Chokai originally formed in Luton, UK in 1997. The original lineup consist… Read Full Bio ↴Chokai originally formed in Luton, UK in 1997. The original lineup consisted of two brothers, Chris Curry and Simon Curry. Chris left Chokai in 2004 and reformed in 2005 as a solo artist.

Originally signing to 3bass records in 2003, and then signing to Artificial Bliss Recordings Ltd. in 2005, Chokai have released 3 official albums. Tori Umi was the first official release on 3Bass records in 2003, Iko was the first release with Artificial Bliss Recordings in 2005, and the third in 2008, with a notably different, more experimental sound titled Knowledge and Ignorance.

In 2007 Chokai released a freely downloadable mixed EP titled Glade Geita EP, followed by the Shoot 'em up ace single in 2008. With the release of the third album, Chokai followed up with his more orginal style on the SKP recordings label with a 2-track single featuring a new track titled "Token robots" and a remastered version of the popular "clockwatcher" track from the 2005 album Iko. Titled Token Robots / Clockwatcher the single was released in early 2009.

With the sad demise of Chokai's record label Artificial Bliss Recordings, Chokai's catalogue and new material were now taken on by the Scottish pioneering techno label SKP recordings who duely released Chokai's next 2 releases '86 Space Battle Robots and the remastered tracxs EP from 2006.

Chokai also released and exclusive live performance of the track "Abunai" on the SKP Black label in late 2010. Chokai continues to work on new material.

Free tracks and samples can be downloaded from Chokai's official site: http://www.chokai.co.uk. Up to date news and tracks can also be heard on the official SKP recordings website at http://www.skprecordings.com

Reliving
Chokai Lyrics

We have lyrics for 'Reliving' by these artists:

Jelly Jams Mr. Mr. of my youth You fed me bread and taught…
The Jelly Jam Mr. Mr. of my youth You fed me bread and taught…

The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos

TRACKS

No Related Genres

More Genres

No Artists Found

More Artists Load All

No Albums Found

More Albums Load All

No Tracks Found

01Good Morning Music3:35

02Crash4:34

03Fall to ground0:26

04Clockwatcher3:31

05Burned old oak tree6:35

PT3M29S

09Information video number 145:45

10Tripoli3:05

11Heights of the rising sun5:21

12Mango Dragon5:01

13Explode into light6:45

Genre not found

Artist not found

Album not found

Search results not found

Song not found

Most interesting comment from YouTube:

WOT Arty Noobs

2y↑1

@aleph0x Replenishment At Sea.
It's an operation that submariners do not carry out that often unless the sea is calm and they can cross deck the goods by helo.

RAS'ing is normally carried out by coming alongside another ship underway, keeping enough separation so that the hulls are not sucked together, but not so far apart that they cannot be crossed by lines linking the two vessels. Usually one of them is an Auxiliary Ship.

The US Navy has an extensive list of auxiliary ships. An auxiliary ship is a naval ship designed to support combatant ships and other naval operations. Auxiliary ships are not primary combatant vessels, though they may have some limited combat capacity, usually for purposes of self-defense.

They are purpose built to carry all the stores that warships need from fuel to food and spares. Even ammunition including missiles. They are capable of keeping pace with the fleet and supplying all that is needed. Sometimes they can be routed to pick up stores to keep the fleet in operations, but priority goods tend to be flown in to the carriers on the COD (Carrier Onboard Delivery) whilst the food stores are brought in by multipurpose ships and the aviation fuel by specialist tankers.

RAS'ing can be one of those fun moments when ship's crew from different navies get to say hello to their allies and play host to their neighbors. All NATO navies have very strong ties. Just as all submariners regard every vessel other than their own as a 'Target'!

All comments from YouTube:

Dalriadaman

3y↑50

The Hornet shot looks like a single long exposure. The strobe on the tail acts as a flash during the exposure and 'freezes' the aircraft in place.

Phish Phood

If you’re shooting in the dark (or near dark) flash essentially acts like a double exposure. If your subject is brightly lit enough it basically looks like a composite image, but isn’t!

frostyupscope

I was going to make that same point...lol

Robin Blankenship

Clever Navy photog!!

Cedo0263

3y↑2

Came here to say the same !

chris Kola

3y↑26

6:40 The double capture of the aircraft is caused by the lighting from the red tail strobe. Basically, it is a long exposure and the scene is not bright enough to capture the aircraft, except when the strobes are on. Cool shot.

Patrik Renmark

@chris Kola Yep, exactly correct.

chris Kola

@Aerochrome The landing gear isn't exposed. It is a silhouette against the deck which is exposed.

