free cities & Nebula
car Lyrics


We have lyrics for these tracks by car:


Can't Hold Us I can't put out your fire, I know it's too…
Car Let's assume we're driving Driving a big blue car Where in t…
Cry Music keeps making me cry And I can't explain it…
Drive Who's gonna tell you when It's too late? Who's gonna tell yo…
Heaven 좀 쉬어 갈게요 너무 오랫동안 걸어왔네요 잠시면 돼요 숨 돌릴 그만큼만 그저 가볍게…
Intro Ice Cold Like Michael My Price Goin' Up Bet You Might Hit…
LITTLE BY LITTLE 그런 눈빛들 속에 어떤 마음인지 내게 보여줄수록 더욱 궁금해지네 나는 무너져가네 yeah eh 난 솔직하려…
Man Can you see the line where the water ends? Throws…
Mr. and Mrs *Mr Loh singing* As I can see the ocean breaking The ocean…
Mr. and Mrs. *Mr Loh singing* As I can see the ocean breaking The ocean…
My First Punk Song It's 24 to nothing and I'm at the intersection Waiting for…
San Francisco I came by through your city I came back for some…
The Road Have you seen them, have you seen them in my…
wash I can't stop looking at you You're in the corner of…



선인장 일곱시부터 자면 좀 나아질 거야 불타는 맘이 달래 달라네 이른 아침에 꾸벅 생각이 덜하면 괜찮아질 걸…


The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos
Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Song not found
Most interesting comments from YouTube:

neutrino78x

@Moon Shine

"Stop trying to take away my rights."

This is what I think they're really trying to do. First they said it was because of pollution, right. Well now we're switching to battery/hydrogen, so that's not an issue. So now they're saying oh no, that's not good enough either. It's like, why? A battery/hydrogen car gives you all the advantages of a normal car without pollution, what could possibly your issue?

What it's really about is that they don't want us to own private property and be able to use that property to get around without the government providing the transportation and thereby controlling us.

At the end of the day they don't want us to be able to own our house/condo either, it should all be state provided housing in their book. State provided everything, that way they can FORCE equal results instead of just encouraging it while still allowing freedom which is what us moderate liberals (I'm a moderate liberal) want. The extreme far left wants to FORCE that. So basically they want everyone to have an equally bad life.

Ever notice how they always praise left wing extremist dictatorships? They'll say the USSR had a great solution to everything, they like how Cuba does stuff, they love China too.

If you're going to praise somebody for their use of HSR, why not praise Japan, since they are a free country like us? But they don't like Japan either because like Europe and the USA, it has a free market economy and free and fair elections. They would prefer China. ((shaking my head at these types.))



MISTER SIR

@neutrino78x The thing is, in Europe that concept is not exclusive to cities or dense areas. And Europe most certainly has dense areas. Step out of the city center and enter the suburbs of the US, now nothing is within walking distance. This means everyone are forced into cars for any purpose, and this flood of increased car use also spreads to city center, because no public transport infrastructure is created due to nobody being on foot in the first place exactly because you need a car for everything.

Electric cars has nothing to do with this, they take up the same space and create the same traffic hellhole, and still forces city and urban planners to believe everything should be car-first, human-second.

The fact is that in Europe, governments and planners are simply more proactive and willing to act. Paris got changed pretty much "overnight", and same is happening with Barcelona. London's entire city center is blocked for cars without special purpose or being electric. Outside my apartment in Copenhagen two of the main streets were completely overhauled within a year, giving priority to busses, cyclists, and pedestrians - while narrowing car lanes and planting more trees and giving space for people, not traffic.

The US is jsut notoriously incapable of acting on anything that goes against the established car centric infrastructure and single use zoning, it will always be doomed-to-fail pilot projects and people without the willingness to act and see things through. And the vast majority of people have never travelled outside the North American borders to experience how things could be better, so they just defend what they know and are used to.
It's a self-contained downwards spiral.
Just ask yourself, has traffic gotten better or worse on average in the US over the past 30 years?
Has traffic gotten worse in European countries? No.

Wonder why.



TheReggaeMortis

On top of taking up too much space, here's a more concrete reason why electric cars cannot be the future of transport

To electrify the entire vehicle fleet of the UK alone would require the following:
207,900 tonnes of cobalt – just under twice the annual global production;
264,600 tonnes of lithium carbonate – three quarters of the world’s production
at least 7,200 tonnes of neodymium and dysprosium – nearly the entire world production of neodymium;
2,362,500 tonnes of copper – more than half the world’s production in 2018.

