Visual band, originally formed in 1993 and lasted until 2001 , in Nagoya, J… Read Full Bio ↴Visual band, originally formed in 1993 and lasted until 2001 , in Nagoya, Japan, by Kazushi, Rika, Rayzi, Kaiki and Shono. Their sound ranged from gothic to rock. Their bassist Kaiki left the band (later joining with sexy and starting the Soleil label) right before ROUAGE became major in 1996. Yuki then stepped in to take his place. Unfortunately he decided to leave. Some time after Rika called it quits too. The remaining band members changed their name to Stray Pig, but soon after Shono retired. Kazushi and Rayzi then changed the name again, this time to Stray Pig Vanguard. Rika on the other hand went on to form the band Dibs.

ego×∞ 「エゴノカタマリカタマリノエゴ」
ROUAGE Lyrics

We have lyrics for these tracks by ROUAGE:

ark Fallin' artistic diceiver. Fallin' artistic diceiver. "too l…
BIBLE 今夜、華のように舞降りてくる誰にも触れられないはずの扉に舞降りてくるどこにこの心は逃げればいいの? 誰にも触れられ…
black box 曖昧なハコがあってそこでキミを待ってる「ホント」のフリで「まんなか」で腫れ上がるそこでキミを望んだ「ホント」の…
Creation -審判逃げまどう子供達...着飾った知的生命体... 審判は下るひとつだけ残された進化の果てに... 舟は放たれた瞳を…
Cry for the moon Cry for the moon 心、閉ざして Cry for the moon 誰も入れず Cry for the m…
endless loop doko made mo ikeru you na hirosa dake moteamashite mune no…
erasure 迷い込んだ艶めく影の中へと溶けこむ彩は堕ちる瞬間を望んでた狂いだした謎めく貴女の中へと溶けだす指は悲鳴をあげ…
ever 蒼い夜の途中感覚もないままでその腕に抱いた空白に気付かず「時」が引き金をひいた鳴り響くキミの音僕だけに届いた…
from zephyr… remember... キミがいつも求めている remember... 温もりは僕の手になかった remember.…

hide and seek 息をひそめて殺めた双子を巧みに隠す心見つけて "絶望を知りすぎたフェミニストが支配する痛みにあふれた世界…
insomnia 不透明な彩未完成な優しさどんな瞬間も塗り変えられていく歩きだしていた不安はなぜか無くて退屈が今唄いはじめた …
Jesus phobia 「明日、目が覚めませんように..」繰り返す毎日に祈り続けた夜を朝が笑った... いつかみんな泡の様に消えてしまえ…
Original sin 苦し紛れ嘘をつく砂の城崩れていく温もりは膨れ上がる「アナタを壊してしまう」 feel so slight "hea…
Over flow 何かがまたひとつ壊れていく音窓の外だけが流れていく... 僕をささえる白い壁放り出した無気力な腕を噛んで生かされて…
Pa・ra・no・i・a 月もない砂丘「クツをとめてよ!」ブザマな夢が形を成して... erode...僕は腐る脚を踊らせている unwan…
Promise 傷口あわせた約束次の朝に戸惑う僕水鏡映る夜には三日月爪の感覚時の雨はいつかあなたを壊してしまいそうで震えな…
Queen どうして「非現実」(ここ)にいるんだろう? いつしかあなた苦しめてたどうして「非現実」(ここ)にいるんだろう空の…
VICE 褪めた瞳の子供と幸せそうな僕ナイフさえもないの? 約束の終わりに禁じられた覚醒? 瞳を閉じれば戻る? ナイフさえも…
「密室」は情熱の部屋 Making"pleasure"情熱は Making"pleasure" 密室は僕だけの部屋情熱は淋しがりやの部屋「…
うわのそらふわりふわり夢も希望もうわのそらでにじんだ青い磨硝子の向こうの出来事足りないアタマ止めたままで黒い瞳は泳…
さなぎそしてキミはサナギになり臆病に外を眺めてるそれが宇宙?キミの宇宙? 奇麗なとこだけ切り抜いた水槽のなか入れたんだ…
ゆめはまたゆめ慰めのことばさえおもいだせず掌は冷めたままでぶらさがってる背けた瞳は伸びる影のスピードにのって永遠をみつめていた…
アネモネアネモネ...きりがないはかない風に揺られてでもね意味がない？夢今夜も見ていた明日の手前にはいつでも冷め…
エゴノカタマリカタマリノエゴエゴのカタマリカタマリのエゴこの世のすべてこの世の素敵エゴのカタマリカタマリのエゴエゴのカタマリカタマリの…
ハッピー、ピープルわがままに欲を広げすぎた街でキミとキミの「ホント」を聞かせてあのソラを焼き尽くしてしまう前にボクとボクの「ホント」…
プラネタリウム靴を履いた「けもの」は星の螺旋を真っ白な壁描いた大空の彼方黒焦げの彼方靴を履いた「けもの」は「アイ」を叫んだ…
プロトタイプな凍えた雨と、痂だらけの羊達キミにふれるすべてよただ優しくとどいてマトモなままではいられないここでは誰もがキミにふれるすべてよただ優しくと…
不眠症不透明な彩未完成な優しさどんな瞬間も塗り変えられていく歩きだしていた不安はなぜか無くて退屈が今唄いはじめた …
人間・失格 I'm here"Fool's paradise" from A to Z"Foolish Game" Count up…
冷たい太陽雨音がさらっていくざわめきは時に僕に優しく吸い込まれそうな灰色の空に想い重ねて戸惑いを止めてこんな小さな真実を…
時間軸上のアリア小さな両手ひろげすべてを受け入れてそのまま何にも怖くないの? 「痛み」もないままで傷だらけ何故? キミも僕も …
月の素顔下から見上げた　月は銀の素顔小さな　小さな　光りを投げかけては... 「キミを理解りたくない」足音と耳鳴りに息を止…
望遠鏡覗き込んだ遥かむこうにぼくらはいるの? いつものように僕らは僕らをけずって... 遥かむこうにぼくらはいるの? い…
沈黙鮮やかな輝き瞳を塞いで終わりへと向かう音を壊せ髪を振り乱し見世物を演じて身を焦がし続けて感情のままに足を止…
深空窓に切り抜いた空はあおくただの大きさをみせつけてる銃声が響いても笑い声が響いても何ひとつ見えないの地球儀で…
理想郷水を求め歩き掌すくう砂はあなたにも似て許されない痛みを深く沈め嘆きを... それは同じ痛み? 僕を呼ぶ神々の声…
発情期萎えた理性欲望の華咲き乱れる想いその瞳盗む糸がもつれ動けない人形僅か痛み消し去るキミ呪縛の様な愛撫その瞳盗…
白い闇聖なる夜静かな夜誰よりも白く面影さえ脆く Virgin air 壊れて消えた聞き分けのない時はいつの日も救い…
皮膚の下で逢いましょういつのまにかこうなってしまったこの身体いつのまにかこうなってしまったこの心いつのまにかこうなってしまった …
瞳をあけてみるゆめ飾り澄ました街の片隅で今日も、キミの側眠ったフリをしてる瞳を閉じてみるユメに何ひとつもう、望むことはないでしょう…
空蝉キミの声がする。それは、耳の奥。蝉が鳴くようにとても耳障り。深く「キミ」のなかに生きて「僕」」を繋ぎ止めていたね…
菜食主義者の肉食動物菜食主義者の肉食動物天使みたい潔癖症僕のカラダは雑食動物汚れてると笑いなさい Hyper freak Hyper…
蟻とチョコレート終らせましょうすべてを終らせましょうココロを開いて sweet sweet sweet ESCAPE.... 終わ…
食物連鎖アナタの為僕は餌食アナタの為僕は餌食アナタの為僕は餌食アナタの為僕は餌食アナタの為僕は餌食アナタの為…

