenne’s name and not Debussy’s).

Here is a complete list of Debussy’s recordings made on piano rolls:
Children’s Corner Suite
D’un cahier d’esquisses
Estampes: La soirée dans Grenade
La plus que lente
Préludes I: Danseuses de Delphes
La cathédrale engloutie
La Danse de Puck
Préludes I: Minstrels
Le vent dans la plaine.

Anthony

1y↑11

Proper Noun

5y↑2

@WHATEVER GOES FOR ME I find the tempo to be moderate and to my liking quite slow.
I certainly wouldn't see a benefit in speeding it up just for the sake of it.
What makes this rendition feel faster is the syncopation and timing differences he makes.
He makes certain phrases seem as though they collapse into place (which I love)
He makes subtle changes in the timing of arpeggios and chords throughout the piece. He does not play a single phrase in exactly the same way, but the differences he makes in them are deliberate and controlled.
I didn't know Debussy was such a good pianist.
I find this to be a much more nuanced interpretation than any I've heard.
If all of this just kind of washes over you and you can't grasp it then I encourage you to listen to some avant garde jazz or something with odd time signatures and syncopation. Then go back to this rendition of the piece.
Your perception of exotic timing and beat will improve and thus your appreciation for it.
Otherwise you might as well just listen to Bethoven and all the countless classical style musicians who play everything straight. (all of which I also adore)

All comments from YouTube:

Walter Sullivan

5y↑20K

Congratulations Debussy, you played yourself

Jens Körber

Armes Würstchen.

Anthony

1y↑1

Marcelo Bruno Rodrigues

Someone posted a comment about another recording of a work performed by its composer as "no one except its own composer to perform it according to his/her wishes*.

A KB

🏆🤓😅

127 More Replies...

Amelia

3y↑1K

Debussy’s version: rapidly yet gently falling in love with a fluttering heart
Modern version: reminiscing a relationship that ended with bittersweet memories

Lickmyazz

I always interpreted it as just life going on. There's sad, happy, angry and melancholic moments through the whole piece but it always ends sad yet hopeful.

New Material

1y↑1

@Cm legosthanks for posting that comment

Cm legos

1y↑1

This music helps me look back on life in a positive way rather than negative and sharing this in a YouTube comment section may be pointless but who cares

Lord Ashtray

What?

Caaru

1y↑1

modern version: "you have 1 hour rehearsal before the recording, do your best"

8 More Replies...

E _

3y↑586

This was the first performance of Clair de Lune to really move me. Debussy knew exactly when to push and when to pull back, how to pace and where to hesitate. This piece just became exponentially more interesting to me. Thank you, Claude.

themadmallard

@DaCelloPlayerr normally agree, but the YT vid on here of Borge's is over 800k views, so maybe not very unknown. ERJiXcmy2Gw

Dominic Kronig

1y↑1

@rrickarr brother if you think that this version is more accurate to the score and has less rubato than modern versions then you have no clue what you‘re talking about lmao

Robin Mead

2y↑1

It's so relaxing to play. An amazing song that never sees time.

L C

First name terms, eh?

DaCelloPlayerr

Sorry for my bad english, i am from denmark

4 More Replies...

Dylan Hall

3y↑350

Gotta say, at first I didn’t like this version. But as it went on I realized how natural and almost improvisational it sounds with him playing it. I’ve never heard someone play it like that before. It truly is a treat to hear a great piece played by the person who wrote it.

carlos c. s.

the others play slow and boring

Nick Ashton-Jones

Yes, you've got it. The feeling of improvisation. Reflections from the water even more so.

Tina Peißker

For me the only one who's able to play it too is Daniel Barenboim.

David Ould Taleb

@JIMMER SKRIMMER FRIDDET really

JIMMER SKRIMMER FRIDDET

2y↑13

We’re lucky to be able to hear this

1 More Replies...

magikrap

3y↑190

I can't be the only one who likes the slow interpretation AND the faster interpretation? This interpretation (that of Debussy himself smh) is evocative and full of feeling. It has faster moments, but also slightly slower moments. To me it has a more playful feeling, a bit happier. The slower interpretations (evidently the more commonly preferred ones nowadays) have a melancholy charm, maybe with a sadder more sombre feeling. Who gives a shit?

Gladius

It sounds more Nostalgic. I noticed it sounds a lot like Joe Hisaichi’s music. I’d imagine he was heavily influenced by Debussy.

Athos401

2y↑1

actually I both like the fast and the slow version, the only thing I don't like is when pianist start slooooow and that get fast as hell. That really drives me mad

lopazio

2y↑5

When a work of superior human art like this comes into existence and is then played by different people, it will sound and feel good in any tempo, style, interpretation. It only proves the geniality of it. Moreover I would like to say that if this is the interpretation of the composer, it must have the original feeling he was trying to convey. What I feel is that he was trying to materialize the energy one feels when the full moon is shinning bright, illuminating the dark and scary night thus putting darkness aside and bringing a new day (after a day) where one can be awaken, energized and full of love. That is why his interpretation feels more energetic and fast (my two cents). Nevertheless Debussy is pure genius!

Martin-Éric Racine

2y↑4

Good musicians known how to play with the tempo and metrics.

3 More Replies...

Sam Hutchinson

4y↑787

I see a lot of people dissing his interpretation, or saying that he played it fast because piano rolls (which is the method through which Debussy recorded this piece) had limited space, but that’s plainly untrue. Each piano roll he did in 1913 had ample enough space for multiple pieces so there’s no reason to believe that’s why he’s speeding up.

This interpretation is really cool and it’s amazing how every different performer of this piece flows with it in a different way. There’s enjoyment to be found in every interpretation :)

Ack

2y↑3

@r a Interpreting a piece is something anyone can do, composers interpret the same sheet music anyone else does, playing it in their own styles with their own flair and interpretation. It's the same with any other musician, playing notes on a piece of paper but in their own way they think sounds best.

O Filósofo (Ou um fumante)

Debussy was like the indie boys we have today obviously he's a great musician but there's a lot of facts about his life that is just funny how he was different

r a

2y↑2

@Jason Bledsoe I can't believe we live in a world where you needed to point this out. Agreeing with you. There is no interpretation lol. It's like saying today I'm making a realistic interpretation of myself.