DarkDutch007

3y↑1

@Aerochrome I think the red tail light is bright enough to lit up the runway in its near facinity with a red tint, the bottom half of the plane and its landing gear isnt exposed or hit with light, it blocks the red glowing runway that is behind it, creating a silhouette, which makes you see the shape of the underside of the plane.

Cameron Ward

@Aerochrome Maybe it's bouncing off the superstructure of the control tower? If it's bright enough to light up the top of the jet maybe it can reflect onto the bottom as well

Aerochrome

But how would that expose the landing gear?

1bottlejackdaniels

3y↑16

the USA and the UN have imposed commercial and economic sanctions against North-Korea...and under these circumstances, North-Korea is still able to develop nuclear warheads, ICBMs, SLBMs and hypersonic missiles.

whether you like it or not, the north-korean scientists and engineers are doing an impressive job!

K. T.

3y↑3

@Maxim Matusevich and maybe pigs can actually fly now...

Maxim Matusevich

3y↑1

@Fizzishin Maybe your understanding of the country is incorrect?

4 More Replies...

Rudi Antesberger

3y↑10

So good you are back Aaron ! Missed your great insight and passion

RISCy Architecture

3y↑2

6:57 It's one exposure. The strobe light on the tail of the jet makes it look like more than one exposure because the aircraft is lit up much more when the strobe fires.

1 KoolKat

3y↑4

Whether DPRK has hypersonics or not it should always be taken seriously because national survival is at stake.
One thing is true about those North Koreans they are as serious as a heart attack and they will never give up.

Ethan Eckstein

3y↑1

Hey love the vid, but there two serviceable type 45 destroyers the other one is transmitting to join back up with CSG, also the whole issue is with a wr-21 gas turbine which was jointly developed by Northrop Grumman ( Westinghouse marine at the time) and rolls Royce, basically the gas turbine overheats and basically destroys itself over time. Basically the intercooler work but not to what they should be so when they go south of the Suez or Carribean they can't steam at full speed for that long

Bold Gambit

3y↑9

The machines will rise when the F-18 mounts the pilot to assert dominance

Bryant Giles

Hot

Casey Limbert

Outside of special teams, I didn't know the Navy did physical training, and I was also in the navy

Draksyl

3y↑5

Have you seen the "Grim Reapers" recent videos in DCS World featuring carrier battle group engagements, and showing just what it takes to saturate a modern multi layer AD setup?

Will Wozniak

2y↑1

The boys just done a mission to see if Taiwan could hold their own against a Chinese First Strike. Taiwan faired pretty well to The Dragon.

Chris Terry

Great content as usual. That photo you mentioned is probably two or three different planes. Camera on a tripod shooting continuously. In post you stack the images and paint in the layers you want to see. As long as the camera doesn’t move it’s pretty easy. Check out masking layers in photo shop on YouTube 🤣

Man of Culture

3y↑16

It’s like Oprah is giving out hypersonic missile tech.

GunMan1942

3y↑5

Always a good day when there's a @Sub Brief upload :)

Quahgalaxy S4

Capability to track North Korean mobile launchers accurately from space 24/7 would help to protect peace in that region.

Jud Dread

The heads up display will include a variation of the Bedford Array for CATOBAR, having been developed for SRVL operations.

Cameron Ward

3y↑7

For that long exposure of the Super Hornet, do you reckon it could be caused by a flashing red light on the tail? Then that outline, if you will, of the jet would only appear when the light is on, creating what looks like a double exposure.

WhiskeyHeavy

3y↑1

As a photographer, this is what I think happened

Adam Smith

3y↑1

Exactly what I thought.

1 More Replies...

WOT Arty Noobs

I seem to recall that one of the TV channels (possibly Discovery) showed a US Replenishment vessel in one of the 'Mighty Ships' shows. The amount of effort taken to keep the Navy ships stocked with fresh food is amazing. Only matched by the amount of work needed on Cruise ships to do the same every week. When we RAS'd with the Royal Fleet Auxiliary ships, they'd usually hoist the Trust House Forte pennant or some other hotel line.

WOT Arty Noobs

2y↑1

aleph0x

What's RAS'ing?

jonesYxxc

3y↑3

Could you zoom in in future naval news? The text and pictures are vary small when you watch on a mobile. Next to the text is only white space so we aren't going to miss something if zoom in further.

Would really appreciate it. I really enjoy your news segments!

