(1) The Romans were one of … Read Full Bio ↴There are two bands called "The Romans":
(1) The Romans were one of Los Angeles' first super-groups with members of the budding art/punk scene sweeping Southern California in the early 80's. With members from Human Hands, Monitor, BPeople, The Deadbeats, 45 Grave, Consumers, Tikis, the LAFMS and Green On Red, The Romans added a unique voice to the "LA Punk" movement. While the explosive chemistry of The Romans was short lived, with only 2 full-length LPs ever recorded (their second LP produced by Steve Wynn of Dream Syndicate), band members went on to make rock history with Mazzy Star and Opal. On the debut release, The Romans were Mikey Borens, Pat Delaney, Juan Gomez, Keith Mitchell, and Michael Uhlenkott, and was engineered by the legendary Paul Cutler. Their debut 1983 LP, YOU ONLY LIVE ONCE was released on cd with 8 bonus tracks by Warning Label Records.
(2) Powerful and very talented band from Maaseik, Belgium, which make music in the best tradition of Hüsker Dü, the Lemonheads, the Posies and Therapy!.
The two brothers Laurens & Chris Leurs and their friend Frank Coonen become runners-up in the 1988 final of Belgians biggest talent contest, Humo's Rock Rally. After the mini-album Ball & Chain (Produced by Kloot Per W) and the full album Trigger Happy, they take a retreat. They perform as backing vocals for other Belgian Artists like De Mens, Ze Noiz and The Paranoiacs.
In 1993 they hit back real hard with "Major Panic". Not less than four singles are released from this album : "Down down underground", "Fire Brigade" (a Move cover), "Minneapolis" and "My friend Stan" (a Slade cover), all of which got raving critics and wide airplay. They tour the country extensively (e.g. as the opener for Iggy Pop).
Or as Knack put it in a review of the album "the Romans have plotted their revenge together with producer Paul Despiegelaere (see Machines). "Major Panic" plays in the first league of the best Belgians of all time and is miles ahead of almost everything that went through our hands in the last half year. That much praise is due to six songs of outstanding quality and their fine harmony in singing and living. They had it already and they found it again."
In an article in Humo, the band is introduced as follows : "After the very good album"Trigger Happy" The Romans have been without a record contract for two years , so with less gigs, so with less airplay, so with less screaming teenagers in skintight jeans, because that's how it goes. That is incomprehensible because (1) the new Major Panic is an excellent rock album and we wish the nitwit in the record company who caused the break a lot of itch and a short arm, and (2) in the meantime countless other groups in the world have had the opportunity to dump countless tons of shitty records on the world."
1996 sees the release of another good album "Be my star" with the brilliant single "Someday Cindy" and "How slow" and "I am the liar". Jacky Huys said about this record "We've always liked the chaps from the Romans, even though the guitar-rock on Be my Star isn't really up-to-date and it begins to appear they've definitively missed their train to Top-ville".
1998 has the next Romans album and a move to a new record company : Oyster Records. El Diablo was received well by the press, but apart from the curious single ""Space Girl", which faired very well in De Afrekening, the album didn't cause much of a stir. As the bio says : "But The Romans don't let it go to their heart, as their primary concern is not 'becoming famous' but writing songs with a capital 'S'."
Although their talent is well-appreciated by the alternative rock-audience and recognized by the critics, they haven't managed to produce a breakthrough to the general audience or markets abroad. But as Laurens Leurs said in 1993 "I am glad with our position as underdogs. It is the most comfortable position to be in as a musician. I don't want to have to prove myself constantly. ... The Romans will never be the next big thing.".
In april 2000 The Romans compiled the best of their material they have recorded in the period from 1989 until 2000 on acompilation album, called "So Far". There even is the release of a single, "Burn 2000", a new version of the song that appeared on the mini-album "Ball & Chain", got a lot of airplay but never got out on single-format.