That's just for a the vehicles single medium-sized country, before considering anything more important like grid energy storage. There simply isn't enough valuable minerals to go around. It'd be insane to suggest a portion of this would be allocated to me so I can own a personal vehicle in the future.

Source: "Electrifying the UK and the Want of Engineering", Michael Kelly, The Global Warming Policy Foundation



JonBlond3000

I live in Oslo. The "car free" city is regarded a huge failure among the population. 

Most shoppers is gone from the city, and stores are collapsing. Especially small, independent stores have vanished almost entirely from the city. The stores left are big global brans scubas as H&M, MCDonalds, Zara, TGI Fridays. Also, unless the weather is really nice, the streets are empty. 

With rain and sub zero temperatures large part of the year, you only have weirdos on bike and the really rich and wealthy being able to use the city.

By the way: This December huge malls outside Oslo have had their best Christmas season in years. 

https://melkoghonning.no/roper-varsku-for-grunerlokka/



UzuMaki NaRuto

@L0ndon42
Boston simply moved their traffic from above ground to below it with the massive tunnels they've built for vehicles. Go look up the Big Dig and see for yourself what that project was all about.

'Los Angeles 2030 has a clear vision of reducing emissions and encouraging active transport. San Francisco has taken moves to pedestrianise major roads. '

Goodluck to LA in trying to hit those emission goals. If they can do it good for them, but I'm not holding my breath on that one.

'Austin has a $7 billion plan to create a complete and comprehensive with a new light rail, new electric bike fleet, expanded bus services, all electric bus fleet and new and expanded commuter lines, and so much more. '

Its one thing to create all those things, its quite another to convince people to give up their cars to use all those bikes, buses etc. if its not convenient for them to do so. I'm sure people living in downtown Austin will likely adopt to using those things more, but people living in the suburbs? I doubt they'll switch over anytime soon.

'And yes, some cities have continued to build more highways and worse, but the general trend is very clear. Things are changing, they’re not ‘the ways things will always be’ as you describe.'

The trend is people who live in the city core and around those areas will use transit and other means of transportation more while everyone else will continue to drive if they can afford to because it will likely remain the most convenient form of transportation for decades to come.



L0ndon42

@UzuMaki NaRuto I really doubt that it will happen ‘no time soon.’ The general trend globally (and in the US) is towards sustainable development.

In older cities like Boston they’ve managed to reverse decades of urban renewal through things such as replacing a freeway cutting the city in half with a new huge park, while Minneapolis has abolished single family zoning, as has all of Oregon.

Even in newer car dependent cities we’re seeing change. Los Angeles 2030 has a clear vision of reducing emissions and encouraging active transport. San Francisco has taken moves to pedestrianise major roads.

Austin has a $7 billion plan to create a complete and comprehensive with a new light rail, new electric bike fleet, expanded bus services, all electric bus fleet and new and expanded commuter lines, and so much more. If Austin, a sprawling city in Conservative Texas can make moves in the right direction, I think most cities can.

And yes, some cities have continued to build more highways and worse, but the general trend is very clear. Things are changing, they’re not ‘the ways things will always be’ as you describe.



All comments from YouTube:

City Beautiful

Sorry to all Finnish speakers out there! I pronounced Kalasatama as KalaTaSama. I’ll try to do better next time!

Dave Otuwa

@Wernt Jo If I were forbidden to obtain a driver's license, I would walk to go places like people from the negative ages.

Dave Otuwa

@Wernt Jo I had some 4-day work weeks before. Now, I'm retired but still looking for a personally fit job.

Wernt Jo

I'm all for saving the world and animals from climate change, but we gotta keep the light rails and hand out some free bicycles. And move to a 4 day work week.

Phillip Mulligan

@Lildizzle420 Still substantially less per barrel of oil refined.

Dave Otuwa

Amish neighbourhoodz are always car-free because the people who live there are always banned from applying electronics. MOST OF SUCH POPULATION ON EARTH LIVE IN PA.

42 More Replies...

Brian Zaladonis

It seems like a feedback cycle. Without cars you want to live within walking distance and then you don't need a car because everything is built for walking. LA and American suburbs are an example of the opposite.

NoPantsBaby

You uh... pick up many cabinets and refigerators with your bike?
Sometimes you need a car. Even in a city without cars. Usually for anything above 40 pounds in weight.

neutrino78x

@Urbanist God I know I definitely find it irritating. I get around without a car but wouldn't want to be told it's not allowed, that's rediculous. Would never support having our liberties taken away.

Urbanist God

@neutrino78x Exactly! We must be more vocal about this

182 More Replies...
More Comments

More Versions