WOT Arty Noobs

I suspect that North Korea is trying to develop hypersonic missiles as they realize that ballistic ones would be engaged in flight. It's likely that quite a few of these tests will end up with the second stage disintegrating at altitude. North Korea had outside help (from Pakistan) to develop their 2nd gen warheads and their missile tech is relatively old Chinese rockets. From the brown clouds, it's very obvious that they are using hydrazine liquid propellant and whilst they give a very energetic launch, they are extremely hazardous to anyone on the ground.

M Hamma

3y↑1

Hey jive, have you seen 'star boat' yet? You're welcome -- that photo was a standard long-exposure -- the collision beacon flashing was acting as a strobe. Nothing fancy, just the red strobe acting to light the scene with each flash.

Jersey Shore Drone Services

About that photo of the hornet Landing on the deck... The Sparks from the hook show as streaks so that is a long exposure. The light on the tail may be a strobe light, you see that it flashed in two different positions during the long exposure. That light illuminated the back of the hornet which is why the rest of it doesn't appear in the image.

The deck of the ship and all items attached to the ship are not blurry because the camera was on a tripod and essentially was moving together with the ship.

Iggy Madness

I’ve played so much World of Warships that every time you talk about a Kongo Class Destroyer, I picture a Battlecruiser.

anuvis raa

As A merchant marine (faborite submarine food) and former submariner (onli for 2 years and 2
navegations) is a strange relation

WhiskeyHeavy

3y↑3

It’s a single shot. The red light was blinking

E Van

3y↑3

The US has had hypersonic missile technology since the Boeing X51 Waverider tests in 2013. It flew at Mach 6 for over 6 minutes of powered flight during the most sucessful test showing scramjet hypersonic capability. Three other tests demonstrated the scramjet cruise missile concept

bruh Momento

HAWC was just successfully tested a couple days ago

Drone Tour DS

Why would it break up in flight ? They have tested that ballistic missile half a dozen times when it had a 2 stage and a ballistic warhead and goes mach 20 , now it's the same first stage with a glide warhead and you think it broke up in flight even though the south koreans say they tracked it on radar ? A manoeuvring warhead on a ballistic missile is no different than a manoeuvring guided bomb dropped from a jet , just from a bit higher and a bit faster . A glide warhead is the same as a guided manovering warhead but with one flat side on the bottom so it glides further. That's it no other difference. Nk and Iran have guided warheads on ballistic missiles for a decade, Iran used them against a American airbase in Iraq, they all work fine . Nk missiles are bigger, warheads bigger, they work the same . Have you seen the guided warheads nk has on their scud missiles? They are quite big , this looks exactly the same but with one flat side . And on a h12 first stage boost. Why would it not work ?

Kenya Kennedy

Keep up the good work

Otto Honkala

3y↑2

SA-2 looks nothing like that...nor does any Russian SA - missile....

stcredzero

3y↑3

For a moment there, I heard "replenishment ship" as "punishment ship."

wimpie

Glad it wasn’t just me. Surprised me they used a ship for punishments 🤣

CaptainDuckman

That destroyer looks a lot cleaner than the ones you can see in the Google maps photo of Yokosuka...

UnBearified Bear

3y↑1

God damn I love this channel ❤🇬🇧🇺🇸❤

PleaDa5th

Does the ghost fleet get counted in those numbers?

Mr Doohickey

3y↑1

Famous Cornish name, Trevithick. Break it down to Tre (pronounced "tree") vith (like Sith) ick. Hope this helps Aaron.

Bruce

China wants to keep North Korea in its orbit but has no incentive to help North Korea develop nuclear weapons or nuclear capable missiles. This is because a nuclear North Korea will incite a reaction amongst its neighbours to arm themselves with nukes, which is ultimately to China's detriment. It pays to keep the Korean peninsula divided for China, but not to impress upon the neighbouring countries of an existential threat from North Korea. China would benefit much more from South Korea diverting its attention and preoccupation away from North Korea, and towards its traditional enemy, Japan. There's plenty of historical animosity between Japan and South Korea, and a degree of kinship between the two Korean nations, and it is useful for China to play divide and conquer.

Mikael

Pretty cool with north korea missles, they start to get good tech and will be a huge problem for japan/korea if there will be a conflict in that area. Those hypersonics will be exxelent shipkillers and are much much cheaper then building modern ships.

Will Wozniak

@Mikael Bro...just about every military that has a decent military have all been testing Hypersonic glide vehicles. Japan....Turkey....etc.,,,US has stepped up in their own Hypersonic magic....US is also working on Hypersonic defenses. Not sure if Russia or China has a plan to defend themselves from Hypersonic strikes.

Mikael

@Montys420 well thats whut the pictures show. so they have them. they are telling all enemies they have the tech and stay away.