In his latest newsletter to the fans, Laurens Leurs said "After 12 years of sweating, labouring, amusing us, rehearsing, manifesting us, we make a round-up of what the Romans have done to this day. This brings to an end an important period of the Romans. What now?! With this, the pages of the nineties' book is definitely turned over. New ambitions need to found, new goals to be set. "You gotta walk and don't look back".
Only a few weeks later, the decision was made : The Romans split. The reason are no "artistic differences", "ego-clashes" or solo-plans, but a feeling that everything has been done.
Members :
- Laurens Leurs (vocals, guitars)
- Chris Leurs (vocals, bass)
- Frank Coonen (drums)
What Gives?
The Romans Lyrics
Jump to: Overall Meaning ↴ Line by Line Meaning ↴
Give to me
What you give to me
Gives me no one else
What you give to me
Give to me
What you give to me
Gives me no one else
Give to me
What you give to me
Gives me no one else
What you give to me
Give to me
What you give to me
Gives me no one else
What you give to me
When we're all alone
Give to me
I feel so much love
What you give to me
No I couldn't ask for more
What you give to me
When we're all alone
Give to me
I feel so much love
What you give to me
No I couldn't ask for more
What you give to me
When we're all alone
Give to me
I feel so much love
What you give to me
No I couldn't ask for more
What
What
What you give to me
Give to me
What you give to me
Gives me no one else
The lyrics of The Romans's song "What Gives?" seem to revolve around the concept of receiving love and affection from someone that is unique and incomparable to anyone else. The chorus repeats the line "What you give to me, gives me no one else," emphasizing the special and exclusive nature of the love being offered. It suggests that the love and affection received from this person is so powerful and fulfilling that it cannot be replicated by anyone else.
The repetition of the phrase "What you give to me" reflects the importance of this love and the impact it has on the singer. It signifies a deep sense of gratitude and appreciation for the emotions and experiences shared with this individual. The line "No, I couldn't ask for more" conveys contentment and satisfaction with the love received.
The verses highlight the intense emotions felt when the two are alone. The singer expresses feeling an abundance of love in these intimate moments, suggesting a strong connection and closeness between the two individuals. The repetition of "What" in the bridge further emphasizes the overwhelming impact of this love, almost as if the singer is at a loss for words to describe its magnitude.
Line by Line Meaning
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Give to me
Please bestow upon me
Gives me no one else
Brings me a unique sense of fulfillment that cannot be replicated by anyone else
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Give to me
Please bestow upon me
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Gives me no one else
Brings me a unique sense of fulfillment that cannot be replicated by anyone else
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Give to me
Please bestow upon me
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Gives me no one else
Brings me a unique sense of fulfillment that cannot be replicated by anyone else
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Give to me
Please bestow upon me
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Gives me no one else
Brings me a unique sense of fulfillment that cannot be replicated by anyone else
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Give to me
Please bestow upon me
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Gives me no one else
Brings me a unique sense of fulfillment that cannot be replicated by anyone else
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Give to me
Please bestow upon me
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Gives me no one else
Brings me a unique sense of fulfillment that cannot be replicated by anyone else
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Give to me
Please bestow upon me
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Gives me no one else
Brings me a unique sense of fulfillment that cannot be replicated by anyone else
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Give to me
Please bestow upon me
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Gives me no one else
Brings me a unique sense of fulfillment that cannot be replicated by anyone else
What
What is it
What
What is it
What
What is it
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Give to me
Please bestow upon me
What you give to me
The gifts and gestures you offer me
Gives me no one else
Brings me a unique sense of fulfillment that cannot be replicated by anyone else
Lyrics © DistroKid, Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC
Written by: ROMAN FLEISCHER
Lyrics Licensed & Provided by LyricFind
Rafael Costa
@Miko Järvinen I do not have to provide you evidence.
You engaged in conversation with me, you said I am not correct, you have to prove it.
All you presented so far are emotional arguments. Please present facts.
But I will give you a little nugget. In the UK the government spends 24% of its income with healthcare.