Ken Peters

You’re right. Many speed interpretations.

11 More Replies...

JockNessMonster

5y↑16.1K

If it didn’t say Debussy played it everyone would be hating on the speed

Thomas Herzog

@Luca Simonelli
The best? No. Better than Debussy? Yes. A confident Yes.

Luca Simonelli

@Thomas Herzog bro thinks he's the best composer of the world lmao

Devi Ritter

I prefer the flowing pace. This is how my son plays it.

Lee Knudsen

Bingo!

William Taittinger

His playing was pretty sheety if we are to be honest.

279 More Replies...

Ruth

3y↑456

An amazingly clear recording using 100-year old technology.

dggydddy59

@El Bretto Haha! I suppose, but certainly a case of style over substance nonetheless, eh? BTW, totally off the subject but El Bretto was sort of my nickname, for a short time, decades ago. And even now, a couple of people from those old days still call me Bretto. I had to remark on it because I don't think I've seen that word anywhere else before. Cheers!

El Bretto

@dggydddy59 I agree with you but I must say I do like his writing style

dggydddy59

Good God, it's mind boggling how hard gnamp here tries to convince everybody exactly how much smarter he is than them and how he is plainly the one who is correct, completely throwing aside the conventional understanding that if someone says "My, what a clear sounding recording" that they are NOT thinking that they're talking about little holes punched in a roll of paper. This nutter is arguing with everybody about everything, because that's what some people out there do. Pointless trolling and desperately trying not to be wrong. That's what he cares about. Obviously.

gnamp

@Joseph Davis oh, please do- by which of course I imply that you are neither obnoxious or uninteresting. So we can have a clear record of your thoughts perhaps you ought to make a nice WAV file and upload it to Soundcloud.

Joseph Davis

3y↑1

@gnamp Well a "clear recording" implies audio recording, so yes, this would be a pedantic correction.

I can define pedantic for you as well if you'd like.

31 More Replies...

London England

3y↑127

The speed and flow of the original is breathtaking... After listening to so many renditions, I don't think there's any more passionate than this one.

ftera4

Absolutely

Lahm Verlassener

2y↑3

Indeed!

1 More Replies...

aleksa p

4y↑971

I like this tempo. The fast parts make me think of twinkling stars or the gentle trickling sounds of a garden fountain.

bt 1000

@aleksa p It's perfectly okay for someone to assume something. Get over yourself you're not special.

ajxjdjjdhss

Claire de lune means moonlight in french so in a way you are right

Tony Clark

I think of stars

Rick Leblanc

@caitgems1 now that was a gay response !

14 More Replies...

Tara Donelson

1y↑29

I've been playing this piece for near 15 years with more than one teacher -- It never crossed my mind to look up Debussy himself playing it! This is a game changer. He emphasizes things I didn't expect. I plan to listen to this many more times and create a sound closer to his than the modern interpretations. It's shocking that the modern ones all sound alike and no one plays it the way he did! It's much more... chaotic... than I expected

gentlelikefire

2y↑34

Him playing is how I always interpreted Clair de Lune; it's nostalgic, not melancholy. It's reminiscing beauty, the past, appreciate the present and the movement of the night. It's moving. Amazing we have this recording.

Deanna Reyna

2y↑1

Love your interpretation 👏🏾 thanks 🙏🏽

Marianne Oelund

4y↑2K

Debussy made this recording of Clair de Lune, and 13 other pieces, onto a set of 6 rolls using a Welte-Mignon reproducing piano, also known simply as a "Mignon."
The Mignon was unique in that it recorded the nuances of a player's performance, including dynamics and pedaling, thus the result can be far more expressive than the more typical player-piano roll reproductions. Debussy was delighted with the quality of the result, and wrote in a letter to Edwin Welte, "It is impossible to attain a greater perfection of reproduction than that of the Welte apparatus. I am happy to assure you in these lines of my astonishment and admiration of what I heard."

William Taittinger

It is an amateur player and the op is TROLLING you normies LOL

Kurtz

Fantastic

studentjohn36

3y↑1

@Jori Steinway are STILL to this day, utterly peeved that Debussy endorsed Bechstein: "My music should only be played on Bechstein Pianos."

Steve O'Guin

4y↑3

Mahler also recorded using the apparatus and it is a revelation to hear how he performs his own music. No conductor today would take the liberties he did. As for time, Mahler recorded the entire 1st movement of number 5 as a piano reduction and it is 13 minutes. Plenty of time for Clair de lune as slow as Debussy would want.

Kevan M Allison

4y↑4

I myself am a connoisseur of Mignons, yet of the Filet, medium rare, variation.

17 More Replies...

Cheryl B Lancaster

3y↑130

I like his rendition because it shows how he intended it to be heard.

MineBlasters

2y↑2

@waterbe3 that is simply false what you said, the piano rolls had space for multiple songs, he played it this way because that is how he wanted it to be played

Epic Gamer

2y↑5

@waterbe3 not your precious claire de lune

Dogorog

2y↑24

@waterbe3 each piano roll he did had enough space, he just wanted it to be this way buddy

waterbe3

3y↑3

I don't think it is. This was recorded on a piano roll and it has a limited time to record so he had to play fast.

1 More Replies...

tiffsaver

2y↑15

When I was still a young rock musician, I hated classical music... until I heard this song coming over the radio. I was so immediately stunned by its sheer beauty, that I stopped some stranger to tell me the name of it. I've been a Debussy fan ever since.

kwame ali evergreen

4y↑2.3K

if you ever want insight on the elitism within the music community, all you have to do is look at all the comments of people saying that DEBUSSY is playing his own composition wrong and too quickly.

Kyle Andre Mercado

@Stephen F nah man I ain't talking to you . I'm talking to the guy who commented this. And I forgot to remove that air quote.

Stephen F

@Kyle Andre Mercado are you talking to me? I literally don't understand what your are trying to say. Are you saying that anyone and everyonr who says they don't like this recording and in fact prefers a different (modern) recoding is elitist? Why is "prefer" in quotes?

Kyle Andre Mercado

Funny to realize how ironic a guy like you who's saying that the people who "prefer' the modern rendition of Clair De Lune doesn't know he's actually committing elitism.