飼い猫僕はキミの飼い猫昇る昇る太陽よ堕ちる堕ちる僕がみたそれは Genius... 空は Genius... 沈む…

The lyrics are frequently found in the comments by searching or by filtering for lyric videos

TRACKS

Genre not found

Artist not found

Album not found

Search results not found

Song not found

Most interesting comments from YouTube:

@NightmareCourtPictures

Hello. I’ve studied the wolfram model for the past three years now and i have enough background to answer this question.

Formally, computational irreducibility is a phenomenon (an observed quality of systems) where trying to understand what a system does is in the same problem space as trying to solve the halting problem.

In his book new kind of science, wolfram enumerates classes of simple rules (in particular the elementary cellular automata rules). He finds that these rules in the same rule class are capable of emulating each other with different initial conditions. He then proved near the end of the book that rule 110 is Turing universal. So by transitive arguments, any of these systems running rules can bump into an initial condition that allows it to emulate an arbitrarily complex rule, like 110, therefor all rules in the rule class are equivalent to the complexity of a Turing machine.

So the implication of computational irreducibility is that if you wanted to know what a system is going to do, that system could at any moment enter a configuration that allows it to emulate any other computable rule that exists…and therefor knowing when it halts is not solvable. The process of predicting this finite system is therfor irreducibly complex, that in some sense you need to have all knowledge of this infinite problem space in order to predict the system.

This phenomenon exposes what would be the principle of computational equivalence, which is that all rules are equivalent to the complexity of a Turing machine. That all finite systems are “connected” to this in infinite statespace and this has major implications and impact on what would soon become the wolfram physics model. The ruliad is this infinite construct (the space of all possible Turing machine evolutions) and the computational equivalence principle implicitly states that finite systems are equivalent to it. The way to understand this equivalence is that what ontologically exists only, is this abstract construct (the ruliad) and finite systems embedded in it are sampling it…viewing that object from its finite perspective and that’s where this observer theory gets its basis from.

I would suggest watching Wolframs 16 part new kind of science series that he published to YouTube. He reads the whole book basically and makes it easy to digest in line with his current day conclusions. Specifically in chapter 11 is where he brings together all the evidence piled up in the book to create those proofs.

@ready1fire1aim1

9w↑2

[The difference between 0 and 1 changed a year ago and why that matters]:

Both sides in the Religion vs Science debates use the Materialism/Empiricism version of logic, math and physics which say 1D, 2D, 3D and 4D are "locally real" and 0D is "not locally real".

Unfortunately for Materialism/Empiricism, quantum physics proved the observable universe is actually "not locally real" a year ago (Oct 2022 was the earliest article i could find). The immediate lead-up to this was the Nobel Prize proving quantum entanglement.

Well over 300 years ago Leibniz vs Newton competed for the title of "Universal Genius". We chose Newton, obviously, but an interesting point is that nobody ever proved Materialism/Empiricism... we simply thought it "ought" to be true.

The only proof that happened was a year ago when quantum physics flat-out disproved Materialism/Empiricism:
The observable universe is "not locally real" and that proves we chose the wrong guy, full stop 🛑.

Zero vs nonzero numbers are what we assign "locally real" and "not locally real" to. If zero is one thing then nonzero is the other. This is due to zero being "not-natural" whereas nonzero numbers are "natural".

The absolute version of the observable universe proposed by Newton simply does not exist and it never has (was never proven anyhow, just disproven).

Leibniz said 0D is necessary and more real; having no predecessor and 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D are contingent and less real; all having an immediate predecessor.

Necessary and more real = locally real
Contingent and less real = not locally real

Leibniz was correct and that means we're all taught contradictory logic, math and physics.

[What is the difference between Newton and Leibniz calculus]?

Newton's calculus is about functions.

Leibniz's calculus is about relations defined by constraints.

In Newton's calculus, there is (what would now be called) a limit built into every operation.

In Leibniz's calculus, the limit is a separate operation.

Study zero (not-natural) vs nonzero (natural) numbers since the difference between 0 (zero) and 1 (nonzero) changed a year ago.

Then:
0 = not locally real
1 = locally real

Now:
0 = locally real
1 = not locally real

It's about time the same tired Religion vs Science arguments we've heard for over 300 years can be updated (on both sides).

Holy guacamole its gotten so boring 💤.

@ready1fire1aim1

9w↑1

Contradictory: impossible to be true.
Non-contradictory: possible to be true.

❌️Contradictory Theology, Mathematics and Physics (knowing good; functions; limit built into every operation)❌️:

1. The Gen 1 character and the Gen 2 character are the exact same character (knowing good).
2. Zero is not fundamental and nonzero numbers are fundamental (Newton/Einstein calculus).
3. 0D is not locally real and 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D are locally real (Newton/Einstein physics).

⬆️ this is what we're all taught. Materialist/Empiricist version of reality.⬆️

✅️Non-contradictory Theology, Mathematics and Physics (knowing good from evil; relations defined by constraints; limit is a separate operation)✅️:

1. The Gen 1 character and the Gen 2 character are polar opposite characters (knowing good from evil).
2. Zero is fundamental and nonzero numbers are not fundamental (Leibniz calculus).
3. 0D is locally real and 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D are not locally real (Leibniz physics).

⬆️ this is what quantum physics proved a year ago and if Theology doesn't match Math and Physics then you're doing it wrong. Realist version of reality.⬆️

[🦄Materialism/Empiricism💩 version of Religion]:

Interpreting the Bible with the Genesis 1 character and the Genesis 2 character as the exact same character generates near 70,000 contradictions (see reason project) and requires heavy apologetics. A Bible interpretation which includes near 70,000 contradictions (impossible to be true) is what a snake-oil salesman would sell you. 🐍

[🦤Materialism/Empiricism💩 version of Science]:

The standard model of physics is Einstein's 3+1 space-time, which are considered locally real, where 0 is considered not locally real...been that way since Newton for zero vs nonzero numbers.
Problem is...quantum physics proved the observable universe (1D, 2D, 3D and 4D) is actually not locally real...and that was over a year ago.
(Yes, Leibniz was correct after all.) 🦧

[Layman's terminology of locally real vs not locally real]:

locally real = more real (Leibniz said "necessary")
not locally real = less real (Leibniz said "contingent")

[Closing arguments]:

The Materialism/Empiricism package contains within itself all the contradictions, false dichotomies, paradoxes and literally "life's biggest questions". It's been a year why is everyone still using Logic, Calculus and Geometry that is contradictory at the most fundamental level? Legitimate question 🙋.