Montys420

I doubt north Korea are able to manufacture hypersonic glide vehicles yet there materials wouldn't be upto standard to cope with the forces involved.

Sooner Frac

3y↑1

To quote/paraphrase Garand Thumb: we know how our Marines love going tip to butt…..

Buddy push-ups…uggg. Don’t miss those, mostly.

LORDOceanus

The Burkes and Ticos both still use variants of the AN/SPY-1 Ticos use the AN/SPY-1B and the Burkes use the AN/SPY-1D

Peter Sone

3y↑1

If you think fast roping looks dangerous, find out about “tree jumping” during the 50’s and 60’s.

Buttars

Cowabunga it is

Baljinder Singh

3y↑1

I think cruse missiles are too dangerous with nuke

Grimm Pickens

Yes, but no. The reason we haven't "flipped" NK is because China has said they will take up arms against who ever restarts kinetic conflict on the peninsula

Montys420

I doubt N.K have the ability to manufacture hypersonic glide vehicles there materials wouldn't be upto scratch to cope with those kinds of forces.

Christian Junghänel

They have six type 45

C Mac

I thought Iwo Jima was home ported in Mayport

twenlil

That is why US does not mess with North Korea!

Jimmy Seaver

3y↑4

North Korean hypersonic cruise missiles? Wouldn't most of them just miss their targets or blow up shortly after launch?

vinak

3y↑1

Always good to see the N-Koreans make innovative weapons for their war against the ocean.

Dominick Little

3y↑1

I heard the hypersonic missiles are all hype

user936

I thought "Super Duper Missile" sounded better. If they named the first one to go into service the Duper 1, I would be very happy.

Worse Than You

3y↑1

“Wake island adventures” I see the theme park “Wild Adventures” has expanded to wake island

MAC BOUNCER

have the cold water vids moved to a different channel??

Sooner Frac

Aaron makes comments again about the English weather.

John Bloor’s dirty looks intensify.

helen

do not fog up and do not tell fairy tales, I am from the former USSR and have not believed in horror stories for the people for a long time

Herner Weisenberg

Uhhh that orange nitrogen dioxide vapor from the korean missile. Kim should take a good sniff from that xD

Anders Hoel

Nort Korea hit the sea.

Ron Feland

3y↑3

I love you man, but you struggle with ALL the names LOL!

al h

3y↑1

Damnit Jim, he's a sailor not a speaker!

al h

And the other words as well.
😜

Fissile Missile

This bloke is a deadset dribbler!

Andrew 13579

3y↑1

Are not all intermediate and intercontinental range ballistic missile warheads hypersonic vehicles?

Herner Weisenberg

3y↑1

I would imagine every weapon thats hypersonic is a hypersonic weapon. Then you got sub categories like hypersonic glide vehicles like in this video, hypersonic cruise missiles like that russian Zircon and hypersonic vehicles like MIRV warheads on ballistic missiles that use lifting body aerodynamics for terminal steering like with the reentry of a space capsule.

David Stevenson

3y↑1

The term "hypersonic weapons" doesn't mean what it literally says. It's a name not a definition. They are a new category of weapon. Otherwise you would have US officials saying "we had HS weapons in the 1950s" but you don't, you have them saying "we need to develop HS weapons to keep up with China and Russia".

Herner Weisenberg

The older ones are more like hypersonic bullets i think, but newer ones that have guidance and can steer with lifting body aerodynamic effects during reentry and bejond probably yes.

al h

I just realized there will be a USS T****....... Doesn't HAVE to be a carrier does it?
Another port fire?

al h

3y↑1

@Simon Zaleski - Beagle Music Labs maybe a garbage scow

al h

@Simon Zaleski - Beagle Music Labs Carter was a fish though

Simon Zaleski - Beagle Music Labs

3y↑1

Jimmy Carter got a Seawolf and LBJ a Zumwalt, so it could be something other than a carrier if it happens, yes.

David Brown

They appear to be progression in rocket/missile technology but they haven't got the targeting aspect down. Well, not as far as we know anyway

Jud Dread

Trev-vith-thick is the pronouciation

William Cox

LPD = Landing Platform Depot.

Pelican1984

3y↑3

@William Cox The dock part is the 'Well Deck" in the stern with ramp for launching Amtracks, LCAC's and Mike boats.

William Cox

3y↑1

@Pelican1984 My mistake. Thanks for the correction.

Pelican1984

3y↑3

"Dock".

香料國境

home erotica.....what??? need to toughen up pt is totally needed!