Stephen F

@John Paluska no one here has said Debussy played it wrong, I've looked down the comments and I can't see one person saying that. The only people insisting on t h e possibiltybof a 'right' or 'wrong' way of playing it are those who insist that this must be the right way because its debussy and if you disagree you are arrogant and elitist. Which is silly.

What's interesting is that this is not Debussy playing at all - he never recorded Clair de Lune. That doesn't change my perspective but must change the appreciation of the recording for the other side.

John Paluska

@Stephen F for starters, if they preferred how someone else played it, then however that person played it is their opinion of how it is supposed to be played.

I do like Debussy's version a lot better than the way it is played in a modern sense. Considering he was actually a fantastic pianist, it is a good chance he played it as he wanted it.

The music producer in me wants to say that the way I like something is how I tend to compose it. So the way I envision a piece of music is how it should be played. But if someone else does a better job at envisioning the piece, then so be it. They could have emphasized the notes better in certain melodic phrases than I did or riffed parts a different way, etc.

But nine of this is to say that Debussy is playing his piece wrong. It is HIS piece, if he wanted it played this way then that is the correct interpretation. If others deem someone got it better than they did, then, once again, that is the right way to play it.

146 More Replies...

Grand Cru

3y↑430

This sounds like a man who just fell in love with a woman right after he waltzed with her as the memory and music fades in his mind.

Lahm Verlassener

@lopazio So well said ! Thank you !

Lauren Duvall

2y↑3

What a wonderful image. I am a woman. What a gift to see the man's point of view. A man waltzed with me on the beach one, years ago. I love him now for that.

manzaza

2y↑1

That's so beautifully put!

Muntsukii

3y↑1

holy shit ur right

Peter Taylor

3y↑2

And that's exactly what he wanted thought. If somebody else sees something else, that's their right, but your feelings are absolutely valid and as you think of it. Good for you!

7 More Replies...

Anthony

1y↑11

Thomas Dalton

5y↑783

For those wondering why it's fast in comparison to modern recordings, Debussy actually gave the instructions "très expressif" (very expressive) at the start of the piece, I.e play it how you want - what speed, what rhythm, what dynamics, what tone... This is merely Debussy's representation of Clair de Lune, and not sounding like a stuck up, but it's one of the most interesting yet beautiful I've ever heard.

adrian wright

There are various indications throughout the score which show his intention to alter dynamics and temp. e.g "peu a peu cresc et anime" , "poco mosso" , "calmato"
Clearly he certainly did not intend a constant volume or speed!!

Jack Curley

4y↑4

Lol tres expressif doesn’t mean you can blatantly disregard what debussy wrote. You still need to follow his dynamics, rhythm (so many people count this piece incorrectly!), etc

IndianaBones

4y↑1

@Virginia Almon It was interesting. My tastes, however, because of my own life and experiences, feel the most emotion when it is played at a slower tempo. But to each their own.

Virginia Almon

4y↑4

@opwave79 Yes. Adagio means slow, not Andante. I think it is easier for pianists to play this slower. I love the tempo, but I think it requires confidence.

Eric

@opwave79 "walking speed" debussy must be parisian lol

7 More Replies...

Keels

I never thought of this song as being really sad. To me, it sounds calming, nostalgic, and dreamy, but not depressing or overly sad. Maybe a little melancholy, but in the way you feel at the end of a really good day: you're sad it's over and you wish it could continue, but you're glad it happened, and then you fall asleep at night thinking about all the great things that happened that day. Listening to this makes me think that Debussy had the same idea when he wrote the song, or at least a similar idea.

C K

3y↑84

It's saddening to see people dissing the tempo or dismissing it as a byproduct of limited technology (piano rolls, even though the piano rolls he used had more than enough time). You may dislike the tempo, but it doesn't mean his interpretation is wrong. Debussy was someone who wanted his pieces to sound like they were improvised, so it's plainly obvious that he'll have different interpretations (note the use of rubato and rhythmic changes). I'm also disheartened by those who dismiss his playing as lacking emotion or feeling simply based on the fact that the tempo is faster than they're used to. His performance is most definitely full of emotion and expression. This situation reminds me of people criticizing Heifetz for his fast tempos and lack of emotion, even though well-respected figures/violinists who personally heard Heifetz speak volumes of the emotion contained Heifetz's playing. Debussy is expressing such raw emotion into this performance and nobody appreciates it for what it is. Truly a shame.

Cynthia Gottlieb

2y↑2

He wrote the piece! I think he knew how he wanted it played.

Cara Being Blue

2y↑2

I've heard that a piece of music only truly played once. Isn't it nice to think that instead of repeating himself, he played as authentically and true to heart as possible for posterity? Just lovely.

Derek Bunyak

3y↑1

Learning to listen to 'fast' interpretations takes a bit of getting used to. The people saying they don't hear emotion just aren't used to faster music. I am in love with this version and I feel there is bounds and tons of emotion. The low hanging fruit of musical opinions: it's too fast therefor i can't feel the emotion

Isaac

The point is: he had never recorded Clair de Lune on whatever technology available then

C K

@Theo E. I can completely understand why people prefer the slower, modern interpretation because it's the most popularized way of playing it. When I first listened to this, I was also put off by the tempo. The way Debussy plays here though, is actually a lot closer to his desired tempo if we use a metronome. He marks the score as Andante Très Expressif which from some research means a "walking-pace" that implies "easy-going" and "expressively" which really helped me put into perspective what sort of sound Debussy was going for. Clair de Lune was also previously named Promenade Sentimentale which I believe has to do with some dancing, but promenade also means "walk" which is a little neat because it sort of reflects his marking. It made much more logical sense to me that Clair de Lune is played at this tempo after I realized that this is a story of dancing, like the original poem. They're dancing, but with that sense of melancholy and sadness hidden underneath. I personally think today's slower tempo doesn't best represent Debussy's intent, though it doesn't mean that a slower tempo is bad.

1 More Replies...

DrCrack

This is the only composer I’ve heard who not only wrote but also played music from his honest soul, not in a formal manner. There are no strict rules. Everything comes together to speak an idea in its bare form, completely ignoring whether others would understand it for it is mature enough to completely stand by itself. One needs to align their speed of thought to his to begin to really hear what he’s saying.