If both Religion and Science removed their "Materialist/Empiricist-perspective shades 👓" (contradictory for a year) and put on their "Realist-perspective shades 👓" (non-contradictory for a year) they would not only cease to argue...they'd agree with each other (world first 🪙).

@ready1fire1aim1

9w↑1

[infinity and zero, theology, soul]:

in·fin·i·ty
MATHEMATICS

a number greater than any assignable quantity or countable number (symbol ∞).
(In counting numbers 0 is the subject where positive integers "1, 2, 3 and 4 etc" are the objects).

What is the meaning of zero in Webster's dictionary?

a. : the arithmetical symbol 0 or 0̸ denoting the absence of all magnitude or quantity.

b. : additive identity. specifically : the number between the set of all negative numbers and the set of all positive numbers.

Zero is the most important number in mathematics and is both a real and an imaginary number with a horizon through it.

Zero-dimensional space is the greatest dimension in physics and is both a real and an imaginary dimension with an event horizon through it.

Isn't⚡God⚡supposed to be outside of space (1D, 2D, 3D) and time (4D)?

Well, 0D is outside of space and time:

0D (not-natural) = dimensionless and timeless
1D, 2D, 3D (natural) = spatial dimensions
4D (natural) = temporal dimension

Read Leibniz's Monadology 📖 and consider that the Monad is the zero-dimensional space binding our quarks together with the strong force (it is). The other side of the Monad is Monos (Alone) and this side is Monas (Singularity) and there's an event horizon between them. So El/Elohim or Theos/Logos etc pick your language.

Quarks are dimensionless (no size) and timeless (not-natural). The two main quark spin configs two-down, one-up (subatomic to neutron) and two-up, one-down (subatomic to proton) could easily be construed as the male (upward facing trinity) and female (downward facing trinity) image that Elohim made us in during Genesis 1.

Quarks (no spatial extension) experience all 3 fundamental forces plus have a fractional electric charge⚡and that's why protons and neutrons (spatial extension) have electrons orbiting around them.

In Geometry any new dimension has to contain within it all previous dimensions. This holds true with it being impossible for atomic protons and neutrons (spatial extension) to exist without subatomically containing within themselves quarks (no spatial extension).

"Something (spatial extension) from Nothing (no spatial extension)".

A) The postulated soul, 👻, has
1. no spatial extension
2. zero size
3. exact location only

B) Quarks are mass with no size measured in Megaelectron Volts. Mass with no size is a unique equation in that it has no spatial extension.

Conclusion: A and B are the same thing.

@ready1fire1aim1

9w↑1

[Important point 👉 (dont forget)]:

0D (zero) is different from 1D-10D (nonzero) because 0D is a not-natural dimension whereas 1D-10D are natural dimensions.

0D monad (Creator event horizon)

1D, 2D, 3D are spatial (space) dimensions
1D line
2D width
3D height

4D, 5D, 6D are temporal (time) dimensions
4D length
5D breadth
6D depth

7D, 8D, 9D are spectral (energy) dimensions
7D continuous
8D emission
9D absorption

10D black hole (Destroyer event horizon)

It is impossible for anything 1D-9D to approach 0D or 10D due to their event horizons. 10D contains a placeholder 0 (not locally real) for its event horizon. Only 0D is locally real on this side.

The other side of the event horizon at the zero-of yourself (near horizon) is God.

The other side of the event horizon of a black hole (far horizon) is not God.

Anything we know about black holes (Destroyer) we know the opposite of that is true for monads (Creator), and we know some crazy sci-fi stuff about black holes.

It's a mirror universe with 0D at the center. This side (Elohim; Singularity) is contingent and less real (the natural dimensions anyway) and the other side (El; Alone) is necessary and more real (pretty sure the entirety of the other side remains locally real).

The zero-of ourselves (more real 👻) was made by the Holy Trinity (Deity; possessive; God's) in Genesis 1 which should not be confused with the Unholy Trinity (Deity; plural; gods) in Genesis 2-3 who messes with the 1D, 2D, 3D parts of us (less real 🤷‍♂️).

Elohim was "syncretized" to just mean El during the Babylonian captivity. To avoid this simply use the Latin, "unsyncretized", counterpart Deity for possessive (God's) and plural (gods) context. (Septuagint and Vulgate use Post-Babylonian captivity "syncretized" meaning of Elohim so mistranslate as Theos and Deus, respectively).

Gen 2-3 introduces the placeholder Elohim (not locally real) and their blind, foolish chief running amok. Plurality of bad guy that 'are' each other and 'are not' God.
Nephilim are sons of the false Elohim associated with Yahweh (the BAAL, or LORD, of the gods).

@ready1fire1aim1

9w↑1

[Monad in philosophy/cosmogony]:

Monad (from Greek μονάς monas, "singularity" in turn from μόνος monos, "alone") refers, in cosmogony, to the Supreme Being, divinity or the sum "I am" of all things.

The concept was reportedly conceived by the Pythagoreans and may refer variously to a single source acting alone, or to an indivisible origin, or to both.

The concept was later adopted by other philosophers, such as Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who referred to the Monad as an elementary particle.

It had a geometric counterpart, which was debated and discussed contemporaneously by the same groups of people.

[In this speculative scenario, let's consider Leibniz's Monad, from the philosophical work "The Monadology", as an abstract representation of the zero-dimensional space that binds quarks together using the strong nuclear force]:

1) Indivisibility and Unity: Monads, as indivisible entities, mirror the nature of quarks, which are deemed elementary and indivisible particles in our theoretical context. Just as monads possess unity and indivisibility, quarks are unified in their interactions through the strong force.

2) Interconnectedness: Leibniz's monads are interconnected, each reflecting the entire universe from its own perspective. In a parallel manner, the interconnectedness of quarks through the strong force could be metaphorically represented by the interplay of monads, forming a web that holds particles together.

3) Inherent Properties: Just as monads possess inherent perceptions and appetitions, quarks could be thought of as having intrinsic properties like color charge, reflecting the inherent qualities of monads and influencing their interactions.

4) Harmony: The concept of monads contributing to universal harmony resonates with the idea that the strong nuclear force maintains harmony within atomic nuclei by counteracting the electromagnetic repulsion between protons, allowing for the stability of matter.

5) Pre-established Harmony: Monads' pre-established harmony aligns with the idea that the strong force was pre-designed to ensure stable interactions among quarks, orchestrating their behavior in a way that parallels the harmony envisaged by Leibniz.

