02
Lightning & Group Lyrics

We have lyrics for these tracks by Lightning & Group:

102 Seasons come And they go Day breaks Yet the night still fall…
I Wonder What Is anyone really who they say they are With two dimensions…

We have lyrics for these tracks by Lightning:

I Luv U Nothing Took a thought from me to you In an honest light,…
In And Out Of Love I was never one to shout out loud Or stand out…
Me and Me Princess I'm not trying to flirt with you You just started talking…
Memories Night comes in, I'm feeling weak I count the seconds as…

We have lyrics for these tracks by Group:

180801-2286 Silently the morning mist is lying on the water, captive…
Everything I Know I told you all about me But you're still a mystery Does…
I Don't Like To Lose Never thought that it could be This kind of life for…
I Want More Ohh, oh Lost in my mind Lost track of time Stuck in a…
Line اصلا ماهتم للدنيا الصاير بيه مو شويه تفرج يمته رايد اعرف حت…
One Night Only And it starts like this We crave to be kissed by…
One Two Siapa yang sudah bisa berhitung satu sampai sepuluh Saya Pak…
Shine 'Cause my hair is curly Just because my teeth are pearly J…
SIMPLE Charming - you said hello Smiled - little did I know You…
Tell Me Why Tell me why is it I feel that you never…
THE FEELING Yeah the day is right my friends Live life as full…
Then We thought we were dreaming; then our mouths were filled…

Toasts raise up your glasses let us drink to the wind…

The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos

TRACKS

Genre not found

Artist not found

Album not found

Search results not found

Song not found

Comments from YouTube:

@BillLaBrie

2y↑563

Considering how many 5.0 Explorers made it out of the factory, I don’t know why Ford never mass-produced a v8 Ranger.

@WhuDhat

2y↑15

plenty of everyday schmoes doing the swap themselves

@MyCatInABox

2y↑19

Yeah...I never understood that.
There was MORE than enough interest.
...but then again, Ford isn't in the business of making cars JUST to make cars- They make cars in order to make MONEY.
I guess they figured they already have enough "income" and didn't wanna make the effort of designing a production-ready V8 Ranger 🤔

@elev8torguy130

2y↑17

Because it sounds cool. Gearheads love something like that. But the general consumer buys a ranger for other reasons. So the market simply isn't there for it.

@04dram04

2y↑6

@elev8tor guy but then whats the point of putting it in the explorer? A truck makes more sense than an suv

@elev8torguy130

2y↑3

@04dram04 They never put the 5.4 2v supercharged in the ford explorer. They put a 5.0 which was severely underpowered for its time. Nothing like the coyote and it wasn't for racing.

40 More Replies...

@gt0783

2y↑302

Holy crap! I never knew about this one. What an incredible job they did on this concept. That big motor and power in that small truck is hilarious, I love it.

@BuzzLOLOL

2y↑8

From the HP/torque, was expecting high 11's in 1/4... or at least low 12's...

@henleybear2742

2y↑11

@BuzzLOLOL thank the bad transmission and barely any traction

@jdubskiwright2380

2y↑12

Im sure some slicks would of helped the E.T. i thought at best it was gonna have the cobra supercharged 4.6 motor but nope svt did it big and used the 5.4 2nd gen lightning motor.. i see why ford didn't release this, because people would have been wrecking them like crazy i can't imagine trying to drive that in the rain with no extra weight in the bed

@ranger8729

2y↑4

@Jdubski Wright I had a 347 swapped '88 Ranger I built in college. You did not drive it in the rain; EVER. Trucks like these are not for the masses.

@jdubskiwright2380

2y↑2

@Ashley Jackson definitely not.. one wrong hit on the throttle around a corner and youll be facing into oncoming traffic..i really wanna swap a mild 302 into a late 90s ranger or mazda they fit and there only about 50lbs heavier then the iron 2.5 4cyl when you use aluminum heads. Id go with a 4r70w auto or a 5spd relocate the battery and put a fuel cell in the bed swap in a the 8.8 axle some bigger brakes and better suspension upfront and you gotta nice little street truck

3 More Replies...

@anthonygonzalez9422

2y↑72

345's in the rear is INSANE for the time. The Vipers of similar vintage weren't even that wide out back.