Oxygen

I have heard so many interpretations of this song. It is very enlightening to hear Debussy’s rendition of his own masterpiece.

Adrastea

4y↑170

This is the only version that has ever made me feel things.

Kasa Jizo

1y↑1

@Ketamine Kyle I never said that. I'm just surprised that someone would have such an opinion.

Ketamine Kyle

@Kasa Jizo “i dont agree with your opinion therefore you are wrong”

William Taittinger

2y↑1

@Adrastea yeah you are right. My patience with normies is very limited but you are right, lol

Adrastea

@William Taittinger Why so angry? Let us normies have our ignorant fun.

3 More Replies...

eenayeah

6y↑5.1K

If it really is him, then it is interesting how fast he plays it..

TJ x Wheel

@Vincent Andrews just because you don’t play it like the composer intended doesn’t mean that your interpretation is wrong

William Taittinger

but its not debussy playing it is an amateur. And op is trolling people. This was recorded in 1988 by a student. a bad one, as we all can hear.

Nasir Ferguson

@Кроули Эс no he didn’t he thought he could play the technicality better, Chopin didn’t like the way liszt played them musically

TwinIceBear

@Vincent Andrews the way a composer plays their own composition isn’t "right" just as any other interpretation isn’t "right". many famous composers like rachmaninoff have said they prefer the way others play their OWN pieces compared to the way they’ve performed it in the past. composing and performing are very different. a composer does not always have a vision of how the music is to be played, especially in impressionistic music. maybe debussy felt in a mood to play it faster, or maybe that’s how he felt the piece is. that doesn’t mean how others feel or interpret it is wrong.

dream fan ,

Hi this is a kid 3 years later

81 More Replies...

Sean Carter

2y↑14

ONLY Debussy himself could play it like this, because if anyone else did it, they would be surrounded with people telling them no, no, you played it *wrong*. But nobody can tell Debussy that he played his own piece wrong. So he plays it however he damn well pleases. Something to be learned about trust here, I think.

Rigged Game

I started listening to early recordings of pianists and was shocked how wildly different they sounded compared to almost everyone today. Some of it is due to recording limitations (they would have to play loud for the recording to actually pick it up) but to me it felt like musicians took a lot more liberties with the pieces than they do now. I can still hear the differences in current interpretations but it’s always really interesting to see what musicians have previously done with pieces.

I’m not sure whether the internet has been good in this regard— obviously it makes this music way more accessible and it’s great to be able to hear basically anything I want on a whim, but part of me also kind of wishes that people would take more risks when interpreting a piece. I’ve been playing piano for a long time but I didn’t really start exploring different interpretations of pieces I liked until recently. I was really surprised when I heard Rachmaninoff play Chopin’s 3rd ballade, and the tempo almost sounds like it’s flexing wildly or something, especially in the coda.

That evolved into a really off topic ramble but tldr I kinda wish we’d hear more varying interpretations of classical music.

maurice salentiny

Well... this shows-for me- that even sometimes the composers do not entirely see all the dimensions that their work is able to have. Michelangelo, Abbado... other times, other circumstances may alter the deep meaning of a musical work.

Terry Martin

1y↑1

Gosh, it's always validating for me to come back to this video and hear how the man himself apparently played it. This is the tempo I go for too but I'm always a bit self conscious that seemingly more authoritative people might criticize me for it. To be fair though, I'm sure I play everything too fast LOL. This one just happens to be correct.

Jay Cee

Debussy creates mood and atmosphere. His genius comes through no matter what it was recorded on. Bravo Debussy.

luis carlos bermúdez pinedo

para los académicos y virtuosos del piano, no es menester mio mencionar vuestras opiniones que pueden ser aceptas respecto a esta interpretación, solo decir que esta es la interpretación del mismísimo Maestro Claude Debussy, si nos regimos a lo que ustedes aprendieron de sus respetables maestros, esta versión no es excepcional, pero si la oyen con el corazón, apreciaran cada toque del maestro, dando algo de su espíritu a todo oyente, con escalas y acordes mesmerizantes, saludos desde Lima Perú.

Carl Rachel

As a composer, myself, it is difficult to explain the "attachment" to one's work that dictates its expression each and every time the composer offers it in performance. Some will say Claude "rushed" through this "recording." Some will accept and like it just as it is. But everyone, I hope, would give Debussy the latitude to have expressed himself any way the moment led him in this iteration of his own creation. None of us were there that night in 1913 to feel the energy of that moment.

Evan Harland

3y↑51

He’s pretty good. I wonder why we haven’t heard much from him lately.

adrian wright

1y↑1

He stopped - now de-composing.

Autotrope

2y↑5

Cancel culture I guess

Peter Taylor

3y↑1

Evan,....a bit hard when you're where he is as we speak.

Simeon Owen

5y↑1.6K

Trying to comprehend the 106 years of time between then and now. Imagine all the moments this song has experienced. Withstood the test of time and reached us today through means that nobody back then could have imagined.

Asher Ang

Piece not song

Joe Wright

It is a beautiful composition. One day, all the art created by Man’s mortal mind will be swept away forever.

David Tinoco

Just you wait...until some archeologists are studying this comment thread, 106 years from now...

Gruber

4y↑1

What a comment

Amen Amen

Sasha Reaper Thank you for your comment. It’s beautiful. 🙏🙏🙏

14 More Replies...

Adrodog

3y↑1

Playing at this speed completely transforms the peice. Playing it slower makes it feel sombre and sad, as if he’s earnestly searching for meaning in life but cannot find any, a sense of hopelessness and helplessness at his inability to grasp any understanding of life and the world. I’ve never really liked this feeling.
But the way Debussy plays it here however sounds magically mesmerising, like hes describing falling in love or gazing at the moon and stars and rather than feeling helpless or hopeless, he feels awe and amazement. He’s accepted the fact that he can’t understand the intricacies of the universe and all that is in it and he’s content to simply observe the beauty of it all and pay tribute to the wonder.
Perhaps Debussy wouldn’t be pleased at many of the elitists interpretations of this peice

tejaswi

At the start, the pace was quite different but as I kept listening, Debussy’s interpretation of this piece turned out beautiful and magical, and I certainly did not hear anyone else play like it

jwbarnhartmusic

4y↑26

There is something haunting about hearing this. It’s absolutely beautiful.