6) Non-Mechanical Interaction: Monads interact non-mechanically, mirroring the non-mechanical interactions of quarks through gluon exchange. This connection might be seen as a metaphorical reflection of the intricacies of quark-gluon dynamics.

7) Holism: The holistic perspective of monads could symbolize how quarks, like the monads' interconnections, contribute holistically to the structure and behavior of particles through the strong force interactions.

[Monad in mathematics, science and technology]:

Monad (biology), a historical term for a simple unicellular organism

Monad (category theory), a construction in category theory

Monad (functional programming), functional programming constructs that capture various notions of computation

Monad (homological algebra), a 3-term complex

Monad (nonstandard analysis), the set of points infinitesimally close to a given point

@ready1fire1aim1

9w↑1

"Some first follow the true Savior but then turn away to worship a dead man." - the revelation of Peter

THE WORLD RULER TRIES TO KILL ME

And then a voice of the world ruler came to the angels: “I am god and there is no other god but me.” But I laughed joyfully when I examined his conceit. But he went on to say, “Who is the human?”

And the entire host of his angels who had seen Adam and his dwelling were laughing at his smallness. And thus did their thought come to be removed outside the majesty of the heavens, away from the human of truth, whose name they saw, since he is in a small dwelling place. They are foolish and senseless in their empty thought, namely, their laughter, and it was contagion for them.

The whole greatness of the fatherhood of the spirit was at rest in its places. And I was with him, since I have a thought of a single emanation from the eternal ones and the unknowable ones, undefiled and immeasurable. I placed the small thought in the world, having disturbed them and frightened the whole multitude of the angels and their ruler. And I was visiting them all with fire and flame because of my thought.

And everything pertaining to them was brought about because of me. And there came about a disturbance and a fight around the seraphim and cherubim, since their glory will fade, and there was confusion around Adonaios on both sides and around their dwelling, up to the world ruler and the one who said, “Let us seize him.” Others again said, “The plan will certainly not materialize.” For Adonaios knows me because of hope. And I was in the mouths of lions. And as for the plan that they devised about me to release their error and their senselessness, I did not succumb to them as they had planned. And I was not afflicted at all.

Those who were there punished me, yet I did not die in reality but in appearance, in order that I not be put to shame by them because these are my kinsfolk. I removed the shame from me, and I did not become fainthearted in the face of what happened to me at their hands. I was about to succumb to fear, and I suffered merely according to their sight and thought so that no word might ever be found to speak about them.

For my death, which they think happened, happened to them in their error and blindness, since they nailed their man unto their death. Their thoughts did not see me, for they were deaf and blind. But in doing these things, they condemn themselves. Yes, they saw me; they punished me.

It was another, their father, who drank the gall and the vinegar; it was not I. They struck me with the reed; it was another, Simon, who bore the cross on his shoulder. It was another upon whom they placed the crown of thorns. But I was rejoicing in the height over all the wealth of the rulers and the offspring of their error, of their empty glory. And I was laughing at their ignorance.

@ywtcc

Observer theory seems to be a substantial departure from naive realism.
If the real universe is high complexity, and the theoretical universe is low complexity, and the goal is to simplify rather than describe, then I think we have entered the realm of idealism!
This is not a criticism, I believe it's the more creative approach.

Between this high complexity reality and low complexity theory is a wall of indeterminacy, where theory and reality interact.
This wall of indeterminacy is the shadows on Plato's cave. It's where theory and reality become indistinguishable.
It doesn't make sense for this wall of indeterminacy to ever disappear, as this appears to be what's doing the work of simplification!

We necessarily live in a universe that's partitioned by horizons of indeterminacy, around bubbles of partial understanding.

@Nonconceptuality

9w↑1

"SOLVED" hey?

Write down this solution in the response then.

I have already solved all of the important questions but no one is willing to accept the truth.

You can't find truth if you are looking through the lens of beliefs and assumptions that are incorrect

From my perspective it's EMBARRASSING to watch these guys flailing around in ignorance, taking it to be truth

@Nonconceptuality

@gwills9337 OH?

I was raised Christian but it never made any sense to me. My mom would send me to Sunday school while she would stay home and watch televangelists such as Pat Robinson, Jerry Falwell, Jimmy Swaggart, and her favorite, Jim and Tammy Baker (I have been to the now deserted Heritage USA, not once, but twice).

I went along pretending that conventional Christianity somehow worked until I hit 30, at which time I felt a irresistable drive to figure all of THIS out. I started reading books about other religions, some philosophy, and a lot on quantum physics. Three books read in sequence broke my mind open. "Why Christianity Must Change Or Die." by Catholic bishop John Shelby Sponge. "How To Know God" by Deepak Chopra, and "The Dancing Wu Li Masters" by Gary Zukav.

I began meditating and found it came naturally and somewhat easily. My mantra became: "I intend to know the true nature of reality. I intend to know God." With great sincerity and reverence this was repeated. I met a Buddhist and started going with her to a Zendo. I called myself a Buddhist for a decade, but the entire time I was still reading/seeking. Although it made more sense than Christianity, all the pieces were not yet fitting.

Then I came across a biography of Ramana Maharshi and started listening to and reading his teaching. My seeking stopped. I knew this was the final teaching. I stopped searching and put my energy/focus on the practice that Ramana prescribed. It was soon after this that my wife divorced me. On two occasions I travelled 3/4s of the way across Canada to spend four months practicing in solitude at the Ramana Maharshi ashram in Nova Scotia. I experimented with Salvia Divinorum

https://youtu.be/kp7iP7Ayj0k?si=V4AjlyJ7QWcM0lbZ&t=3

a dozen times. I bought a $10,000 float tank (sensory deprivation chamber). Due to my new perspective (Advaita Vedanta) I was kicked out of the Zendo and my Buddhist friend of a decade stopped talking to me. My brother and sister basically disowned me. My brother, who had been a professor at a bible college once literally yelled in my face "You're going to hell."

It mattered not. I was on the correct path and I knew it.

I'm now 54 and have been retired from my old job of Wildland Firefighter for two years. My partner and I are in a perfect relationship (we have not had one fight in 7 years. She is also a "Nonconceptualist"; she understands what the voice in the head is). We live on 70 acres in a 6000 sq foot house on a lake in central British Columbia and are well on our way to becoming completely self-sufficient.

My life is a miracle and it is because of the practice. I do know the true nature of reality. I know God. Turns out the mantra worked! Imagine that

@Nonconceptuality

@@gwills9337 I was raised Christian but it never made any sense to me. My mom would send me to Sunday school while she would stay home and watch televangelists such as Pat Robinson, Jerry Falwell, Jimmy Swaggart, and her favorite, Jim and Tammy Baker (I have been to the now deserted Heritage USA, not once, but twice).

