was ist crash?
The Cadillac Lyrics

We have lyrics for these tracks by The Cadillac:

Gloria Gloria, Gloria It's not Marie Gloria, it's not Sherie Gloria…
Rudolph The Red Nosed Reindeer While walking down the road Christmas morning I saw a reinde…
Speedo Boom, boom, boom, boom Boom, boom, boom Boom, boom, boom…
Speedoo Bom, bom, bom, Bom, bom, bom, Bom, bom, bom, bom. Now t…

Still In Love (Campbell, Deery, Hackford, Noyes, Nugent, Santoriello) No, …

The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos

TRACKS

Genre not found

Artist not found

Album not found

Search results not found

Song not found

Comments from YouTube:

@JohnSmith-mk5jt

30w↑38

It's really sad that the moment the IIHS makes their tests a little bit tougher, a lot of companies start struggling again.

@pestsov

30w↑8

Don't see any sadness here. Iihs provides room for improvement and you can see the cars really get there in some time, which makes driving much safer

@connorPiper0

30w↑5

Well the sad part is that the safety level seems to have been built to the test. Like when cars started failing the passenger overlap, when really both sides should be the same. @@pestsov

@pestsov

30w

@@connorPiper0 well, you cannot improve all the things at once, there would be much price difference then at least (and we are speaking about invisible security features). there is the danger that car manufacturers would just ignore the tests claiming them for insane as well. So incremental steps are a good way to do it.

@palmviewlobos15

28w

It's not sad because GM always does this. They get tested and fail always then try to fix it after. Rather than being prepared the first time around like some companies, they just wait until IIHS tests it for them and points out their flaws

@pigeon8198

30w↑26

Even though the XT6 has won Top Safety Pick+ for three years, it's impressive that the new test score is terrible. More manufacturers must strive to meet higher standards.

@HamsterDesertEagle

30w

More manufacturers must strive to meet Tesla’s standards. Model Y has reached the highest score in euroncap. Tesla performs edge testing and constantly updates their airbag and crash algorithms through software updates. Only a small handful of companies perform edge testing.

@kevinschannel

29w↑2

@iihs, in the original side test, if the driver or rear passenger torso injury measures are rated poor, and everything else is fine, the vehicle would get a marginal overall rating. In the new test, why would this result in a poor? Is the new test more heavily weighted than the original?

@uncleshark1103

29w↑1

Gotta watch out for those solid, unbending blocks of steel that sneak up on you from the side when you're sitting perfectly still.
I hear that's about 99% of side impact crashes nowadays.

@nicholasskyhigh

29w

lmao that's just any soccer mom with a suburban

@brookst9384

22w

iihs is a non profit, give them a break

@HondaZRV

30w↑1

Hello IIHS i am curious if you have tested the new pathfinder for the updated moderate overlap.

@randomcrashingfacility31

30w↑20

just needs a rear torso airbag it seems like

@randomcrashingfacility31

30w↑2

@@IvanDBelmont It seems like you've mistaken the overall rating for the structural one since they're near each other, the structure is rated good.

@IvanDBelmont

30w↑1

@@randomcrashingfacility31you are correct.

@kurt44ko

30w↑2

No skin in the game (i own a volvo) but how does this rating go from good to poor with one sub category (torso) for rear passengers getting a poor rating. Everything else got a good rating.

The volvo XC60 just got a marginal rating on one subcategory but got an acceptable rating. Can you explain the discrepancy?

@point4894

30w↑3

Good result but lack of rear torso airbags being cause poor rating.

@iamblepg

30w↑1

This could have gotten a good but a rear torso airbag like what Random said was needed. Come on GM!

@lilmonix

30w↑1

GM should equip a rear torso airbag, if it had it the XT6 would be much safer

October 3, 2023 1:28AM

@AntLive29

30w↑7

GM will fix it when they got off strike

@MediKombi

30w↑20

Not surprised that another GM vehicle got a poor rating in the updated test. GM only seems to do the bare minimum when it comes to safety.

@point4894

30w↑5

This car has very good protect for front passengers, body is strong. Just need passenger torso airbags.

@zhila5958

30w↑2

they do the bare minimum in one department especially and they are pretty good at being the bottom of that particular department. Reliability

@palmviewlobos15

28w

Agreed! I always say the same thing. They do whatever they can to barely get them by.

@MBisFrenchy

30w↑7

When buying a luxury brand you expect better safety.

@Frank-sp7vu

30w↑26

That's definitely a disappointing result, especially for a heavy SUV. Then again it's a GM product. What do you expect??

@semegamer0097

30w↑7

it’s not really a bad result, it got a poor rating because the rear passenger dummy chest injury measures were very high, but the structure performed well

@gGfiarwnaj526

30w↑10

@@semegamer0097what are you talking about? What matters more, a human life or the vehicle’s structure? The job of the structure is to prevent injury and nothing more

@Frank-sp7vu

30w↑2

Ig the driver would have walked away at least. Even so, a lot of affordable vehicles like the Accord have 2nd row torso airbags and somehow this doesn't.

@vipermoon_

30w↑1

@@Frank-sp7vuif the rear passenger's a child, they are more important than the driver. you probably agree with this already but just wanted to mention

@busfan9874

30w↑2

Why not a marginal? It should be marginal instead everything was good except for the rear passenger torso

@Windows_VistaSP2

30w↑2

yes, why marginal just poor torso and nothing else

@palmviewlobos15

28w

Test was made more stringent on bodily measures. That's the newer requirements.

@smartconsumer9125

29w

The Subaru Ascent received a good rating in this updated test; no rear torso airbag needed.

@GabrielYouTube2010

24w

GM disappointing us yet again. 🤦‍♂️

@HamsterDesertEagle

29w

Basically that rear dummy hip got bashed hard. A combination of poor dummy movement control and hard interior. Fix the pre tensioner and pad the rear door and they might have a chance. I bet the rear dummy would score poor in the updated moderate overlap test too due to the lack of rear dummy control. Just my guess!