Aretha Walker

I find the speed endearing! Debussy wrote this masterpiece! I wish his performance was caught on camera! Bravo👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

storm riser

3y↑1

Irony is everyone plays the composition like it's meant to be melancholy. I hear a composer who layered the work almost like looking at image, say a river , and admiring both the water flow and the rocks it rolls over. The pace is essential to generate movement through sound in the same way most people's rendition has to be slow to fit the normal , dramatic or emotional, emphasis we seem associate with the piece. Best to remember this pace is how to was intended to be played at then maybe adjust our original take on it. He was a remarkable player as well as composer in my opinion.

Slack

5y↑2K

I'm glad Debussy is still around to share this with us

Marquis Robins

Go to his house 🏡

RelaxedAndLovingIt

3y↑1

lol this comment made my night

Davi Silva

@Guitar Rens oh, I never said we can't listen to him playing.

Slack

@Davi Silva 😂

Guitar Rens

3y↑1

@Davi Silva actually, I don’t think yóú understand.

33 More Replies...

satsumamoon

What an honour it is to hear Debussy play!

Claude Maillot

L'elegance, le bon rythme,.. Tout y est. On le voit et on le vit ce Clair de lune.

pianomanbrad

What a gift it is to hear him. Beautiful!

Lia Adralia

3y↑9

When Debussy plays it, it is joyful, vibrant, exciting, very much in love, I can almost hear his joyful eyes gazing on the woman he loves. Think of Paris, at night, under the moon light, and the gorgeus lady he describes beautifully with the melancholic notes. But when others play it, it is melancholy, despair, beautiful but tragic, unrequited love..

JNash

This is post romanticism
All the romantic artists played with effusive emotive gestures because you were in essence a COMMUNICATOR and your audience was rapt with attention to LISTEN to your message.
This was a different time. People now don't even know how to hear the damn music.

Geh Vicente

3y↑4

Essa música é fascinante! Ela toca a alma, acalma, relaxa.. 💕 Grande Debussy 😍

Carl Smith

5y↑2.1K

I can understand why people enjoy this song with a slower tempo, but remember that Debussy is an impressionist. I think the idea behind this piece, especially in the mid section, is to fill a room with music, not slowly played single notes. The sound that comes out of the piano when it's played at this speed is completely different and creates a different mood. I think Debussy was going for this.

Carl Smith

@PopanTermopan yeah thanks for telling me that for the 30th time in this thread...

PopanTermopan

Debussy disagreed with the term "impressionist".

FaDeD EtH3r

lol lol french newspapers! Debussy said anyone who were to site his work as impressionistic was an "imbecile"

FaDeD EtH3r

Debussy would roll in his grave if you called him an impressionist.

Hapedise Divide19

4y↑1

But Debussy was also notorious for getting performance nerves which means it could have just been the adrenaline causing him to play fast in some parts

40 More Replies...

Steve CLAPPING

3y↑11

Achille-Claude Debussy interprété par lui-même, une surprise pour moi. J'apprécie cette belle oeuvre romantique qui m'inspire une agréable nostalgie et me touche dès les premières notes.

John Griffith

2y↑1

well, after nearly wearing out my CD with Francois-Joel Thiollier playing this, I tried here. I immediately noticed the higher tempo making the sound more like water sprightly bubbling over a small delicate waterfall, but near the end Debussy seems to slow, which makes greater emotional effect. Lovely.
Like all great works of music, the best always seem too short.

John Griffith

2y↑1

fyi, Thiollier's version is 5 minute, 10 long!

Joseph Bloggss

Recording time (duration) was limited and expensive in those days, so no surprise to find the playing a bit rushed. . But great music allows for reflection and interpretation. It is, was, and always will be, one of the greatest and most inspiring pieces of music ever written.

Carl Bowlby

Wow. Blows my mind. Imagine not only playing this piece, but knowing it’s your piece! Truly revolutionary hearing Debussy play this, the first time I’ve heard this. And it’s true what I’ve read about Debussy’s playing style. Pedal throughout, but you’d never know it it’s so seamless. And plays with lots of rubato back and forth tempo-wise even in the same measure. And for all I know not a single missed note. Such feeling, such grace, so very musical.

Lance Farmer

The most beautiful song ever. It gets better and better every time I hear it.

Fabricio Guido

6y↑3.7K

Honestly this is the best performance I've heard of this piece. Well, who can beat the composer anyway?

_ydhdh

@Fra A lol anch'io sono ita, cmq quello che dici è vero

Die Geigergarnele

4y↑1

@Vexar If instead you really think about this like that, I can only tell you to keep listening to different recordings of various pieces. Especially old ones. Look for Rachmaninov and Bartok playing their music. There's a whole world out there and if a composer doesn't respect their own metronome it's because music is freedom and not a boring repetition of what is written. I don't know how advanced your studies are, probably not much, but I remember than when I was 14 y.o. it was very hard for me to like a recording after I got used to one. It's hard because our ears get used to smth and want to hear the same. You have to challenge yourself, because once you leave this mentality you will find a new layer of interpretation, of listening without prejudice.

Die Geigergarnele

@Vexar you are sarcastic right?

Vexar

@Die Geigergarnele Bruh I study music and this recording doesn't even respect the time it's written in... It's just idk man i don't like it that's all. I think it's terrible :P

96 More Replies...

Wilkins Micawber

It isn’t just the tempo that he is playing it is the phrasing and colour. I’ve listened to many pianists play this over my 74 years. But never until today listened to this recording. Which quality for 1913 is wonderful. As for the music if his is the way Debussy played, then this MUST be the definitive version. Personally, I love it.

Sue Monk

3y↑12

This is sublime - I love hearing it at the speed he, the composer himself, plays it. Gorgeous!

黄英哲

2y↑1

The song is so good and amazing for me!
I love it so much!
I hope somebody can play this song for me!
Listen the piano played by Debussy is so fantastic! This is good and nice and amazing and important!
Every time, when i listened this song,it was touched to me and let me remembered my father.