@tyopsie

2y↑19

345 is still pretty insane in any of the time periods current and past

@KrGsMrNKusinagi0

2y↑2

probably slowed its mph down in the quarter

@noredcr

2y↑3

probably wasn't even enough, the rear end of these rangers was far too light, they'd spin the tires easily in the rain. i can see why this never went into production, it'd be worse than the mustang memes.

@DonkeyKong2222

2y↑110

If this was produced with just a 4.6, It would have been a good competitor against the Dakota V8. The Dakota threw a 5.9 in it as well and called it the RT. Was a good decade for compact trucks.

@siegessaule

2y↑1

Nissan, Toyota, Big 3 all had competitive small truck designs back then that command premium prices today.

@anthroism26mc

2y↑4

I own an 03 Dakota R/T and it's excellent at making tires disappear

@better_call_ALL

2y↑1

@Michael C never knew they were a thing but dang it sounds like it’d be nasty.

@midnight347

2y↑3

Dakota is midsized not really a compact.

@sporkybutterz

2y↑45

The OG SVT engineers were like the skunkworks of Ford...very cool engineering products

@bigtex144

2y↑2

Amen! I was just thinking about the V10 Mustang they did. Not even a Triton V10 from their trucks, but a Modular 4.6L V8 designed with two more cylinders to be a 5.8L V10. Wacky stuff!

@StrictlyPlinking

2y↑137

I loved this era/generation of Rangers! Had a ‘95 and an ‘01. This beast should have been mass produced!

@ike789125

2y↑11

had the 99 and the 03 Edge; best trucks everrr

@mastersitorou8289

2y↑1

Don't forget the Crown Vitoria that spawned like cockroaches, the cruiser, taxi, and civil use.

@jmin8400

Senseless business case.

@martymcpeak4748

2y↑1

More 400+ hp Rangers would have been in ditches or wrapped around telephone poles than there would be running normally. My 2000 v6 flareside is bad enough for spinning the tires in 1st and into 2nd gear 400+ hp would be pointless.

@jmin8400

@Marty Mcpeak Exactly

2 More Replies...

@MarkMeadows90

2y↑85

The guys over at Trucks! did a similar project on an early 2000s Mazda B Series truck (same platform as the Ranger). They stuffed a 4.6L DOHC unit into one. But, the modifications got more gnarly as time went on with that truck. It's called project Rolling Thunder if anyone has seen.

@elroycooley398

2y↑2

I remember that

@86twin

2y↑1

I watched that here on YouTube

@sidneysanders5726

I saw that! With the V8, and IRS from a cobra R and it still weighed close to the stock 4 cylinder and had very sports car like weight distribution. I enjoyed that project!

@clintonstubbs2319

2y↑2

I remembered seeing that truck on Trucks! Miss seeing that show. It was a really good show.

@sidneysanders5726

2y↑1

@Clinton Stubbs it's now called truck tech, and it use to have the same hosts from trucks, Kevin tez and Ryan, but they changed hosts also

@billgateskilledmyuncle23

2y↑15

A 5.4 stock would be scary in a single cab ranger, let alone a supercharged one! Wouldn't touch it on rainy days.

@BuzzLOLOL

2y↑2

But from the HP/torque, was expecting high 11's in 1/4... or at least low 12's...

@dodgeguyz

2y↑1

@BuzzLOLOL
I’m sure they were pedaling it hard!

@carllovullo6602

@BuzzLOLOL Looking for traction 🤷‍♂

@TheRealHungryJoe

2y↑59

Gotta love these retro reviews.. I had a buddy who owned base Ranger with over 300K miles on it. Nice little trucks

@lego4virgo

2y↑29

I always wanted them to stick the 4.6L V8 in a Ranger, back in the early 2000's.

