Last Price
Mechanix Lyrics


We have lyrics for these tracks by Mechanix:


Bisshoy আমার ক্লান্ত চোখ ভেজা পাতার ঘামের মতো ডুবে যায় এইসব চোখ ভেজা…
Dhruboshor ছায়াকে বিভক্ত হতে দেখেছি রোদের অভাবে ছায়ার ভেতরে সহিসের মৃত …
Elegy কেউ আর কারো চোখে দৃষ্টি রাখে না নিবন্ধিত নয়কো কাহারো পানে কে…
Hawar naame আলো দেখে কেমন আঁকড়ে ধরি তুমিতো সেই জলের ঈশ্বরী ডাকতে পারো হ…



Hawar Namey আলো দেখে কেমন আঁকড়ে ধরি, তুমিতো সেই জলের ঈশ্বরী, ডাকতে পাবো…
Protipokkho ভাঙ্গছি-গড়ছি নিয়ত নিজেকে নিয়ত নিরীক্ষার অন্তরালে নিজের ভেতরে…


The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos
Genre not found
Artist not found
Album not found
Song not found
Most interesting comment from YouTube:

Ivan Vasin

Very impressive work on the test jigs for this video! Testing gloves is an inherently challenging task compared to most of the other types of products tested on this channel, and I applaud your tenacity and rigor in taking on the task.

I would be very interested to see this battery of tests applied to other, especially higher-end gloves, particularly some of the more advanced and more specialized models produced by Mechanix and IronClad (especially the Mechanix Durahide HD Driver and Mechanix SpeedKnit M-Pact Chemical), as well as several of the ATG/PIP MaxiFlex models.

If you do someday revisit this, please consider adding tests pertaining to other important aspects of gloves: dexterity, ergonomic fit, water/oil/chemical resistance, blunt-impact resistance, vibration damping, cold/wind resistance, heat/fire resistance. Some of these aspects might seem too subjective to afford rigorous testing at first glance, but the right combination of analytical and creative thinking could plausibly capture them—at least partially—in the form of a generic test with quantifiable results. Some aspects are already captured by various industry-standard ratings for which some gloves carry certifications. However, these are limited to those models for which the manufacturer has taken on the process and the expense of those tests and certifications, and the associated tests—although they are extremely rigorous and objective—are in some cases so reductionist in their design that they don't provide much meaning to the typical end-user (beyond "Level 4 is objectively better than Level 3 under some wear conditions"). Free from the demands and constraints of a standards organization or of an industrial testing facility, I'd bet that you could devise some tests that assess these aspects in a manner that is more directly meaningful—and more interesting/entertaining—to a large cohort of glove-wearers.

You might also consider that the overall construction and assembly of some glove designs perhaps contribute significantly to their performance in use—in ways that are compromised by the teardown approach employed in some of your test designs. For example, it's plausible that the cut test would yield different results on the fingers and palms of intact gloves than on isolated strips of the gloves' fabric layers (considering the weakness of fabric edges, compromised or missing seams/stitching, loosening/detachment of the layers' relative position/orientation, etc.). For another example, abrasion resistance might be more meaningfully measured if the abrasion was applied to other contact points or over larger areas, such as across all the contact points of the open palm or of the inside of a closed fist (subjected to a realistic pushing/squeezing force). Perhaps a future revision of this video could employ an accurately shaped human hand mannequin—or some approximation/equivalent—in order to more accurately simulate and assess the various performance characteristics of gloves as a human wearer would encounter them in actual use. Combined and realized with the high-quality execution that is prevalent in your work, such a revision would be supremely useful to anyone researching this topic—for many, potentially more so than the applicable EN/ANSI/ISEA standards/certifications, or at least enough so to serve as a major supplement to them (for the products that you select as your test subjects).

Those wishes aside… Excellent work, yet again! Keep it up!



All comments from YouTube:

y0gan0

Man this guy provides a valuable service. Spends his own money doing it. And just seems like a genuinely good guy making high quality content. What a great channel

Ben Baselet

@The Masked Musician Indeed it does.

The Masked Musician

@Ben Baselet yeah but this is not easy work. Most youtubers don’t have to do much but this type of work takes a lot of patience and time.

Showtime Springy

To be fair he gets to keep all these tools.I can only imagine how stuffed his workshop is.

ghw7192

WhenI was growing up, thee was Wells Lamont, either canvas or leather. Quite a few surprises in these tests! Thank you!

Gene Vetere

@YerocMc wrong, some of it’s from Walmart, Harbor freight, Home Depot.. That’s his point. Unbiased, non-sponsored testing..

17 More Replies...

Bill B.

I'm a Facility Manager, responsible for outfitting our large department with thousands of tools and equipment. I have found myself placing orders based on your results!!!!

Austin Fox

@Vicente Cerda Abásolo Any good manufacture will cert their glove if it's a quality product, once a glove has a cert it can be sold into the industrial market which amounts to $$

Austin Fox

@Jagger Murlin Im a BDM for a tooling company now. but when I was supplying PPE it was paramount safety and trubrands. paramount has recently been bought out by PiP safety and I was able to supply G-tek toward the end of my time with the industrial supplier. The US also has a glove standard ANSI which offers it's results on each glove. If you wear glove for work I'd recommend looking into EN388 and ANSI standard.

Jagger Murlin

@Austin Fox what are some glove brands you guys use?

More Comments

More Versions