黄英哲

2y↑1

Yes,this is good!

Giescul

3y↑7

The entire feeling of the piece changes when played this fast. It's amazing how it almost sounds like a different song with a whole different feeling. The slow version is ethereal and dreamy, the fast version is full of energy and feels like a rushing river. A beautiful piece no matter how you play it.

Lars Holger Holm

2y↑1

From the horse's mouth! Extremely interesting to hear his own interpretation of the piece, more dramatic and fluid than one usually hears it. Not just some serene marble-like moonlight, but also passion and turmoil under it: there are some Van Gogh fists against the merciless sky here! The more I listen to this, the more I'm also seized by the raw emotion of the piece. No modern pianist, to my knowledge, brings out that same despair: this is flesh, lunatic 'horror' and reality. To me, this is a prayer from a man who has nothing to hide, and nothing to lose. He sees the Seine in moonlight, where so many people have drowned themselves. He feels la cathédrale engloutie within him. He is at one with his soul. And no teacher has ever, never, taught him how to interpret and feel this nocturne: Mon coeur mis à nu...

Ken Mayfield

4y↑578

This has to be one of the most beautiful pieces of music ever composed.

Choi

@Arlene Gwynn wow i expected Liebestraum before click this comment. i love both.

Michelle Rumball

It never fails to move me to tears.

Peter Taylor

No, but it's one of them. In the vast array of pieces written it would be impossible to find what is generally considered 'the most beautiful'. That would be a matter of personal taste, I'm thinking.

xponchox

I beleive it is universally considered to be just that

Katherine Heckerman

I cry everytime listening to it. I love it so much!! ❤❤❤❤ it's beautiful.

13 More Replies...

Billy Cobb

2y↑17

This recording is remarkable for 1913

BigPig

@William Taittinger Provide evidence for your claims, please. If not, then what can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

William Taittinger

oh really? but its not debussy playing it is an amateur. And op is trolling people. This was recorded in 1988 by a student.

b4d69

guffaw

Jul W

Okay thanks verified Youtuber

1 More Replies...

Eugene Danker

Always nice to hear the way the composer interprets his own composition

8 of Wands

Debussy is sublime. The most transporting music. Literally. 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗💗

糖鱒ケ

3y↑21

I really love this version. It’s just perfect, regardless if Debussy himself actually played it this way, or not. I just like it this way. I would love to be able to replicate it in this interpretation, but whatever I try it’s just so difficult to integrate, especially this weird rhythm that I just can’t really comprehend. Also getting the melody so cleanly separated from the background :O After all I’m just a noob I guess. There is just this huge gap between being able to play it and being able to play it nicely. At least I tried...

糖鱒ケ

@William Taittingermindblowing indeed. I think I have never listened to a more inspired interpretation of John Cage's legendary 4'33".

William Taittinger

@糖鱒ケ you should listen to this same russian student's version of 4'33 by John Cage. I bet you will find it mindblowing. Cheers,

糖鱒ケ

@William Taittinger Not sure if you’re just trolling. I still love this interpretation. Whoever played this had a very peculiar rhythmic sense and was definitely rather talented as well. If it was a student in 1988 he certainly had a lot of fun in this recording and played it unique in a way that makes it stand out from mainstream interpretations. Obviously, I’m not the only one who enjoys this.

William Taittinger

oh really? but its not debussy playing it is an amateur. And op is trolling people. This was recorded in 1988 by a student. Still the best you ever heard? lol. great taste in music you have, LOL.

JNash

Never give up. Practice slow then allow the practice to cease and enjoy your own sound.

Laura D'Amico

Magica...dolce...tenera...musica immortale........❤💯🔝

Carlos Vargas

4y↑1.4K

Debussy: Plays Clair de Lune at the double of the usual speed:
Piano Virtuosos: That's not the way you should play it.
Beethoven: Plays the 3rd movement of the Moonlight Sonata at half of the usual speed:
Piano Virtuosos: That's not the way you should play it.

Sebastian-Benedict Flore

Nobody saying whole beat wasn't real has finished a Wim Winters video.

RModillo

@Chris C Czerny left metronome marks for most of Beethoven's piano music. And he heard directly from The Man how it should go.

Jesse Davis

@Qrayon no he did not. I call fake news to that!

P.J.B

3y↑1

I am surprised that people still go around believing mood mornings like "Adagio", "andante" and "presto agitato" are metronome markings. I mean, the information is out there. These words were used long before the metronome was invented and in many pieces, the publishers include BOTH the mood markings and the metronome markings. Unfortunate that people still think that because the two things are written beside each other, they are the same thing. If prestissimo was a metronome marking, we would not need any other description for very fast pieces (like allegrissimo or vicacissimo). We wouldn't even need to qualify the markings with things like Molto or Agitato or con Brio etc. It's clear that though there's some relationship between the mood of a piece and the tempo of that piece, mood and tempo doesn't mean the same thing. Some fast pieces are light hearted. Others are tragic. Others are agitated. And others are just breathtaking.

We shouldn't still be stuck with the idea that allegro means fast. The information is out there.

Peter Taylor

@Paul Prince I guess, as a different instrument, it might sound better played slower or faster, whatever. But, as I see it, he composed it in a particular way for, say, piano. So, he's right and so are you or anybody who uses a different sounding instrument. So, that's from somebody who plays neither instrument but who just imagines what it is like to do so.

25 More Replies...

I changed My Self

2y↑4

The original, very much has undertones of syncopated jazz & is all around more a happy tune, a celebration of the night. There is clearly an explosive yearning in the melody and keystrokes. Amazing. Beautiful. One of my ever favorites.

Patrick Lynn

If I'll be honest I do prefer it slower. But this is such a beautiful song that it can be played with different cadences and still work

Roger Wauters

2y↑1

Although many famous recent pianists played this it all sound different with the composers version on this recording. It sound a bit faster but more dynamic, as if he discribe a waterfal against water running out a spigot. Absolutely my favorit performance of all and many times i heard ''Claire de Lune'' be played.

Trust The Process

One of the best melodies - listening in 2020 but wishing it was 1913

Mathieu Vernizeau

3y↑3

This version is just so emotional, compare to all others i've listened to. The space between the notes here are magical !

