Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Song not found

Sounds Of Africa
Eubie Blake Lyrics


No lyrics text found for this track.

The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos
Comments from YouTube:

Andrew Barrett

This recording is one of the greatest things of all time, Mr. Blake's playing is so flawless and his feel is so incredibly funky and sophisticated, especially for 1921!!!

AT first listen his eighth notes SOUND straight, but NO!!!

They're not always widely swung, neither, it is a very tight, subtle, sly form of swing, very flexible and totally in the service of the phrasing, of the syncopation, and also in service of the MUSIC (as all swing should be), and you have to have a rather hip ear to "get it".

That's not to imply that I have a hipper ear and that you won't be able to hear it, now that I've hipped you all to the 'secret'... LISTEN AGAIN... :D

Bourg Productions

Years later, this song would be recognized as "The Charleston Rag." Even in his 90s, Blake could play it like a B.A.M.F.

jazzwatch64

Early stuff...LOVE it-3 1/2 stars.....

Andrew Barrett

And yes, just so everyone's clear, the title of this piece on the original 1921 Emerson 78 rpm record (which I do not have, but have seen before on eBay) is given as "Sounds of Africa". Again, the earlier and later title given this piece by Mr. Blake is "Charleston Rag" so the title "Sounds of Africa" appears to have been a one-off for this Emerson session only (of which I believe two takes were made, does anyone know which take this one is, and have the alternate take to post? :) )

kafenwar

Will Marion Cook retitled this composition "Sounds of Africa" when he allegedly tried to get G. Schirmer to publish this piece around 1907 or so.

mark borowsky

This is Take 4, the one normally found on jazz re-issues. I have put take 6, the one normally found on ragtime re-issues ( as Charleston Rag ), on Sound Cloud.

Keith Otis Edwards

The name of this tune is "The Charleston Rag."

Andrew Barrett

@***** Nick, I'm sorry man, I normally agree with what you write, because it is generally very well-informed, but here I must dispute this. Mr. Blake's first known document of this piece, the 1917 Rythmodik / Ampico piano roll (of which I think only one known original copy of the Ampico version exists, the basically identical Rythmodik version not having turned up to my knowledge), indeed titles this piece "Charleston Rag" and claims that it was copyrighted in 1917 by M. Witmark & Sons, arguably the largest published of popular music in New York at the time.

Mr. Blake, later in life, told a story of going into the G. SCHIRMER & SONS (not Witmark) offices in New York at some point to get this piece published, and famous conductor and composer Mr. Will Marion Cook accompanied him.

Apparently, the gentleman there in the Schirmer office was friendly and it looked like they were interested in publishing the piece
(remarkable, since Schirmer was, and IS, mostly known as a US publisher of the very heaviest / most serious European and American classical music, and they were NOT known as a publisher of popular music,

*although, in the late 'teens and early '20s, Schirmer did have a brief fling at trying to promote some semi-popular type works, both songs and instrumentals, possibly because they may have thought they would be more "accessible" to the general public than the normally very difficult classical music they were (and continue to be) publishing.

I should point out, though, owning original sheet music copies of a few of these rare Schirmer "popular" works...
(including a couple of nice instrumental things by none other than Mr. Rudolf Friml, who was, believe it or not, a song plugger /sheet music demonstrator for this publishing house at this time; you'd have to be a virtuoso classical pianist on the scale of Liszt to be able to demonstrate ALL of Schirmer's virtuosic published wares, and Mr. Friml WAS!!!),
...that they are not NEARLY as simple to play as the majority of the simplified popular sheet music being published and peddled by other big publishers like Remick, Feist, Shapiro, Harris, Haviland, etc. and also Stern and Witmark (although the latter two firms usually left a bit more musical meat on the bone of their published instrumental pieces, for pianists to savor).

So in other words, had Schirmer actually published "Charleston Rag" in 1917, or whenever the meeting took place (earlier or later, but probably earlier), then they probably would have published it in full score unsimplified form, in the original keys (6 flats!!!), and it would have REALLY given pianists something to chew on!!!

Only a few publishing houses had the balls to do this back in the original old days, such as Stern (publishing a few of the masterpieces of Mr. Scott Joplin and others), Stark (publishing more), and Witmark (who, for example, in 1915 published the remarkable, very classic, romantic, difficult, and utterly wonderful "Texas Fox Trot" of Mr. David Guion).

Most other publishing houses did not bother trying to publish ragtime anywhere near the way the pianists (even the composers) actually played it, or envisioned it (Mr. Joplin's pieces, though difficult, and almost certainly published as he must have intended them to be played, are not nearly as difficult as some of the things ragtime pianists were playing by the mid-teens, as evidenced by audio recordings and piano rolls!!!). Instead, they published simplified versions of everything, for the amateurs at home buying the sheet music, and the professional pianists were expected to learn from these and fill out the music to sound more rich and full, according to their own style and manner, or risk losing their jobs to someone with more musical chops. (Of course, you know this already, I'm posting the above paragraph for others to read here on YouTube).

Anyway, long story short, Mr. Cook got mad at some question the Schirmer folks asked Mr. Blake, and ended up spoiling the whole publishing deal due to his temper, so "Charleston Rag" had to wait about 60 years before finally being published (in a version very close to the way Mr. Blake played it, so pretty darn near full difficulty) by Edward B. Marks Music in the wonderful folio "Sincerely, Eubie Blake" which I recommend. Mr. Terry Waldo did this transcription/adaptation with Mr. Blake's advice and numerous tips, and I believe some manuscripts of Mr. Blake were consulted in addition to the 1921 recording heard in this video and also the 1917 piano roll.

However, the 1917 Witmark copyright listed on the piano roll of "Charleston Rag" is a curious thing, since I have not YET found a listing of the actual copyright registration in the Library of Congress records, although it might be there.

It is possible they were second in line after Schirmer to get the rights to this, and must have meant to register it for copyright, yet forgot to (this is not unusual; I have seen several other instances of this failure with other songs and instrumentals that were supposed to have been copyrighted...oops!).

I am almost (not quite, until I finish listing all of the plate numbers in order) positive Witmark did not actually publish "The Charleston Rag", at least I have never seen or heard of this vintage sheet music, nor has any sheet music collector with whom I've ever talked, and no known ad page on a Witmark sheet advertises it for sale or even mentions its existence (such as a title page or first page on some contemporary other tune by Mr. Blake which could have theoretically read "Music by Eubie Blake, composer of "Charleston Rag", "Baltimore Blues" etc., if it existed).

The reason I'm blathering on and on about the Witmark publishing house and the copyright for "Charleston Rag", is because I firmly believe it is the REASON for the alternate title "Sounds of Africa"; I think that since Witmark owned the copyright (or at least claimed it), and Mr. Blake may have sold it outright, or perhaps did not have permission to record it from the publisher (a rather stupid thing for a composer to have to get at any time, but these things sometimes happened back then!!!), he then would have had to re-title it to avoid detection and some sort of a (financial?) penalty. Anyway, I have not seen or heard anything published or recorded by Mr. Blake before or after the 1921 recording titled "Sounds of Africa", so I think he may have just made up this title for the one recording session only, and "Charleston Rag" was the REAL title of the rag the entire time.

At least, this is my theory; what do you think?

Keith Otis Edwards

@*****
When did this name change occur?  There are many recordings posted here of "The Charleston Rag," including one from a 1917 piano roll, but not one titled Sounds of Africa.  But you're a better musician than I, so out of respect, I'll defer to your opinion.

More Versions