@TSL73

2y↑6

GM did stick the 5.3 in the Colorado

@smirage22

2y↑4

@Tom245332 very rare

@bryankerbow7871

2y↑9

Insane to think that this truck concept is now 20 years old. I remember hearing about it I was 21-ish at the time and back then I was obsessed with big horsepower numbers and hearing that they stopped at 5.4 l V8 inside of a small truck like that was just baffling at the time. How times have changed. Everybody's worried about how much electric juice they can shove under the hood nowadays. I never thought I would be one of those old men that would look back and say, "Ya know, back in my day". But it seems now I can. Times have changed so much and I am constantly looking back on those days thinking how much simpler things seemed.

@bspep3

2y↑46

I saw a red ranger that had the 2nd gen Lightning front bumper, wheels, and side exit exhausts. It was called "lil lightning" and had custom badging for it. Had a 3.8 supercharged engine from a Thunderbird S/C

@justgrundy12

2y↑8

It's a shame that this little beast never came to fruition!!! I'd love to have one in my driveway right now! 😭

@Catboy.

2y↑12

Too bad these weren't in production. What an incredibly weird and awesome vehicle

@yupyup4209

2y↑36

I had a 1996 Ford Ranger Splash with the 2.3L 4-cylinder with 5-speed manual. It had over 400K miles before I sold it. Nothing ever went wrong with it other than standard stuff like dead batteries.

@TheRealHungryJoe

2y↑5

I believe it! I’ve seen it

@brian5o

2y↑5

I absolutely love the Splashes. My uncle had a blue 1994 with the 4.0 V6, I believe and the 5-speed and it was such an awesome truck. I wanted to buy an black extended cab with either V6 and a 5-speed in 1995 however the dealership jerked me around and I ended up with a very nice 4.3 V6, 5-speed S-10 extended cab.

I'd still love to get a Splash although it seems like most that I see have lived a pretty tough life by this point. If I ever find a nice one and can afford it, I'll jump on it for sure.

BTW, that old Ford 2.3 L is such a bulletproof engine. You were very lucky to have one.

@damontroch4765

2y↑2

You mean you never has electrical issues like dome light never turning off. Sometimes never turning on. Lol.
How about Cold Start sensor either not activating or not being able to tell when its warmed up ?
8 spark plugs and 112 HP that literally couldn't get out of its own way if your life depends on it 😂🤣

@monikhushalpuri

I love ford's but I hate the electrical system...recently got rid of my 88 thunderbird turbocoupe with the same engine your ranger has but with a turbo attached to it, great engine...stupidly designed electrical system from the factory, any ford's pre 1994 just don't bother unless you're willing to rewire the whole car because the ass hat engineers couldn't be bothered to properly wire them

@economicfusion6065

Just that they had terrible mpg for a 4 cylinder

9 More Replies...

@aeiq1219

2y↑6

My gosh, I am getting old remembering this old video from MotorWeek.....John, you are still the best...thank you.

@prestigewoodworks

2y↑8

As a Chevy guy, I approve of this truck and remember when the concept came out, I would have this in my garage

@shanStreetracer

2y↑146

I did not know these were made 😳

@bghoody5665

2y↑59

They weren't. This is a one off concept.

@danjones3402

2y↑7

Same, because it's a concept probably 🤣🤣

@Mitroff85

@Dan Jones 🤣

@robertstone9988

2y↑7

They did an expedition lightning concept as well that never saw the light of day. I think there was an SVT Thunderbird also that made it the concept but never made it to production. This truck was killed off for the same reason the SVT Thunderbird was because the platform went away.

@cheldosarmiento2733

2y↑2

It was a concept

18 More Replies...

@hellatightdude

2y↑14

Holy hell this thing is incredible

@mr.pan-pan6446

2y↑5

Saw a guy who did something like this had a stroker kit made for the v6, mild cam, slapped a supercharger on top, t56 trans, and got a cobra irs in the rear. Impressive af.

@patrickmichael3384

2y↑7

I miss this rare one time only review of this one of a kind Ranger. Thanks!

@Please_Enter_A_Name7078

2y↑15

Damn, 420 horsepower and 480 lb/ft torque. That is literally double than that of the Ranger’s highest output engine. My 4.0L V6 only makes 207 horsepower and 238 lb/ft torque. They should’ve totally made this a production vehicle.

@BuzzLOLOL

2y↑2

Yeah, from the HP/torque, was expecting high 11's in 1/4... or at least low 12's...
Guess estimate was grossHP, not netHP...