Emmanson Favour

Yess

Dragon Pictures

4y↑2.4K

Debussy: "Music is the space between the notes."
Also Debussy:

Giuseppe LoGiurato

Well, all I've got to about that is !

Giorno Giovanna

my mate, take a look at the year that has been recorded… and the recording standarts, audio quality…

Peter Taylor

@Eric Huang Piano rolls did alter the sound sometimes, esp. the speed. They were far from perfect. So, Debussy cut a few pianorolls for the masses to hear. I don't mind at all.

mommy2's stupid channel #ahahah

3y↑1

@Eric Huang yeah, to much longer than four minutes lmao

Oh Zachary Oh

He has a love of Chou Chou

18 More Replies...

Comp Lex

Virtuoso piano players deserve credit for what they add to classical music in addition to the well-lauded composers. This is one of the greatest composed pieces ever but with all due respect we've all heard it played better.

Mike Guthrie

I think this was a beautiful rendition of his work. I like the other ones too, but this one by the Author is my favorite one now.

L T

Thank you do much for uploading this and for giving history and background on it!
A different interpretation and it's cool to know how he originally envisioned this piece.
I still prefer the version from oceans 11 myself but this was a treat to listen to and read about.

Justin K

3y↑3

Usually the piece is played still, contemplating, lonely, cold, and in awe. Debussy plays it entirely different. It's playful, almost improvisational, and cold yet euphoric. It is the feeling when you walk alone through the night, and suddenly an inexplicable euphoria hits you. You watch the moon and the silent hills around you and your bones tickle of happiness and you start to jump and dance through the night, because life is just beautiful and the moon watches you from above.

Justin K

This contrast between the lonely, awing stillness of the harmonies and the playful, happy tone and rhythm is so beautiful and mirrors life's complexity.

Janna Tuominen

4y↑1

From the point of view of a dedicated amateur and ordinary music lover it's really fascinating and astounding to find how much controversy and tension surrounds the interpretation of music. I guess it's inevitable but I truly hope no-one takes it too personally or seriously because, as my mother always tells me: music is supposed to make you feel fulfilled and happy

JNash

Exactly. It is how the person felt when they were performing not how you the listener feels !

Molybdenum Rose

5y↑2.7K

I like the speed. It feels like the music is pouring out of him.

TwinIceBear

@Helge Christensen an interpretation is an interpretation, even by the composer. rachmaninoff himself prefered for example Horowitz interpretation of HIS OWN second piano concerto to rachmaninoff’s own recording years before. just because he wrote the material doesn’t mean he had a concrete vision of how it was to be played. of course, debussy’s interpretation is just as valid as any other’s. especially in impressionistic music, interpretations vary greatly. just because someone feels something different from the music doesn’t mean they are wrong, or that they are disgracing debussy. debussy would be happy to know his music affects and draws out a large range of emotions of many different people.

Kristian l

@HyperMario Hm, yes i think i agree with you

HyperMario

@Kristian l From what I've read, Liszt could at best replicate what Chopin was able to do. Btw Chopin was furious to see Liszt interpreting his own compositions.
About your other claims, as they might be true, I don't see anything supporting those on the Internet (maybe source a bit ?).

My point is that when you play a composition, you actually create another one by interpreting it. You might find it better than the original but the true author intent only resides in the original composition played by the original author, until proven otherwise by himself.

Kristian l

@HyperMario There is a diffence between feeling their own music in their mind and expressing it through play. I believe it was Chopin who didn't like to let Liszt play his pieces because Liszt (according to chopin) played them better than himself. Schumann was known not to be very good at playing his own works. Tchaikovsky could not play the piano very well and let others play his works and i could go on and on. It has nothing to do with entitlement. It is simply a fact.

HyperMario

@Kristian l How entitled you have to be to think the original author isn't the best person to express his own creativity ?

19 More Replies...

Noah

3y↑1

Composers can reinterpret their own music 👍

SammyT

2y↑2

Not sure if the fast tempo is because of how it was recorded or Debussy actually meant to play it that fast, but I personally prefer the slower interpretations of that masterpiece.

SammyT

@Deanna Reyna You're welcome, and thanks for the kind words!

Deanna Reyna

2y↑1

Pay attention, fellow commentators! @SammyT…now THAT is how you share your opinions as a gentleman/woman, courteously and without insulting anyone 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾 Thank you, Sammy!

Sebastian W.

4y↑7

I just love how the music pours out of him... unlike other pianists who play too slowly and dampen the entire atmosphere by putting too much emphasis on the individual subtunes. Instead of creating the entire scene itself.

Scott Preston

4y↑1

It was his baby, it came from his soul and he understood it. He wasn't trying to write for a mass audience.

Stu Riley

2y↑2

Im amazed by how differently i interpret this GIANT'S piece... i will endeavour to capture this interpretation from now on. It almost sounds rushed but i love it - its frenetic! Like he cant get it out quick enough! You'll never be forgotten Claude! I played this to my children when they were babies. They will never unremember!

Shieldmaster Kyrrsk

3y↑57

It's a strange change but I kinda really like it, doesn't feel as depressing to me. Feels magnificent

Historical Significance

6y↑1.1K

His view of playing this piece is so unique and different from other interpretations, it's not played in the way you expect. I like it

Hassaan Bangash

@Proper Noun Amazingly put, you really hit the nail on the head with the subtle differences that Debussy intentionally put into it. I found the exact things you mentioned to be fascinating myself, I just couldn't word it as well as you did :) Cheers

Zack Sima

lmao interpreting own work?

Michael Ibrahim

WHATEVER GOES FOR ME The reason you don’t like it is probably because he was running out of time on the recording

WHATEVER GOES FOR ME

@Proper Noun I also enjoy jazz so I understand what you mean about the difference in classical interpretation vs. innovative interpretation which is always present in any art form from dance to music to visual arts. I guess, I just like the other versions of Claire de Lune compared to this one. It is a matter of preference since I can like different interpretations of some musical compositions from classical music to modern music but I can also like only one interpretation as well.

Proper Noun

5y↑2

10 More Replies...

LazyDays

2y↑1

I really like his version. Why doesn't anyone play it this way?