PLANET TRUMP

3y↑2

Bro wtf is going on with the work outs man the way they do push-ups is all wrong man I’m pretty sure your supposed too be doing push-ups with a straight back

navyreviewer

LOL. Zero, zero, zero, zero, zero.

al h

3y↑1

Now we know where your browser history goes. You dirty fish.

Vojtech Pribyl

Those letters on the diagram are not korean. Hangul looks different. I think that was something they have taken from a chinese source as well.

Also you haven't toppled NK because there is little use in doing that, rather than because of nukes. After all they don't have them for that long, but neither Russia nor China would allow it to take place in their neighbourhood and ROK would probably also be quite unhappy. Just look at the economic side of the thing. NK is already on a good way to be a humanitarian catastrophe on it's own and if it collapsed the ROK and China would probably face a massive refugee wave. After that ROK would either have a massive burden in infrastructure building on it's shoulders and China all too eager to get a cut of the pie and tie whatever resulting state, unified Korea, or some sucessor, to itself. Either way it looks as a net loss for the ROK and maybe a long time investment that could bring some fruits after a lot of effort. NK is a state that only a few like, but even fewer would like to collapse. That's why it still exists and there are just attempts to initiate internal changes IMO.

Alexander Toshich

Mr Turkey, I have an old Kodac camera, you intresed

Apex Kevv

Kim is not Iraq or Libya.

Christian Junghänel

And 5 don t work

Thomas Wormsley

Post processing

CrazyWarriorsCatFan 🇺🇦

riskinhos

north korea will have hypersonic missiles sooner than ameritardia. LOL. what a joke it has become. as if the major defeat in afganisthan wasn't enough already

David Stevenson

3y↑1

@David Seager No they don't, they have test vehicles that sometimes work, when they can get off the aircraft.

David Seager

America already has hypersonic that work.

John Doe

3y↑2

Even NK has a HS missiles. But what abt US? Why we don't have it?

David Stevenson

@skyserf That's not what I meant. I meant precedent as in: an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances. I can't consider what isn't known. I meant that the F117 being kept secret isn't a blank check to claim that every technology currently being persued has already been created, partly because that is not even what happened with that program. We don't know everything but that doesn't mean that anything goes.

skyserf

@David Stevenson You can’t possibly know the precedent. You have no idea what weapons systems are being developed in the black.

David Stevenson

@skyserf None of those systems kept the variants secret from each other. There is no precedent for what you suggested and the F117 program was completely different, like I said.

skyserf

3y↑2

@David Stevenson Multiple obvious answers would be parallel development, different capabilities, more than one contractor, loss of confidence in a contractor, improved/expanded throttling, changing needs or changing whims of an administration. None of those answers would necessitate the exposure of a program that is currently secret. You have no idea what they currently have. And you don’t know that the tests were fake. Maybe what they have doesn’t have the range they would like but works well enough that it could be fielded.

There are few weapons programs that haven’t ever been modified for greater potential. The AIM-9 has had at least 15 variants. The Hellfire has roughly the same number of variants. The Minuteman ICBM has had 3 not including mobile and air launched versions. The MIM-104 has at least 5. All of those systems either grew in effectiveness or changed capability. To get to their end states they needed tests. Somehow I doubt that missiles operating under extreme thermal stress are immune to continued testing.

Fizzishin

@skyserf Again, irrelevant to the context of nuclear weapons.

10 More Replies...

Pelican1984

3y↑2

Where is the Taiwan invasion you were flogging as imminent 3 weeks ago?

skyserf

@Pelican1984 The CCP also believes invasion is imminent.

Pelican1984

@skyserf No, the regular cast of posters here on this channel.

Pelican1984

@Fizzishin No, the video and discussion was that the QEII carrier group was off Taiwan in preparation for the imminent invasion in September, because the seas are best then for amphib ops. JT and all the sycophants were ranting about the war about to start.

4 More Replies...

spikedpsycho

Aircraft carrier is obsolete

Herr Fugbaum

Unfortunately, you only know with certainty whether something is out of date when it is already too late. The battleships were considered important and modern by the conservative military until they finally lay at the bottom of the seas.
It should also not be forgotten that any weapon system creates economic and social constraints. If you part with aircraft carriers or battle tanks for example, billions of dollars will be distributed in a different way. The shipyards and tank factories will do everything to prevent this. Even if that harms the effectiveness of the military.

AtomicWarsmith

3y↑1

@spikedpsycho I don't think you have any idea what you're talking about if you honestly think CVs are obsolete. If they were going to be made obsolete they would have been as soon as the SSBN came about. Plenty of countries wish they had the funds, personnel, aircraft, and logistics to run CVs.