I went along pretending that conventional Christianity somehow worked until I hit 30, at which time I felt a irresistable drive to figure all of THIS out. I started reading books about other religions, some philosophy, and a lot on quantum physics. Three books read in sequence broke my mind open. "Why Christianity Must Change Or Die." by Catholic bishop John Shelby Sponge. "How To Know God" by Deepak Chopra, and "The Dancing Wu Li Masters" by Gary Zukav.

I began meditating and found it came naturally and somewhat easily. My mantra became: "I intend to know the true nature of reality. I intend to know God." With great sincerity and reverence this was repeated. I met a Buddhist and started going with her to a Zendo. I called myself a Buddhist for a decade, but the entire time I was still reading/seeking. Although it made more sense than Christianity, all the pieces were not yet fitting.

Then I came across a biography of Ramana Maharshi and started listening to and reading his teaching. My seeking stopped. I knew this was the final teaching. I stopped searching and put my energy/focus on the practice that Ramana prescribed. It was soon after this that my wife divorced me. On two occasions I travelled 3/4s of the way across Canada to spend four months practicing in solitude at the Ramana Maharshi ashram in Nova Scotia. I experimented with Salvia Divinorum a dozen times. I bought a $10,000 float tank (sensory deprivation chamber). Due to my new perspective (Advaita Vedanta) I was kicked out of the Zendo and my Buddhist friend of a decade stopped talking to me. My brother and sister basically disowned me. My brother, who had been a professor at a bible college once literally yelled in my face "You're going to hell."

It mattered not. I was on the correct path and I knew it.

I'm now 54 and have been retired from my old job of Wildland Firefighter for two years. My partner and I are in a perfect relationship (we have not had one fight in 7 years. She is also a "Nonconceptualist"; she understands what the voice in the head is). We live on 70 acres in a 6000 sq foot house on a lake in central British Columbia and are well on our way to becoming completely self-sufficient.

My life is a miracle and it is because of the practice. I do know the true nature of reality. I know God. Turns out the mantra worked! Imagine that.

All comments from YouTube:

@SB324

9w↑36

Stephen Wolfram is playing for keeps. This is a man who will be remembered.

@jimjiminy5836

9w↑2

Sounds like an 80’s vhs action hero.

@TheMarcusrobbins

9w↑3

He's crossing over into sage territory, like all the great minds. I think he's right, and he's rapidly assimilating vastly disparate aspects of human experience into the model. It's exhilarating to listen to. I think the scientific world is starting to take him more seriously too. It's the project I dreamed of vaguely in high school, only I couldn't because I was short 40+iq points!

@00TheD

Who?

@jayherring3227

9w↑21

A computer scientist/physicist absolutely at the top of his game and an interviewer absolutely at the top of his game. Thank you. Just a pleasure to hear such good questions presented to Stephen and listening to him answer. Kurt, it's clear that you are putting the work in for us all at home to sit back and enjoy such great conversation

@ineffige

9w↑13

I love listening to this man. It makes my brain think about what he said for weeks after I watch long interview with him. His theory is kinda beautiful

@gloriaharbin1131

9w↑4

Long live Stephen Wolfram! There is no telling what this man and his team are going to be capable of discovering and achieving.👍

@MIKE_THE_BRUMMIE

9w↑2

What truly incredible is his ability to hammer it home for those of us not verst in the mathematics.

We're so lucky to be alive at a time where such information is available...thank you TOE

@gloriaharbin1131

9w↑4

This was/is brilliant. Great questions and discussion Curt. Thank you so very much.❤

@JAYMOAP

9w↑7

Kurt you doing a great job keep it up . Also shout out to Stephen

@Tripp111

9w↑5

Thank you to you both.

@TheSensimillionaire

9w↑2

One of my favourite TOE guests. Great work Stephen and Curt ❤

@cbrophy

9w↑4

Really appreciate your content. These interviews and questions are important!

@JB-ip7vr

9w↑3

Great talk easier to understand as he speaks in metaphors and layman’s terms

@michaelvodinelich4392

9w↑1

Stephen Wolfram's theory is very similar to the line of thinking that came across my mind the other day. That the state that the wave function collapses into is determined by the quantum state of the observer. I have no physics degree but do learn a ton from TOE and similar podcasts that set the framework for me to philosophize/play with these ideas. Thank you Kurt for being such a great interviewer on these dense topics.

@NightmareCourtPictures

9w↑1

This is one of his best videos/interviews. Great questions asked, and great answers given.

I’ve studied the wolfram model for 3 years now and I encourage people often to go and watch the new kind of science series he has on YouTube, to introduce you on a formal level to the ideas here.

It’s a lot to get through but the power of the wolfram model is very real and very powerful. The way he talks about it is no overstatement. It has applicability (I would know I’ve applied it in modeling and creating systems) and it’s pretty much changed my life.

Cheers.

@ingenuity296

9w↑1

Yes!!! Because we are observers that we are. What an epiphany! ❤

@ourblessedtribe9284

9w↑3

Oh my gosh man this is one of your best ever

@ourblessedtribe9284

9w↑1

3/4 finished. Incredible interview so far you guys are both firing

@DimiOana

9w↑1

Brilliant! And I've just started to watch.

@HUSTLE_MONEY

9w↑1

Wolfram is a master mechanic that knows exactly what he knows, knows what he doesn't know, knows what he's likely to know and has grown from what he thought he knew. He's mastered these disciplines enough to be a leader among younger, smarter, students, his broad, deep knowledge, coupled with his knowledge of AI and computer programming has made him a egoless phenom. With all the technology that exist, i would love to see this information disseminated via some amazing visual aids, animations, any way to easily translate these complex insights into palatable meals for greedy consumption. Maybe I will learn to code in his language, some kind of immersion into the Wolfram.

@williamjmccartan8879

9w↑1

Thank you both Stephen and Curt for sharing your time and work, Stephen is such an interesting guest, his built his project from asking himself if he can answer some of the same questions asked in science using his toolkit and found that he can present a different system to reach the same outcomes. Very, very cool, peace

@artpinsof5836

9w↑6

LETS GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@darthjarwood7943

9w↑1

Sometimes i wonder if everything happened in a very small measurement of time from an outside observers perspective..."think of a firecracker" the beginning and the end. But within that small measurement of time we evolved enough that our brain recognized time

@chyfields

9w↑1

In meditation, I perceive our reality as a Universal trefpunckt; a platform that we consciously project into in order to liaise, on an apparently physical plane, with others in the conscious Universe.

@user-vi3sz3fg2r

9w↑7

Wolfraaaaaammm!

@ourblessedtribe9284

9w↑1

So far it is assumed what 'observe' means. I am so hoping that higher/simpler question gets asked!

@nicholasbrunning

Appreciate it Jamiungal & Wolfram ❤

@johnbuckner2828

9w↑1

Lots of shadows on the walls of Plato’s cave. Gotta make them work because no matter where you go there you are.