@robertjebediahfreeman

2y↑1

This thing would eat a raptor/trx alive lol

@Jcastro9444

@BuzzLOLOL same but what's killing the times and power in that truck is the slow slushbox trans. If it had a 10 speed or even 6 speed auto it would be way faster.

@BuzzLOLOL

@Jay C - But you have to consider the additional weight of trannies with more gears...

@midnight347

@BuzzLOLOL it should be faster the lightning ran like 13.9 at 100 same engine with less power and more weight. It don'tale sense.

2 More Replies...

@hudsondonnell444

2y↑4

There was some Arizona based tuner who built a Ford Ranger stepside with a Vortec supercharged 5.0 and a T-56 transmission back around that time. That was what I envisioned as the ultimate Ranger.

@lucasblanchard47

2y↑3

That’s an incredibly cool little truck! Love this kind of build with a bigger engine in a small vehicle!

@WardoUSA

2y↑1

Growing up In Toledo Ohio, my next door neighbor was a salesman at the local dealer and brought one home to take me for a ride.
Super cool as a ranger was my original dream truck.
I remember the lighting felt faster.

@zecrid446

2y↑11

You've been SITTING ON THIS THE WHOLE TIME???
The Lightning Bolt was one of those legendary 2000s Ford experiments to me, that along with the Boss 351 V10.

@crazybear5475

2y↑1

how come GM sometimes produces one off's for mass purchase, Syclone and Typhoon, but Ford does not?

@zecrid446

2y↑4

I'd say Ford has had a few wild one offs in their belt
Like the V8 Taurus that had a completely custom Yamaha/Cosworth engine, the 1999-2004 Mustang Cobras also had a whole new rear suspension designed just for them, and also to a lesser extent when Ford turned the 4.6 4 valve 90° and put it into the FWD Continental and the Continental only that needed a special block to work with the transverse layout. Ford definitely does weird things, but unlike something like the Syclone and Typhoon Ford sells a lot more of their weird cars so they might seem less special I suppose?

@midnight347

2y↑2

@crazybear I mean Ford has a ton of special vehicles that are rare that are sold to the public even more rare than the syclones. Ever heard of a cobra r? Made em in 93, 95 and 2000. They made 107, 250 and 300 respectively. The svo mustang was unique and fairly limited as was the turbo coupe tbird and sc tbird which was a blown v6 those were very corky cars that were fairly limited. I think anything svt did was super cool. There are tuner versions of special cars too like Saleen cobras for example. Boss 302 was cool as shit and pretty limited at only like what 8000 vehicles total for 2 model years? 93 cobra was 1 year only and just under 5000 made total. They made like 3000+ syclones so they aren't much more rare than a 93 cobra and alot of the other cars I mentioned are much more limited than the syclone and typhoon

@crazybear5475

2y↑1

@Lil' Ike i know ford did a lot with SVT in the 90s and 2000's with cars but NEVER with the Ranger. That was a waste.

@The1stRealVR

2y↑11

I wish this had made it to production. I had an 01 ranger 4L v6, 5 speed manual, extended cab with the rear dual suicide doors, 4.10 gears, lsd, 4x4, with a box delete and a custom rear baja style frame was made in the rear. It was a blast to drive. I put about 180 000 miles on it before giving it to my best friend who then sold it for $200.

@gavinvalentino6002

2y↑1

...aaaaaaand no one cares.

@P71ScrewHead

That motherfucker, hope y'all ain't friends no more..

@austinfrazier7325

2y↑2

Truck is worth 10K now 😂

@The1stRealVR

2y↑3

@Austin Frazier i know. Kick myself in the balls often thinking about that one.

@TheMec1978

2y↑2

Hermosa camioneta!
Muy buen programa!
Saludos desde Argentina 🇦🇷

@bghoody5665

2y↑6

Ford's response to the GMC Syclone. Pretty crazy.

@JDMHaze

2y↑1

agreed, what a time to be alive

@05gtdriver

2y↑3

Over 10 years later....

@hellatightdude

2y↑3

I wish they would’ve brought this to production. It’s fucking rad.