B. Lenz

1y↑1

It's always an enlightening moment to listen to a composer with his own music. What a gem, to have this.

Darna Bedwell

The original interpretation by the composer himself. The way it was meant to sound. BRAVO!!!

Julian Galarza

1y↑1

This rendition is like a dance between two lovers on a cold autumn day, two lovers that don’t where anything is heading. They suspect that their time is limited and the joy and fast tempo of the music has a underlying slow sadness to it

KL.

2y↑3

This piece belongs to eternity and will never fade; it's something that connects past, contemporary and future generations. The sense of beauty and purity of this music... it is blasphemous when it is used in commercial contexts.

chris Wright

4y↑946

Can we also acknowledge that perhaps Debussy intended the piece to be played quickly? I mean after all he wasn’t a baroque or classical player, he was an impressionist, his music was meant to invoke feeling, often of nature and more often of water. And in the way he plays the piece in this recording I can hear that, so maybe instead of saying it’s cause he was running out of time, which I can admit that also might be the case, can we also think that we have our interpretations of his piece incorrect, and Debussy as the composer intended it to be this way. Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.

Hardcore Veritas

Did yall know that there is this thing called BEAT and TEMPO ? Oh , I should have known . Maybe yall should ask someone who actually can play it how quick to play it . ( Duh ) 😕

No problem, don't worry about thanking me 😉

John Lubeck

@Iamhorny Thank-you! Thank-you for validating how I play (actually played) this piece (when I was still able to). I hoped that Debussy would not have been horified, but I can literally say that my intention was to play it andante très expressif.

Tina Perez

3y↑1

I absolutely loved this performance / interpretation. Anyone playing this this way would've done an awesome job. That it was CD himself was the coolest thing youtube had ever recommended to me and definitely so cool of the uploader of this recording. Still just thrilled over this. 🤗😛🤗😊😘♥️💕 It's interesting to see people suggest that the piano roll format necessitated a faster tempo, but, I don't know - I don't see a right or wrong here. Just a wonderful reach across time to share something so beautiful with the person who made it. 🤗

Vextrove

Loroxe hundred years ago.... magic.

Beverley Levy

I actually like it in its original format.

22 More Replies...

Goth Punk

2y↑1

So hauntingly beautiful!

SANDRA LEROY

Une merveille remplie de sentiments sincères merci pour ce chef d oeuvre

Happy Girl

1y↑1

This is the most beautiful piano music, I just love it. I honestly can’t imagine any other piano music sounding better or prettier than this one. I applaud Mr. DeBussy! 💖

YourHalfSister

When this showed up in my suggestions, I knew it would be something special. This the best I've ever heard it played. ❤

Pamela Bergner Bergner

Omg thank you I had no idea we had recordings of Debussy playing Clar de Lune! ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Wow could he play🤗

Flaming Five

5y↑8.5K

the actual reason it’s so fast is because it’s recorded on a roll that has limited time for recording, so playing it fast is the only way to get through the whole thing

Chombers Baconbulle

Ooooohhhhh

BlackHayateTheThird

@BRAH MOMENTO Literally no

Thomas B

Ye that sounds like bullshit.. They could just continue on another roll.

And you mean a composer would compromise his artistic vision for a roll? And lets not get started on how the pace changes through out the piece and it all sounds like a perfect fit which would make no sense if he just sped it up for one recording

Pablo CAAR

You have no idea how this system works...

Rebekah Asay

Many of his other pieces were recorded the same way, much longer as well. This is how he wanted his piece to sound

119 More Replies...

Holly Craft!

3y↑36

he's good at playing the piano. I predict a great carrier for him in this industry. 👍

starguy2718

3y↑2

Keep practicing, Claude...maybe someday you'll be "discovered", by some A & R guy!

steve55 sogood

3y↑3

...or even a career!

loonaya

3y↑3

Wow. I don't like too fast Claire de Lune's, but this is something different. He slowed down and sped up at the right places, giving this composition new nuances that I didn't know were there. I guess Debussy understood his own composition ahahaha :)

Lahm Verlassener

2y↑4

This heavenly musical work by the great Claude Debussy so wonderfully soothes the soul of the listener...

Lahm Verlassener

2y↑1

I worship it and often dearly need it...

A

Since we're apparently voting, I enjoy his own redition more than any other version I've heard. It really evokes a deep feeling I can't easily describe. Whereas with others I'm evaluating my enjoyment of a piano piece, with this I forget I'm listening to music and experience it as something more.

Terry Newcomb

The magic of a masterpiece like Claire de Lune is that it can be interpreted in many ways, evoking different feelings in the listener. Try the versions recorded by a virtuoso harpist or guitarist, for example.

Horig G

Yes

handpancake

5y↑164

I was confused as to how the audio quality was so good for such an old recording until I realized thanks to the comments and then a little internet scouring that this is a piano roll recording. So glad that this technology was around back then so we could hear this amazing piece of art played by its creator! Kinda adds a little touch to an already ethereal song.

Hal Asimov

MP3 in 80 years on what media? Most digital media won't last a couple decades. Those "Lifetime" dvds are interesting though

barkbarkwoof

If you've ever listened to old recordings of Caruso, the accompanying piano sounds so horrendous it makes me appreciate this technology used at the same time. To bad it couldn't have been done for voice.

Magnetron33

4y↑1

The clarity and nuances are remakable

coast2coast00

4y↑7

Yes, the first digital music is over 100 years old. It still sounds exactly the same as it did then, as a MP3 will in 80 years.

Christian Mohammed Cohen

3y↑5

Un des airs les plus beaux!
chargé d'émotions ,
De nostalgie...

Quelle inspiration
Claude était véritablement
En dialogue avec Dieu...

S-0

2y↑1

I honestly don’t consider this to be like the modern interpretation. This is its own unique masterpiece that evokes different emotions, like butterflies in a lush meadow, fluttering around one another in the moonlight.

Anita Gallentine

When I was growing up, my dad brought home a Baldwin player concert grand piana and a bunch of player rolls dad called "expression" rolls. This was one of them, as well as rolls by George Gershwin and Oscar Levant. I haven't heard this version since I was a kid - thank you for posting it!

Load More Comments...

More Comments

just now