@matthewriek1929

9w↑1

Kuryt! You need to have Steve Bassett on..DC disclosure advocate..he’s nailing it on the current UAP phenomenon..super clued in on the government’s involvement and where it’s heading post disclosure

@resofactor

Have the science these craft use. Know how to build UFOs.

@babydragon2047

9w↑1

Hi Stephen!👋🏻
Long time😊

@user-wp1nf1zj7h

9w↑1

Curt, I am interested in what your very smart and intelligent guests would have to say about some problems in philosophy
For example "Problem of induction" "Indentity over time"...

@HUSTLE_MONEY

To piggyback on my last comment, I mean, time dilation as a result of where computational power is consumed. Oh gosh, the idea, something to gnaw on and imagine, you can almost feel the math squeezing out of a truth like that. Can we draw and analog with insects that live their whole life within a day. Just amazing.

@indream6318

9w↑1

Oh, im interested! As I understand its completely irrelevant if observer is conscious or whatever, what makes the difference in outcome is (at least in double slit experiment) if the path can be know or not. The structure of experiment can be as such that there is no observer but in one case the path is know and other is not and result are different, there is no consciousness or observer needed. Only thing that matter is if information is by any means there

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

The end product of heat will be cold and unmoving. Ultimately so far it sounds like a good description of a shared subjective reality and it sounds like he's also explaining logical deduction and reasoning using our limited mindset and capacities to simplify and incorporate as much as we can. I whole heartedly agree with this video thus far.

@hypercube717

9w↑2

Interesting

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

I always liked the idea of communicating as much as you can with this minimal amount of language as possible that's why I I keep a Yang 2020 bumper sticker on my car... it says the most without saying anything.

@MyTBrain

Would love to see a clip of just the portion with 'cat island' and the 10^600 possibilities of 'inter-concept space'. That seems like an area worth a ton of consideration.

@user-if1ly5sn5f

13:26 I’ve been commenting a lot and people don’t understand. He says you’re different every variation and he’s right, the absorbed difference is constantly growing you in differences but those differences are all the same overall and that’s why we exist as a range just like we speak in a range of differences connected to area and stuff. Since we are human, the same body holding multiple consciousness would be like if we were resurrected or if using a neuralink we could interconnect our mind with another’s memories that were recorded and we could feel those differences and basically just move the pieces into a body that understands what it is and weaves the differences into connections. It’s like a puzzle and the more we reveal the more we can understand and connect and bring out in reality, like a prediction or invention. The neurons grow in reflection to the thing absorbed, using our conscious will we can guide our body and our neurons to connect and remember things just like sleeping after school, the body can be guided, nature under our guidance. We guide this form built of many differences and we weave ourselves in with the rest of reality and share our energies and the differences branch out to find connections like a root reaching for water or the leaves for the sun or a baby for food. We absorb the differences and use them, do you intertwine yourself with yourself to actually live or do you let your body and nature guide you and eat and drink and smoke with no control? It’s easy to get lost like a child exposed only to the candy and never taught about the dangers of sugar.

@Kowzorz

Wolfram's words about discovering the technical application of, say, cobalt, based on human needs reminds me of our attempts at understanding ancient religious practices. As the meme goes, "what's that for?" "dunno, must be ritual". How much simple daily life technology do we not see because it solves a problem we can't even conceive of two thousand years later.

@Radioposting

9w↑1

At first I didn't understand what he was saying... Then I took a bong hit.

@brandonb5075

9w↑3

Here’s a thread that may help. “Man is the measure of all things” Hermes T. Circa 5000+? BC.
If you take that phrase to heart then you have multiple levels of “observers” in our own bodies. Bacteria in our guts are alive and operate on a “molecular” level. Maybe looking at things for what they are will produce more productive thought experiments.
Thank you for the knowledge Gentlemen.✌🏼🤙🏼😊

@ChrisDaChemist

Is this not a specific interpretation of the Anthropic Principle? Love the talk!❤

@Anders01

Great topic! I will compare it to the Integrated Information Theory (IIT). There might be a connection between IIT and Stephen Wolfram's approach. One different idea I have is that instead of all systems having consciousness with a value Phi I believe that there is a threshold value where consciousness is activated when Phi reaches a high enough value.

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

I can speak as a soul time traveler and I can tell you when you enter into a body all you have is a subconscious information and it is a knowing without knowing it is a bird's-eye view of the root information ultimately when you take over a body all you have is the knowledge of that body and if you're lucky like me you'll have a communication implant that will allow you answers when you ask the right questions... this helps to guide you to remember who you are...

@Mr.CreamCheese69

9w↑1

ahh ok lol, my previous comment was posted when I was 6 minutes in, he legit explains it in once sentence @8:05... WOW

@LoSGatoS-pe9hk

Welcome to the simulation theory professor Stephen Wolfram i believe you are the most Mature scientist/exceptional Thinker/philosopher to validate the simulation theory and settle down, to give us time to put some efforts into lowering this society'$ entropy before this simulation bust thank you for enlightening us Much love❤

@kahlrhoam6769

Fascinating interview!
I’d sure like to have Prof. Wolfram & Donald Hoffman, discussing their research. 🖖✨

@HaHa-gy5vg

Rogan would never have Wolfram on because this man is not a nut.

@ourblessedtribe9284

The part about "when we recognize Ai we will recognize alien intelligences everywhere"

Reminds me of the Christian biblical tradition of 7 levels of intelligence above and below human. seraphim, cherubim, thrones, powers, dominions, principalities, virtues, archangels, angels all above and similar below

@Timesend

🔥🔥

@tonyguize1241

9w↑1

Question: you mention using other axioms, arnt you always stuck with identity and modus ponens (object and relation)? Isnt that the same as Wittgenstein’s limit of thought or consciousness. Isnt that also limit of computation.

@ready1fire1aim1

Objects only exist because subjects determine them as such.

In counting numbers 0 is the subject where positive integers (1, 2, 3 and 4 etc) are the objects.

@user-ji1zr7mz1t

Maybe things like the double slit experiment can help decide what is and isn’t an observer and what it means to be an observer.

@aboxarox

What is the "framerate" of the universe?

@timb350

What do you think of this idea: Don Hoffman...and Stephen Wolfram...together on this show??? Stephen sounds like he's really keen to explore the farthest reaches of legitimate science...and Don is the same. I think they would have a lot of overlap...and might even spark some new ideas in each other. And with minds like these...who knows where truly new ideas could go !!!!!

@ourblessedtribe9284

9w↑1

Riveting!!!

@timb350

Concepts. They've been around for a looooooooooooooooooooong time. It's basically the meaning of the Tower of Babel. Godel had something to say about them. Quite specifically related to the biblical story.