@crazybear5475

2y↑1

yup but Ford chickened out where GM did not.

@hellatightdude

2y↑2

@crazybear One of the rare times that happened. Usually it’s the opposite.

1 More Replies...

@deepharrow8520

2y↑1

The human mind is amazing. I didn't remember this until he said getting rid of the burnout evidence. Definitely saw this with my dad on TV many moons ago

@Backyardcustom

I love watching these videos cause my grandmother lived right down the road from that drag strip and I remember going up to see her in the summers and sitting in the back porch at night hearing them run down there

@bricegraham8256

2y↑2

I never knew these existed. Gotta love Ford Rangers.

@ThatV8Ranger

2y↑2

This is why I have a V8 ranger. Just too fun!

@mikes1292

2y↑1

Dad had a 1998 explorer with the 5.0 ,was a beast for back then

@hunterphille1280

2y↑9

This is the first time I've heard of this truck and it's amazing! I hate that I missed this back in the day! I guess Ford did an amazing job making this sleeper because if one rolled up on me I wouldn't expect what would happen next.

@kupidzheart

2y↑4

never knew of this , these would have been siiiiick!

@trevagraham1605

2y↑2

I'm a Ranger guy and didn't even know about this one. That would've been awesome!!!

@19jody72

First time ever for seeing a video of this truck in action!

@joshc606

2y↑3

I remember a few people doing this with the 4.6!

@JDMHaze

2y↑9

This would’ve been worth so much money today

@georgeschmall9254

2y↑1

You can buy concept cars, most of the time they arent street legal. There was the Purple 1995 Riviera Convertible GS Concept Car for sale a few weeks ago.

@JDMHaze

@George Schmall oh wow

@victoryepik1950

13w

Some SVT concept cars really deserved to be made because they are really sick and also will atract a lo t of new fans

@nathanlopez5667

2y↑5

Truck should be going deep into the 12 second range with that much horsepower

@jamescurrier5828

2y↑1

Traction issues.

@mach1mustangguy992

2y↑9

Shame they didn’t make these. They woulda been a major hit! Wouldn’t have cost much more to make these. Don’t know why they didn’t 😢

@midnight347

2y↑2

Prob because it would have been too fast for the price range aka smoking the mustang gt and running with terminators for less money lol. It would have to be priced under the lightning which was around the 03-04 cobras cost prob little less. So it would have been closer to mustang gt pricing but smoking it on performance lol. Can't have that.

@2H2521

34w↑1

Totally badass! This is easily one of the coolest concept vehicles I’ve ever seen, this definitely should’ve been a limited production truck.

@zorans8114

2y↑7

It would've been a monster with awd!

@jaye2865

1y↑1

Love it. I kept waiting for the 0-60 though.

@GKMess42

2y↑1

Stuff seen in this video that we'll never see again for general consumers:
1. A Toys R' US sign
2. A legitimate mini truck (I.e. One with a frame)
3. A supercharged V8 in a pickup truck.

@davidaubin3902

2y↑3

1:23 John: WHAT IF THE LIGHTNING HAD A BABY BROTHER? LOL

@tagle2818

Wow. Would love to have one. Perfect in every way. Especially the color.

@greylonbrady

2y↑8

These would be selling on bring a trailer for $50k now haha

@robertjebediahfreeman

They’re worth it lol

@MustangsTrainsMowers

2y↑3

I’m wondering how they modified the front suspension? I put 1994 Mustang Cobra 17” wheels on my 2011 Ranger XLT Supercab in 2016 and the tires were rubbing the front brake hoses even with wheel spacers on. I then tried 5/16” disc wheel spacers on and the lug nuts had only 1/3rd of an inch of wheel studs to hold onto. Off came the wheels after 10 days as they were too big of a hassle. I have a video of them on showing how close the tires were to the brake hoses.

@robertforward1453

Big fan of those mirrors. So cool

@hemifan3925

2y↑1

I remember those 2002 Alteza taillights.... everyone was getting them.

@amitmitra6487

2y↑1

This is really good, didn't know this existed.

