here we go again…
The U.S. Army Airborne & Infantry Lyrics


Jump to: Overall Meaning ↴  Line by Line Meaning ↴

Its the real
Here we go again
Here we go again
Bogorappaz represent




Overall Meaning

The song "Here We Go Again" by The U.S. Army Airborne & Infantry is a motivational anthem for soldiers serving in the army. The phrase "Here we go again" is a nod to the fact that soldiers live a life plagued with difficulties and challenges that they must overcome every day. The opening lines "It's the real" signal that this is something that soldiers experience on a daily basis - this is not a drill, but the real deal. The repeated refrain "Here we go again" serves as a rally cry, fortifying soldiers' spirits as they face their next mission or challenge.


The inclusion of "Bogorappaz represent" is a nod to the unit that created the song - the U.S. Army Airborne & Infantry, or "Bogorappaz." This song represents both the pride that army units feel for their service, as well as the solidarity that they feel within their own unit. The song is an anthem for the brave men and women serving in the army, encouraging them to persevere and thrive despite the hardships they face.


Line by Line Meaning

Its the real
This is not a drill, it's actually happening


Here we go again
We are about to engage in combat once more


Here we go again
This is not the first time we have been in this situation


Bogorappaz represent
We are proud members of the Bogorappaz unit and will fight to defend it




Lyrics © O/B/O APRA AMCOS
Written by: UnderClass U.C.

Lyrics Licensed & Provided by LyricFind
To comment on or correct specific content, highlight it

Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Song not found
Most interesting comment from YouTube:

Sol Invictus

The history of why Italy left the Triple Entente is more complicate than this. It was a Defensive pact, not an Alliance (a totally different thing).
The article 7 of the Triple Entente stated that not a single nation member of the defensive treaty should've had become an aggressor, otherwise the all the nations involved would have been automatically considered neutral and the treaty withot any legal value.
Rome warned many times Vienna to not attack Serbia, cause it was an infringment of the Article 7, but to resolve the casus belli with the Diplomacy. Vienna do not did that, they declared war to Serbia and the treaty with Germany and Italy becomes null.
Then Italy as any other Nation would have done, choose his path looking at national interests.
So i laugh when i ear someone say that Italy betrayed the "Alliance"...on contrary, after WW1 who was betrayed by Americans was Italy itself, that wasn't granted with the lands previously agreed, wich Americans refused to vote in favoir to give to Italy in the pact of London.
Also, the stereotypes that Italians regularly underperformed in War is just that, a stereotype. Italian soldiers did stuff in WW1 and WW2 that no other army had never even thinked about it.
The problem of Italians was their higher officials (inept noblesman) and the lack of bellic industry and oil resource.
Also, on Arditi, their standardized equipment was a knife and hand grenades, in fact when they was assaulting the trenches they was doing it with the knife in their mouth and a ready grenade in their hand. They was using also flametrower and muskets.
The armor aka "Corazza Farina" wasn't a common equipment, but was given only to that Arditi that was doing some suicidal mission, to protect themselves from shrapnel.
Also the Arditi trained also an US Unit, the 813th company



All comments from YouTube:

Duck

So, Italians basically broke the saying
“Never bring a knife to a gun fight”

Kiki

always bring a knife to a gun fight?

Duck

TF are you two saying?

DC4

Maybe the saying is always bring a knife and a gun to a knife or gun fight

Duck

FBI what are those other people in the reply saying?

Foxglove

I can't imagine it ended well for knifefighters who found themselves inadvertently up against somebody using a submachine gun. (Assuming these fighters were still around in 1918.)

39 More Replies...

TheConqueringRam

World War One was a horrific war. The tactics that were used are very interesting to study and at this point in time the idea of having soldiers attack with melee weapons would have seemed archaic, but here it was somewhat effective. Also when it comes to WWI people usually talk about the Germans fighting the French and British at the Western Front, so a video about the Italians fighting the Austro-Hungarians is refreshing.

Pt Bot

Refreshing?

bouse23

The tactics in 1914 were based on napoleonic tactics they didnt take into account modern weapons like machine gun etc

deth

Melee weapons are still being used... just look at the India china border conflict in 2020.

More Comments