@Privacityuser

lithography to build nano system that self organize like von neumann machines are the goal of quantum conquering classical

@JustAnotherWiseMan3588

The better we can capitalize on human potential and focus less on our differences and more on the things we agree on for example not being okay with the greatest evils and the manipulative games and evil acts they commit and play the better we can refine and improve systems that are good that are already in place as well as adding other systems to protect the whole function of all giving more power to the people from top to bottom of these systems from those who would corrupt it and make it function less efficiently and even to the extent to where no real overall progress has been made in the most meaningful of ways the better we will see true more natural but also more noticeable positive collective scientific economic and spiritual change in our society and world at least I believe and I'm sure many others as well

@rajeevgangal542

9w↑1

So what about bacteria that move about by sensing chemical gradients and maybe even extremely small no of molecules? I think we evolved to not care about microscopic details to be parsimonious and had no influence on what laws got selected for our universe...

@rikimitchell916

Granularity, scale dependence

@Mr.CreamCheese69

what if the limitations we see in our measurements of physics, are simply the limitations within our own collective awareness. it brings us back to the analogy of the cave and shadows. where, we mistake the limitations and processes of our awareness, for the limitations and processes of existence itself, when in fact existence itself is transcendent of said limited cognition, only thusly providing us with slice snapshots of a higher modality. if any of this makes sense lol.

@Delta_Tesseract

What is computational irreducibility? What sources do you recommend for numpty knucklehead's like me?

@NightmareCourtPictures

@Aedonius

Don't confuse the map for the territory. (or don't confuse the equations for the phenomenology)

@priyakulkarni9583

9w↑1

Here is the math formula for consciousness :

C= A(i 5f+O5f)c2

I= inside output electrical pattern
f= feeling
O =outside input electrical pattern
A= awareness
5= senses
C2= speed of light squared

@DeuceGenius

He reminds me of anthony hopkins. Especially the voice

@MIKE_THE_BRUMMIE

Conceptual space!!!!!!! The universal blueprint.

So much of what ever are striving towards is self-actualizing and manifesting into reality our thoughts, the greatest powers we attribute to our gods is the instant conceptualization of thought "let there be light" creation...it took billions of years for the geological to become the biological and for that to become beings that can tap into that conceptual space and manifest thought into reality the next step I believe in this journey, might be apon us

@glenrotchin5523

This is sounding like, if a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it does it make a sound. It makes a sound (a measure) only in the sense that we have ears and brains constructed in a certain way to convert air vibration into sound.

@NightmareCourtPictures

Yep exactly.

@timb350

9w↑1

"The laws of physics are what they are...because we are the kind of observers that we are." There's a LOT to unpack in that simple little statement. I'm sure Wolfram is gonna get a LOT of blank stares from a LOT of practicing physicists...but then again...they're much more likely to just pretend he didn't say it. Cause understanding that is much more philosophy than physics.

@hogwrangler3283

jonathan gorard deserves an episode too

@weinerdog137

Giant.

@guillermobrand8458

Wolfram would do well if he incorporated into his "model" the "utilitarian" character of the models that we build using Reason; For worse or worse, we inhabit a material world, and our very matter body is obliged to "respect" the laws that govern the world of matter.

@greenbeans6253

it speeds up?

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

9w↑1

Yes I would say The problem is we don't have really objective reality Because in order to have objective reality you need to have an observer that exists from the beginning of time all the way to the end of time and even if such hypothetical Observer exists end of time has not came yet therefore it's all subjective and the best we have is a shared subjective reality.

@lindltailor

9w↑1

It seems however there is no objective beginning or end

@gwills9337

9w↑1

Just bc you as an individual observer can’t perceive the entirety of reality doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist or is subjective (whatever that means in physics). Thats not what his point was at all.

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

@@gwills9337 I'm not saying thats his point I'm just pointing out the logical fallacy for something to be objective it needs to exist throughout all of time and even if it did exist end of time has not came yet therefore everything is subjective the best we have is a shared subjective reality I'm just taking it down to the Baseline...

@timb350

That may explain why we have the particular variety of laws that we have...but it still doesn't explain where the so-called laws-of-physics (our own...or any) come from in the first place ("out-of-brains" is not an answer)...and what it the relationship between these laws...and the phenomena that they describe and predict?

@darwinlaluna3677

Ex: we both have a five picture of the same thing, you look 1 to 5 pictures bfore u have an answer, but the other one is they look all five pictures as one and already have an idea or answer

@ready1fire1aim1

9w↑2

@ready1fire1aim1

9w↑1

@ready1fire1aim1

9w↑1

@ready1fire1aim1

9w↑1

@ready1fire1aim1

9w↑1

@ready1fire1aim1

9w↑1

@theccs5012

Observe rage

@Paul1239193

Stephen Wolfram is so self-aggrandizing it's insane.

@user-yo2ki7vu7d

Observer means not the observer of matrix or this world, but visions time travelling and other experiences, supposedly of the higher dimensions, that is via access consciousness in them. Not everyone has the access and observers of such. Some can observe fifth dimension and Above. You don't really figure it out by a device or matrix science. You may understand a bit more but that understanding never let's you in or have access consciousness.

@Rampart.X

Missed it :/

@brandonb5075

9w↑3

Dr. Wolfram, do you think consciousness is made in the brain?
There seems to be a huge difference developing between those who us who are favoring “consciousness” as the root of the system and in the “aether” vs. the more egocentric idea that our brains/CPUs are masters of reality.
Thanks in advance.😊

@darwinlaluna3677

Yes ur observation is different from someone else’s observation,

@jeff__w

“I’m sure you probably—”
The podcast is now concluded.
“I’m sure you probably what” ?

@pandoraeeris7860

Probably concluded.

@user-ui2mk2no1f

9w↑3

I prefer Dr Bernardo Kastrup´s Analytic Idealism take on AI and Mind at Large.

@zoran69ser

hmm mambo-jumbo without exsperiments

@ywtcc

@tresjordan982

My head hurts my head hurts😂

@greggary7217

9w↑1

I really appreciate Stephen and I think his work should be taken far more seriously by the Witten Kittens, and might be if they weren’t so completely cowed.

That said, I honestly do t think Stephen does the best job of explaining.

Interviewers often seem to end up looking like they are constipated or at least consternated.

The effort in reaching a moderate level of grok is worth it imo, but I’m not sure it really need be quite so seemingly opaque to the uninitiated.

@Nonconceptuality

His "ruliad" is my Fundamental Model of Reality. It is the state of superposition. The superposition itself is the Absolute Fundamental Reality and the dualities that emerge from it are the appearances of body-mind, particle-wave function, yang-yin, son-holy ghost, past-future, birth-death, etc.

It moves from plurality, to duality, to singularity, and that's where it concludes. Not recognizing the conclusion that is expressed in my Fundamental Model Of Reality, peeps keep trying to define beyond the singularity. But the Self, Observer, Tao, God, Presence, Life, cannot be described/expressed any further. This is where the thinking about the Reality, and realizing that you (not the body-mind appearances, but what is experiencing sensations and thoughts) ARE the Reality, must occur. This is the conclusion of thought; the silencing of the voice in your head.

@animeleepocket7984

Lil bro thought he was onto something.