@jakefr5150

2y↑2

Always like the look and basic nature of this era Rangers. I had a ‘99 XLT single cab that was decent, but had fuel delivery issues early at about 30k which were aggravating to diagnose and costly to fix. After that it was pretty solid until I sold it just shy of 100k. Would have kept if it for fun if it weren’t for my lack of storage space and that it was only 2WD when I moved to the snow belt where it was almost undriveable 4 months of the year.

@molallamerica896

2y↑1

That would have been awesome. I would love to see a slammed and fast 6th gen Ranger.

@Kaiser187

2y↑2

Never heard of this. I totally dig it!

@kylewoods2904

Every single shirt that was looking at this truck was tucked in

@mustang750r

2y↑3

Perfect for the new Maverixk

@genebooher1707

2y↑3

Damn it'd be hot ranger today !!!

@torqueandbeanssauce

2y↑1

How did I never hear about these? Crazy I've never seen one either.

@fernandochaves9665

1y↑2

What can i say, i'm also sorry that this never went into production. With that look and power could have been a milestone in sport trucks. I'm sure its capable of faster quarter mile times, something happened during those runs.

@stupidvideos1449

2y↑2

Holy crap I knew about the SVT Thunder, but wow

@PRCdM

2y↑4

I had a friend who had a 1997 Ford Ranger with a crew cab, he used for his painting business, he beat the hell out of that truck for 300,000 miles before he had to put in a new transmission 5 years ago and it was still running last I saw of him. Edit: It was a 1993 Ford Ranger that he bought new.

@limoboy27

Mexico spec?

@PRCdM

@Adams_1998 No

@limoboy27

@A-Frame-Wedge it would be interesting to see because we never had a crew cab ranger in the us. The closest we had was the sport trac

@dkmorris713

2y↑3

Now THATS a F.F.R.!

@richardschwarz7071

2y↑6

1989-90 Ford did a 5.0 h.o 5spd in an aerostar minivan, got to drive it and the same years did the 3.0 dohc Taurus SHO v-6 in a ranger, got to ride in it. My godfather was an engineer in Ford light trucks. He would come down from Michigan every few years to see my Dad and would always drive something really cool. R.i.p. Phil

@richardschwarz7071

2y↑2

The SHO powered ranger went 160+ at Talladega

@briteidea08

2y↑1

I remember this thing. It was at the dealership there in Owings Mills once.

@mattjohnston7686

1y↑1

Dang shame, THAT wasn't mass produced 😢😫

@jhomrich89

2y↑17

Think it would have been amazing to see a production version of this even if it was a supercharged version of the 4.0 liter V6 that still would have kicked some butt and turned some heads

@The1stRealVR

2y↑1

My 2001 ranger 4L 5 speed manual had 207hp and 237lb ft at the crank. So about 190hp and 210lb ft of torque at rear wheels.

@stevenlopez5832

@The Real VR I think you're 4.0 ranger was probably making more like 182hp and 209lb ft at the wheels stock.
I say that because a 4.0 mustang makes 185hp and 211lb ft at the wheels stock.

@The1stRealVR

@Steven Lopez i had mine dynoes at my friends performance shop before i did an ls swap

@The1stRealVR

@Steven Lopez 190 and 210 is what it made. Dont make assumptions.

@jhomrich89

@The Real VR but I would be willing to bet a supercharged version with higher flow exhaust and radiator could easily make over 300hp and still be plenty of power for such a light truck

@arttijerina1269

This my number one show 17 years ago

@Mac10Daddy

That’s some serious beef on the back of that truck. This thing is badass

@ramonjrusa

2y↑2

I remember watching an episode of Stacey David’s trucks! or gearz that he made a custom pick from a for ranger or mazda b series that put in a mustang power train and of course tweaked the frame and upgraded suspension nstuff. It was smoking hot!

@peatyxxjxxx1494

2y↑3

It was very common for people to throw 5.0 engines in rangers back in the day. Having to retool that front suspension is probably why these were never messed produced.

@crazybear5475

2y↑1

The GMC Syclone used a twin turbo v6 that was quicker than the zr1. The zr1 kills mustang cobras so this Ranger could not keep up.