That means 3 out of 12 months in a year you pay taxes for healthcare.
People on an average salary can get a good health insurance with what they pay in taxes in 2 months.
I know, I live here, I compared the prices. I did the math, something public healthcare supporters refuse to do, therefore resorting to emotional arguments.
Most people are worse off by paying the government to provide healthcare. You say private companies must make a profit, and do not even consider the huge inefficiencies in the public sector.
If you do not have any arguments besides "buahh you are selfish" please do not bother replying
Mage Player
@PauldogI think that this is wrong
SPQR(rome you dunce):
0th guy: is a slave makes nothing saves nothing, no social mobility.(bottom 10-20%)
USA:
0th guy: lives, can take a shower, went to school as a child, probably has a cell phone, may go in debt but will get health care.
1st guy: can afford family, house,
2nd guy: insurance, peace of mind, retirement
3rd guy: last one to take their hand off this private jet keeps it
While the gap of wealth between the rich and the poor has not really changed (maybe even expanded) quality of life has increased substantially for everyone especially the poor.
For example universal emancipation and voting rights or even things often unthought of like the right to a trial.
Additionally the social status and recognition have additionally greatly evened out. what i mean by this is that people can actually often times marry up in the social hierarchy think the great gatsby.
AshenAshAshy
@Blugale Doh stable food supply and produce could be used to sustain other produce and also produce different goods such as medicine, clothing etc.
Without farming in general humanity probably could of not evolved tho farming and its difficulty varied by a lot of characteristics.
How large of a land, how many individuals work on it, types of corp, terrain etc.
Farming was also often mixed as a source of income and food supply depending on civilisation. They were farming seasons and non farming seasons,
Some areas required less work and others required more, some societies had systems for them making it a communal job.
redmanticore
@Kyle Davis except capitalism develops their wages with time, too.
some are now complaining china is becoming too expensive to outsource, that they need to find cheaper place because wages have naturally risen.
people aim for education with the money, they don't want their children to be factory workers like they were for 40 years. chinas GDP has risen multifold in 40 years while western world, at least European unions, GDP has stagnated for 40 years.
so its not permanent slavery system compared to romans. in roman times, a slave would be same slave for thousands of years. in capitalism, china has developed and become wealthier in 40 years, a lot wealthier relatively.
in 1980, chinas GDP was 190 billion.
now it is 17 trillion.
that is not ten times increase, that is 89 times increase.
they are not slaves, forever stuck. if you think so, that is not only offending to them, but also highly factually incorrect.
Filaxim Historia
We hope you enjoyed the video as much as we enjoyed making it. Make sure you make it to the Aristocrat's lavish feast at 20:24!
Nikolei Graham
could you please include exchange rates from Dinari to USD so that we know how much these things cost IRL.
AΩΣ
Cool story bro
Daguitardoctor
The farmer can use the leftover unsellable harvest, the olive oil from his landlords farm as well. As there is the unsellable harvest.
Dávid Kiss
@Lester Dilworth mostly from 1 ( and same used for 2 )but close:D
Tijl Aerts
When you look at factors like occupational hazards, working hours, child labor, pollution,... It's quite possible roman plebeans had much better lives than 1800's factory workers.
Richard
oc
red inhaler
@Mohamed Ramadan exactly but most definitely the hardest, the other stuff would have been fine for kids, not good but not terrible for them. You cant compare a kids life in rome with a victorian kid, imagine telling a chimney sweep kid their life isnt as hard as a roman farmers kid. If you really want to find the worst standard of living in ancient rome look at the kids that had to clean the floor heating in big houses (but then again they could go to a bath and got decent food after work), or even worse look at the crew of a galleon. Still not comparable to the moldy rotten life filled with hunger violence and infection or disease a victorian age person would have had.
Mohamed Ramadan
@red inhaler plowing the land is hardly the only work in a farm
red inhaler
@Mohamed Ramadan exactly plowing was hard labor that needed to be done by big strong men, so kids wouldnt have done it