@jeremywvarietyofviewpoints3104

He looks like Bob Hoskins.

@HUSTLE_MONEY

The world should observe this!! It doesn't. So, so, so true. From our perspective, "how can a person not be deeply interested in this fundamental truth?" How can anyone in this world not be pulled by the massive gravity of every part of physics? Yet it's true and by a wide margin. Man cares not.

@airkidproductions2848

what whould the world seem like when you are blind

@guillermobrand8458

The interviewer was unable to "follow the son" of the interviewee, which resulted in asking him questions that were not relevant to the topics raised by the interviewee.

@theomnisthour6400

Human-incarnated souls are almost never true observers, because they are incarnated within a larger experiment. It is only in those rare moments that you experience the realm of your own universe - the innermost nature of your 12D merkaba - that you are observing as you create your own virtual reality. Most only experience this in dream states, and don't even realize that they are training their observer nature - their ability to watch a virtual reality experiment without getting drawn into it. Few souls advance in Karmic consciousness to be able to become capable of choosing when and how long to be an observer - one of the watchers who are allowed to actively monitor God-level experiments. Most get so involved in their own thought experiments that they choose to become an almighty micromanager of their universe - constantly struggling against the pressure of their NPC toy soldiers to fall back into random execution of their default programming.

The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is the tendency of NPC characters to devolve to random behavior absent active direction by non-observer souls. Experiments in time-space have a common arc - the first half of any virtual reality experiment works to set up a desired state, and the 2nd half observes how that state operates with diminishing external interference as the universe's owner gradually sidelines the players it finds interloping in their experiment, keeping their desired state from materializing. This pattern is evident in all of human history and legend.

Building a workable universe requires adversarial pressure to counter the ideas of the design team, but only up to the point that the design goals are met. Then these adversaries need to be driven from the test tube in focus. This is the moment of apocalypse, when a desired state is achieved and a handful of generations are stored as the starting point for coming up with future experiments that focus on pushing the adversary out of the perfected space-time. These handful of generations are the messianic periods, when the senior creators of the universe step in to play key characters in person repeatedly till they achieve a new version of themselves that is "smart" enough to begin a new phase of the experiment with new ideals and concepts that allow the next version of space time to be "better" - bigger, more beautiful, with less existential adversaries, etc. than the previous version.

This is why the souls that were inspired to codify the Torah put in the idea of 7 days of creation - a half truth that was necessary for the 6th major version of space-time to set up the testing of the 7th version, rooted in the instant conflict of those who believed perfection was already achieved in 6 days by some almighty creator, and those who concluded that things were not perfect and all the possible religious explanations one might draw from that fact that there is no "almighty", but only more conscious and experienced creative quanta of consciousness. Basically, the distributed power of polytheism had to be deconstructed into monotheism to inspire more players to the higher levels of play that shape their own universes as places to "escape" from the physical universe - either temporarily to rest, relax, and plan their next incarnation - or permanently as part of the staff of that alternate universe, freed from worrying about problems that their god, goddess, or collective chooses not to have their devotees deal with - places freed from the laws of physics and chemistry, for better or worse.

@mitchkahle314

Entropy (the past) precludes "free will" entirely. Include uncertainty (the future) and the claims of "free will" have no merit whatsoever.

@trentonfjeldsted7981

Im observing an observer, observing the way that the way we observe the way in which observing observes that observers are the observes? I lost him after he repeated observe ad infinitum. In a way he's very redundant.

(Edit) Apparently Observer Theory "it's about the question of sort of characterizing what it means to be an observer." Word salad.

@nathenwesner9856

If you cant see idealism as the answer. Your scared of the implications. Let go.

@gwills9337

9w↑1

Pro tip: anytime you think Stephen Wolfram’s theory confirms your personal Woo - you’ve missed something.

@tinfoilhatscholar

Wolfram is awesome, but wrong about one thing for sure. There are absolutely big theories in biology, just most people haven't been paying attention to them!
Quantum coherence for one, and scale all the way up from there to the soil-food-web, Gaia theory, holistic management, the soil-carbon-sponge, and probably several more. Local biology equals global ecology. Done

@jr8209

t h i s i s i n t e r n e t

@GetnBrains

i know this work is important but in the end we have no f**** clue what's truly going on.. all these theories are based on or with other theories

@Nonconceptuality

9w↑1

@gwills9337

9w↑2

In good faith I’m curious about your ideas but am skeptical you’ve applied the same level of horsepower and rigor as the good doctor…

@Nonconceptuality

@NotNecessarily-ip4vc

Yeah just swap from Newton logic, calculus and geometry to Leibniz logic, calculus and geometry.

Super easy, barely an inconvenience :)

@Nonconceptuality

More Comments

just now

3h 43

97K

Solving the Problem of Observers & ENTROPY | Stephen Wolfram

More Versions

ego×∞ 「エゴノカタマリカタマリノエゴ」ROUAGE Lyrics

We have lyrics for these tracks by ROUAGE:

@NightmareCourtPictures

@ready1fire1aim1

@ready1fire1aim1

@ready1fire1aim1

@ready1fire1aim1

@ready1fire1aim1

@ready1fire1aim1

@ywtcc

@Nonconceptuality

@Nonconceptuality

@Nonconceptuality

@SB324

@jimjiminy5836

@TheMarcusrobbins

@00TheD

@jayherring3227

@ineffige

@gloriaharbin1131

@MIKE_THE_BRUMMIE

@gloriaharbin1131

@JAYMOAP

@Tripp111

@TheSensimillionaire

@cbrophy

@JB-ip7vr

@michaelvodinelich4392

@NightmareCourtPictures

@ingenuity296

@ourblessedtribe9284

@ourblessedtribe9284

@DimiOana

@HUSTLE_MONEY

@williamjmccartan8879

@artpinsof5836

@darthjarwood7943

@chyfields

@user-vi3sz3fg2r

@ourblessedtribe9284

@nicholasbrunning

@johnbuckner2828

@matthewriek1929

@resofactor

@babydragon2047

@user-wp1nf1zj7h

@HUSTLE_MONEY

@indream6318

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

@hypercube717

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

@MyTBrain

@user-if1ly5sn5f

@Kowzorz

@Radioposting

@brandonb5075

@ChrisDaChemist

@Anders01

@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler

@Mr.CreamCheese69

@LoSGatoS-pe9hk

@kahlrhoam6769

@HaHa-gy5vg

@ourblessedtribe9284

@Timesend

@tonyguize1241

@ready1fire1aim1

@user-ji1zr7mz1t

@aboxarox

@timb350

@ourblessedtribe9284

@timb350

@Privacityuser

@JustAnotherWiseMan3588

@rajeevgangal542

@rikimitchell916

@Mr.CreamCheese69

@Delta_Tesseract

@NightmareCourtPictures

@Aedonius

ego×∞ 「エゴノカタマリカタマリノエゴ」
ROUAGE Lyrics