@TBird100636

2y↑3

This wasn't the first time SVT put a V8 in a Ranger. Years before they put a built 5.0L or 5.8L in a Ranger, it was red in color. But like the one featured in this video, Ford wouldn't pull the trigger on that earlier SVT creation for production.

@jamescurrier5828

2y↑1

I believe it was a 1997 with a 5.0L

@cedricjackson7521

That’s a beautiful ranger but also scary in a good way

@LTJohn

2y↑1

Absolutely badass!!!!! 😇⚡🛻

@southsidehtx1

2y↑2

Not a fan of ford but I have to give credit when it’s due this is a nice truck !

@jonesvaughn8946

I'm a die hard Ford fan and even I never knew there was a Ford ranger lightning bolt before watching this video

@ironmikelaw

2y↑1

I want that! A body kit or ground effects would have looked ven cooler!

@luisforeal8676

2y↑1

If im not mistaken, that same 5.4L was later put in the Ford GT in 2005.

@shanebigfella7884

This is awesome

@jp23x

2y↑1

Never knew this was even a concept haha

@mesropmadzharyan6727

480 Torque holy crap 2002 that’s huge

@DownHillgamer

2y↑1

Damn that's awesome

@CornFedZ06

This thing would have been a legend

@johnvangennip1163

2y↑3

That's alot of work considering the old pushrod explorer 5.0 will bolt right in the standard ranger frame rails with no modifications

@BuzzLOLOL

Or even the Ford 400"...

@TBird100636

They did it with an earlier prototype, Ford wouldn't give the go ahead for production.

@midnight347

Yea but the 302 don't make over 400 hp and almost 500 torque and drive like a bone stock vehicle smooth as silk. They don't have a 400 horse stock 302 to put in it. They never had a roots blown 302. The point was they were making it a mini lightning hence lightning bolt. It was just a cool 1 off not a production vehicle.

@chiefexecutive

2y↑1

Damn shame they didn’t mass produce this. Hate living in a world without v8 rangers running around

@glennstiller7616

2y↑1

Woulda bought that in a heartbeat

@Kungfurobbie

2y↑3

Rear tire width is hilarious. 325s. Necessary though!

@BuzzLOLOL

2y↑2

345's wide... like came on back of Panteras and some Ferraris...

@AaronJ323

The king of the rangers 👑

@BuckFudweiser

34w↑1

Oh that is so bad ass. I want one!

@Zzus321

34w

Get it line😂😂😂

@BuckFudweiser

34w

@@Zzus321 shit. Does the line start back here?

@Zzus321

34w

@@BuckFudweiser 😅😆😂

@CactusJack252

2y↑1

Westen Chaplin has a ranger like this with a V8 shoved it in. It is pretty badass.

@PhillyDee215

2y↑1

Small.....BIG beast right there😎

@chrisdooley1184

I had a first year Ranger Splash that I absolutely loved it. But had this been available I would’ve jumped at the chance to get one with full factory warranty. I remember seeing another Ranger SVT version in maroon that had the 5.0 Cobra motor in it but alas that never made production either 😢

@BrandonDrew87

Better not be scaring my cows with your little blue truck 👊🏾

@johnnymason2460

2y↑4

A production version would have probably had either a supercharged 4.0 liter V6 or a supercharged 4.6 liter V8. It could have been available with a 6-speed manual or a 4-speed automatic. Would have been cheaper than the F-150 SVT Lightning.

@midnight347

They wouldn't make that because it would be faster than the mustang gt for similar money. That is probably why they didn't make this truck. It would have to be cheaper than the lightning so it would have been in the mustang gt price range.

@johnnymason2460

@Lil' Ike Ford isn't that obsessive with the Mustang like GM is with the Corvette. At the time, the most powerful Mustang was the Mustang Cobra with the supercharged 5.4 liter V8. The SVT Ranger would have been nowhere near that model.

@Lewismotorsports

2y↑6

I had a 1993 Splash. I live in Michigan and was in Dearborn, I was a gas station and an Engineer asked me how I liked my Splash, he said they were going to put 5.0 in all Splash models but it was conducive to line assembly. The whole front end had to be removed to fit the Motor